Goals:
1/ Usable in any given screen width (ie/6 fixed at 780 width)
2/ Look and feel: macho (off-topic comments appreciated off-list, please)
Constructive suggestions and comments appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/
css
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/css/style.css
Best,
Morning David
You wrote
Dunno about IE/8 but imagine it will also break the same way all browser
will at 800 and drop the right column at less than that ;-) .
This could be a nice touch:
p{ /*font-size:.8em;*/}
Thanks for taking a minute to look at this page, It's appreciated.
I am / was
Morning Georg
You wrote about www.nannery.net .
Looks a bit strange on narrow windows, but the same in all browsers -
including IE8.
(snipped a bit)
http://www.gunlaug.no
Thanks for taking a minute to look at this page, It's appreciated.
As I pointed out to DL, I am / was when I posted /
Morning all
I'd appreciate it if some of you with IE 8 would have a look at
www.nannery.net and let me know if there are any problems.
This is a conversions from tables Works as I expect in IE 6- 7, FF
3.0.7 and Opera 9.00 on Win XP Pro SP3.
Thanks in advance.
Jim Nannery
blog -
JWN wrote:
Morning all
I'd appreciate it if some of you with IE 8 would have a look at
www.nannery.net and let me know if there are any problems.
This is a conversions from tables Works as I expect in IE 6- 7, FF
3.0.7 and Opera 9.00 on Win XP Pro SP3.
Thanks in advance.
Jim
JWN wrote:
I'd appreciate it if some of you with IE 8 would have a look at
www.nannery.net and let me know if there are any problems.
Looks a bit strange on narrow windows, but the same in all browsers -
including IE8.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
OK I have this page it works fine in Safari, FF on Mac.
I did take notice that if I added a wrapper around the header to the footer
the maincontent bgcolor moves to the top of the manicontent section.
Now if I move the closing div for the maincontent so it is outside of the
footer closing div
Good Morning;
The page in question
http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_properties.htm
is pretty simple but it is another step for me in using best practices.
This uses no tables and I believe my CSS is pretty lean and clean.
Right now I use Javascript to display
Del Wegener wrote:
Good Morning;
The page in question
http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_properties.htm
is pretty simple but it is another step for me in using best practices.
This uses no tables and I believe my CSS is pretty lean and clean.
I pass:
David Laakso wrote:
Del Wegener wrote:
Good Morning;
The page in question
http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_properties.htm
is pretty simple but it is another step for me in using best practices.
This uses no tables and I believe my CSS is pretty lean
In the wonderful world of personal opinion, setting the primary content
font-size to suit your preference, rather than users preference does not
look okay to me.
Nor I'm not crazy about trying to decipher or read anything in print-media
or on the Web that is red, white, and blue.
A
David Laakso wrote to Del,
In the wonderful world of personal opinion, setting the primary content
font-size to suit your preference, rather than users preference does
not
look okay to me.
A line-measure of 85 percent of the screen will be difficult for users
with very wide widows.
Del Wegener wrote:
http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_properties.htm
You frequently make similar comments about font-size. I started with
font-size at 100% in the body and then set the other font sizes relative to
that by using em measurements.
The
, June 29, 2008 3:10 PM
To: Del Wegener
Cc: css
Subject: Re: [css-d] Page Check please
Del Wegener wrote:
http://www.drdelmath.com/special_topics/function/functions_quadratic_p
roperties.htm You frequently make similar comments about
font-size. I
started with font-size at 100
There is one display issue that I did see. While you did fix the centering
with respect to the radio buttons, when printed, the heading is no longer
centered.
...Rob
Thanks Rob;
I will fix that. It is centered on the content, but not on the page.
Thanks for the catch.
Del
Page Check - my first fully CSS page multi column layout
http://beta.handmade-paper.us/page/CPO/CTGY/mbt
See what you think - tear it up.
This page only as I have not verified other templates on the site.
Navbar is not done yet.
