://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2008/01/21/structured-timeline/
for more; it's a long one). It turns out that, per CSS2.1: 9.3.1
(http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#choose-position), the
result when table cells are set to 'position: relative' is undefined.
I think most browsers are simply
, thank you for your attention.
Eric Sol, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
on announcing its creation here (but check with me
first, please). Do look around to see if there are already CSS
newsgroups in existence that would serve the intended purpose, though.
As for the rest of this thread, it's similarly off-topic, and needs to
end right now. Thank you.
--
Eric
of the thread that have been about
what browsers to support, and focus on how to support (or work around)
the browsers we have.
--
Eric Meyer
List Chaperone
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
,
completely, and entirely the wrong place to be asking. Let's all
please make sure to have exactly zero responses to this post show up
on the list, so as to limit the amount of off-topicness. Thanks.
--
Eric Meyer
List Chaperone
Hi,
I think you should have a look at this :
http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/slantastic/demo.html
Regards,
Éric Vesque
Theresa Mesa a écrit :
Sorry - very late.
http://mdh-test.com/compTextWrap.png
Can you mock it up in photoshop and post the image? It would be
easier to
envision
Stuart King a écrit :
Hi CSS-Der's:
URL:
http://www.clarksburgwineco.com/pages/contact.html
floating right class not going all the way to the right (.mc_66r). I am
trying to get it to line up with the right edge of the page, justified with
the footer.
help!
thanks
--Stuart
Hi
Le 22/11/2010 10:58, Seamus McCauley a écrit :
Hi, I'd be grateful if someone could help me out with this one. I'm using the
Typepad theme Journal (http://qurl.com/s42g5) on my blog at
http://www.virtualeconomics.co.uk. I've just started using CSS to customise this
theme - taking off the indent,
;}
Then all REMs on the page will be 16px no matter what eles.
When using EM's you can run into problems when the font-size or an element's
parent has a direct and not so nice effect on a child element's font-size.
Eric Miner
e...@minerbits.com
let's take a look at a few paragraphs from Eric
Meyer's new CSS booklet titled Values, Units and Colors
http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920027621.do
On page 12 under the heading Relative Length Units:
The rem unit
Like the em unit, the rem unit is based on declared font size. The
difference
to people who know more than
I do...it sounds like this list may be just for posting URLs to code samples.
Sorry, but I really did think that the info I posted was fairly clear.
Eric.
On January 23, 2013 at 3:31 AM David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Eric
.
Eric
On January 24, 2013 at 8:25 AM David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Eric e...@minerbits.com wrote:
Since I'm still in the process of getting to 'Pro level I can point you to
a tree Pro's site if you're interested in see how the REM unit is used
relative to the parent element. Not
sure if you've ever run
across these issues, but I have and it's a major pain. And, those issues are
exactly why the REM unit was developed.
So shall we go into more detail on the REM and other relative units or move on
to the next topic?
Eric
On January 24, 2013
?!
Well, I'll keep posting information to help folks learn and understand CSS. Feel
free to run that info through the validator and a spell-checker if you want.
Eric
On January 24, 2013 at 2:22 PM Philip TAYLOR p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Eric wrote:
I would assume the Andy checked his design
and relative units... it most often works however.
Eric
On January 25, 2013 at 12:37 AM Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 25 janv. 2013 à 14:04, Eric e...@minerbits.com a écrit :
What does that have to do with developing an understanding of relative units
in
CSS?
But, since you
I'm not usually a 'hot headed' type and my recent messages are not my usual tone
and will not be my tone going forward. I apologize to all if I lowered the
standards here. I hope I can provide useful information to anyone who
wants/needs it in the future.
Later,
Eric
Philippe,
It comes down to the value set by the UA stylesheet (in case of font-size,
usually the value set in the browser preferences, or the system preferences).
I knew I had read that somewhere. Thanks for clarifying it.
Thanks,
Eric
On January 25, 2013 at 8:07 PM Philippe Wittenbergh e
Mike,
I took a look at your site in FF 19.0.2 and Chrome 25.0.1364.172 m both on Win7
and they look identical to me. Could be more specific about where the problem
is?
Thanks,
Eric Miner
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
. Interestingly, IE will use the REM unit to
size elements (as I do regularly).
