Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jay Lee writes:
Sam could say better why 4xx errors aren't possible with .smtpfilter.
A message may have multiple recipients.
Couldn't a filter be aware of the number of recipients
and have more actions granted in case the number is 1?
What for?
A possible example
Why don't we use a default-deny approach and DNS whitelists?
That's the theme of a thought provoking article by Meng Wong:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_governance_an_antispam_perspective/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Lyndon Tiu wrote:
I wrote a maildroprc:
-
if \
( \
/^To:.*all.*/ \
\
( \
( /^From:.*user1.*/ ) \
\
( /^From:.*user2.*/ ) \
) \
)
{
to /mail/junk/Maildir
}
-
Now the maildroprc regex
A few mumblings about that patch
Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[...]
+#define FILTER_LIST_INCREMENT 8
+
+static char **filterlist = NULL;
+static int filterlistsize = 0;
+static int nfilters = 0;
+
+static void free_filters()
+{
+ if (filterlist != NULL)
+ {
+ for (int
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
[...] All filters must
give a green light, so it's not important which filter rejects it.
It may make sense to order them for efficiency reasons?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Lyndon Tiu wrote:
I wrote a maildroprc:
-
if \
( \
/^To:.*all.*/ \
\
( \
( /^From:.*user1.*/ ) \
\
( /^From:.*user2.*/ ) \
) \
)
{
to /mail/junk/Maildir
Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ ... ]
But now, I have a new challenge: coming up with a patch/enhancement to
the filtering mechanism which will cause a message to be accepted
without any further filtering. In other words, every filtering step
would result in a
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ ... ]
But now, I have a new challenge: coming up with a patch/enhancement to
the filtering mechanism which will cause a message to be accepted
without any further filtering. In other words, every filtering
Sam,
I don't use ldap, however ldapaddressbook failed to configure
and compile. Apparently, solaris has a problem with ldap.h:
it cannot be compiled unless lber.h is included before it.
Perhaps the patch attached may work...
diff -du courier-0.53.1.20060318/ldapaddressbook/configure.in
Josh Grebe wrote:
Hello,
I have been comtemplating writing a pre-DATA hook into courier to allow for more
efficient greylisting. I guess it would actually hook into the RCPT TO: handler.
That is much more lightweight for the receiving server.
The biggest problem with the current method (in
Sander Holthaus wrote:
[...]
Those md5's should be done carefully, as a sender might rewrite MIME
boundaries on the fly, assigning random values as required by the RFC.
Do those need to change on every retry as well? E.g. are they
rewritten / parsed as the message is send?
They _may_
Tuomas Silen writes:
Hi,
There seems to be a bug in couriertls (~every version of courier-imap) that
causes it to segmentation fault if there are files with no dots in the
certificate directory (peer_cert_dir). Openssl likes to put files like Makefile
there for some strange reason.
Problem
Gordon Messmer wrote:
JP wrote:
Sam, if someone else were to write an acceptable patch that updated
SQWebmail to handle larger cookies, would you be willing to accept it
into the main trunk?
While making that argument, consider that allowing greater input means
that you may increase the
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
However, why shouldn't webmail just discard unwanted cookies,
rather than storing them in the environment?
All cookies get stuffed into a single header. The header needs to be
parsed first, but this can't be done at this early stage
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
However, why shouldn't webmail just discard unwanted cookies,
rather than storing them in the environment?
All cookies get stuffed into a single header. The header needs to be
parsed first
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please !!! Help ... I am tired of compiling with make , gmake , dmake , sun's
and gnu LD's ...
GNU make is a perfectly working, POSIX compliant make.
Version 3.81 compiles and works out of the box even on Windows.
(I've only seen one package, ipf, suggesting not to
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
Anyone have another one to add to cbl.abuseat.org?
It's included in spamhaus' XBL
http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Ricardo Kleemann writes:
So using
BLACKLISTS='-block=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,BLOCK'
should take care of it?
Yup! You can add a 3rd var as, e.g.,
BLACKLISTS='-block=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,BLOCK,550 Rejected - see
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=@;'
I don't know how they do. Sometimes I
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
Thanks.
the '@' returns an ip with a ::: prefix. Is there any way to print out
the reject with only the IP?
