On 03/12/12 20:13, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com
mailto:marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
OI know that Accessor has an Applicative instace because the operations
work. I'd like to find the instance, so I can see how it works,
On 30/11/12 18:25, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
Hello Simon,
there was no discussion because I thought that this would be completely
uncontroversial since: (i) it does not change the current behavior, and
(ii) it adds new functionality which is quite useful.
Here is the use case that motivated me to
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
OI know that Accessor has an Applicative instace because the operations
work. I'd like to find the instance, so I can see how it works, so I try:
Ok, so this is a bug: you shouldn't be able to use the instance
On 30/11/12 02:03, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
Repository : ssh://darcs.haskell.org//srv/darcs/ghc
On branch : master
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/2ec32a8e1cb323b230b0c228dbee313647892bf4
---
commit
Hello Simon,
there was no discussion because I thought that this would be completely
uncontroversial since: (i) it does not change the current behavior, and
(ii) it adds new functionality which is quite useful.
Here is the use case that motivated me to implement this (described by Eric
Mertens,
