Adam wrote:
The Russians, Americans and I believe others have moved from
physical to psychological methods which have proven to work
better than actual physical pain. I recall reading a story
on Abdul Murad, the Al Qaeda member arrested in 1995 in the
Philipines, where the way they
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:30:42PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
| On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 12:49 PM, dmolnar wrote:
|
| On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Tyler Durden wrote:
|
| to have a big jpg of a hand with middle finger extended...) More than
| this,
| they will have unknowingly destroyed the real
Tyler Durden wrote:
[...]
Let's say I've been coerced into revealing the private key to a certain
encrypted message. And now, of course, the authorities use that key and open
the message, and see the contents (let's assume they are picture of a
demonstration or whatever).
WOULDN'T IT BE
Kevin Elliott wrote:
2) rifled muskets were not effective because of the ponderous reload
time (I don't have precise figures, but the number 1/6th-1/10th the
rate of fire of a smoothbore musket comes to mind)
There isn't that much difference in reload times - say 30 seconds for a
Kentucky
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 12:49 PM, dmolnar wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Tyler Durden wrote:
to have a big jpg of a hand with middle finger extended...) More than
this,
they will have unknowingly destroyed the real data. (Perhaps a 3rd
key is
needed that DOESN'T destroy the
Jim Choate wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Tyler Durden wrote:
Damn what a pack of geeks! (Looks like I might end up liking this list!)
When we say complete, are we talking about completeness in the Godelian
sense? According to Godel, and formal system (except for the possibility of
the
There's a few opinionated people on this list, I think :-)
Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike
-- Forwarded message --
From: MX%[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jonathon Giffin 20-NOV-2002 18:19:49.35
To: MX%[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Subj: [PKILAB] [SECRSCH] DMCA Feedback
For anyone
Variola wrote...
What's missing? What part of your threat model didn't they consider?
Well, that the recipient of the message may not be on their own machine (not
running Rubberhose), etc...
Stego your activist photos into kiddie porn which is stegoed into random
plaintext cover images.
at Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:26 PM, Sarad AV
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was seen to say:
'A' uses a very strong crytographic algorithm which
would be forced out by rubber horse cryptanalysis
Now if Aice could give another key k` such that the
cipher text (c) decrypts to another dummy plain
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 06:31:58 -0500
From: Dave Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] Pentagon transcript on TIA
http://usinfo.state.gov/cgi-bin/washfile/display.pl?p=/products/washfile/latestf=02112003.tltt=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml
Jim Choate[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,717141,00.asp
Why the heck is cypherpunks included for this post? Two weeks ago
we discussed this topic in exhaustive detail (far, far beyond what
the linked article provides). This article has nothing new.
hi,
But there's a hitch: When WPA detects a break-in
attempt, it shuts down the network for a minute and
then restarts. During that time, legitimate users are
off the air too.
Unauthorised access can be taken off by setting fake
access points as such,whats the need for shutting down
the
At 17:56 -0600 on 11/20/02, Jim Choate wrote:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,717141,00.asp
As if we hadn't talked the living crap out of this subject... Use
the volatile keyword. That's what it's there for. Really.
--
_
Kevin Elliott
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 10:25 PM, jet wrote:
At 9:01 -0800 2002/11/20, Eric Cordian wrote:
Cable News is reporting that the Onion, America's Finest News Source,
has
pulled from its Web site an article on the recent siege at the Moscow
theatre by Chechen rebels.
You got any
Got Aerosil?
What the heck is Aerosil? Is that like UBIK?
Extremely fine SiO2. Helps disperse pharmaceuticals,
anthrax, VX. Lots of others uses. Bugs U$G that
the New Next Target bought some.
What's UBIK? D'you mean Dr. Seuss' Ooblek?
Is Ooblek on the ITAR list?
---
Got Atropine?
At 06:34 PM 11/20/2002 -0800, Lucky Green wrote:
I recently obtained an illuminating recording of a speech by a judge
sitting on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which was given before the
San Francisco Commonwealth Club. In said recording, the honorable judge
proposes the issuance of formal
hi,
I had suggested the same for an encryption product
called digisecret,this is what they had to say.
Here is an example where hiding cipher text in cipher
text is ideal..
DigiSecret currently does not use assymmetric
algorithms. Besides this
the introduction of this technique will mean that
UBIK is a book by Philip K. Dick.
In the book, the main character is continually receiving messages to imbibe
or otherwise apply the substance UBIK to himself. He is unaware (for most of
the book) that he has died and is in deep freeze, and that his boss Runciter
is sending him UBIK messages so
Having read the article I can't help but consider more benign reasons
for its removal...
1. It's not funny.
2. It's jokes are in pretty poor taste.
3. Michael Bay got his lawyers to send a letter to the Onion.
The situation raises a mildly interesting issue. The Onion, for
whatever reason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 09:33 AM, Greg Broiles wrote:
At 06:34 PM 11/20/2002 -0800, Lucky Green wrote:
I recently obtained an illuminating recording of a speech by a judge
sitting on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which was given before the
San Francisco Commonwealth Club. In said
At 11:38 AM 11/21/02 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
I was thinkin about this...
It certainly looks like Concerned Authorities might be able to easily
stop a
Smart Mob from uploading the images of beatings, etc... this way.
That and
a round-up-and-grab knapsacks/laptops as evidence of illegal
activity,
At 23:46 -0800 2002/11/20, Tim May wrote:
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 10:25 PM, jet wrote:
At 9:01 -0800 2002/11/20, Eric Cordian wrote:
Cable News is reporting that the Onion, America's Finest News Source, has
pulled from its Web site an article on the recent siege at the Moscow
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 09:52 AM, Marc Branchaud wrote:
I wonder: if The Onion were to attempt to pull an article due to a
court
order, or some such, and yet the article persisted in various caches
here and there, to what extent could The Onion be charged with not
complying with the
Major Variola (ret)[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
What's UBIK? D'you mean Dr. Seuss' Ooblek?
Is Ooblek on the ITAR list?
Check out the UBIK website:
http://www.philipkdick.com/ubikcorp.htm
Ubik Corporation:
Providing spiritual salvation through
a variety of convenience products.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:46:20PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
Web crawlers (observers, in quantum mechanics lingo) saw the article
and indexed it is enough for me to beleve it was there, at least
temporarily.
It was, and as of an hour or two ago it was still on the Onion's
mobile.theonion.com
Note the rulemaking is limited. See below. --Declan
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-966525.html
Because it won't affect researchers or companies that publish software
code that circumvents copy-protection technology, the practical impact
of the new rulemaking is limited. It could not have helped
26 matches
Mail list logo