Ooops, I didn't mind it... I disable IPv6 at build time.
BLACKLISTS='-block=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,BLOCK,550 Rejected - see
Lindsay Haisley writes:
I can always query the database (authmysql) directly, but since I'm going to
publish this I'd rather at least use a method which will work with courier
across any auth mechanism supported by the current courier configuration.
I have a script doing that using
Sam,
AC_CHECK_FUNC looks for functions and explicitly avoids macros,
which fails with BDB 4.xx versions that decorate function names and
#define db_env_create db_env_create_40xx.
The patch attached apparently works fine, after installing both
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sam,
AC_CHECK_FUNC looks for functions and explicitly avoids macros,
which fails with BDB 4.xx versions that decorate function names and
#define db_env_create db_env_create_40xx.
The patch attached apparently works fine, after installing
Hi,
I keep getting this message
# Checking listening processes
NEW: --WARN-- [lin003w] The process `couriertcpd' is listening on socket
57123 (UDP on every interface) is run by courier.
It looks bogus (otherwise it would have been named `courierudpd', eh?)
I asked on other lists to no
Sometimes configuring gets complicated, e.g. the BLACKLISTS
item in esmtpd, which changes quite often. I set it with
something like
ALIST=-block=blah...
ANOTHER=-block=...
# and then
BLACKLISTS=$ALIST $ANOTHER
Sysconftool silently discards anything after the first line.
OTOH, the patch
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Hi,
I keep getting this message
# Checking listening processes
NEW: --WARN-- [lin003w] The process `couriertcpd' is listening on
socket 57123 (UDP on every interface) is run by courier.
It looks bogus (otherwise it would have been
Sam Varshavchik wrote on Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:32:25 -0400:
Stefan Hornburg writes:
Hello,
I'm the Debian maintainer of Courier and try to build Debian packages
for courier-authlib 0.57 / courier 0.51 on Debian sarge.
courier-authlib 0.56 / courier 0.50 builds worked fine.
I appreciate
--- courier/libs/comtrack.original.c2005-01-23 03:34:46.0 +0100
+++ courier/libs/comtrack.c 2006-08-03 21:23:45.008312657 +0200
@@ -112,8 +112,10 @@
fp=fopen(namebuf, a);
if (fp)
+ {
fprintf(fp, %s %c%s\n, buf2, (char)status, addrbuf);
-
Since --with-transport isn't documented any more, I configured
Courier without it. Now I have a running courieruucp.
Should I comment it out from module.uucp, i.e.
#PROG=./courieruucp?
TIA
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
I added the following paragraph to dnsheader.txt:
In case the original message was not yours, your e-mail address
is probably being abused by spammers. To protect your e-mail
address, ask your network administrator to publish SPF information
for your domain: that way you will not
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
I added the following paragraph to dnsheader.txt:
In case the original message was not yours, your e-mail address
is probably being abused by spammers. To protect your e-mail
address, ask your network administrator to publish SPF
--- courier/module.local/local.original.c 2006-05-28 17:29:52.0
+0200
+++ courier/module.local/local.c2006-08-07 15:54:15.495792252 +0200
@@ -693,13 +693,13 @@
if (pid == 0)
{
char*argv[11];
+ int fd0 = fd;
close(0);
-
Sorry, I meant
--- courier/module.local/local.original.c 2006-05-28 17:29:52.0
+0200
+++ courier/module.local/local.c2006-08-07 16:08:02.727499591 +0200
@@ -693,13 +693,16 @@
if (pid == 0)
{
char*argv[11];
+ int fd0 = fd;
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sorry, I meant
Nope, I don't think you meant this either.
Oh my gosh, it must have been a hot afternoon...
So I just meant
--- courier/module.local/local.original.c 2006-05-28 17:29:52.0
+0200
+++ courier/module.local
Bernd Wurst wrote:
If the above is not true, you can use custom query string (have a look at the
end of authmysqlrc) and use something like
[...] WHERE account=LOWER('$(local_part)@$(domain)') [...]
