Re: [crux-devel] TODO28: /run

2011-04-04 Thread Michal Soltys
W dniu 04.04.2011 11:10, Moritz Wilhelmy pisze: Dear CRUXers, TODO28 in the wiki mentions the possible inclusion of /run in the next release. While I see the point of this for other distributions, I'm not completely convinced we should do so as well. I didn't want to break this discussion

Re: [crux-devel] [ports] pkg-config, new dependency to glib

2011-05-20 Thread Michal Soltys
W dniu 20.05.2011 14:31, Juergen Daubert pisze: Sorry, that's exactly what I mean: move the glib-libraries required by udev to /lib and leave all the other stuff beneath /usr. The same way we are doing it with libusb or acl for example. Or do I miss something? That's what mentioned option

Re: [crux-devel] [ports] pkg-config, new dependency to glib

2011-05-22 Thread Michal Soltys
On 11-05-22 11:27, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote: Juergen Daubert [2011-05-16 19:19]: Hi, the latest pkg-config, version 0.26, no longer ships with a bundled glib but depends on a system glib. That means core/pkg-config would depend on opt/glib, which is of course not acceptable. [...] b) move

[crux-devel] a state of udev 171+

2011-06-05 Thread Michal Soltys
A few things have piled up, so before any simple patches to get it up to speed (with other related or no stuff), maybe you have some other ideas/plans: 1) hwdb This is enabled by default, but de-facto depends on usbutils (usb.ids) and pciutils (pci.ids). Which is prefectly fine, apart from

Re: [crux-devel] a state of udev 171+

2011-06-08 Thread Michal Soltys
On 11-06-05 19:54, Juergen Daubert wrote: 1) hwdb This is enabled by default, but de-facto depends on usbutils (usb.ids) and pciutils (pci.ids). Which is prefectly fine, apart from /usr mounts. Nothing anywhere close to important here judging from egrep, but there're a few rules that set

[crux-devel] rc v2 headsup/info

2011-10-15 Thread Michal Soltys
Hi, This is a headup about a certain thing that I've been breeding inbetween sending patches to dracut mailing list ;) Current crux scripts are kind of ... [too] minimal. While certainly they are trivial to expand, they de-facto (or at least that was my experience so far) require expanding

Re: [crux-devel] rc-ng scripts

2011-10-26 Thread Michal Soltys
On 26.10.2011 13:07, Juergen Daubert wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:00:15PM +0200, Michal Soltys wrote: Ok, as promised, this is fresh approach to initscripts. Perhaps a few rough edges here and there, but is thoroughly tested (modulo just-a-moment ago minor changes I did) thanks a lot

Re: [crux-devel] rc-ng scripts

2011-10-27 Thread Michal Soltys
On 11-10-27 11:56, Fredrik Rinnestam wrote: I have to say, i started by looking at rc.conf and i was taken back a bit. Granted, most is comments - but it still spanned my entire terminal screen. The beauty with our current rc is that it takes about 5 seconds to figure out exactly how everything

Re: [crux-devel] rc-ng scripts

2011-10-29 Thread Michal Soltys
On 28.10.2011 09:53, Juergen Daubert wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:17:01PM +0200, Michal Soltys wrote: [...] Btw, shouldn't we try to add application specific stuff like the one for lvm and mdadm via the corresponding port, a kind of run-control directory with short scripts added

Re: [crux-devel] rc-ng scripts

2011-10-31 Thread Michal Soltys
On 11-10-31 11:31, Juergen Daubert wrote: - setting KEYMAP=de-latin1 in rc.conf dosn't work, dunno why but a error message I saw might be related: CRUX: setting terminal blank/poweroff timers CRUX: setting hostname to: jue CRUX: updating timezone to: Europe/Berlin CRUX: + random