At 12:24 PM 10/17/05 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
Soon we'll find out that toothbrushes are able to determine what I ate for
dinner and are regularly sending the info...
Soon there will be sensors in urinals that page the DEA..
So this dupe/spy/wannabe journalist thinks that journalists
should be *special*.. how nice. Where in the 1st amendment is the class
journalists mentioned? She needs a WMD enema.
LAS VEGAS (AP) -- New York Times reporter Judith Miller defended her
decision to go to jail to protect a source
Just presented at ICETE2005 by Daniel Nagy:
http://www.epointsystem.org/~nagydani/ICETE2005.pdf
Abstract. In present paper a novel approach to on-line payment is
presented that tackles some issues of digital cash that have, in the
author s opinion, contributed to the fact that despite
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:27:53PM -0700, cyphrpunk wrote:
Just presented at ICETE2005 by Daniel Nagy:
http://www.epointsystem.org/~nagydani/ICETE2005.pdf
This is a thorough and careful paper but the system has no blinding
and so payments are traceable and linkable. The standard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My understanding is that she only went to jail because of a federal law
passed in the early 80's designed to protect undercover federal agents.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I was under the impression that were it
not for that law, there would be
Unfortunately, it's not as simple as protecting a source.
Most shield laws, or proposed shield laws, as I understand them,
protect a journalist from revealing a source who is exposing
wrongdoing that is in the public interest. This is not the same
thing. The act of leaking the identity of Ms.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You're just trolling, right?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to
On 10/19/05, Chris Clymer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're just trolling, right?
[snip]
Major Variola (ret.) wrote:
So this dupe/spy/wannabe journalist thinks that journalists
should be *special*.. how nice. Where in the 1st amendment is the class
journalists mentioned? She needs a WMD
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 2005-10-19T19:59:18+, Gil Hamilton wrote:
Reporters should have no rights the rest of us don't have. It's hard to
imagine the framers of the constitution approving an amendment that said
freedom of the press is granted to all those who first apply for
Dave Howe wrote:
Gil Hamilton wrote:
The problem is that reporters want to be made into a special class of
people that don't have to abide by the same laws as the rest of us. Are
you a reporter? Am I? Is the National Inquirer? How about Drudge?
What about bloggers? Which agency will you
On 2005-10-19T10:37:55-0700, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Previous Politech message:
http://www.politechbot.com/2005/10/17/barney-lawyer-recommends/
Responses:
http://www.politechbot.com/2005/10/19/more-on-barney/
Some of the first-round responses mentioned the iniquities involved in
attacking
Gil Hamilton wrote:
The problem is that reporters want to be made into a special class of
people that don't have to abide by the same laws as the rest of us. Are
you a reporter? Am I? Is the National Inquirer? How about Drudge?
What about bloggers? Which agency will you have to apply to
On 2005-10-19T19:59:18+, Gil Hamilton wrote:
Reporters should have no rights the rest of us don't have. It's hard to
imagine the framers of the constitution approving an amendment that said
freedom of the press is granted to all those who first apply for and
receive permission from
13 matches
Mail list logo