I battled with their bug reporting system for months, it kept closing the bug
with 'as designed' and I had to keep reactivating it. Finally I contacted out
Fearless and Famous Leader, Mr. CSS Wizard himself, Eric Meyer who talked
supported MQ's by
nowI could be wrong.
As for me I work from the desktop down, it just makes more sense for me.
Eric
On August 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
sandy.pittendr...@gmail.com wrote:
Been reading Implementing Responsive Design by Tim Kadlec--which
playing around in that module today.
Eric
On August 26, 2013 at 12:52 PM Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com wrote:
This is a webkit thing, check it in Firefox and it should work. I'll need
to do more research to find out why.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Kuzeko Web Design
I forgot to mention thisthe -moz- prefixes for animation are no longer
necessary, haven't been for a couple of versions.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
engineers stating why
they should support (one saying that it's embarrassing for FF to be the only UA
not to support) it's still sitting there unassigned over 15yrs later. That's
just how engineering teams work.
I would suggest that you don't use percentage as a unit of measure in CSS
animations.
Eric
Hi Marie-Ange;
Your CSS works fine in IE11, I don't currently have access to an earlier
version, but I'll try it on another box soon.
On August 29, 2013 at 10:43 AM marie-ange.demeulemees...@bnpparibasfortis.com
wrote:
Hi,
How can I use position fixed in IE 8+ without changing the
Hello Again,
It works in IE10 also.
Eric
On August 29, 2013 at 10:43 AM marie-ange.demeulemees...@bnpparibasfortis.com
wrote:
Hi,
How can I use position fixed in IE 8+ without changing the doctype: !DOCTYPE
html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN , and without using
jQuery
MarieAnge,
When I ran your CSS on IE 10 and 11 I applied to markup that was very large and
in both cases the fixed element stayed where I told it to while the other
elements scrolled. I agree could you point us to a URL example?
Eric
On August 30, 2013 at 5:50 AM marie-ange.demeulemees
I do have a here. With IE7 having a 0.6% share right nowwhy bother with it
at all? Many of the big name pros in the Web Design/Dev industry no long check
for UA versions. Most don't even support the ancient UAs at all.
Just wondering.
On September 4, 2013 at 3:19 PM Tom Livingston
David,
I really don't see how the three HTML errors would case his problem. And, you
might want to check the CSS before running a validation. He's using CSS3 that
validation does not appear to have been run under CSS3 but rather CSS2.1 making
the error irrelevant. And, even if they were the only
Albert,
I'm not seeing your problem. Have your fixed it?
On September 3, 2013 at 8:20 AM Albert van der Veen albert.lijs...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you
can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can
is playing catchup is
some areas and is not addressing non-support in others. Chrome also fell behind
but has recently begun to catch up too. All of this is just 'IMHO' stuff.
Eric
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
Pocket Guide
http://www.amazon.com/The-HTML-Pocket-Guide-Peachpit/dp/0321699742
Around the first of they year Eric Meyer's publisher was offering three huge
chapters from his upcoming edition of CSS: The Definitive Guide for free.
They're offering them for a couple of US$ each HERE
http
Ed,
I'm surprised that IE11 would be the source of your problem, the last I read
it's the most standards compliant UA in the wild. I've had less problems with it
than Mozilla or Chrome UAs.
Anyway, could provide a link to the page in question so it can be looked at?
Eric Miner
On January 22
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the body with margins, positioning,
sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect.
Rachel, Tim will need to give his element a position of absolute, relative (and
maybe fixed but I'm sure about that one) for z-index to kick in.
Eric
On February 9
I agree with Colin...I don't like them either.
But, they do remain in HTML5
http://html5doctor.com/i-b-em-strong-element/
Eric
On February 15, 2014 at 5:47 PM Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings to all,
I know this is highly subjective question, but am curious
stylesheets and off I go -
* { -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box; }
A few years ago I read some place that the W3C box model came down to a decision
by a single member. I don't know if that's true or not but I'd like to get some
history on the topic.
Eric
On March 9, 2014 at 7
Tom,
You're not using the strong tag for styling are you?
On March 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
pHi there span
Yes, I realize that. I was just checking to see if a different CSS approach
might be used.
On March 27, 2014 at 2:53 PM Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Eric wrote:
You're not using the strong tag for styling are you?
I very much suspect that the browser neither knows nor cares
/web-fonts-and-the-critical-path/
Hope this helps a git,
Eric
On March 27, 2014 at 3:23 PM David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/27/14, 9:34 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold
Could you please post a URL to an example?