The default query selects WHERE login_field = input
so it depends ho you defined that
Hi Jeremy,
Jeremy Davis wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The default query selects WHERE login_field = input
so it depends ho you defined that field (MYSQL_LOGIN_FIELD)
in the MySQL table:
CHAR values are sorted and compared in case-insensitive fashion
according to the default
Shawn Jones wrote:
I've set the following options in /etc/courier/bofh:
opt BOFHSPFHELO=all
opt BOFHSPFMAILFROM=pass,neutral,none,softfail,unknown
opt BOFHSPFFROM=pass,neutral,none,softfail,unknown
opt BOFHSPFHARDERROR=fail,softfail
opt BOFHSPFTRUSTME=1
opt BOFHSPFNOVERBOSE=1
Issue #1:
Shawn M. Jones wrote:
[...]
I also let 'error' for both FROM fields.
After you mentioned this I saw error for some legitimate mail in the
maillog. I've added that to the list too.
BOFHCHECKDNS should affect that too
Well, thank you Alessandro for clearning a lot of this up for me. I've
Wojtek Swiatek wrote:
A real life example would be: all emails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should
be bounced to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like the messages, as seen on the
gmail.com account, to look like as if they were sent by the original sender
That may violate SPF: in case the original
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Georg Lutz writes:
On 2006-09-06 04:37, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
There's no point, whatsoever, in a pre-data hook. The only thing known
at that time is the sender's IP and return address. The return address
Cheng Bruce wrote:
Would you please advise me if it is good enough to run in our
company(production) ?
There's a number of things I don't understand.
logfile /home/domains/maildrop.log
VERBOSE 9
DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir
TEST=/usr/bin/test -f
CUSTOM_FILTER=$HOME/.mailfilter
if (
Hi,
my log has these:
Sep 12 07:21:12 wmail courierd:
started,id=000CA6A9.450554B7.1F80,from=[EMAIL
PROTECTED],module=local,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/export/courier/tana.it/mylist!!,addr=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sep 12 07:21:12 wmail courierd: Waiting. shutdown time=none, wakeup time=none,
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sep 12 07:21:12 wmail courierlocal:
id=000CA6A9.450554B7.1F80,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],addr=[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:
Invalid address.
Sep 12 07:21:12 wmail courierlocal:
id=000CA6A9.450554B7.1F80,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],addr=[EMAIL
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Sep 12 07:21:12 wmail courierlocal:
id=000CA6A9.450554B7.1F80,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],addr=[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Invalid address.
Sep 12 07:21:12 wmail courierlocal:
id
Hi all,
the courierdeliver local module checks if the message
already contains a Delivered-To header with the same
recipient that it is about to deliver to. Is that needed?
That feature requires a wrapper around sendmail for resending
messages from command line. I use sed with something like:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
the courierdeliver local module checks if the message
already contains a Delivered-To header with the same
recipient that it is about to deliver to. Is that needed?
Yes.
Ok, thanks. Sorry for the silly question. I should have found a long
Papis wrote:
Hi all,
I want create some mailling list in courier mta using couriermlm.
I create the directory of mailling liste :
couriermlm create directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I create the two required dot file :
.courier-list
.courier-list-default
Hi all,
I currently can change html pages, but cannot easily add
features to webmail. By _easily_ I think I mean
- don't edit Courier's html templates,
- use PHP scripts if at all possible,
- integrated into Courier environment,
i.e. authentication, folders, etc.
One feature I'm thinking
Sunet Sysadmin wrote:
Hi,
i am trying to setup courier mail server. i am trying to figure out a
way that all mails comming will be filtered in by courier server and
forwarded to another mail server.
AFAIK, only global filtering does that. However, it cannot alter messages.
If the server
Christopher Chan writes:
The site appears to have been wiped clean?
The date is old, but content length is 0 (disk problem?)
telnet www.courier-mta.org 80
Trying 66.35.250.210...
Connected to vhost.sourceforge.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD /
Webmail currently obtains the email address from the html form.
The patch I propose replaces that with the official address
obtained from authentication. Often they are equal. However,
using advanced configuration features of Courier-Authlib,
it is possible to obtain different results. (In such
David Gomillion wrote:
charles uchu wrote:
I think it is understood that based on the current code in courier that,
even if there is an aliased domain set in hosteddomains, that you must
again explicitly state this aliasing in the aliases file for addresses
that are not mailboxes.
To cut
Jay Lee wrote:
On Mon, October 30, 2006 3:22 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got courier calling maildrop, and maildrop calls SA and
filtering. But the problem is, after it's been through maildrop, I want
it sent on to another computer. I'm using postfix for that (see maildrop
rule
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Webmail currently obtains the email address from the html form.
The patch I propose replaces that with the official address
obtained from authentication. Often they are equal. However,
using advanced configuration features of Courier-Authlib
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
[use the official email address rather than the one typed by the user]
That does not look right. It's going to screw up the subsequent call
to sqpcp_login(); which although is not frequently used, still should
not have to suffer.
I can't
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
AV:[use the official email address rather than the one typed by the user]
SV: [won't work]
pcp uses the same login as webmail.
Also, webmail uses AUTHADDR for building URLs.
Anyway, I see two cases where the user typed ID and the authenticated
login ID are
Nathan Harris wrote:
About two weeks ago, our server's spam load suddenly increased four
times. I am filtering all email through spamd and clamd.
Content filtering of course only happens after the message has been
received. IMHO, anti-spam should happen before.
In the past,
this was fine.
Marco Balmer wrote:
Is there a implementation for http://www.avira.com 's AntiVir solution?
Their AntiVir Unix MailGate works with Sendmail's milterlib. Courier has
more or less the same callbacks, however the details are slightly different.
One may try implement milterlib for Courier. It
sergio wrote:
I can't find any good answers for this problem.
When I telnet to my courier (25 port) and send to him MAIL FROM
command with correct mail address, he said 432 service temporarily
unavialable. And in maillog he write nothing bad. Maybe somebody fixed
that problem. Please
Tommy Braun wrote:
What about user role? Is it possible to configure special actions, e.g.
learn antispam ham/spam, set spam score, and similar?
No, QUICA just supports managing Users. There is one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] account which can do everything - users might
login to their accounts
Martin Orr wrote:
On 05/12/06 11:12, Anton Basistov wrote:
Ok. I'll ask from another side.
Can I configure Courier not to tell me about the wrong addresses? Even if
my
mail client very bad?
I did this once, using a localmailfilter,
I too
but I forget the details.
I didn't :-)
It is
Lucio Crusca wrote:
Here is my authmysqlrc (without sensitive informations):
-- authmysqlrc
[...]
MYSQL_HOME_FIELDhome
That's '/home/posta', not the user's home dir. (Look for a mailbox created
there.)
When that's correct, the maildir can get a suitable default after
Kenny Dail wrote:
Example: If my customer sends out a lot of mass-mailings and things, it's
possible that he gets on some IP-based blacklists. My wish would be that if
this customer gets on a ip-blacklist, that I am not on this list.
Another possible reason would be to restrict SPF policies.
Pardon me for jumping into this thread,
Jérôme Blion wrote:
[...]
I have an example where it could save me:
- mails are generated from SAP... As they are invoices, shipping
orders, programs can only run one time (because the invoice will appear
as a duplicata and no more as original). I
Eduardo Roldan wrote:
[...]
http://www.multitel.com.uy/eroldan/quica/quica2-20050620.tar.gz
in the installation_guide I read: In the /dbload/ [...] MySQL.sql
that contains the commands to create the database layout. [...]
Courier package has a file with similar commands.
Has it? I run `find .
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jeff writes:
Hi guys,
I was wondering if anyone has done anything related or knows if
DomainKeys will be implemented on Courier any time in the future?
No, since DomainKeys is patented by Yahoo, on GPL-incompatible terms.
I believe it is dual-licensed under
Bernd Wurst wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2006 10:42 schrieb Alessandro Vesely:
GPLv3 should
come in a few months and Courier's Copyright holder may want to use it.
Then, there will still be an incompatibility: would the DomainKeys
Identified Mail (DKIM) addition have to be reverted
Most incoming message events start their log history as
courieresmtpd: started,ip=[xx.xxx.x.xxx]
Successful delivery or an error indication terminate the event.
