Indeed, I've heard the same. One could argue that for someone to believe in
something (religion) so intensely as to shun all moral explanation against
this hypothesis and to persist in those beliefs without any proof is akin to
schizophrenia.
Well, I'm sure this is not an issue that
Holy Shit!
Does that mean that some 18-year-old script kiddie could get LIFE?
If this wasn't such an immense pile of stupidity, I'd get angry over the
obvious invasions of privacy, etc...
Having worked in many a company, I KNOW how most management systems work.
Let's say there's something as
2002 08:26:02 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Tyler Durden wrote:
Damn what a pack of geeks! (Looks like I might end up liking this list!)
It's full of nut cases too :-)
I have not, however, heretofore considered that there could exist
systems
that had some form of completeness built in. My
a) Those friggin' war-posters are hilarious.
b) Downstairs and across the street in front of Starbucks I just saw two NYC
cops holding what looked like AK-47s...on their backs it said Emergency
Coercive Unit.
_
Protect your PC -
Damn what a pack of geeks! (Looks like I might end up liking this list!)
When we say complete, are we talking about completeness in the Godelian
sense? According to Godel, and formal system (except for the possibility of
the oddballs mentioned below--I hadn't heard of this possibility) is
How can anyone claim that the U.S. or Israel or corporations or rich
Americans are morally worse than the likes of Hussein?
Can't answer that directly, aside from pointing out that theUS is largely
responsible for Hussein's rise to power. I could be argued that oil in our
hands has created many
a little chatty and clumsy at this point.
From: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The End of the Golden Age of Crypto
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:04:32 -0800
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 10:22 AM, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, my main point was that the fact that we
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photos in transport plane of prisoners: Time for eJazeera?
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 17:53:48 -0800
At 08:32 PM 11/9/02 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
So I'm still playing with the idea of a publically-accessible document
that
outlines
Sorry, I'm new, but does this refer to the notion of splitting up a document
holographically, and placing the various pieces of numerous servers
throughout the 'Net? (Any one piece will probably not contain a complete
copy of the information, and is encrypted too, sot that it is not possible
The subject line says it all, if one remembers Variola's clever dare.
As far as I'm concerned, this big brother bullshit should work two ways: any
tyrrany should expect that any public actions will make it onto the net
somewhere. Of course, one day they'll probably begin a set of countermoves,
...
From: Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Tyler Durden' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: What email encryption is actually in use?
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:00:56 -0500
--
From: Tyler Durden[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:13 AM
Some of these problems can be avoided by using very short pulses.
Again you get into dwell, the short pulses -must- be made up for by
increasing the PRR and this defeats the who purpose of the short pulses
since you need more of them (we're talking an integration effect here
so it doesn't take
Everyone pretty much knows who all is involved, and has to keep in contact
with each other in order to capture video optimally.
Well, I've been wondering how feasible it would be to implement video
transfer in such a way that the cameras don't know the buffers in
advance. Haven't put pen to
In antoher context I've wondered about the possibility of wireless,
near-real-time video upload. With 3G this will cetainly be easy, but I'm
wondering if there are soft/hard gadgets that can auto-upload stuff.(In
addition, 3G looks like it's going to roll out in the US only in fits and
starts
AM 10/28/02 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
In antoher context I've wondered about the possibility of wireless,
near-real-time video upload. With 3G this will cetainly be easy, but
I'm
wondering if there are soft/hard gadgets that can auto-upload stuff.
Plenty of webcams come with software to auto
Any chance this is the same Dave Emery who does the radio broadcasts? (I
listen from WFMU). If so, man! If a tiny fraction of the stuff you have said
over the years is true, well...brrr. A good example is Los Amigos de
Bush...doesn't have to be true/right...the fact that those theories so
Apparently a new Crypto chip from nCipher.
What's the C-punks view on this standard--FIPS 140-2 Level 3? Anyone have a
link to this document?
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. -- Ingrian Networks, the leader in Active Application
Security solutions, announced it has extended its strategic relationship
Palladium sets up a separate trusted virtual computer inside the PC
processor, with its own OS, called Nexus, and it own applications, called
agents.
Holy crap. So does this mean that MS Windows 2005 with Palladium operating
will take about 15 minutes to boot up? Will Age of Empires 5 even be
Well, there was also some other details left out by that article. A 100kW
beam doesn't tell you very much if you don't know the beam diameter. A
1310nm telecom laser can cause serious eye damage with 10mW, but that's 10mW
into, say 38 um^2. But it ain't going to do nothing to enemy aircraft
: Re: was: Echelon-like resources..
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Tyler Durden
As for Chomsky lying, can you give us
some specific citations? Did he lie
about our support for Sadam Hussein?
No
Our support for Indonesia?
Yes
Our bombing of the sudanese
pharmacuetical
willing to concede that at his point I'm talking completely out of my
arse. (That will change when I get time to do some real homework in this
area, however.)
From: Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Echelon-like
or know that their message
is of enough importance to go outside ofLotus Notes or whatever if they have
it.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:37:52AM -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
OK, let's assume for the same of argument that it takes about 1 minute
for
Echelon/NSA-like resources to break a weakly
So as a follow on question...what kind of hardware does it take to break the
weak and strong versions of Bogus Notes? Is it possible that NSA or Echelon
have the ability to decode a large number of such messages?
And if the amount of hardware needed to break the strong version is
returns to my original point: the easy availability of strong crypto
products does not mean it is unprofitable for an agency to continue to push
populations towards lighter forms of encryption.
From: Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Echelon-like...
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:41:21 +0100
Sounds about right. 64 bit crypto in the strong version (which is
not that strong -- the distributed.net challenge recently broke a 64
bit key
Notes) on EVERY message they sent.
Or perhaps you've all discussed this before, but the responses I've seen so
far don't indicate that.
From: Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Durden lies, was: Echelon-like resources...
Date: Fri, 11 Oct
Uh, first of all can we get rid of the part of the subject line that says
Durden lies? (Particularly seeing how the quote attributed to me did not
originate from me.)
As for Chomsky lying, can you give us some specific citations? Did he lie
about our support for Sadam Hussein? Our support for
I assume everyone knows the little arrangement that lotus
reached with the NSA over its encrypted secure email?
I'm new here, so do tell if I am wrong. Are you referring to the two levels
of Encryption available in Bogus Notes? (ie, the North American and the
International, the International
XRCD is not steganographic in the sense that we are disscusing, but merely a
very carefully done 24 bit master mastered down to the normal 16x44 of CD.
They also pay very careful attention to the physical manufacturing of the
disc, and use aluminum as the substrate (instead of the normal
The other formats of note are probably SACD and then DVD-Audio. SACD
is multichannel 16-bit/44.1kHz... so multichannel CD without additional
sample resolution (if I recall). SACD is not backwards compatible
though, whereas HDCD is.
DVD-Audio is really the way to go, though... 24-bit/96kHz
601 - 630 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