Thanks
On April 4, 2014 at 6:01 PM Davies, Elizabeth elizabeth_dav...@gallup.com
wrote:
Looking for insight into (and potential correction to) the latest Firefox
browsers inflating the overall size/resolution of webpages. We use a mobile
first
between Nightly and
Chrome are minor and appear to be due to the usual diffs in UA font rendering
engines.
Eric
On April 7, 2014 at 10:41 AM Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Davies, Elizabeth
elizabeth_dav...@gallup.com wrote:
I've not used PX sizing
a
higher density monitor which I don't have access to (unless I try it on my
wife's iPad...when she's not playing WwF that is).
However, keep in mind that high density displays are still a tiny fraction of
what's being used in the wild. For a little while that is...until 4K takes off.
Eric
On April
Mickey,
I've tested on Win8 and reported my findings. I'll test later on Win7, but I
seriously doubt there will be a diff. Especially on my standard density
1920x1080 screen.
Eric
On April 7, 2014 at 8:59 PM Micky Hulse mickyhulse.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Davies
Not not correct - The value of a REM is taken from the font-size of the root
element...thus the HTML element, not the BODY element.
On April 9, 2014 at 12:05 PM Shari webweave...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use rem's it stays consistent from the body tag... correct?
Shari
Opps, forgot to add this:
Yes, if you use REM the value will stay consistent with the value of font-size
set on root element. If you use a percentage for the root element's font-size
your other font-sizes will vary depending on the browser's default font size
setting...Some have no problem with
of static on this list.
Just my US$0.02 worth.
Eric
On April 24, 2014 at 11:46 AM Andrew C. Johnston attyjohns...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hello All:
I have been a bit busy and haven't been keeping up, how does the list feel
about discussions involving LESS, SASS and SCSS? I have a Sass project where
Andrew,
I'm not following what you mean by this -
Why can't there be a code for all browsers, to do something like transparency
or rounded corners.
Are you talking about something outside of CSS? Something else maybe?
Eric
On April 28, 2014 at 3:52 AM Andrew C. Johnston attyjohns
=gizmodo_facebookutm_medium=socialflow
Eric
On April 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM Russ Peters rpet...@redcanoecu.com wrote:
Have an issue with the fieldset not expanding to contain the radgrid. It is
working as expected in Chrome, but I need it to work in IE. Any suggestions?
I'm also not able to get
While my message mI am a big fan of IE11ay be a bit off-topic it was a sincere
effort to keep everyone here safe. And, by the way I'm a big fan of IE11.
I would be happy to take a look at Russ' code but I won't be testing it for now.
Eric
On April 28, 2014 at 3:26 PM MiB digital.disc
Sorry something got cropped
It should have read -
While my message may be a bit off-topic it was a sincere
effort to keep everyone here safe. And, by the way I'm a big fan of IE11.
On April 28, 2014 at 6:14 PM Eric e...@minerbits.com wrote:
While my message mI am a big fan of IE11ay
Is that first letter more 'bold' or is it actually a bit larger?
Is that first letter a cap in the HTML? If so this is normal...Since there is no
Arial SC the UA is transforming the lowercase letters to uppercase and then
shrinking them a bit.
HTH
On June 12, 2014 at 5:42 PM Richard Wendrock
Technically the error was thrown correctly:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-section-element
http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/
Eric
On July 9, 2014 at 8:32 AM Nancy Johnson njohnso...@gmail.com wrote:
I do application development and the W3C throws
Yep this is what I have done for a long time.
The support for the REM unit is now pretty much universal in modern UAs, except
for bugs (one of which I found and reported on pre-IE11). And, in that case the
REM unit was only being ignored for font-size.
If you have to support ancient UAs than use
for a drop int he bucket of users.
Eric
On August 5, 2014 at 9:00 AM Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
List,
I was having a discussion in the comments of an article about using
svg as a background-image in CSS, and using a png as fallback. I was
writing it like this:
background-image
Hope they've seen the MS press release about EOLing IE 8 in about 18 months ;-)
Eric
http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-drop-support-for-older-versions-of-internet-explorer-732437/?s_cid=e589ttag=e589ftag=TREc64629f
On August 7, 2014 at 7:00 PM Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Our
Did you read on this list that the REM unit is only for type? - It's a relative
unit like any other relative unit. I use it for everything except element widths
(they get %s) and line-height that should be unitless.
