Title: Allow relay from any IP if authenticated
Anyone know how I can allow courier to relay mail from any IP address as long as the client authenticates successfully? I have tried many configurations to no avail!
etc/esmtpd - AUTH_REQUIRED = 0
etc/smtpaccess - 192.168.24.220
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:02:37 -0400
Michael Bernardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
#Anyone know how I can allow courier to relay mail from any IP address as
#long as the client authenticates successfully? I have tried many
#configurations to no avail!
It does this by default.
--
Jesse Keating
Jesse Keating wrote:
It does this by default.
Are you sure it does? I've seen it claim it does in the docs and here on
the list many times... but when I did the run-of-the-mill install of
'everything'... one key thing was left out which was the cause of most my
grief for user trying to auth
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:12:11 -0700
Randall Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
#Are you sure it does? I've seen it claim it does in the docs and here on
#the list many times... but when I did the run-of-the-mill install of
#'everything'... one key thing was left out which was the cause of most my
Jesse Keating wrote:
I touched nothing, did an rpm install, and esmtp was working perfectly. Even
was auth'n through mysql, due to my setting of authdaemon.
Might be it... I dont use RPMs, I do the compile and install methods of
virtually everything. But I didnt do any 'withouts' or 'withs'
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:52:19 -0700
Randall Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#Might be it... I dont use RPMs, I do the compile and install methods of
#virtually everything. But I didnt do any 'withouts' or 'withs' that would
#conflict with default settings of authorization processes. So, it may be
Juha Saarinen wrote:
Despite what you might have been told, RPM packages are not evil,
especially when you can build them yourself very easily. They cut down
the amount of troubleshooting and system admin time required a lot.
I dont think they are evil... its just the machine I chose to install
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randall
Shaw
Sent: 17 July 2002 23:23
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Allow relay from any IP if authenticated
Juha Saarinen wrote:
Despite what you might have been told, RPM packages
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:21:25 +0100
Bill Michell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#Then I start to hit problems - the faq doesn't make clear exactly how you
#use that spec file to build your RPMs - I have successfully overwritten my
#changes now several times. Should I be using the -ta option to rpm, or
July 2002 00:41
To: Bill Michell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building RPMs again (was RE: [courier-users] Allow relay
from any IP if authenticated)
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Bill Michell wrote:
Not evil, perhaps, but not trivial.
I'm trying to build the rpms for the latest courier release
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:48:59 +0100
Bill Michell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
#Also, when it is recommended that building from RPMs should be done as
#non-root, it is strange that a file in /sbin should be referenced at all.
When does it mention /sbin? /sbin/chkconfig should only be done as a
--
Bill Michell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Juha Saarinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 July 2002 01:04
To: Bill Michell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Building RPMs again (was RE: [courier-users] Allow relay
from any IP if authenticated)
[snip]
Please trim
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 01:23:38 +0100
Bill Michell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
#[Bill Michell] It is in the Requires(post) lines scattered liberally through
#the spec file. Actually, it seems to have been the first part of the line
#that was causing RPM to choke, not the second...
I see from your
13 matches
Mail list logo