Page should be a fully fluid multi column layout - no tables.
The
Barrett wrote:
http://beta.handmade-paper.us/page/CPO/CTGY/mbt
See what you think - tear it up.
Barrett
Seems fine to me in Mac Opera, FF, Camino, and Safari; and, in XP IE/7
and IE/6.
Holds decent font-scaling and folds well from a full to narrow window
cross-browser.
FWIW, I
Good to hear it works so far.
Yeah the background color has been a paradox of just what you say and
the known branding of the site now for so many years.
I have contemplated seeing if someone could help me come up with some
sort of javascript chunk where I could allow the user to change
the
Barrett wrote:
Good to hear it works so far.
Yeah the background color has been a paradox of just what you say and
the known branding of the site now for so many years.
Barrett
http://beta.handmade-paper.us/page/CPO/CTGY/mbt
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the
Hello everyone,
Please check this image:
http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/images/example-image.jpg
against this page:
http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/showcase-template.html
http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/showcase.css
and you'll see
Erin Spangler wrote:
Hello everyone,
Please check this image:
http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/images/example-image.jpg
against this page:
http://www.thedogsonline.com/temp-site/new-showcase/showcase-template.html
http://www.ricochet.org/ricochet2/company_principal.html
i haven't yet viewed the page in msie; only opera and firefox on the
mac. i'll deal with msie when the page is stable
gap issue:
at the top of the page (on top of yellow box and menus), i'm getting
a gap.
i've tried zeroing out
Ron Zisman wrote:
http://www.ricochet.org/ricochet2/company_principal.html
i haven't yet viewed the page in msie; only opera and firefox on the
mac. i'll deal with msie when the page is stable
gap issue:
at the top of the page (on top of yellow box and menus), i'm getting
a gap.
Ron Zisman wrote:
http://www.ricochet.org/ricochet2/company_principal.html
font question/issue
originally, i speced .8em font size on html/body
looked and worked fine. i know it's a no-no as i've been informed it
causes issue in msie, i have been taught (by a list member) to use
100%
Morning List
I'd appreciate it if some of you would look at
www.sylvesterneal.com/index2.html
especially with Mac / Safari browsers. I have (and test in) Safari Win 3.0
and all seems fine but I don't have enough faith in it for final production.
Should be good to go in all other major
OS X 10.4.10; Safari 3.0.3; Camino 1.5:
Just basic poking around on the site …
everything looks good with 1 exception:
On the home page in Safari, there is no white space between the portrait and
the body of text, i.e. This web site is designed serve the Districts … is
flush left against the
On 5 Oct 2007, at 14:17, Jim Nannery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd appreciate it if some of you would look at
www.sylvesterneal.com/index2.html
Hi Jim,
Mac OS X v10.4.10
Safari beta 3 - the main text is tight against the gold edge of the
picture
Firefox 2.0.0.7 - text is okay but picture
At 6:13 PM -0500 10/5/07, Jim Nannery wrote:
I'd appreciate it if some of you would look at
http://www.sylvesterneal.com/index2.html
especially with Mac / Safari browsers. I have (and test in) Safari Win 3.0
and all seems fine but I don't have enough faith in it for final production.
CHOP
If
I have just finished a new page design. This is my
first using a fixed width page. It looks OK on
Windows IE6/7 and Firefox.
Can you please validate on other OS and browsers?
Also, any comments on the design would be appreciated.
The URL is
Scott Povlot wrote:
I have just finished a new page design. This is my
first using a fixed width page. It looks OK on
Windows IE6/7 and Firefox.
Can you please validate on other OS and browsers?
Also, any comments on the design would be appreciated.
The URL is
Thanks, David.
I changed the #shop width to 200px. That's much
better.
However, I am not sure what you mean about Eighty
percent of default (on body) is kind of tiny start
point for those using a high dpi monitor. What
resolution are you using? What do you suggest for a
font setting?
