On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:40 +0200, Jens Rehsack
rehs...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, I understood your desire - but your patch doesn't catch all the backward
compatibility you typically want - see (and apply)
0001-add-test-case-for-rt61168.patch
first.
As we have no reason this time to run
2010/9/16 H.Merijn Brand h.m.br...@xs4all.nl:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:40 +0200, Jens Rehsack
rehs...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, I understood your desire - but your patch doesn't catch all the backward
compatibility you typically want - see (and apply)
0001-add-test-case-for-rt61168.patch
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:43:05 +0200, Jens Rehsack
rehs...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/9/16 H.Merijn Brand h.m.br...@xs4all.nl:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:40 +0200, Jens Rehsack
rehs...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, I understood your desire - but your patch doesn't catch all the
backward
2010/9/14 Jens Rehsack rehs...@googlemail.com:
2010/9/14 H.Merijn Brand via RT bug-dbd-...@rt.cpan.org:
URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=61168
The problem is two-fold. Using the most recent versions of DBI,
SQL::Statement, Text::CSV_XS and DBD::CSV, the problem was that the
