Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] dosbox-0.57-2mdk

2003-03-21 Thread Michael Scherer
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail de Götz Waschk, à Vendredi 21 Mars 2003 09:20 you've mixed this up: intel and alpha are little-endian, while sparc and ppc are big-endian. well, not me, the file. /tmp/dosbox-0.57 $ head INSTALL First of all if

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] dosbox-0.57-2mdk

2003-03-20 Thread Michael Scherer
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail de Per Øyvind Karlsen, à Jeudi 20 Mars 2003 04:15 Name: dosbox Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.57 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 2mdk

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] dosbox-0.57-2mdk

2003-03-20 Thread Michael Scherer
# (misc, 15/02/2003 ) only work on big endian system. ExclusiveArch: %ix86 this is incorrect, dosbox runs on other archs too According to the INSTALL file, it runs only on big endian system. Since the package is not in debian ( last time I checked, one or two month ago ), I was unable

Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-19 Thread Michael Scherer
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail de Till Kamppeter, à Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 01:44 Michael Scherer wrote: Can you please tell to me that the security hole discovered this morning is closed ? Check your Cooker mirror whether it already caught up

Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Michael Scherer
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail de Frederic Lepied, à Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 00:02 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you provided to build this

Re: [Cooker] urpmi features

2003-03-17 Thread Michael Scherer
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail de Stefan van der Eijk, à Mardi 18 Mars 2003 00:52 yeah... if the BuildRequires would be correct. Major hurdle here... Well, on the other hand, you will see immediatly if the buildrequires are wrong... --

Re: [Cooker] Whats in a name

2003-03-16 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Dimanche 16 Mars 2003 16:31, El Gringo ( aka Greg Meyer ) a écrit : On Sunday 16 March 2003 10:28 am, Spencer wrote: Hi all, I have a fantastic looking and running ML9.1 on this desktop. Does anyone know what the code name is going to be? Pheonix would be appropriate Was thinking the

Re: [Cooker] kernel-source rejected to CD4

2003-03-14 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Vendredi 14 Mars 2003 05:36, El Gringo ( aka Quel Qun ) a écrit : MandrakeLinux-Cooker-4.i586 mandrake_doc-drakxtools-en-9.1-2mdk.noarch MandrakeLinux-Cooker-4.i586 mandrake_doc-drakxtools-es-9.1-2mdk.noarch MandrakeLinux-Cooker-4.i586 mandrake_doc-drakxtools-fr-9.1-2mdk.noarch What about

Re: War (was: [Cooker] Re: APCI not working on presario 700)

2003-03-12 Thread Michael Scherer
Hey.. I'm USian (virtually no French tho, sorry), but that'd be a reason for me to SUPPORT Mdk. Sometimes, being the good guy means you have to let the other guy shoot first, even if that means the bullet might be nuclear. I see no need to go back in for war at this point, and if we do, I

[Cooker] Cooking on cooker [ Was : WAR ]

2003-03-12 Thread Michael Scherer
And of course neither french fries nor french toast have a thing to do with France. In the first case, IIRC, the dish in question originated in Belgium Are you sure sure ? Some cooking books of my grand mother said it comes from Paris, near the Pont Neuf in 1890. They may not be right, but,

Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count

2003-03-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Wow, I'm sure you don't use mbox. My Cooker folder becomes unusable at 1000 messages and I have to delete stuff. Mine work fine on a 13000 messages mbox. For Cooker and with Kmail But I had some problem when sorting message, since I am always low on disk space ( documents are like gaz, they

Re: [Cooker] URPMI in the spotlight, was: question on ftp sites

2003-03-10 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 00:56, El Gringo ( aka Austin ) a écrit : Two or three times a day I think to myself: URPMI IS MANDRAKE'S MOST UNDERRATED FEATURE! And unfortunately, nobody knows this, and Mandrake doesn't advertise urpmi per se. When I think Mandrake, I think: Debian done right!.

