Re: [COOT] CHO H-bonds.

2015-07-02 Thread Jan Stransky
About the unit cell shrinkage: I have heard a lecture (I believe it was Andrea Thorn form G. Sheldrick group on one of CCP4 meetings), where she mentioned a mistake in X-ray wavelenght input (swaped 3rd and 4th digit), which no program from integration to structure solution did not

Re: [COOT] CHO H-bonds.

2015-07-02 Thread Jan Stransky
Dear Tim, I know that it cause rescaling and you don't have to input the number manually most of the time recently. I just wanted to point out that it can obviously happend. The question reminded me Andrea's lecture. Jan On 07/02/2015 10:34 AM, Tim Gruene wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [COOT] CHO H-bonds.

2015-07-02 Thread Tim Gruene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Jan, when you input the wrong wavelength during data processing, you rescale the Ewald sphere construction, i.e. it will result in a different unit cell and crystal to detector distance. I am not sure what you mean by 'which no program from

Re: [COOT] CHO H-bonds.

2015-07-02 Thread Ian Tickle
Hi Jan Thanks for the suggestion. I checked AFAICS the wavelength is correct. I think in any case the difference you are talking about would be far too small to explain the effect I'm seeing (the error in the wavelength is ~ 0.01% whereas I'm seeing deviations from the ideal vdW contact of up

Re: [COOT] CHO H-bonds.

2015-07-01 Thread Ian Tickle
Paul, as an aside to this, would it be possible to have it so that if the relevant boxes in the Environment Distances menu are checked then H-bonds and.or bumps are automatically re-calculated on re-centering? Currently it's necessary to check off on one of the boxes every time the view is