CS: Pol-action by shooters

2000-06-13 Thread david
From: "david", [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was interested in what would transpire from this thread and so have not responded but simply read the few responses. I imagine there will be no trembling knees in Whitehall with the response. Whether the 3rd march got 15,000 or 20,000 it didn't make any

CS: Pol-action by shooters

2000-06-05 Thread RustyBullethole
From: RustyBullethole, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simple passive protest is not a crime it's a duty and damn it, he's not asking us to throw ourselves under the "kings horse" ... just organise ourselves in plenty of time so that we are ready for the elections when they come. Like the blue inked

CS: Pol-Action by shooters

2000-06-03 Thread Paul Ann Isherwood
From: "Paul Ann Isherwood", [EMAIL PROTECTED] I like this idea, David has a point worth further investigation. If there is no risk to either personal safety or suitability for an FAC then why not ? Simple passive protest is not a crime it's a duty and damn it, he's not asking us to throw

CS: Pol-Action by shooters

2000-06-02 Thread david
From: "david", [EMAIL PROTECTED] IMHO this is way over the top. In my recent postings I am all for a much more agressive stance against anyone who would harm my already pilloried sport. I feel that to equate the attacks on our sport with the wanton murder of millions of innocent people is too

CS: Pol-Action by shooters

2000-05-26 Thread RustyBullethole
From: RustyBullethole, [EMAIL PROTECTED] the recent debate on BASC attitudes and the need to be 'pro-active' (I loathe that word) and conspicuous reminded me of a proposal for action I put without success) to friends and officials of the Sportsman's Association in 1996 or early 1997. I