Re: HMAC Benchmark

2017-03-19 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 4:59:44 PM UTC-4, Abderrahim HAJJI SOUALFI wrote: > > Thanks Jeff for your answer. > I run the Benchmark test(cryptest.exe b 3 2.0 > benchmark.html). I > had just 1 variant result : > > > > So I add those lines, in bench1.cpp file, to have all the statistics, but

Re: HMAC Benchmark

2017-03-19 Thread Abderrahim HAJJI SOUALFI
Thanks Jeff for your answer. I run the Benchmark test(cryptest.exe b 3 2.0 > benchmark.html). I had just 1 variant result : So I add those lines,

Re: HMAC Benchmark

2017-03-19 Thread Abderrahim HAJJI SOUALFI
Thanks Jeff for your answer. I run the Benchmark test(cryptest.exe b 3 2.0 > benchmark.html). I had just 1 variant result : So I add those lines,

Re: HMAC Benchmark

2017-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> I want to know a benchmark comparison of the HMAC(*keyed-hash message > authentication code*) variants: HMAC-SHA-1, HMAC-SHA-224, HMAC-SHA-256, > HMAC-SHA-384 and HMAC-SHA-512. > > I will use it in ad hoc case, and I want choose the right one! > > Thanks in advance. >