Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-04 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michael Scherer : i suggest the last solution, but, maybe someone see a problem ? Yes, coherency with other development tools. How many packages really requires autoconf/automake ? I guess less than 1%. However, autoconf/automake are rpm-build

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-04 Thread Michael Scherer
On Thursday 04 September 2003 00:32, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michael Scherer : i suggest the last solution, but, maybe someone see a problem ? Yes, coherency with other development tools. How many packages really requires autoconf/automake ? I guess less than 1%. However,

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-03 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:11:36AM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: It is still not a good idea to add as buildrequires it to a gazillion spec, either manually or automatically. Just adding rpm-build requires would be more consistent with current solution used with other build tools. AFAIK,

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-03 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Ben Reser : On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:11:36AM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: It is still not a good idea to add as buildrequires it to a gazillion spec, either manually or automatically. Just adding rpm-build requires would be more consistent with current solution used with

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-03 Thread Michael Scherer
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 08:42, Michael Scherer wrote: The patch is not perfect. If applied right now,linphone would requires pkgconfig, which is useless. So, what i propose is to add pkgconfig as a requires if : - a file is dropped in /usr/lib/pkgconfig and if - a file is dropped in

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-03 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
[..] using the patch and automaticaly adding it to the package that need it this would only add pkgconfig for library that really use it when aclocal is used, and is automated, so no need to change library, just rebuild them. all file dropped in /usr/share/aclocal are included in

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-03 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Michael Scherer : i suggest the last solution, but, maybe someone see a problem ? Yes, coherency with other development tools. How many packages really requires autoconf/automake ? I guess less than 1%. However, autoconf/automake are rpm-build dependencies. Here we have more

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-03 Thread Abel Cheung
On 2003-09-04(Thu) 00:32:50 +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michael Scherer : i suggest the last solution, but, maybe someone see a problem ? Yes, coherency with other development tools. How many packages really requires autoconf/automake ? I guess less than 1%. However,

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-02 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 01 September 2003 21:16, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson : I agree, rpm-devel should require pkgconfig. Same for me. That's silly to add it to all packages individually. But some package use pkgconfig in their autoconf macro, as a grep pkg /usr/share/aclocal *

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-02 Thread Abel Cheung
On 2003-09-01(Mon) 22:17:08 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: On Monday 01 September 2003 21:16, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson : I agree, rpm-devel should require pkgconfig. Same for me. That's silly to add it to all packages individually. But some package use

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-02 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 01 September 2003 23:31, Abel Cheung wrote: On 2003-09-01(Mon) 22:29:52 +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: I agree, rpm-devel should require pkgconfig. Same for me. That's silly to add it to all packages individually. So..., what do you all suggest? File a bugreport or

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-02 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Abel Cheung : Anyway, I'm eager to see your patch against find-requires go into rpm package, that's a much more automated solution. It is still not a good idea to add as buildrequires it to a gazillion spec, either manually or automatically. Just adding rpm-build requires would be

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-02 Thread Abel Cheung
On 2003-09-02(Tue) 10:11:36 +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Abel Cheung : Anyway, I'm eager to see your patch against find-requires go into rpm package, that's a much more automated solution. It is still not a good idea to add as buildrequires it to a gazillion spec, either

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Abel Cheung
On 2003-08-31(Sun) 22:16:14 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/contrib/i586/problem/ices-0.3-2mdk the compilation stopped when configure tried to detect libshout3-devel, listed as buildrequires. It stopped because pkgconfig was not found. libshout3-devel should

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
Michael, Would you consider making this into a find-requires script? In that case the dependencies won't need to be added manually. regards, Stefan Hi. will trying to fix buildrequires, i have come on this one http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/contrib/i586/problem/ices-0.3-2mdk the

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Luca Berra
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 10:16:14PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: there is a lot of package who drop a file in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ without having a requires on pkgconfig. libsqlite0-devel for this one at least pkgconfig is not needed for building stuff with linsqlite, the file is there as a

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Michael Scherer
On Monday 01 September 2003 07:54, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: Michael, Would you consider making this into a find-requires script? In that case the dependencies won't need to be added manually. done. -- Mickaël Scherer --- find-requires.bak 2003-09-01 09:49:23.0 +0200 +++

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 1 september 2003 08.26 skrev Luca Berra: On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 10:16:14PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: there is a lot of package who drop a file in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ without having a requires on pkgconfig. libsqlite0-devel for this one at least pkgconfig is not needed for

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
Oden Eriksson wrote: måndagen den 1 september 2003 21.16 skrev Guillaume Rousse: Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson : I agree, rpm-devel should require pkgconfig. Same for me. That's silly to add it to all packages individually. So..., what do you all suggest? File a bugreport or

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 1 september 2003 21.16 skrev Guillaume Rousse: Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson : I agree, rpm-devel should require pkgconfig. Same for me. That's silly to add it to all packages individually. So..., what do you all suggest? File a bugreport or bug the rpm package maintainer? I

Re: [Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-09-01 Thread Abel Cheung
On 2003-09-01(Mon) 22:29:52 +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: I agree, rpm-devel should require pkgconfig. Same for me. That's silly to add it to all packages individually. So..., what do you all suggest? File a bugreport or bug the rpm package maintainer? I personally think this

[Cooker] pkgconfig not required by -devel

2003-08-31 Thread Michael Scherer
Hi. will trying to fix buildrequires, i have come on this one http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/contrib/i586/problem/ices-0.3-2mdk the compilation stopped when configure tried to detect libshout3-devel, listed as buildrequires. It stopped because pkgconfig was not found. libshout3-devel should