There are some strange rules of thumb floating around out thereTake a look
at
Arno,
You need to load more than just .TTF files. Take a look at this page from CSS
Tricks it's more up to date.
Eric
http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/using-font-face/
On October 7, 2014 at 7:28 AM Stuff @ arnoenzerink.com
st...@arnoenzerink.com wrote:
Hi list,
I made a new
practicing, it'll
click with you soon.
Eric
On October 9, 2014 at 1:10 PM Darren Brierton darren.brier...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for replying Chris. My answers are below:
On 9 Oct 2014, at 18:59, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com wrote:
(Does anyone have the faintest idea what I'm
worth
Eric
On October 15, 2014 at 1:04 PM Peredur pere...@peredur.net wrote:
I imagine that this will turn out to be a very simple question, but
never one to avoid displaying my own ignorance, here goes...
I'm trying to create a layout for a website that is in dire need of
attention
Darn box model!
Well, the box model isn't set in stone you know.
On November 6, 2014 at 5:43 PM Angela French afre...@sbctc.edu wrote:
Darn box model!
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of
That's right David. If you have:
img {max-width: 100%;
The image will not exceed the width of its parent.
Eric
On November 6, 2014 at 11:42 AM David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/5/14, 9:22 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Crest Christopher composed on 2014-11-05 23:45 (UTC-0500
Have you tried CSS counters...might just work for you.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/CSS/Counters
http://caniuse.com/#search=counter
On November 28, 2014 at 11:06 AM Øyvind Teig oyvind.t...@teigfam.net wrote:
Hi!
I'd like this list
Check this one out, it helped me understand how it works...
http://thewebrocks.com/demos/3D-css-tester/
On November 28, 2014 at 1:40 AM Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
I need some help, why this http://jsfiddle.net/yexao7mL/ doesn't
rotate along the Z, I know it's flat
not have any effect, depending on where you apply it.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
__
css
administrators from booting you.
Sorry to clutter things up a bit more with this; now back to your
regularly scheduled list traffic. Thank you.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http
unclear on any of this, or were unaware that the list
even has policies, please see http://css-discuss.org/policies.html.
Thanks.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http
. The focus on whether there are layout
types that are difficult or impossible to achieve in CSS is perfect,
and if there are any, documenting them in detail (along with current
workarounds to make them happen) could be incredibly valuable.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
in the first
value form discussed, if you only use one keyword in the second form,
the missing one is assumed to be 'center'. So 'top' is equivalent to
'top center' (and 'center top'), and 'left' is equivalent to 'left
center' (and 'center left').
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List
always add them to the css-d wiki page on this
subject http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=TablesVsDivs, but here
on the list, we're done. Thanks.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff
developer toolbar?
There's the cross-browser XRAY bookmarklet developed by Western
Civilisation (http://westciv.com/xray/)-- but again, whether it
compares probably depends on what you find most useful about the
web developer toolbar (or Firebug).
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List
=OffTopic.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css
RKN Studio wrote:
Hello - I'm having a little trouble with an image being the larger portion
of content within a div container. I'm not sure why it is that text
content will extend the container as necessary, but not an image. Am
I missing something?
#nav is floated left, used to be you
RKN Studio wrote:
Thanks Eric - That appears to work for Moz/FF, but not IE6... :/
I'm still too groggy too test this, but if I remember correctly, the
trick to getting ie6 to jive with the overflow: auto trick is to give
that same element a width. Try a width on #main-text and let us know
is not a selected list, nor do additions
to it require anyone's approval. It's meant to be a list of good CSS
books that have been helpful to members of the list. If anyone here
has a book they think is a really great CSS book and it's not on the
list, they should by all means add it!
--
Eric A. Meyer
it in browsers. My
guess is that you have a problem with margin collapsing, but maybe
not. Until the empty divs get filled with whatever goes into them on
a regular page, we won't know.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant
includes discussions of how to make designs behave
well in various browsers. It very definitely does NOT include
discussions of which browsers are or aren't 'worth' supporting.