Re: [Cooker] URPMI in the spotlight, was: question on ftp sites

2003-03-10 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 12:04, El Gringo ( aka Guillaume Rousse ) a écrit : Ainsi parlait Michael Scherer : Very effective, everybody who read Linux Magazine France know that apt-get is so cool http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/linux/urpmi.html for instance ? Yes, exactly what I

Re: toward community-ruled website ? (was Re: [Cooker] The Mandrake Audio Workstation)

2003-03-10 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 14:26, El Gringo ( aka Buchan Milne ) a écrit : Of course, it would have to be decided which documentation (all, none, some?) would be available only to club members. But it could be something along the lines that all cooker/bug testing etc docs are free, really good

Re: [Cooker] Re: toward community-ruled website ?

2003-03-10 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 20:52, El Gringo ( aka Sascha Noyes ) a écrit : Steffen Barszus actually posted a message to cooker yesterday asking the mandrake people how they envision the community helping them with the hardware database ... and got no answer. They will answer, just not now, since I

Re: OT: desktop advocacy (was Re: [Cooker] whose bright idea?)

2003-03-10 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 21:23, El Gringo ( aka Buchan Milne ) a écrit : Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 18:25, Jean-Michel Dault wrote: File dialog is one legitimate problem, it's well known and well discussed, and is in the works for GNOME 2.4. No-one can agree on exactly what

Re: [Cooker] Reinventing the Debian (was: 9.1...Delayed)

2003-03-09 Thread Michael Scherer
I think maybe keeping milestone snapshots of cooker would be a good thing. These would be less stable than the betas but more stable than Cooker, thus encouraging more to test out packages that are still in development. It would also provide more flexibility; if, late in the devcycle of a

Re: [Cooker] The Mandrake Audio Workstation

2003-03-09 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Dimanche 9 Mars 2003 22:22, El Gringo ( aka Andi Payn ) a écrit : Of course if Mandrake links to his page, they already have that extra-link safety--but if they want to host his document directly, they don't. And, more vaguely, not mentioning PLF in his document allows Mandrake to host it

Re: [Cooker] what's the mess with the club ?

2003-03-01 Thread Michael Scherer
Newer package in PLF (yanc-0.2.0-2plf.src.rpm) Austin, is there a reason why it cannot be in contrib? Other NVidia-specific software is in contrib: yanc in club only as yanc-0.1.4-1mdk.src.rpm It's made with Kylix. Lenny said anything that we can't compile with gcc can't go in contribs.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2274] [vim-common] File missing from package: /usr/share/vim/tutor/tutor.vim

2003-02-24 Thread Michael Scherer
/home/misc $ urpmf tutor.vim vim-common:/usr/share/doc/vim-common-6.1/tutor/tutor.vim vim-common:/usr/share/vim/tutor/tutor.vim vim-common:/usr/share/vim/tutor/tutor.vim multiple packages installation ? multiples sources of installation, i had some problem with some mirrors. The

Re: [Cooker] installing over PPPoE ADSL in use?

2003-02-20 Thread Michael Scherer
Perhaps leave the image on the mirrors of the tree but not include it on the CD would work? On the CD it is nearly for free since it's contained in the network.img. On the cd, it is not so useful, since the whole point is for not downloading the cd, but to install it from the web... --

Re: [Cooker] some thougths about the package groups.

2003-02-14 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Vendredi 14 Février 2003 21:01, Warly a écrit : Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have take a look at the groups classification of some package with rpmdrake, and I have seen there is a big lack of consistency. To give a simple example : Should wmnetload

Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community

2003-02-13 Thread Michael Scherer
The two, I think. A bug can be a KDE bug, or it can be a mail related bug. But, to cross post he bug will generate noise on one of the two list I really don't see how a bug in anything but a server (in which case the group is known) would affect both mutt and kmail, unless it was a

Re: [Cooker] Re: UNIX Lore

2003-02-12 Thread Michael Scherer
But I agree that's not a solution, else we'll soon have more packages in PLF than in regular mdk... Did someone already complain about BitchX ? Well, I don't see why, after all, it has no meaning in other language . We cannot be sure that 'talk' is not offensive in some obscur language, no ?

Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community

2003-02-12 Thread Michael Scherer
I would recommend using a Wiki, just like the one we have for internal engineering. It's easy to install, manage, and very low on resources. What's more, anyone can create a topic and link it to a project page. Each group could have a separate mailing list. This way, I wouldn't have 30,000

Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community

2003-02-12 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Mercredi 12 Février 2003 21:09, Buchan Milne a écrit : But, it will take a lot of time to choose the groups of each package All packages have groups, and are probably close enough to be used: rpm -qa --qf '%{GROUP}\t%{NAME}\n'|sort So, what should be the name pf the group talking of

[Cooker] Re: Creation of a community

2003-02-12 Thread Michael Scherer
So, what should be the name pf the group talking of kmail ? Networking-Mail or Graphical_desktop-KDE ? Does it belong with mutt or with knode and lisa etc? The two, I think. A bug can be a KDE bug, or it can be a mail related bug. But, to cross post he bug will generate noise on one of the

[Cooker] some thougths about the package groups.

2003-02-12 Thread Michael Scherer
I have take a look at the groups classification of some package with rpmdrake, and I have seen there is a big lack of consistency. To give a simple example : Should wmnetload be in the GraphicalDesktop/WindowMaker group, or in the Monitoring group ? This is a wm applet who monitor the network.

Re: [Cooker] A new Mandrake Baby!

2003-02-11 Thread Michael Scherer
We'll need a Kids group eventually. Is there any good alphabet-learning programs or such? If this is a real question, here is a real answer : Gcompris , has a activty for alphabet-learning ( Click on the book at first page, and try some activities ) Oh, and by the way, congratulations. --

Re: [Cooker] Software for kids [was: A new Mandrake Baby!]

2003-02-11 Thread Michael Scherer
So, here is my list so far: gcompris, tuxpaint, childsplay and ktuberling. Anything else I have missed? There is also TuxTyping, but i don't know if it still alive ( http://www.geekcomix.com/dm/tuxtype ). There is also some french website on linux and education, such as

Re: [Cooker] Software for kids [was: A new Mandrake Baby!]

2003-02-11 Thread Michael Scherer
There is also some french website on linux and education, such as www.education.free.fr, and other, but I can't remember their URLs. Here it is : http://ofset.sourceforge.net/ ( was in the GCompris about box ) -- Mickaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] Talking about developers coooperation ( Was: Creation of a community )

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Scherer
We don't have guidelines for rpm, We do, it's just not updated. The mdk-rpm howto could be more precise. We can do rpms with this, of course, but, I have always found not-so-easy rpm. I had to figure by myself by loooking at others spec. no information is given on how to become

Re: [Cooker] Talking about developers coooperation ( Was: Creation of a community )

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Scherer
You miss of course some of the work Austin and others do on the Mandrake Club (on the club-volunteers list). Not a club member, sorry. Guess what: contributing to the club as a volunteer will get you a free membership... just ask Deno! Well, this is not advertised, and,I think the

Re: [Cooker] kernel and systrace

2003-02-09 Thread Michael Scherer
Thank you to reply, but can you add it in TODO or WISHLIST? Or in the list of future possibilities? Can you test it? Warly said that it would be great to have this ( a TODO list shared for the distro ) And he is right. That way, people will see this will be done in the future, or if someone

[Cooker] Talking about developers coooperation ( Was: Creation of a community )

2003-02-09 Thread Michael Scherer
I never proposed any kind of fork. Yes, you already said that, as everyone should have seen. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cookerm=104457720609404w=2 A fork is not even possible. Only a fool could even dream to do a work as good as done by Chmouel, Warly and all the Mandrake

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 01:13, Gustavo Franco a écrit : But, I don't think we need to be a carbon copie of Debian. Debian is not the only volunteers OS project, everybody seems to forget FreeBSD, and other, or even some smalls os, such as AtheOs, OpenBeOS, and others, who don't work in

