[Fwd: Re: Handle Creation with new_child()]

2005-02-13 Thread Michael A Chase tech
I'd meant to sent this to the list. Sorry. On 02/12/2005 07:35 PM, David Wheeler said: On Feb 12, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: That's starting to get might complex, isn't it? Uh, mite. :-) Or mighty, perhaps. Quite. So, I'm looking at your new_child() stuff, instead. I'm

Re: DBI::DBD::Metadata: type_info_all

2005-02-13 Thread Tim Bunce
Thanks Steffen, applied. Tim. On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:59:38AM +0100, Steffen Goeldner wrote: A DBI driver should pass the following tests: my @ti = $dbh-type_info; ok( @ti,'type_info'); my $tia = $dbh-type_info_all; is( ref $tia,'ARRAY','type_info_all'); my $idx = shift

Re: [Fwd: Re: Handle Creation with new_child()]

2005-02-13 Thread David Wheeler
On Feb 13, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: Maybe the answer it to not allow changing attributes on a cached handle. That's already the rule and would not change. Er, that's news to me. Uh, sorry, I was thinking of the resetting of AutoCommit. Different applications use handle caching for

Re: Handle Creation with new_child()

2005-02-13 Thread David Wheeler
On Feb 13, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: So, I'm looking at your new_child() stuff, instead. That's a much bigger can of worms! (And one that's hard to tell how deep it is before you really get into it. Driver migration issues may be painful, for example.) Hrm. No :) Having per-class