Scott
Scott Povlot wrote:
Thanks, David.
I changed the #shop width to 200px. That's much
better.
However, I am not sure what you mean about Eighty
percent of default (on body) is kind of tiny start
point for those using a high dpi monitor. What
resolution are you using? What do you suggest
David Laakso wrote:
I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to
work in all versions of win/ie.
Comments, suggestions, and links to an anger management seminar
appreciated.
Thanks.
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Best,
~dL
Hi David,
The
Ray Leventhal wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Best,
~dL
Hi David,
The layout looks good in Win: FF1.5/2.0 IE 6/7. In WinFF 2.0, the link
for GF Safe Lists shows GF underlined. Not so in my view in FF1.5 or IE
6 or 7.
~Ray
David Laakso wrote:
I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to
work in all versions of win/ie.
Comments, suggestions, and links to an anger management seminar
appreciated.
Thanks.
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Best,
~dL
Looks great!
On 08-Jul-07, at 10:55 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Comments, suggestions, and links to an anger management seminar
appreciated.
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
As always, I wish I'd picked out those colours myself. I tried very
hard to break it in the browsers (all OS X) that I
I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to
work in all versions of win/ie.
Comments, suggestions, and links to an anger management seminar
appreciated.
Thanks.
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
David, I just opened up IE5.01 and, as far as I can
~davidLaakso a écrit :
A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated.
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Hi
Mac OS X
Firefox 2.0.0.4 and the geckos (Mozilla, Netscape)
#secondary img.rht {index.css (line 465)
display:block;
float:right;
margin:6px 3% 3px 0pt;
On Jul 8, 2007, at 1:25 AM, David Laakso wrote:
I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is
supposed to
work in all versions of win/ie.
It does work just fine -- unless you count that the left add may
overlap the last nav-element on extremely narrow windows and font-
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
On 08-Jul-07, at 10:55 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Comments, suggestions, and links to an anger management seminar
appreciated.
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
As always, I wish I'd picked out those colours myself. I tried very
hard to break it in the
At 1:25 AM -0400 7/8/07, David Laakso wrote:
I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to
work in all versions of win/ie.
Comments, suggestions, and links to an anger management seminar
appreciated.
Thanks.
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Best,
~dL
Luis Speciale wrote:
~davidLaakso a écrit :
A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated.
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
code and specific issues mentioned trimmed
Luis
Luis, you have raised some very good points and I appreciate your
Donna Jones wrote:
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
David, I just opened up IE5.01 and, as far as I can tell, it works
perfectly! Good work! could he be looking in IE4??!! ...trimmed]
cheers and good luck finding an anger management seminar, I notice
that no one has
David Laakso wrote:
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Best,
~dL
It even works on my Dell laptop (IE 6) - with UseHR on or off. FWIW,
Lynx and Fangs are also happy.
Lori
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ingo Chao wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to
work in all versions of win/ie.
Comments, suggestions, and links to an anger management seminar
appreciated.
Thanks.
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Best,
L Lay wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Best,
~dL
It even works on my Dell laptop (IE 6) - with UseHR on or off. FWIW,
Lynx and Fangs are also happy.
Lori
These are important considerations in my book, as is Phlippe's
I get frequent reminders from the guy that the thing [1] is supposed to
work in all versions of win/ie.
Comments, suggestions, and links to an anger management seminar
appreciated.
Thanks.
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/ct1/
Best,
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Luc wrote:
Good evening Roger,
It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 12:38:55 GMT-0400 (which was
13:38:55 where I live) Roger Roelofs would write:
snipped a bit
One of the beauties of allowing floats to drop is
that the content is conveniently viewable at more screen/window
Good morning James,
It was foretold that on 20/6/2007 @ 08:23:40 GMT-0400 (which was
09:23:40 where I live) James Gadrow would write:
Place your ie code in a conditional comment so it doesn't mess up the
page in other browsers.
Yeah, it seems that's the only way out :-)
Anyways, tnx for
Good morning list,
At the moment i'm without IE7 on my machine. Could somebody check
this page on IE7?
http://www.dzinelabs.com/projects/MP/Pages/roger
Does it hold together when resizing the viewport?
TIA
--
Best regards,
Luc
Powered by The Bat!
Luc wrote:
Good morning list,
At the moment i'm without IE7 on my machine. Could somebody check
this page on IE7?
http://www.dzinelabs.com/projects/MP/Pages/roger
Does it hold together when resizing the viewport?
TIA
Only problem I see is that the last letter in your
Good morning James,
It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 09:16:57 GMT-0400 (which was
10:16:57 where I live) James Gadrow would write:
Only problem I see is that the last letter in your header is overlapping
your right hand image.
Is that some IE7 bug i'm not aware of? Or just setting the
Luc wrote:
Good morning James,
It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 09:16:57 GMT-0400 (which was
10:16:57 where I live) James Gadrow would write:
Only problem I see is that the last letter in your header is overlapping
your right hand image.
Is that some IE7 bug i'm not aware
Luc,
On Jun 19, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Luc wrote:
Good morning James,
It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 09:16:57 GMT-0400 (which was
10:16:57 where I live) James Gadrow would write:
Only problem I see is that the last letter in your header is
overlapping
your right hand image.
Is that
Good afternoon Roger,
It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 10:14:22 GMT-0400 (which was
11:14:22 where I live) Roger Roelofs would write:
snipped a bit
This design assumes users will browse at full screen and have large
monitors, and neither is true in my case. I only ever see the
Good afternoon James,
It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 10:02:58 GMT-0400 (which was
11:02:58 where I live) James Gadrow would write:
snipped a bit
I presume
you either need a hasLayout trigger somewhere that contains your header,
or (depending upon how you laid out the page) you may
Luc,
On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Luc wrote:
Good afternoon Roger,
It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 10:14:22 GMT-0400 (which was
11:14:22 where I live) Roger Roelofs would write:
snipped a bit
This design assumes users will browse at full screen and have large
monitors, and
Good evening Roger,
It was foretold that on 19/6/2007 @ 12:38:55 GMT-0400 (which was
13:38:55 where I live) Roger Roelofs would write:
snipped a bit
One of the beauties of allowing floats to drop is
that the content is conveniently viewable at more screen/window
sizes, but that means
any idea why IE 6 and 7 are throwing off the content div to the right on this
site-in-progress?
site: http://ambientglow.com/garage/priestess/web/index.html
CSS: http://www.ambientglow.com/garage/priestess/web/css/priestess.css
Thanks,
Peg
Peggy Coats wrote:
any idea why IE 6 and 7 are throwing off the content div to the right on this
site-in-progress?
site: http://ambientglow.com/garage/priestess/web/index.html
CSS: http://www.ambientglow.com/garage/priestess/web/css/priestess.css
Hi Peg. You'll need to change quite a
Thanks Audra and Marc -- I'm still working through how positioning
works, so this is a good lesson for me. I appreciate you both taking
the time to plow through the code and help me out.
Peg
On 6/19/07, Audra Coldiron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peggy Coats wrote:
any idea why IE 6 and 7 are
Good evening list,
Could some good soul give me some feedback on the following page:
http://www.dzinelabs.com/projects/MP/Pages/werkendvoorbeeldcsslist2.html
Css is embedded.
Requests:
how does it look at 600x800, Moz, FF, IE?
--
Best regards,
Luc
Hi All,
Can you please click on the faces on the left. I want to make sure that two
onclick events work that the person's bio comes up and a detail photo comes
up too. I am especially interested in internet explorer 6.0 and older.
http://www.bartlettsfarm.com/staff1.html
Many Thanks,
Noah
i'm seeing bios pop up but no images besides the first in ie6
Jeff
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ --
Hi all,
I'm coding this crazy layout with lots of rules dividing up the space,
and so far it is coming together pretty well, but I am up against a
problem in IE (6+7) that I can't figure out the cause of.
