hi,
Blitz comes with high casualities.Shock and awe
technique can use troops paratrooping into baghdad.But
casualities are always unacceptable to the U.S. So
they do it the conventional way.
Sarath.
--- Ken Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tyler Durden wrote:
[...]
PS: Anyone notice the
Neil Johnson wrote:
- Most important, using Biological or Chemical Weapons is a two-edged
sword. They could do just as much damage to their own troops as to
the US and UK troops if they make a mistake.
Might be interesting to see what would happen if iran felt threatened by
bush's aggressive
At 4:05 PM -0800 3/31/03, Neil Johnson wrote:
- They don't want the US to be able to justify the invasion, See we told you
they had WMD, we had to go in.
If I were Iraq, I would make sure that any WoMD that survived the
inspections were destroyed and all traces removed as part of an
On Monday 31 March 2003 11:40 am, Steve Schear wrote:
At 05:00 PM 3/31/2003 +, lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 22:35:55 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
hi,
What's the US line on why Iraq hasn't shot nukes, chems and bio
weapons at them? If an invasion and missile
Tyler Durden wrote:
[...]
PS: Anyone notice the conceptual similarity between shock and awe and
blitzkrieg?
Yes, similar in some respects, though not the same. Shock and awe
(terrible name for a quite sensible idea) was about a military force
which is overwhelmingly stronger than its opponent
hi,
on the first or second day of the war-iraqi missiles
hit kuwait-4 to 5 of them.
After that there is no word of any more strikes in
kuwait or else where.What is Iraq waiting for?
Regards Sarath.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS'