However, sometime there is no termination. IMO there should be
no log if the remote host QUITs, whilst abrupt TCP disconnection
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Actually - as a side thought... : wouldn't it be better to use an
envelope sender
(be it a mailer-daemon address - did i missed to configure it
somewhere) ?
i might not be the only one who rejects non-local/trusted mails with
an absent/invalid envelope sender
Manuel Schneider [Everything Open] wrote:
A wrapper skript, replacing the symlink /usr/sbin/sendmail which is used by
PHP told me, that sendmail gives error code 75.
EX_TEMPFAIL
Does the script fail _every_ time or just in certain cases, e.g.
system somewhat busy?
Manuel Schneider [Everything Open] wrote:
Manuel Schneider [Everything Open] wrote:
A wrapper skript, replacing the symlink /usr/sbin/sendmail which is used
by PHP told me, that sendmail gives error code 75.
EX_TEMPFAIL
Does the script fail _every_ time or just in certain cases, e.g.
system
lacks is the political will to do so.
Alessandro Vesely,
Free-lance programmer and service provider in Milano, Italy.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
Svetozar Mihailov wrote:
I am using full courier suite since version 0.37, [...]
Courier 0.52.2 + Authlib 0.58
Courier 0.54.1 + Authlib 0.59
Do you mean aliases stopped working when you upgraded [to which version]?
There are logs with real domains hidden:
does testmxlookup return the same
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
If I understood correctly the rest of this thread, at the moment it is
not a good idea to modify the message even once, within a
courierfilter. So it wouldn't be possible to save a modified copy,
which is desired in my as well
Julian Mehnle wrote on Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:08:34 +0100:
Courierfilters cannot currently modify messages, so Courier would have to
be modified to either allow the former or to directly support DomainKeys
message signing.
I'm amazed at NUJ advises boycott of ‘unethical’ Yahoo!
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Ironically, this, too, defies Courier's attempts at being efficient
There's nothing ironic about it.
There is some irony: the incongruity between the efficiency that
courierfilter design is expected to deliver and the
Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Does the MYSQL_SELECT_CLAUSE (in authmysqlrc) still work,
or has that option been removed?
I'm using it with a query similar to what I wrote in
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=37341273
It works fine.
I can't seem to get it to work, and I'm not sure if
- - wrote:
If I change now the settings in the DB and configure that the email address
equals the username for login, then of course it's working for maildrop but
sadly then I have also to use the email address as login name for webmail
and mailclient. But that's not what I want!
As a
Jérôme Blion wrote:
- Bonus question: how to disable delivery process in order to fill my
queue by myself?
chmod g+r .mailfilter
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
Harry Duncan wrote:
Yeah, searches are a client side feature, and should be so. The
searches may be a limitation for sqwebmail, but because the sqwebmail
system churns out customisable HTML, it would be very easy to tie in
the power of shell based searches into sqwebmail, and have very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the point of having RFCs if no one enforces them?
They made choices. I can not control that.
They probably deserve a submission to http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
-
Using Tomcat
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
Is there a way for the postmaster system alias to apply to all domains?
Yes, that's what a shell script is for. Write a shell script to generate
a postmaster alias for all domains.
Ok. but I'm not sure what you mean by generate a postmaster alias for all
domains?
Antonio Di Monaco wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mail loop - already have my Delivered-To: header.
The spammer sent a message to KNOWN_USER and specified UNKNOWN_USER as
the sender. The original message intentionally included a Delivered-To
header. Courier checks that header during local delivery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible to use e.g. gmail as smtp-relay with courier?
It is possible to configure courier to relay through another server.
However, you should find a server who accepts relaying your mail.
I don't think gmail does that. Your ISP may do it.
My problem
is,
Andreas Wittig wrote:
My problem is, that hotmail accepts my mail. The logs look normaly:
[...]
But the mail never appears in the inbox of the hotmail-account. Seems
like hotmail has an own blacklist.
Yes, you're right. I made a few tests, varying MTA, MAILFROM, FROM, and
messages never
As stated in the docs, it is not safe to filter on From: header.
