I've updated the data files today, it has about 7,83,014 facilities. You
can download individual state files
from https://github.com/pratapvardhan/rural-facilities-pmgsy
On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 11:47:43 AM UTC+5:30 nikh...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Harsh,
>
> The PMGSY site is dizzyingly
Hi Harsh,
The PMGSY site is dizzyingly full of data! Kudos and gratitude to all the
people who have been working on it and the govt / elected officials who
supported its release to the public. Sets a great benchmark / precedent.
Even apart from the data itself, the hierarchy in the dropdown
>
>
>
> Does anyone know how to get this data ported to OSM (if at all that's
> possibility)?
>
>
Importing data to OSM is possible, but since it will have to be conflated
with any existing data, it will require quite a bit of data
preparation with many volunteers. An example of a recent import
On Wednesday, 20 January 2021 at 11:40:46 UTC+5:30 prkraj...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hello Harsh and everyone,
> This is great work!
>
> Would it be possible to include these two pieces of info in the FAQs:
> 1. Date/ Month of the opening of the dataset to the public
> 2. The survey period over
Hello Harsh and everyone,
This is great work!
Would it be possible to include these two pieces of info in the FAQs:
1. Date/ Month of the opening of the dataset to the public
2. The survey period over which this dataset was collected (I understand
the survey is ongoing for some states, so maybe
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:10 PM krit...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Really useful to have this FAQ! Just a quick question is there a
> habitation to PC11/LGD village mapping anywhere?
> In case we want to match this at the village level?
>
A lookup of the PMGSY data block names to block LGD codes was
Really useful to have this FAQ! Just a quick question is there a habitation
to PC11/LGD village mapping anywhere?
In case we want to match this at the village level?
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 14:59:00 UTC+5:30 Harsh Nisar wrote:
> Closing the loop: The team has uploaded FAQs on the main
Closing the loop: The team has uploaded FAQs on the main website and given
a static link for attribution & sharing.
http://omms.nic.in/Home/PMGSYRuralDataset/
On Saturday, 5 December 2020 at 06:36:33 UTC+5:30 krit...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ah makes sense! Still, i look forward to the dataset FAQ
Closing the loop:
The team as uploaded FAQs on the main website and given a static link for
attribution & sharing.
http://omms.nic.in/Home/PMGSYRuralDataset/
On Saturday, 5 December 2020 at 06:36:33 UTC+5:30 krit...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ah makes sense! Still, i look forward to the dataset FAQ
Ah makes sense! Still, i look forward to the dataset FAQ getting uploaded.
But thank you so much for the quick clarification.
Regards,
Kritarth
On Thursday, 3 December 2020 at 12:23:27 UTC+5:30 Harsh Nisar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The definitions were purposely kept lose as the primary focus of the
>
Hi,
The definitions were purposely kept lose as the primary focus of the
datasets was to aid *local *selection of roads for a government programme.
In such cases; the consistency of definitions within a block/district/state
was assumed more important than having it consistent across
This is Amazing!
Thank you very much!!
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:49 AM nisar...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> *ANN:* PMGSY has opened data for about 7,00,000 geo-tagged rural
> facilities across India.
>
> The data was collected to help plan road investments in PMGSY-III. It was
>
Hi Harsh, All;
Thank you for pointing this dataset out and storing it in an easy to access
location. It looks super useful.
I was trying to find how exactly they've classified schools and hospitals
and couldn't find anything in this PMGSY documentation
Btw, Bhanu and I have made some great progress matching the LGD codes in
the last hour. 100% of districts matched and it looks like the PMGSY
district names are definitely older (eg. Allahabad vs Prayagraj).
Down to 1539 unmatched blocks which can be finished with some help. Feel
free to request
I've added a note on top with source, license and last updated. Is there an
recommended citation you'd like me to place? (also, feel free to submit a
PR of what you think might keep the reading more informed.)
Rows which don't have lat-long will get updated as the work progresses in
the concerned states. The lat-long which are out of extent will not be
corrected and remain as-is because of errors in the app or simply low GPS
accuracy. They'll be very few. Once the survey work is complete and
Images seem to have been lost. Attaching them.
Distribution for states.
[image: pm1.PNG]I
22 rows which probably have sub-category mislabeled?
[image: pm2.PNG]
On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 9:27:56 AM UTC-5 Pratap Vardhan wrote:
> Thanks Nisar, that's useful to know. I'll update the repo
Thanks Nisar, that's useful to know. I'll update the repo with these
pointers.
What frequency for updates would you suggest (monthly or)? If you prefer,
we can move the repo to datameet org or any other widely accessible one and
collectively edit it.
So, what I meant about coordinates data
Really beautiful!
I'll answer some of the queries you raised on the tweet thread here for
everyone.
You've commented that the data in UK, HP & Nagaland appears erroneous. I am
assuming because the lat/long is missing. It is so because these states are
still doing the survey and haven't
I've pulled states csvs to this
repo https://github.com/pratapvardhan/rural-facilities-pmgsy. Consolidated
India csv is
at
https://www.kaggle.com/pratapvardhan/770k-geotagged-rural-facilities-in-india-pmgsy
And, posted a thread of couple of visuals and minor data issues here
Wonderful Harsh, its amazing to see such rural spatial datasets opened by
the government. The OpenStreetMap India community is looking into the data
to better get a sense of the quality to see how it could be integrated with
the existing OSM basemap.
As a sample have made an interactive map of
21 matches
Mail list logo