Here is the basic page:
http://test.hinshawdesign.com/pfg/round2/template_css_v3.1.html
Don Hinshaw wrote:
http://test.hinshawdesign.com/pfg/round2/template_css_v3.1.html
My intuition tells me that it has something to do with the floats
above the footer, but I fear I am in a little over my depth.
You're close enough :-)
Add a 'hasLayout'[1] trigger...
#footer {width: 100%;}
You're close enough :-)
Add a 'hasLayout'[1] trigger...
#footer {width: 100%;}
...to make IE recognize footer as a block that shall clear floats as
one unit.
regards
Georg
Thanks Georg,
I love and hate how you make it so simple! You've bailed me out more
than once.
Best,
Hi All,
Can I please get a page check on www.oneyed.com/mt/vendors/ideagen
I have checked it with FF2 / IE7, but don't have access to any of the other
browsers.
If there are glaring mistakes in my CSS, please let me know, because if this
looks okay across browser land it will become the
Kevin J Pledger wrote:
Hi All,
Can I please get a page check on www.oneyed.com/mt/vendors/ideagen
I have checked it with FF2 / IE7, but don't have access to any of the other
browsers.
If there are glaring mistakes in my CSS, please let me know, because if this
looks okay across
Hi Kevin,
I've checked it in Mac Firefox 1.5. Everything seems to be order, if
you didn't want the horizontal-stripe white background going down to
the footer on the left and right cols.
The image 'Secured Network Solutions' has shifted left about 10px
beyond the left margin of your central
Hi folks -
Can I get a couple of eyeballs on this page, please? None of the
links go anywhere, but I'd like critique of the page in especially
MS. It validates, it looks good in Safari, FF for Mac, and Opera for
Mac
Any comments that might be off topic are welcome, but only in direct
Hi folks -
Could I get a page check on http://newsite.outdoorimage.com, please?
I work in Mac, and have looked at it on Firefox, Opera, Safari, and
Camino. I need IE for PC 6 and 7 if you have it. Everything
validates so far. None of the links work yet.
Thank you kindly,
Keith Burgin
Keith Burgin wrote:
Hi folks -
Could I get a page check on http://newsite.outdoorimage.com, please?
I work in Mac, and have looked at it on Firefox, Opera, Safari, and
Camino. I need IE for PC 6 and 7 if you have it. Everything
validates so far. None of the links work yet.
Thank
your support.
The 'fixed' problem implies I modify the design?
Best.
Larry
From: ~davidLaakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jehangir Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] page check please
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Appreciate
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Pls re-check for me? Also any suggestion - how to center those
'buttons'?
Change to...
.center { text-align:center; width: 190px;}
...and the buttons will be centered.
The '.center' will otherwise collapse to the width of two buttons, and
there's no width to center
Jehangir Larry wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
Thanks David.
Did as you said. Unable to center the various buttons in the sidebar -
despite margin 0 auto and text-align-center.
The above reference was to center the page. The page is centered now.
However, the search thing is too wide--
Though I believe everything is working as you intend, I would suggest
rethinking the header rollover trick. When I roll over the header image, the
image extends, and thus increases the height of the page. But then if I move
on to the navigation bar - in an effort to navigate to a particular
To: Jehangir Larry
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] page check please
Though I believe everything is working as you intend, I would suggest
rethinking the header rollover trick. When I roll over the header image, the
image extends
~davidLaakso wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
[trimmed]
Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the
drawing board.
~dL
Oh, my. Such a mess. Better now I hope.
A page check of this test page with whatever you're running is
appreciated. But when
Subject: Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL [continued]
~davidLaakso wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
[trimmed]
Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the
drawing board.
~dL
Oh, my. Such a mess. Better now I hope.