Some mailing lists (e.g. collab.net's) do not publish SPF records,
thus BOFHSPFFROM should be all or off to accept that mail.
One of these weeks I'll find the time to experiment with an
additional mailfromempty keyword and
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
I run an old version of courier (0.44.2), have been using it for years and
very happy with it.
For some strange reason my mailfilter has stopped working for $MATCH1
recognition. It used to work fine but something is strange.
I have something like this:
if
Aidas Kasparas wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Providing a signature is a client's job. Developing that in
the server requires unfolding mime structures and dealing
with client generated html content, which may be weird.
Well, at least to some extent courier-mta already does mime unfolding
Bill Merriam wrote:
I don't know if including the Delivered-To header is an effort to get
around spam filters or just an incompetent spammer. I could stop this
by rejecting mail that fails SPF but then I have the classic problem of
rejecting all the mailing list mail I receive.
That spammer
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Olivier Sannier wrote:
How do I locate courier's spool folder? Is it written in some file?
[...]the courier.config module
knows about that location, and searches for it.
shouldn't that run `courier-config | egrep '^localstatedir'` ?
Jérôme Blion wrote:
if( /^X-Virus-Status: INFECTED/:h )
{
`echo INFECTE /tmp/maildrop/virus`
exit
}
- I don't want viruses to be delivered ! I want correct mails to be
delivered.
- Is it mandatory to have a to instruction at the end of the
maildroprc?
- The
Jonas Genannt wrote:
if (/^To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/:h )
{
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
[...]
Is it possible that maildrop does not change the Return-Path?
I'd say one _should_ change the return-path, e.g. specifying
-f [EMAIL PROTECTED] as an option to sendmail. (I assume that
[EMAIL
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
in pop3 log file I get theese errors:
ERR: rename(./new/1179507568.V804I4c4004.mail4
That is the only message that looks somewhat strange. It probably happened
while moving files from ./new to ./cur. The message itself is truncated,
as the target name and error reason
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
in pop3 log file I get theese errors:
ERR: rename(./new/1179507568.V804I4c4004.mail4
That is the only message that looks somewhat strange. It
probably happened while moving files from ./new to ./cur.
The message itself is truncated, as the target name and error
John wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
in pop3 log file I get theese errors:
ERR: rename(./new/1179507568.V804I4c4004.mail4
That is the only message that looks somewhat strange. It
probably happened while moving files from ./new to ./cur.
The message
Mark Constable wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 16:37:09 Gordon Messmer wrote:
a particular user is allowed to send email to only list of authorized
mail address - say a list of 20 people , he should not be allowed to
send mail to anybody besides the people on this list
No. In particular, it's
Tim Boneko wrote:
However, there's one little configuration issue i can't resolve myself.
Outgoing mails should have their sender address rewritten to the real
mail address (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] should become [EMAIL PROTECTED]). How do
i set
that up?
What is kiste? Courier assumes it is
maximatt wrote:
1) i have my virtual users under directory server
2) i configure (and install) maildrop with the options:
--prefix=/etc/maildrop --enable-maildirquota--enable-authlib
If you use courier as MTA, you should use the version of maildrop
included in it.
If you use a different MTA,
maximatt wrote:
2007/6/11, Alessandro Vesely [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
maximatt wrote:
1) i have my virtual users under directory server
2) i configure (and install) maildrop with the options:
--prefix=/etc/maildrop --enable-maildirquota--enable-authlib
Marco Balmer wrote:
Hi Bernd
Am Mi, 20.06.2007, 07:40, schrieb Bernd Wurst:
v=spf1 mx
mx:exchange.comparis.ch ip4:194.209.79.216 .
^^
courieresmtpd:
error,relay=:::194.209.79.216
Ah now I understand.
Then the SPF record should be v=spf1 mx mx:comparis.ch. ?
Jesse Molina wrote:
Sending mail from other users on these systems works perfectly. This is
also not a problem of the MTA accepting inbound mail to the root user,
as I successfully receive those mails.
check http://www.courier-mta.org/install.html#aliases
101 - 200 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
