-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: nurev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
snip
I don't think I care
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: nurev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Let me address some of your false conclusions
scounts in any form, or their equivalent, are hereby
declared unconstitutional.
-Original Message-
From: SCIO-LTD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.
-Caveat Lector-
- O
, what use are you planning to make of the information you
collect from these surveys, 'books' ? (Just curious).
eagle 1
- Original Message -
From: books [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: Eagle 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By the way, what use are you planning to make of the information you
collect from these surveys, 'books' ? (Just curious).
It can't be as nefarious as compiling a "hit list" of those who answer
incorrectly,
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Let me address some of your false conclusions as follows nurev: (and let's
dispense with the puerile value judgements, "You get a little self serving
here don't you buddy?" )
I don't think I care to dispense with my value judgments, and
-Caveat Lector-
Nuerve and Joshua2 - what am I going to do with you boysthat was not
what Jesus said, humping daschounds he said it would be easier for
a Rockefeller to go through the eye of the needle, than a rich man to
get into heavensomething like that.
Can't I leave you two
-Caveat Lector-
"M.A. Johnson" wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
The subsidies are often indirect through the granting of
minor or major monopolies, (for a good example see the
history of ATT, and the monopoly they had for well over
a half a century).The
-Caveat Lector-
"M.A. Johnson" wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
William Hugh Tunstall wrote:
Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded
by the taxpayers... We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT,
the mammoth defense contractors.. Silicon Valley
has had its share of
- Original Message -
From: M.A. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
The subsidies are often indirect through the granting of
minor or major
io-ltd.com
http://www.scio-ltd.org
- Original Message -
From: nurev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
As a
-Caveat Lector-
This piece alone deserves posting:
nurev wrote to SCIO-LTD:
[The internet has promise in several areas, none of
which are necessary for sustaining life.]
Think again.
Digital Society
Internet Whacks $2 Billion Off Merrill Lynch
by Clay Shirky
THE INTERNET HAPPENED to
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
This piece alone deserves posting:
nurev wrote to SCIO-LTD:
[The internet has promise in several areas, none of
which are necessary for sustaining life.]
Think again.
I read the piece. I see no reason to change my statement.
Both the
-Caveat Lector-
William Hugh Tunstall wrote:
Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded
by the taxpayers... We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT,
the mammoth defense contractors.. Silicon Valley
has had its share of government subsidies..
MJ:
Then it is
-Caveat Lector-
Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded by
the
taxpayers... We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT, the mammoth defense
contractors.. Silicon Valley has had its share of government
subsidies..
So the argument that market forces (capitalism) are responsible for
io-ltd.org
- Original Message -
From: William Hugh Tunstall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.
-Caveat Lector-
Much of the R and D in high tech industries
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
The subsidies are often indirect through the granting of
minor or major monopolies, (for a good example see the
history of ATT, and the monopoly they had for well over
a half a century).The government often has a dual
use/dual purpose
-Caveat Lector-
William Hugh Tunstall wrote:
Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded
by the taxpayers... We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT,
the mammoth defense contractors.. Silicon Valley
has had its share of government subsidies..
MJ:
Then it is NOT
-Caveat Lector-
SCIO-LTD wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
As a technology professional with over tens years Internet experience, I can
testify to William Hugh Tunstall comments. The subsidies are often
indirect through the granting of minor or major monopolies, (for a good
example see the
-Caveat Lector-
Nurev:
No matter what changes and inovations Capitalism goes through,
there always remains the deadly constants.
1- Private ownership of large amounts of capital ALWAYS
causes concentration of wealth into few hands. With that
ALWAYS comes control and
-Caveat Lector-
6/6/99
No matter what changes and inovations Capitalism goes through, there
always
remains the deadly constants.
1- Private ownership of large amounts of capital ALWAYS causes
concentration
of wealth into few hands. With that ALWAYS comes control and
exploitation
of society.
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 6/6/99 8:58:28 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
6/6/99
No matter what changes and inovations Capitalism goes through, there
always
remains the deadly constants.
1- Private ownership of large amounts of capital ALWAYS causes
22 matches
Mail list logo