A page check of this test page with whatever
In Opera 9.10 there's a ~10px white gap between questions and the gray box
(left column). The same space in FF 2.0.0.1, IE7, IE6 and Netscape is gray.
In IE5.5 and IE6 the Chevrolet logo is not found. Also the contents of that
gray box (Chevrolet Question?) is not centered like in the other
~davidLaakso wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
A page check of this test page with whatever you're running is
appreciated. But when push comes to shove it's all versions of ie she
hopes to please.
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/auto/
Thanks to all who took time to offer comments and
Appreciate a page check - different user agents (specially older IE), with
suggestions for improvement.
www.teerthyatri.com
Many TIA.
Larry
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Appreciate a page check - different user agents (specially older IE), with
suggestions for improvement.
www.teerthyatri.com
Many TIA.
Larry
Larry, I think it is probably working as you intend in ie7.0 and the
latest versions of ff and opera. IE 6 and down do not
A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated.
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/auto/
(embedded)
Thanks.
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi david
safari 2.0.4 running off powerbook G4 - panther res 1440 x 900.
Looks good. menu bar under banner has different weights to typefaces.
- maybe cos links not in place.
top 3 menu items on banner are a little unclear. especially my garge
- the red is lost against background.
email
~davidLaakso wrote:
A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated.
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/auto/
Gives me a Forbidden message! :-(
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
~davidLaakso wrote:
A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated.
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/auto/
(embedded)
Thanks.
~dL
Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the
drawing board.
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
~davidLaakso wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated.
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/auto/
(embedded)
Thanks.
~dL
Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the
drawing board.
What level of CSS does a
My first CSS website. And my first post (hope it's not a duplicate),
although I've been trying to follow and learn from the discussions for
several weeks.
http://www.callibeth.com/index.htm
Although this page looks as I want it to in Firefox/PC and IE7/PC, I
understand that this page doesn't do
For starters, it's a very attractive first css layout. Congrats!
I noticed one thing right away- and I don't think it has anything to do with
the Safari problem you mention.
Your layout scheme for the three columns (defined in index.css) is a little
wonky. If I resize the size of my browser
://www.callibeth.com/galleries.htm
Beth
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Dawson
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite
For starters, it's
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite
For starters, it's a very attractive first css layout. Congrats!
I noticed one thing right away- and I don't think it has anything to do
with
the Safari problem you mention.
Your layout scheme
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Dawson
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Page check for newbite
Yeah, it applies on that page too.
Fixed position
~davidLaakso wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
[trimmed]
Whoops. I discovered a horrendous error and took it down. Back to the
drawing board.
~dL
Oh, my. Such a mess. Better now I hope.
A page check of this test page with whatever you're running is
appreciated. But when push comes to shove it's
Hi list,
Cross browser check please.
http://www.highburytearooms.com.au
http://www.highburytearooms.com.au/highbury.css
There are a couple of errors that I am aware and I would like some help
in sorting them out.
IE 6.0 two layers not showing up . I have fooled around with z-index
etc to no
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
~davidLaakso wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
In reference to: http://mockups.rahulgonsalves.com/mitra/mockup.html
I am getting a 404 at the moment, Rahul.
I should have clarified - the Sign Up button in the bottom-right
corner, was the one that was giving
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Dear All,
http://mockups.rahulgonsalves.com/mitra/mockup.html
My first non-fixed width layout, so I'd like comments on whether this
is, if not the best, then at least a good method of constructing a page.
I did not see any replies to your post, Rahul.
One of the
~davidLaakso wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
One of the problems that I'm facing is that the submit button does not
shift its position on hover.
Well, I can't help with that (I guess one needs to know what a submit
button is? :-) ).
I should have clarified - the Sign Up button in the
Dear All,
http://mockups.rahulgonsalves.com/mitra/mockup.html
My first non-fixed width layout, so I'd like comments on whether this
is, if not the best, then at least a good method of constructing a page.
One of the problems that I'm facing is that the submit button does not
shift its
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
