On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:38:45AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ricardo Signes
perl.cpanw...@rjbs.manxome.org wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:42:35]
03. Deprecate YAML Tiny dialect for JSON
Strongly agree.
* I would like one
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote:
I see 01, 02 and 03 all part of the same discussion really. There seems
little point in discussing YAML if we think moving to JSON is the better
option. I'm with the strongly agree camp on the first part of above :)
(and
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Ricardo Signes
perl.cpanw...@rjbs.manxome.org wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:42:35]
03. Deprecate YAML Tiny dialect for JSON
Branch available: http://github.com/rjbs/cpan-meta-spec/commits/03-json
+1
(I guess I just needed to keep
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:42:35]
03. Deprecate YAML Tiny dialect for JSON
Strongly agree.
* I would like one violation of the JSON spec: allow Javascript-style
comments. My one beef with the JSON spec. Elliot
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ricardo Signes
perl.cpanw...@rjbs.manxome.org wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:42:35]
03. Deprecate YAML Tiny dialect for JSON
Strongly agree.
* I would like one violation of the JSON spec: allow Javascript-style
comments. My one beef
5 matches
Mail list logo