-Caveat Lector-
Hello!,
Steve points out a very weak point in the Constitution (imho); it's too
bad the founding fathers did not require every law passed by congress to
go through the US Supreme court and pass Contitutional muster before
becoming law. And don't forget, the President and all
-Caveat Lector-
I thought the Constitution gives the final authority to decide what laws are
constitutional or not, is the Supreme Court, not John Q. Citizen. You know,
the same Supreme Court that appointed your hero GW Bush President?
Steve
On 16 Apr 01, at 19:34, William Bacon wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
On 15 Apr 01, at 5:30, William Bacon Quoted:
Yet according to
Parker, the new results do not undermine the case for global warming: "It is
raising questions about the interpretation of the sea-surface data."
This is the important statement. Global Warming is occurring, some
In a message dated 4/15/01 1:54:43 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some will use this to claim there is no global warming. They are Fools.
since qwe are comming out out of a "cold" cycle it is aparent there is
"global" warming. Question is is this exaserbated by the green
In a message dated 4/15/01 2:32:46 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
since qwe are comming out out of a "cold" cycle it is aparent there is
"global" warming. Question is is this exaserbated by the green freaks
psychosis or not?
I may be a fool, but at least i am not a social;
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 4/15/01 1:54:43 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some will use this to claim there is no global warming. They are Fools.
since qwe are coming out out of a "cold" cycle it is apparent there is
"global" warming. Question is is this
In a message dated 4/15/01 4:52:40 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, your wrong. You are a fool. We are coming out of the WARM cycle.
90,000 cold, and 10,00 warm.
No, you are incorrect. Recent discoveries show a mini ice age about 10k BC.
in fact as late as mid 1500s cold
