Hi Bartek,
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 23:42:36 +0200, Bartek Palmowski wrote:
Hi
(this is my first post here \:D/)
Pkgmk deletes work dir before performing build, I think it would be very
handy feature to optionally allow building package from existing work dir,
it would work very well
Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
//So you'd end up with a package you can't reproduce after the 'work' is
removed, because you didn't make patches from your changes. Seems like a
major step back, and nothing that should be actively encouraged.
Pkgfile is the only interface to interact with building
Bartek Palmowski [2008-05-23 09:07]:
Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
//So you'd end up with a package you can't reproduce after the 'work' is
removed, because you didn't make patches from your changes. Seems like a
major step back, and nothing that should be actively encouraged.
Pkgfile is the
Bartek Palmowski [2008-05-23 09:25]:
I wonder whether we can protect ourselves from releasing a port that
only worked because we messed with the srcdir directly :)
maybe we could make pkgmk _not_ create the final package if -b is
used,
so you just get to see whether the
Juergen Daubert [2008-05-23 09:55]:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:06:30AM +1000, Lucas Hazel wrote:
[...]
1 -
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.crux.general/2940
I submitted that patch almost a year ago, and it wasn't accepted. So I
guess core didn't think it's
On Thu, 22 May 2008 23:42:36 +0200
Bartek Palmowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
(this is my first post here \:D/)
Pkgmk deletes work dir before performing build, I think it would
be very handy feature to optionally allow building package from
existing work dir, it would work very well
