Re: [DBD-SQLite] SQLite 3.7.x problem fixed, please dev-release

2010-08-27 Thread Adam Kennedy
Quite a few FAIL reports, mostly around Test::NoWarnings in fts3.t

I'm on flaky connection, but if someone can fix it I'll drop another
dev release tonight.

Adam K

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
 Kenichi Ishigaki wrote:

 Hi. Sorry that I had little time recently and didn't fix
 the issue on sqlite numbers for 64 bit environments.
 I tentatively disabled it as it is rather a big change
 and might break other distributions' tests that expected
 every bind param was a quoted text for sqlite. I'll look
 into it again after we ship the next non-dev release.

 Best,

 Kenichi

 Thank you for the timeliness of these corrections, which got in prior to
 Adam making the developer release.

 Under the circumstances, I recommend releasing what we have now as version
 1.31 production within a week if there are no showstopper problems
 discovered with 1.30_04 in the meantime.

 In preparation for that, I'll send out a few emails now asking for people to
 test 1.30_04, which has some large changes from 1.29.

 -- Darren Duncan


___
DBD-SQLite mailing list
DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite


Re: [DBD-SQLite] SQLite 3.7.x problem fixed, please dev-release

2010-08-25 Thread Darren Duncan

Kenichi Ishigaki wrote:

Hi. Sorry that I had little time recently and didn't fix
the issue on sqlite numbers for 64 bit environments.
I tentatively disabled it as it is rather a big change
and might break other distributions' tests that expected
every bind param was a quoted text for sqlite. I'll look
into it again after we ship the next non-dev release.

Best,

Kenichi


Thank you for the timeliness of these corrections, which got in prior to Adam 
making the developer release.


Under the circumstances, I recommend releasing what we have now as version 1.31 
production within a week if there are no showstopper problems discovered with 
1.30_04 in the meantime.


In preparation for that, I'll send out a few emails now asking for people to 
test 1.30_04, which has some large changes from 1.29.


-- Darren Duncan

___
DBD-SQLite mailing list
DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite


Re: [DBD-SQLite] SQLite 3.7.x problem fixed, please dev-release

2010-08-25 Thread Toby Corkindale

On 26/08/10 05:38, Darren Duncan wrote:

Under the circumstances, I recommend releasing what we have now as
version 1.31 production within a week if there are no showstopper
problems discovered with 1.30_04 in the meantime.


It sounds like there are some quite major changes in this version of 
SQLite, and thus also DBD::SQLite.


As with other major releases, I'm interested in testing the dev release 
against our code which does tend to stress SQLite - however this isn't 
something I can fit in in the time frame you're discussing (within a 
week).


I am sure I'm not the only person in this situation.

Do you really need to release a so-called stable version so rapidly?
If what you have now is a release candidate, then would you mind leaving 
it for a bit longer while people have a chance to shake it out?


DBD::SQLite is a major piece of many applications. Please be careful 
what you nominate as stable.


Thanks for your efforts in keeping it up to date and incorporating 
upstream improvements - it's really appreciated.


-Toby

___
DBD-SQLite mailing list
DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite


Re: [DBD-SQLite] SQLite 3.7.x problem fixed, please dev-release

2010-08-24 Thread Kenichi Ishigaki
Hi. Sorry that I had little time recently and didn't fix
the issue on sqlite numbers for 64 bit environments.
I tentatively disabled it as it is rather a big change
and might break other distributions' tests that expected
every bind param was a quoted text for sqlite. I'll look
into it again after we ship the next non-dev release.

Best,

Kenichi

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:19:59 +1000, Adam Kennedy adamkennedybac...@gmail.com 
wrote:

Will do

On 25 Aug 2010 09:53, Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
 Update ...

 Thanks to Niko Tyni (Debian Perl Group), a patch to fix the
incompatibility with
 SQLite 3.7.x has been handed to us via RT (
 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=60698 ). It was just 3
lines for
 test.pm.

 The patch was written against 1.29 but I tested it against both 1.30_03
and
 trunk and it fixed the test failures under 3.7.x for both.

 Since my earlier report of this problem, 3 more SQLite releases came out,
and
 I've added all 3 to DBD::SQLite at the time; 3.7.2 is now the latest;
upgrading
 to it is officially recommended for users of all prior releases.

 I also un-TODO'd 3 other tests which now pass, but didn't in 1.30_03.

 I also skipped-all t_44891_strings_look_like_numbers.t which has a few
 still-failing tests (some large integers are formatted in scientific
notation
 like floats) so that we can ship the 3.7.x fix ASAP.

 That test had been added after 1.30_03 came out, and fails with that
release too.

 Adam, can you please cut 1.30_04 now? (Don't forget to update the release
date
 in the Changes file.)

 The test suite all passes now, for me.

 The t_44891_strings_look_like_numbers.t will still need dealing with
somehow
 prior to a non-dev release, I suppose.

 Thank you. -- Darren Duncan

 ___
 DBD-SQLite mailing list
 DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk
 http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite

___
DBD-SQLite mailing list
DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite



___
DBD-SQLite mailing list
DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite