Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Cryptopp

2017-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Walton
FYI... Coverity Scan results for Windows x64. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:20 PM Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Cryptopp To: webmas...@cryptopp.com Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s)

Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Cryptopp

2017-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Walton
FYI... Coverity Scan results for Windows x86. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:34 PM Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Cryptopp To: webmas...@cryptopp.com Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s)

HMAC Benchmark

2017-03-17 Thread Abderrahim HAJJI SOUALFI
Hi I want to know a benchmark comparison of the HMAC(*keyed-hash message authentication code*) variants: HMAC-SHA-1, HMAC-SHA-224, HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384 and HMAC-SHA-512. I will use it in ad hoc case, and I want choose the right one! Thanks in advance. -- -- You received this

Re: HMAC Benchmark

2017-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> I want to know a benchmark comparison of the HMAC(*keyed-hash message > authentication code*) variants: HMAC-SHA-1, HMAC-SHA-224, HMAC-SHA-256, > HMAC-SHA-384 and HMAC-SHA-512. > > I will use it in ad hoc case, and I want choose the right one! > > Thanks in advance. >