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 10:47, Michael Scherer a écrit : OpenBSD team release CDs each 6 month, as said before. They maintain the four last release. Well, a small mistake, they maintain two previous release. ie, actually, 3.1 and 3.2. -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Scherer
But can you run Mandrake on more than ten architectures? Well, if it was the main reason to use a Debian instead of another distro, we should all be using NetBSD... -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Scherer
Read the documentation, here: http://www.openbsd.org/porting.html Well, I just missed this one. That is the problem to work when there is too much people in a small room. Mandrake as a new project inside Debian.But it was refused here, many feels involved.But if you change the original

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Scherer
If it was accepted, can you explain what we would do ? We've two scenarios here: 1) Mandrake as a new subproject: If accepted, you can contact Debian developers through two MLs: debian-project and debian-devel.To discuss about a internal merge with Desktop subproject or not and others

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Scherer
So , merging the differences would not be interesting, for all the works it represent. Yes, but we can share our experiences. Well, of course, I agree at 100 % . But I really hope that nobody has waited this discussion to do so. -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1422] [kernel] New: no apm support

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Scherer
Dell Inspiron 8200 P4 Nvidia video... what all info do you need / want about the system ? I think this laptop is not compatible with acpi. A friend of mine have it, and still run with APM. Well, this may have changed since last month, of course ;) -- Michaël Scherer

Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 22:28, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us! please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely useless and out of context... Well, I think, for the good of all

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-07 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 00:50, Austin Acton a écrit : On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:38, Michael Scherer wrote: We also need to support equaly contribs and main, don't you think ? Well, the problem is Mandrake says publicly we fully support the packages in main, but not in contribs so they do

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community

2003-02-07 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 01:16, Austin Acton a écrit : 1. Is there any hope of MandrakeSoft adopting a plan like this? Since the beginning of the thread was Warly's post, I hope MandrakeSoft will adopt this plan. After all, nobody talk about this after Ben Reser's post on Slashdot (

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-07 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 12:35, Han Boetes a écrit : Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just take a look at the discussion for Maildir in /etc/skel, which involves changes in main. If there is a distinction between developers, because some of them have control on main

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-07 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 18:04, Gustavo Franco a écrit : On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 20:28, Michael Scherer wrote: Well, we could try something like morethan one developper per package. Actually, in Debian, only the packager can change something. If you take a look to the changelog of any

Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-07 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 19:51, John Goerzen a écrit : I would like to try to offer a bit of insight on what Debian has done right, what Debian has done wrong, and perhaps explore some areas Debian can work together with the Mandrake community in the future. You 're welcome. I also like

[Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-06 Thread Michael Scherer
The difference must be who is a mandrake developer and who is not, and forget who is mandrakesoft employee and who is not. We should stive to create a TWO tier system Developer User This sounds great, so , now, what is the definition of a developer ? I propose ( as a draft ) someone

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-06 Thread Michael Scherer
This sounds great, so , now, what is the definition of a developer ? One who contributes tangible material to the distro. Software, documentation, detailed bug-reports, graphics. I propose ( as a draft ) someone having write access to some part of the distribution, this will include

Re: [Cooker] Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-06 Thread Michael Scherer
But demand high quality for what they deliver. Otherwise, send it back. Well, of course. Peer reviews, but this would say tht some developpers hav more power than others. All developers should be treated as equals, but, some of them should be team chief , or something like that... How do

[Cooker] Some microsoft bashing ( was : win32 for 9.1? migration tools )

2003-02-01 Thread Michael Scherer
Windows has automatic update to, which nobody uses because microsoft is known to release patches that will make your computer stop working No, Microsoft is known to release software that will make your computer stop working. So, their patches only correct the buggy software who do not crash.

Re: [Cooker] installing over PPPoE ADSL in use?

2003-02-01 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 21:53, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit : The installation program of Mandrake Linux currently supports installing from local network adapters through a PPPoE ADSL account. Since we're much lacking diskspace on boot floppies, and since I've heard zero news from people

Re: [Cooker] win32 for 9.1?