So: thread over. Thank you.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too
of
the content. So it's fairly easy to vertically center an image, for
example, but not necessarily text.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com
to the original posts about it from me, as well as pro-and-con
essays written by others about the topic of reply-to munging in
general.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http
Okay,
That's enough: e-mail client configuration, the relative merits
of e-mail clients, and mailing list settings aren't any more on topic
than spreadsheet setup or particle physics would be. Time to end the
thread now. Thanks.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List
development habits, let us know
you're on it and then announce the survey location once it's ready to
go. I'd be interested to know who uses what and how, but hashing it
all out on the list isn't appropriate. Sorry!
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too
At 9:45 AM -0700 1/28/08, Cyber Cog wrote:
PS: this really is so off topic! ;-)
Yes, it really is, and so people should really stop posting about
it, as both Alex and I indicated on Friday, which makes it well past
time to end the thread now.
Thank you.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http
.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
that has IE on it. Also Web 2.0 and CSS hacks, but
never mind that now.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com
about it.
BUT: if you only have time to report an IE8 problem in one place,
do it via the Microsoft feedback page Nick listed. If you then find
time to document the same problem on the wiki, that's awesome, but
it's really secondary priority.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric
by my snippy retort.
This page best viewed on my computer.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com
try a version of that test where you add
'display: block;' to your clearing-break styles and see if anything
changes? If it starts working, that means IE8 upgraded its support
for 'clear'. If not, then there's a bug afoot.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much
At 3:03 PM -0500 3/14/08, Jeff Gates wrote:
In troubleshooting this I found an old (1999) article by Eric Meyer
Help! My CSS Isn't Working!
(http://meyerweb.com/eric/articles/webrev/199904.html) in which he says
that there should be no space between the property and the variable (i.e
members' time and
attention. Thank you.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
__
css-discuss
to the bottom of the page.
Tried the IE bug fix Doubled Float-Margin but don't think I applied it
correctly. Tried to change the DOCUTYPE but the added a whole list of issues.
Here is where the site is being held at this time:
http://www.kucia.com/bcs/BC_Surgical_08
Thanks
Eric
Under the top nav of the following link IE 6 is placing an lt;Sgt; type
character?
Can anyone give me a hint on why?
Link: http://www.kucia.com/bcs/BC_Surgical_08/insights/index.html
Eric
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
does the HTML validation not like the lt;embedgt; mark-up that
Adobe uses for flash files?
Eric
--- On Fri, 6/6/08, Jukka K. Korpela lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: Jukka K. Korpela lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE 6 Showing Character that should be hidden?
To: css-d@lists.css
if it works.
http://www.kucia.com/bcs/BC_Surgical_08/insights/index.html
Thanks!
Eric
--- On Fri, 6/6/08, Christian Kirchhoff lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: Christian Kirchhoff lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE 6 Showing Character that should be hidden?
To: css-d@lists.css
I was having an issue with IE throwing my center and right columns down below
the l/h nav. Would the height not be the initial cause?
Just curious.
Learning as I go along.
Thanks
Eric
--- On Fri, 6/6/08, David Laakso lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: David Laakso lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt
Barrett,
Plan to set up a virtual IE environment on my mac using VMware Fusion.
My only issue is getting a hold of IE 6. But the tredosoft.com may work.
Thanks!
Eric
--- On Fri, 6/6/08, Barrett lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: Barrett lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE 6
Amazing!
Thank you so much for this site link.
This would have saved tons of times yesterday!
Thanks
Eric
--- On Fri, 6/6/08, Sandy lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: Sandy lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE 6 Showing Character that should be hidden?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
At 12:47 PM -0500 11/29/06, Daniel Hammond wrote:
I smell an administrative off topic email coming soon...
Like now, which is already far too late. Thread over.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously
.
Possible? If so, how?
TIA,
Eric
_
The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here. Get all the scoop.
http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2
__
css
I just got yanked into this job as
a last minute emergency. I'm spending most of my time reading the css
and trying to figure out what the guy before me was trying to do.
So I got this here page, http://www.mentallyregarded.com/advo and a comp
that I have to make it look like. I have two days,
-position_Keyword_Order
for details.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously.
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
At 4:26 PM -0500 1/22/07, Rick Fulmer wrote:
The concern I raised about my images being cut-off in IE7 has be resolved.
Was the problem CSS-related, or something else? If it was CSS
related, what was the problem? Inquiring minds want to know!
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric
out if Eudora has CSS support or
not is to create some test messages and send them to a Eudora user.
I'd also take a look at
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=StyleInEmail, if you haven't
already.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
CSS is much too interesting
1 - 100 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
