Re: [Cooker] ext3 vs XFS wich would you prefer?

2002-10-13 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
that is not included in the main 2.4 tree, considering that Mandrake, SuSE, Gentoo, Slackware, and JB Linux all have support for XFS? -- Bjarne On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 19:52, Wes Kurdziolek wrote: XFS will most likely not be integrated into the 2.4 tree. On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 12:35, Bjarne

Re: [Cooker] Missing pine

2002-10-12 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 16:23, Biagio Lucini wrote: Right. But Debian has as far as I know a non-free tree. Why this solution can't be implemented in Mandrake? Biagio Debian doesn't include pine in it's non-free software tree. I believe there used to be a pine-src package which provided a

Re: [Cooker] cdrecord error

2002-10-12 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
The error is probably that your CD media doesn't work w/ your drive. Now take this thread to expert. On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 03:41, Steffen Barszus wrote: Am Samstag, 12. Oktober 2002 01:11 schrieb Ben Reser: On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 12:13:26AM +0200, Steffen Barszus wrote: Hi! First of

Re: [Cooker] ext3 vs XFS wich would you prefer?

2002-10-12 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
XFS will most likely not be integrated into the 2.4 tree. On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 12:35, Bjarne Thomsen wrote: Does anybody know if XFS has been included in 2.4.20-pre or 2.4.20-pre-ac ? Bjarne On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 18:04, Claudio wrote: On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:

Re: [Cooker] ext3 vs XFS wich would you prefer?

2002-10-12 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
I thought quotas *did* work, but users couldn't get quota reports, only root. On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 12:04, Claudio wrote: On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote: 3)Quotas might work better in XFS, but I haven't tested that enough ... (ie from a windows box via samba). quota DOES NOT

Re: [Cooker] Auto detection

2002-10-10 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
AFAIK, MDK doesn't auto-configure sound cards. You have to run their sound configuration tool. On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 09:33, brent sirna wrote: Hi all, On the weekend I just tried switching from my motherboard's audio(ac97) to my sound blaster live value card. And it would seem that on power

Re: [Cooker] Sound not working with MDK9.0 and SB LIve emu10k1

2002-10-02 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
1) This is a support question, so you should be asking MandrakeExpert, not this list. 2) Make sure your speakers are on. 3) Turn up the mixer volume; the emu10k1 drivers typically set the default mixer volumes very low. On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 14:35, Torstein Hernes Dybdahl wrote: I do not have

Re: [Cooker] Random Shut-Down Bug Fixed?

2002-10-02 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
This sounds like an IRQ storm failure and is probably not a Mandrake-specific issue if that's the case. On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 19:23, Matthew C. Tedder wrote: I recently read a negative review of Linux Mandrake from a Red Hat user and presumed that this hasn't only happened to me. (Can't seem

Re: [Cooker] RE: MPG123 issues in 8.2 - SOLVED!

2002-10-01 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
Han, you're taking the long road to pariah-ville. Just suck up your pride and apologize. On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 01:36, Han Boetes wrote: Damon Lynch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 17:09, Han Boetes wrote: Damon Lynch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: But I think if Han

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-10-01 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
No, the NV03 is the RIVA128 chipset. The NV04 is the chipset for the TNT, the TNT2 (a sped-up version of the TNT w/ support for more RAM), and the Vanta (cheap-ass version of TNT). NVidia started marketing the TNT as the RIVA TNT 128 b/c it was originally touted as a TNT-enhanced RIVA 128

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-10-01 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
The NV04 chipset is officially the RiVA TNT chipset. The name lspci shows is whatever the kernel developer who entered the PCI ID decided to give it. On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 07:12, Guy.Bormann wrote: The Diamond Viper V550 is a TNT card, not a RIVA128 card, and there's no such thing as a

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.0 and I845G and DMA

2002-10-01 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
I remember seeing a message on lkml that this is fixed in 2.4.20-pre7. On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 11:12, Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote: No, I don't have a solution to the DMA problem yet. I remember trying hdparm, but not even hdparm could enable DMA on the hard drive (try it -- it will refuse. weird.)

Re: [Cooker] Compaq Proliant DL360

2002-10-01 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
Support for the ServerWorks IDE chipsets has always been a bit awful. There's a long-standing bug where enabling DMA on ATAPI devices tends to screw with the system pretty severely. On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 10:40, tarvid wrote: This is ugly.

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 KDMRC bogus path #2

2002-10-01 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
Edit the file: /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 13:08, Bob Walker wrote: Does anyone have a fix for the bogus paths being set in KDMRC? SystemPath=/usr//bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin::/usr/local/bin UserPath=/usr//bin:/bin:/usr/bin::/usr/local/bin Bob

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 KDMRC bogus path #2

2002-10-01 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
is generated automatically WITH the bogus paths, I'll assume that someone has fixed the root cause, i.e. the app/script that is generating 'kdmrc'. Thanks for your response. Bob On Tuesday 01 October 2002 10:24 am, Wes Kurdziolek wrote: Edit the file: /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc On Tue

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 KDMRC bogus path #2

2002-10-01 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
After some further, research, I found a better solution (since this tends to make msec barf): Edit the /usr/share/msec/libmsec.py file and find the line that defines KDMRC. Change its value to /tmp/kdmrc or some other throw-away value. On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 14:17, Wes Kurdziolek wrote: Ah, I

Re: [Cooker] Install of 9.0 - raid ?

2002-09-30 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 22:43, Bruno Prior wrote: Basically I've got a ASUS A7V133 RAID m/b with 1G ram, althon 1500XP and two 40G 7200rpm disks. One disk on the main controller, the other on the onboard promise controller. Booted mandrake 9.0 disk #1, partitioned as follows:

Re: [Cooker] Install of 9.0 - raid ?

2002-09-30 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
That's not very helpful if the damn thing won't come up even in single user mode. ;) I could use the rescue mode from the CD, but I'd rather everything work right w/o having to do that. On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 04:15, Thomas Backlund wrote: From: Wes Kurdziolek [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 2002-09

Re: [Cooker] Install of 9.0 - raid ?

2002-09-30 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 05:46, Bruno Prior wrote: This was my first guess as well, but the system still wouldn't come up after I built my own initrd with raid1 and raid5 support. I added aliases for md-personality-3 and md-personality-4 to /etc/modules.conf, but no luck. Every array would

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-09-30 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
Typically one can assign an IRQ to the video card in the BIOS -- mine has an option named Video IRQ. Most video cards do not need them but work fine if one is assigned. Some, for one reason or another, require an IRQ and won't work without it (NVidia RIVA128 cards, for instance, tend to require

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-09-30 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 13:02, Guy.Bormann wrote: Some, for one reason or another, require an IRQ and won't work without it (NVidia RIVA128 cards, for instance, tend to require one). Nope, I have a RIVA TNT128 (Diamond Viper V550) in my machine here at work. In fact, after Felix's problems I

Re: [Cooker] I hate to admit it . . .

2002-09-28 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
slip through. I am still and remain a dedicated user (and hope to contribute to the next round of Cooker) I thank you all for your time. R.Fox Wes Kurdziolek VT CS Lab Linux Systems Administrator E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Cooker] I hate to admit it . . .

2002-09-28 Thread Wes Kurdziolek
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 17:56, Jason Straight wrote: On Saturday 28 September 2002 04:21 pm, Wes Kurdziolek wrote: If these issues are so important to you, why don't you find out what RH does different and submit a patch? I hate hearing that response, sounds like something microsoft would