2003-01-31 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Vendredi 31 Janvier 2003 12:57, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here's my proposal. Why not ship distributable win32 applications like WinSCP, cygwin, etc? i don't belive that's our job to develop for others OS than the one we create :-). No, the fact

Re: [Cooker] hd.img install options...

2003-01-20 Thread Michael Scherer
Not even mentioning the fact that people has never put much confidence in ntfs.o (hum, there even was a time when it corrupted partitions mounted ro, isn't it?). Well, all I can say that ntfs work perfectly for me. I never had any problem to read, and even one time to write ( you know, you

Re: [Cooker] user login is very long, while root login is very fast

2003-01-16 Thread Michael Scherer
But why is it necessary to change the perms of the devices ?? This should be only a matter of groups. For example /dev/mixer should always belong to root:audio with perms crw-rw, and a user should be in the group audio. So even ater login, the /dev entry has not been changed, but only

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] Geramik-0.17-2mdk

2003-01-15 Thread Michael Scherer
I think it's a good thing to package it like any other GTK theme. I understand what you want though. But imo it would only make sense if you select Keramik in Kcontrol and decide to have other apps follow that theme, maybe then it should setup Geramik as default GTK theme. Not when simply

Re: [Cooker] Prepare for the onslaught.

2003-01-12 Thread Michael Scherer
Anyway, how does debian handle this mess? (I'm asking because debian users usually brag about how they only need to install once) Right, this, and how it is easy to type apt-get install foobar ;-) First, since Debian has more expert users than Mandrake, they are able to handle the problem,

Re: [Cooker] Prepare for the onslaught.

2003-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
I don't know any other software company that ships their official, commercial software distribution on CDs650MB. I had just take the first CD that was on my desk : Starcraft Brood War /home/misc $ df | grep cdrom /dev/cdrom684M 684M 0 100% /mnt/cdrom Date back to 98. I have

Re: [Cooker] apache2 a dep for apache?

2003-01-07 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Mardi 7 Janvier 2003 20:13, Buchan Milne a écrit : J.P. Pasnak wrote: Yes, a very good reason. I was planning on switching all my servers over to apache2 over the holidays, but I got Starcraft working in Wine, so out went that plan :) Would yo like to enlighten us how (or should we

Re: [Cooker] zope 2.6.0

2003-01-06 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Lundi 6 Janvier 2003 20:53, Austin Acton a écrit : Hey, Zope 2.6.0 is out, and the folks over at Polish Linux have it compiling with Python 2.2. As far as I can tell, there's only a one-line patch. It think redoing our old zope RPM is a bit over my head, but I've attached the PLD's

Re: [Cooker] batik

2002-12-12 Thread Michael Scherer
Le Jeudi 12 Décembre 2002 21:36, Austin Acton a écrit : Has anyone thought of packaging Batik? It's GPL, and the source (java) is available... so I assume if it will compile with a GPL java compiler Already done by the jpackage project : http://jpackage.zarb.org/rpm.php?id=364 Mick

Re: [Cooker] vim spec plugin

2002-12-11 Thread Michael Scherer
The problem is that currently there is no such mechanism to dynamically load extensions/mode for vim like we do for emacs as per packages. Hum, what about autocmd BufRead *.spec source ~/.vim/rpm_mode this run the command 'source ~/.vim/rpm_mode', which , obviouly, apply the command from

Re: [Cooker] pornview: in contrib or plf?

