Re: Continuum 1.1

2007-11-13 Thread Brett Porter
Given that there have been not-insignificant code changes since the last release, and this falls over the weekend - I'd suggest a longer vote period on this. On 13/11/2007, at 11:55 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, All issues for Continuum 1.1 final will be closed this week, so I'll try

RE: Continuum 1.1-beta-1

2007-07-17 Thread McNaught, Duncan
Do you know when this week it will be out? Thanks --Duncan -Original Message- From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 2:53 PM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Continuum 1.1-beta-1 they have been released... continuum 1.1-beta-1

Re: Continuum 1.1-beta-1

2007-07-13 Thread Jesse McConnell
they have been released... continuum 1.1-beta-1 will be out next week :) \o/ On 7/13/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We must release plexus-contextualizer and plexus-utils-1.4.3 first. Volunteers? Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : Hi, All 1.1-beta-1 issues are closed.

Re: continuum 1.1-beta-1 update

2007-07-03 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
ok, I modified fixed version on lot of issues. Can you check if you're agree? Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : On 03/07/2007, at 5:54 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Jesse McConnell a écrit : Just to capture some talk on irc today... I think the strategy moving forward is going to be get

Re: continuum 1.1-beta-1 update

2007-07-02 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Jesse McConnell a écrit : Just to capture some talk on irc today... I think the strategy moving forward is going to be get some of jira cleaned up a la the recent maven jira push and continuum 1.1 is going to get wrapped up a bit for the first feature complete beta release very soon. I'll

Re: continuum 1.1-beta-1 update

2007-07-02 Thread Brett Porter
On 03/07/2007, at 5:54 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Jesse McConnell a écrit : Just to capture some talk on irc today... I think the strategy moving forward is going to be get some of jira cleaned up a la the recent maven jira push and continuum 1.1 is going to get wrapped up a bit for the

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-18 Thread Brett Porter
I had a look at this, and added high next to the ones that I thought were high, and realised it was all but two. So I took the column out and moved those two to a 1.2 roadmap. Maybe we can break that down into 1.2, 2.0, etc. as we go and just keep this page as the this is what we're doing and

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-12 Thread Rinku
Hi, Just wondering what happened to this idea: http://www.nabble.com/2.1-Design-and-Process-tf1617559.html#a4383722 Cheers, Rahul Jesse McConnell wrote: hi everyone, I have been trying to help emmanuel some with pulling together the roadmap for Continuum 1.1 on the wiki and maybe help

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-12 Thread Jesse McConnell
it disappeared into the ether of the mailing list? :) I still think its a good idea, thanks for bringing it back up...could be very useful on some of the larger issues like security and project groups, etc.. jesse On 7/12/06, Rinku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Just wondering what happened

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 3 Jul 06, at 9:30 AM 3 Jul 06, Brett Porter wrote: On 28/06/2006 8:40 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: When we last discussed it on the development process, we talked about instead doing regular promotion of the automated builds (eg, roughly once a week we say this is a stable build with

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-07-03 Thread Brett Porter
On 3/07/2006 7:17 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: So you're suggesting we not doing any official alpha/beta releases? Right. - Brett -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org/ Better Builds with Maven - http://library.mergere.com/

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Jun 06, at 10:04 PM 27 Jun 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. Are we deciding that these are the things are going to be in 1.1 and take as long as we need? I would prefer that myself. Looking below

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Jason van Zyl a écrit : On 27 Jun 06, at 10:04 PM 27 Jun 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. Are we deciding that these are the things are going to be in 1.1 and take as long as we need? I would prefer

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
- Remove JDO (at least jpox) because it the source of lot of our issues +1 My only opinion on this is to think about it, but save the work until we bump into the next big problem that is going to require a lot of effort to fix. It seems stable enough in 1.0.3 and if it remains that way

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
- customization of the add project feature. In this part, I think to add a multi-project as a multiple projects or as a single project, scm connection string to use, add with a scm url, add all modules by a scm connection instead of an url contruction based on project url provided in the add

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

2006-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
ok, I think the roadmap is done now. We have 159 issues. I'll be happy if we can include all these issues in 1.1 :-) Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : Hi, I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done normally tomorrow. The major first things to do in this roadmap