-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 98-12-15 18:21:39 EST, Che writes:
I brought up Bu sh Rea gan to emphasize the similarities between the
Republocrats Demicans. They all eat from the same dog dish. The purpose
is not to distract but to point out that C1inton is part of a continuing
-Caveat Lector-
At 10:04 AM 12/14/98 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it that every time something is posted about Commie Lover C1inton
all we hear about is Bu sh and Re agan. Seems to be a conspiracy to keep any
topic off C1inton and some people on this list said they were
-Caveat Lector-
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Che wrote:
I brought up Bu sh Rea gan to emphasize the similarities between the
Republocrats Demicans. They all eat from the same dog dish.
What an insult to canines!
No self-respecting dog I've ever known would eat from the same dish as
THAT crowd!
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but I would wonder about ole Ronnie. Have you read Moldea's Dark
Victory and/or Freed's Secret Life of Ronald Reagan? What would a 'B' do to
play 'AAA'?
Exactly. Reagan is probably WORSE, since he was so good at hiding it
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that I mentioned that the Reagan Administration was peopled with
white collar criminals Wall Street, CIA... they swooped in from
everywhere. I wouldn't take issue with any of the items you mentioned.
However, you have
-Caveat Lector-
Why is it that every time something is posted about Commie Lover Clinton
all we hear about is Bush and Reagan. Seems to be a conspiracy to keep any
topic off Clinton and some people on this list said they were "conservative."
Clinton is as far to the left as anyone can get
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 11:27:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At issue is that
RR owed up to what happened and BC refuses to do so.
"Mistakes were made" is owning up?
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational
-Caveat Lector-
Why is it that every time something is posted about Commie Lover Clinton
all we hear about is Bush and Reagan.
Which part of the Mena operation do you not understand?
Seems to be a conspiracy to keep any
topic off Clinton and some people on this list said they were
]
Subject:Re: [CTRL] "Heads Up": Bill Clinton Is Finished
-Caveat Lector-
Why is it that every time something is posted about Commie
Lover Clinton
all we hear about is Bush and Reagan.
Which part of the Mena operation do you not
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/14/98 10:04:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"conservative."
Clinton is as far to the left as anyone can get without being called
"Comrade." "IF" the media is owned by the Republicans why does it
support
Clinton all the
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
And so I ask the list membership the question I always ask when I've
recounted this -- does anyone remember this article, or hearing this
story elsewhere? And more importantly, does anyone have a clue as to
what Powell said or did to Reagan
-Caveat Lector-
anti-Clinton is verboten.
I have not posted anything pro-Clinton. His sell-out to the Chinese was more than
a crime against the US, it was one against the world. The threat of the military
satellite hardware he sold to the Chinese for the sake of donations to the
Democrats
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 98-12-14 14:37:53 EST, you write:
I have not posted anything pro-Clinton. His sell-out to the Chinese was
more than
a crime against the US, it was one against the world. The threat of the
military
satellite hardware he sold to the Chinese for the sake of
-Caveat Lector-
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I don't discount the idea that something was done to him in that time
period. I'm aware of his change of political position. I was not aware of
this incident. It probably would be of value to try and find something about
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/14/98 8:05:13 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a sidebar (which perhaps has something to do with a potential
'conspiracy', perhaps not), it's interesting that both Powell AND Reagan
found renewed popularity in the new medium of
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/14/98 3:34:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It may go farther than that. I think George, Jr., be the next
President and if he is anything like his Dad or Grandfather... we'll be up to
our necks in trouble.
Excellent Thinking,
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 9:32:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reagan!?! I mentioned before about how Reagan derailed half of Garrison's
investigation, but good lord, do the words "iran-contra"
-Caveat Lector-
At 08:36 PM 12/12/98 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that's an interesting observation. The media have been defending and
covering for the current president since before his first election. For years
prior to that they have consistently espoused a left-wing agenda. ..Are
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 98-12-13 04:36:15 EST, you write:
At 08:36 PM 12/12/98 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that's an interesting observation. The media have been defending and
covering for the current president since before his first election. For
years
prior to that
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, Sno0wl wrote:
Just one more case of the media--which seems to be in the pocket of
the Republicans and the radical right and whoever the puppetmasters
are--calling the shots before the play is done.
