On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Frederic Soulier wrote:
Yes, this also applies to nForce3 based Athlon64 systems. Disks I
Were the disks using SATA?
Nope.
tested so far flied at around 57 MB/sec, i.e. faster than anything I
used so far. Not only the disks were fast, the rest of the platform was
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 05:32, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone on the cooker list had the privilege to try the upcoming 9.2
on an Opteron/nForce3 configuration (single or dual Opteron)?
Yes, this also applies to nForce3 based Athlon64 systems. Disks I
Were the disks using SATA?
Frederic,
CSC at Warwick is running a Penguin Computing Altus1000, see:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/MdkPorts#amd64
This is the machine that is compiling the contribs at the moment. As far
as I know, they've haven't had many issues with the box. It's running
amd64 version of
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 11:52, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Frederic,
CSC at Warwick is running a Penguin Computing Altus1000, see:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/MdkPorts#amd64
Thanks Stefan.
--
Frederic Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Has anyone on the cooker list had the privilege to try the upcoming 9.2
on an Opteron/nForce3 configuration (single or dual Opteron)?
If yes, how does it run?
--
Frederic Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Has anyone on the cooker list had the privilege to try the upcoming 9.2
on an Opteron/nForce3 configuration (single or dual Opteron)?
Yes, this also applies to nForce3 based Athlon64 systems. Disks I
tested so far flied at around 57 MB/sec, i.e. faster than anything I
used so far. Not only
