On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
On 2 July 2013 16:07, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 2 July 2013 11:25, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
does it provide forward secrecy (via k' =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/13 13:26, danimoth wrote:
Not directly related to remailer, but what about dc nets [1] ?
[1] The Dining Cryptographers Problem:
Unconditional Sender and Recipient Untraceability (David Chaum)
DC nets have two major drawbacks: they
On 30/06/13 at 07:32pm, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
I'd love to see a revitalisation of remailer research, focussing on
unlinkability (which we know many people would benefit from) rather
than sender anonymity (which fewer people need, and which is prone to
abuse that discourages people from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Announcing the release of a more secure Python wrapper for GnuPG on PyPI.
About this release
- --
This is the first stable release of a module (named 'gnupg' on PyPI)[0], which
originated as a fork of python-gnupg.[1] Several
On 03/07/2013 13:31, Michael Rogers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/13 13:26, danimoth wrote:
Not directly related to remailer, but what about dc nets [1] ?
[1] The Dining Cryptographers Problem:
Unconditional Sender and Recipient Untraceability (David
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 2 July 2013 11:25, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
does it provide forward secrecy (via k' = H(k)?).
Resumed [SSL] sessions do not give forward
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Wasabee,
I'm no expert either but I'll try to answer to the best of my
understanding. I'm CCing Henry Corrigan-Gibbs, one of the Dissent
designers, who will hopefully correct my mistakes. :-)
On 03/07/13 17:11, Wasabee wrote:
is it really
On 2013-07-04 2:11 AM, Wasabee wrote:
On 03/07/2013 13:31, Michael Rogers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/13 13:26, danimoth wrote:
Not directly related to remailer, but what about dc nets [1] ?
[1] The Dining Cryptographers Problem:
Unconditional Sender
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:25:50PM +0200, Adam Back wrote:
I think it time to deprecate non-https (and non-forward secret
ciphersuites.) Compute power has moved on, session cacheing works,
symmetric crypto is cheap.
A reasonable use for the $3k the OP is talking about would be to add