What media are YOU watching?
All the mainstream shows
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 12 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that's an interesting observation. The media have been defending and
covering for the current president since before his first election. For years
prior to that they have consistently espoused a left-wing agenda.
I wouldn't say
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, Che wrote:
If you don't believe the polls, try crawling out of your troll cave
sometime and asking your fellow citizens how they feel about the subject.
First off, Che, I don't seem to remember seeing you post to this list
before, so I assume you are a new
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you actually think the press is "right wing?" You think the media is in
bed with Ken Starr?
I've never heard one mainstream media pundit say anything supportive of
Starr...if anything, they consistently present him as 'strange',
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 6:41:20 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip a lot of good stuff
If it were you or me who was being brought up on these charges we would be
imprisoned, fined, possibly tortured... we would be decimated, but not
Clinton. Can
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 7:50:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carter's policies which LEAD to the
Embassy takeover in the first place...
I believe the record shows that Carter and US government resisited the shahs
entry into the US. Intel said if shah entered
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/12/98 8:36:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Now that's an interesting observation. The media have been defending and
covering for the current president since before his first election. For
years
prior to that they have
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 5:46:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
In a message dated 12/12/98 8:36:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, JYester@AOL.
COM
writes:
Now that's an interesting observation. The media have been defending and
covering for
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 12:42:57 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Generally in newsrooms you have a perponderence of democrats, -- just as in
the general population . . .duh! The ownership is almost 100% percent
republican and there is no true
-Caveat Lector-
Thanks, but I would wonder about ole Ronnie. Have you read Moldea's Dark
Victory and/or Freed's Secret Life of Ronald Reagan? What would a 'B' do to
play 'AAA'?
Just some thoughts,
Om
K
In a message dated 12/13/98 5:12:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, to
-Caveat Lector-
Reagan!?! I mentioned before about how Reagan derailed half of Garrison's
investigation, but good lord, do the words "iran-contra" mean anything to anyone
any more? What about "October Surprise"? The rip-off of PROMIS and the death of
Danny Casolaro? Even things like Clinton's
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 9:32:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reagan!?! I mentioned before about how Reagan derailed half of Garrison's
investigation, but good lord, do the words "iran-contra" mean anything to
anyone
any more? What about
-Caveat Lector-
you have no proof that Reagan himself had personal knowledge, any
more than I have proof that he did not.
Ignoring that Reagan stated openly that "mistakes were made" in iran-contra, are
you saying he had no personal knowledge of the appointees to his own
administration?
kt
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 9:32:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reagan!?! I mentioned before about how Reagan derailed half of Garrison's
investigation, but good lord, do the words "iran-contra" mean anything to
anyone
any more? What about "October
-Caveat Lector-
RR knew who he appointed. To think otherwise would be eqaully silly and foolish.
Switching the topic to whether RR knew his appointees is senseless. At issue is that
RR owed up to what happened and BC refuses to do so.
Kenn Thomas wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
you have no
-Caveat Lector-
"HEADS UP": BILL CLINTON IS FINISHED
(CNNS, 12/11/98) -- Most valued CNNS (Conspiracy Nation News
Service) source "Rhea Fortean" (pseudonym) has tilted the scales.
This news service had planned to hold back on the following
-Caveat Lector-
Today, Bill Clinton gave his final good-bye to America in an
abrupt Rose Garden speech where he reiterated his apologies for
misdeeds, both the implied specific and the unmentioned general.
It reminds me of when one is suing someone...at the point that the party
you are
-Caveat Lector-
Just one more case of the media--which seems to be in the pocket of
the Republicans and the radical right and whoever the puppetmasters
are--calling the shots before the play is done.
Nothing new. They haven't stopped all year and they're not about to
stop now. The only thing
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/12/98 2:54:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just one more case of the media--which seems to be in the pocket of
the Republicans and the radical right and whoever the puppetmasters
are--calling the shots before the play is done.
38 matches
Mail list logo
