On 25/10/10 11:40, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:59:57PM +0100, Martin J. Evans wrote:
I've released a DBD::ODBC requiring Perl 5.8 but included the use of
my_snprintf (from ppport.h) which unfortunately was not defined
until 5.9.4. Fair enough, my fault but I have no way
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:05:52PM +0100, Martin J. Evans wrote:
As a result, I'd like to change that include in DBIXS.h to add this
flexibility in the future.
Any objections?
None.
Done, thanks.
I didn't add a change entry. Sometimes I'm unsure whether to or not.
In
I've released a DBD::ODBC requiring Perl 5.8 but included the use of
my_snprintf (from ppport.h) which unfortunately was not defined until
5.9.4. Fair enough, my fault but I have no way of fixing it (other than
reversing my_snprintf back to sprintf) because of the way DBI includes
dbipport.h
H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:10:29 +0100, Martin J. Evans
martin.ev...@easysoft.com wrote:
I noticed DBI was upgraded in subversion to the latest ppport.h (in
dbipport.h) and the recommendations that ppport.h has made.
:)
dbipport.h seems to be ppport.h from Devel
I noticed DBI was upgraded in subversion to the latest ppport.h (in
dbipport.h) and the recommendations that ppport.h has made.
dbipport.h seems to be ppport.h from Devel::PPPort.
The DBI::DBD docs say to copy dbivport.h from the latest DBI
distribution to your DBD distribution - which I have
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:10:29 +0100, Martin J. Evans
martin.ev...@easysoft.com wrote:
I noticed DBI was upgraded in subversion to the latest ppport.h (in
dbipport.h) and the recommendations that ppport.h has made.
:)
dbipport.h seems to be ppport.h from Devel::PPPort.
Correct
The DBI::DBD
