On 2/23/07, Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A milestone should focus on showing the fancy new features and bugs
fixed. Stuff like security, upgrading existing databases etc are all
secondary.
I understand what you mean but I think database upgrade is very
important because users
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
On 2/23/07, Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A milestone should focus on showing the fancy new features and bugs
fixed. Stuff like security, upgrading existing databases etc are all
secondary.
I understand what you mean but I think database upgrade is very
+1
For an alpha-1, you can't call it anything else until you push it out
and get feedback. It's getting close to a year the codebase is quite
different and it's like releasing something new. But I think the
group owes it to users to get this thing out. Continuum deserves the
garner the
+1 for a beta, if everything it's cool let's go for 1.1 and push to
1.1.1 whatever else that needs to be fixed
On 2/23/07, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed nicely with
some plans I had talked about late last year in regard to
On 24 Feb 07, at 1:05 PM 24 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
+1 for a beta, if everything it's cool let's go for 1.1 and push to
-1 for beta
This version has so many changes it cannot be called a beta until it
has been tried en masse. It is most certainly an alpha.
Jason.
1.1.1 whatever
if we are not planning to add new features and just bugfixes then I
understand it's a beta
On 2/24/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Feb 07, at 1:05 PM 24 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
+1 for a beta, if everything it's cool let's go for 1.1 and push to
-1 for beta
This
ideally we will revisit a couple of fundamentals for this release
still like build profiles, so yes, a couple of planned new features,
hopefully assisted by a new person or two interested
jesse
On 2/24/07, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we are not planning to add new features and
I really don't like the idea of pushing again the release for more
features, because what today are couple features and a week of work
it's gonna end in another alpha release 5 months later as it happened
with maven and it's happening with continuum.
We have to be reasonable about how many
Agreed. Someone needs to:
- properly mark up the model as it was for 1.0.3 release
- add methods to continuum-data-management to utilise that and then
make any necessary transformations (c-d-m will do the basic 1-to-1
conversions)
- probably write a little CLI to fire it off.
On 24/02/2007,
I agree with an alpha-1 labelled release.
I think someone will need to flush JIRA before cutting the release
(close things that are no longer relevant, or fixed, or duplicate).
- Brett
On 24/02/2007, at 8:35 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed
10 matches
Mail list logo
