Re: [CTRL] Pushing Bad Science and Bad Religion on Discovery/CTV..Why?

2002-03-23 Thread Party of Citizens
-Caveat Lector- I want to believe -Fox Mulder, X Files On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Joshua Tinnin wrote: Your argument basically begs the question over and over, a logical fallacy. No I am not begging the question. I am mostly functioning as a critic of both science and religion in these postings

Re: [CTRL] Pushing Bad Science and Bad Religion on Discovery/CTV..Why?

2002-03-23 Thread Jim Rarey
Both creationism and evolution have to be taken on faith since neither can be proved with scientific evidence. JR - Original Message - From: Party of Citizens To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 3:02 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Pushing Bad Science and Bad Religion

Re: [CTRL] Pushing Bad Science and Bad Religion on Discovery/CTV..Why?

2002-03-22 Thread Joshua Tinnin
-Caveat Lector- Your argument basically begs the question over and over, a logical fallacy. You still have not proven your own conclusion using your own logical tools which you use to tear down the theory of evolution: that there was a creation. Use your logic to prove your point, now: there is

Re: [CTRL] Pushing Bad Science and Bad Religion on Discovery/CTV..Why?

2002-03-22 Thread Party of Citizens
-Caveat Lector- I want to believe -Fox Mulder, X Files Good reply. I'll give it more though before composing an essay on good science and good religion. POC On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Joshua Tinnin wrote: -Caveat Lector- Your argument basically begs the question over and over, a logical fallacy.

[CTRL] Pushing Bad Science and Bad Religion on Discovery/CTV..Why?

2002-03-21 Thread Party of Citizens
-Caveat Lector- On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ivan Semeniuk wrote: I don't know who put me on this listserver but please take me off. Of course I will stop emailing you with this information as truth in science makes you uncomfortable. I hope the management of Discovery and CTV will sooner or later