On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:56:32PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the impression (maybe wrong) that guntella as it exists is
something much worse than a tree, that connections are
pretty much haphazard and when you send out a query it reaches
the same node by multiple paths, and that
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 04:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 Mar 2002 at 22:43, Eugene Leitl wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recall ever having read of this type of structure before,
but it seems so obvious that I'm sure it's been discussed before.
At 05:14 PM 3/27/02 -0800, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Additionally, Aimee is an Outlook user, and mattd is a Eudora user. The
forgery referenced below was sent from Eudora.
And strings in exe's can't be edited?
I know of folks who've edited the PGP header line to
You know, Lucky, most of the people here have been around the block a
few times, and your previous post is just classic Usenet whinage.
Complaining about puncuation indeed. Spare us, please.
Look, we've all read the background. The improvement is a function
f(n) which for large n may approach
On 28 Mar 2002 at 2:18, Adam Back wrote:
And gnutella is not able to resume a transfer that dies part way
through which is very bad for download reliability. FastTrack/Kazza
(but no longer Morpheus since the Kazza / Morpheus fall-out) on the
other hand can resume, and in fact do multiple
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adam Back [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And gnutella is not able to resume a transfer that dies part way
through which is very bad for download reliability. FastTrack/Kazza
(but no longer Morpheus since the Kazza / Morpheus fall-out) on the
other hand can resume, and in
Adam Back writes:
Contrary to what article [2] claims FastTrack/Kazza really does blow
Gnutella away, the supernode concept with high performance nodes
elected to be search hubs makes all the difference. Gnutella last I
tried it was barely functional for downloads, ~95% of downloads
failed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gil wrote:
Faustine writes:
best is write code, write code. The main thing is to DO something, whatever
your skills and talents are. Spare everyone the hot air and just do it.
What *you* say is hot air; what *I* say is policy analysis.
But who's
[OK, let me try this again, since we clearly got off on the wrong foot
here. My apologies for overreacting to Damien's post; I have been
receiving dozens of emails from the far corners of the Net over the last
few days that alternatively claimed that I was a stooge of the NSA
because everybody
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Lucky Green wrote:
:Which brings me to an issue that I hope may be on-topic to this mailing
:list: I would like to be able to enforce that the keys my users can use
:to authenticate themselves to my sshd to be of a minimum size. Is there
:a config option to sshd that will
10 matches
Mail list logo