2002-11-30 Thread Michael Scherer
It looks like a useful program. If we can have a package called BitchX, I don't know why we can't have pornview. Just my $ .02. I think because of this picture : http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pornview/pornview/src/pixmaps/logo.png?rev=1.1.1.1 This is the logo. Mick

[Cooker] packaged fenris 0.0.7

2002-11-28 Thread Michael Scherer
hi I've submitted in incoming a spec file for fenris, a very powerful debugger. Mick

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake-gtk2 pre testing

2002-11-27 Thread Michael Scherer
It click inspect and it shows my /etc/samba/smb.conf and /etc/samba/smb.conf.rpmsave, whereas shouldn't it be using /etc/samba/smb.conf.rpmnew (since this file is %config(noreplace)). I have a /etc/samba/smb.conf.rpmsave from a previous uninstall, which might be confusing it (bug?). Since

Re: [Cooker] Re: rpmdrake-gtk2 pre testing

2002-11-27 Thread Michael Scherer
Is there an echo in here? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cookerm=103180266303247w=2 oh, i should have know, all my good ideas have already be suggested, or implemented. one other idea, is that we may put every config file in cvs. when we upgrade a package = cvs commit. something

Re: [Cooker] Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib...

2002-11-27 Thread Michael Scherer
Mandrake currently ships several things that walk the fine line of licensing. Perfect example of this is the mp3 decoders included in the distribution. It is unclear if Mandrake should have to pay royalties on every CD it ships (though I think free downloads it is clear that they would

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: rpmdrake-gtk2 pre testing

2002-11-27 Thread Michael Scherer
one other idea, is that we may put every config file in cvs. Like this: http://jamsb.austms.org.au/cdrom/images/S2_2002/Blue/USQ/csc2405/sysad-doc/ sysad-doc/indexf.html Exactly what i said . I have talked about this idea with a friend after seeing someone who put his home in CVS ( Linux

Re: [Cooker] mplayer in main ?

2002-11-26 Thread Michael Scherer
Are we really OK with the license and co ? I heard that debian won't put it int their tree, because of the licence. But, I do not exactlly where is the problem. I will ask. Mick

[Cooker] spec file of the documentation in rpm.

2002-11-25 Thread Michael Scherer
Hi I have just uploaded the file lea-book.spec, which create a rpm with the documentation of the web site lea-linux.org, a very good source of documentation ( in french only ). Mick

Re: [Cooker] documentation in rpm.

2002-11-25 Thread Michael Scherer
2 ) since this is only in french, how should i deal with this ? Should i translate the menu files, or do it elsewhere ? Not sure on this one. I would assume that it's safe for the menu entries to be in French if the package only contains French documentation. Well, yes, of course. but,

[Cooker] documentation in rpm.

2002-11-24 Thread Michael Scherer
hi . I have written a .spec file for Mandrake 9.0 for some french documentation on linux ( lea-linux.org ), and I have some small questions. 1 ) to launch it in the menu, i use the $BROWSER var, but, can I be sure that this is set ? I didn't found it in /etc, but i havn't look everywhere... 2

Re: [Cooker] want to inovate ?

2002-11-23 Thread Michael Scherer
Take a look to 3ddesktop : http://desk3d.sourceforge.net/ It's innovative, but is it actually useful? It works great on my 3d hologram projector ;) The same model used in Starwars. :) To be serious 5 seconds. It provides a visual feedback when a user changes of desktop ( as enligthment

Re: [Cooker] kernel2.4.20-0.1 and supermount

2002-11-21 Thread Michael Scherer
I still have troubles with supermount, even in kernel2.4.20-0.1. It has never correctly worked in 2.4.19 but was always fine with 2.4.18. The problems are that if I access a file (like listenning to a mp3 with xmms) then after few seconds all the other files are missing. I have to eject the

Re: [Cooker] [important for 9.1] software coherency/strategy

2002-11-18 Thread Michael Scherer
I think a more feature based software strategy could be better, no ? Yes, you are right, but, then this is the problem of one apps for one task. This is exactly what Microsoft is doing, and we all now that the end user will not take a look at the alternatives, even if it is better. I don't

Re: [Cooker] Font trouble.

