FYI... Coverity Scan results for Windows x64.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:20 PM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Cryptopp
To: webmas...@cryptopp.com
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s)
FYI... Coverity Scan results for Windows x86.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:34 PM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Cryptopp
To: webmas...@cryptopp.com
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s)
Hi
I want to know a benchmark comparison of the HMAC(*keyed-hash message
authentication code*) variants: HMAC-SHA-1, HMAC-SHA-224, HMAC-SHA-256,
HMAC-SHA-384 and HMAC-SHA-512.
I will use it in ad hoc case, and I want choose the right one!
Thanks in advance.
--
--
You received this
> I want to know a benchmark comparison of the HMAC(*keyed-hash message
> authentication code*) variants: HMAC-SHA-1, HMAC-SHA-224, HMAC-SHA-256,
> HMAC-SHA-384 and HMAC-SHA-512.
>
> I will use it in ad hoc case, and I want choose the right one!
>
> Thanks in advance.
>