2002-11-16 Thread Michael Scherer
IN konqueror, licq and other programs almost all my fonts apear as a square. No real characters. I had the same problem when I upgraded 8.2 to 9.0. It was a probleme of permission on the directory where the fonts were. ( /usr/share/fonts, i think, correct me if i am wrong ) Just give read acess

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Scherer
Hello? quicktime movie in powerpoint? Do you never give presentations which need animations? Engineering shops need this. I'm sorry, I 'm just a student. And I do presentations, but never so sophisticated. DivX could also be useful in this regard, and I am sure there are business

Re: [Cooker] contribs repositeries are too unknowns

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Scherer
Can we possibly get some poeple together to maintain this? Would a Wiki (or something similar) work? Could we extract it as static html to go in a package (and get it into main)? For documentation, another good idea would be to have localized book mark. there is good french sites on linux, but

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Scherer
But the point is to develop a opensource dvd player is not possible, thanks to movie maker. Not impossible, just illegal in some countries. It's legal here (for example). Mmh, when you say some coutry, you speaks of this country just below Canada ? This country who arrest people in some

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Scherer
By talking of university, is the free software situation as bad in my old school ? We only had Windows NT, and some old sparc station. And some students in a engineer school in France were not happy about that situation, ( in their school ). not sure about the hardware, but I know one

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-14 Thread Michael Scherer
The point is Mandrake wants to make money, therefore they need bigger install base, therefore they need to make windows users transfer to linux, therefore what keeps windows users from using linux, therefore try to imagine what do we need to add or change. If you want to do money, i think it

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-14 Thread Michael Scherer
Therefore, there is no need for all these fancy multimedia application. Some real businesses need multi-media. We do (animations from simulations). In fact, that's probably one of the big reasons we don't make more use of OpenOffice, and have to use Powerpoint for some presentations. I

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-14 Thread Michael Scherer
actually, flash / quicktime are the best multimedia tools for selling, they make powerpoint presentations look backwards and clunky. the fancy multimedia is where the prospective clients will be wowed into buying your service / product. you put together such a fantastic presentation your

[Cooker] drakconf-themes missing file, and some suggestion for rpmdrake

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Scherer
I use drakconf-themes-9.0-6.2mdkplf drakconf-themes install 2 theme, but kde theme nor gnome theme works. And crash mcc It seem that at least one file is missing : resolution-mdk.png In fact, all these file are missing ./resolution-mdk.png ./tv-mdk.png ./webdav-mdk.png ./drakperm-mdk.png

Re: [Cooker] drakconf-themes missing file, and some suggestion for rpmdrake

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Scherer
So it is actally a PLF RPM, not really maintained, contact the maintainer and author, http://damz.net (IIRC). There was no mention of the authors in the summarry. But, if you click on get new themes, you have the website. Sorry, I should have look earlier. I think that is is important to have

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Scherer
I think that porting their configuration to linux option is a good thing: like their favorite folder , their mails , mail folders , config... , shortcut to my Document networks setting (adsl connection lan etc)... User that got all thingy better and unchanged a lot would be ported to

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Scherer
On other thing , you can use flash without paying 350 euros to Macromedia, I mean, if you are honest. search : http://freshmeat.net/search/?q=flash+macromediasection=projects Oh, i'm sorry, I didn't reread my mail, i ve said that you can't do flash without paying. And, in fact, it is not

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windows users[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Scherer
reading the configuration files from windows at install of LM isn't as simple as it sounds.. with the weirdness in the different windows versions. and the xp ntfs that isn't read by linux yet. ntfs is ready on read only, i use it on a daily basis, no problem. I even get it to write one day (

Re: [Cooker] MU (9.0)

2002-11-12 Thread Michael Scherer
No, I would have booted up to do the upgrades... remember, I'm the guy that has a long-standing wish for the ability to install *while* running the current distro -- see http://pfortin.com/Linux/live_install.html for an 8.0 install on a running system (this was done with some minor mods to

Re: [Cooker] MU (9.0)

2002-11-12 Thread Michael Scherer
can I use urpmi in the same way as debian use apt-get upgrade ? Yes, you can. ISTR some new RPM macros introduced sometime after 8.0, so that could limit the ability to do that, but that's the only limitation I can possibly see. I mean, apt-get dist-upgrade ( which seems to be the same as

<    1   2   3