On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 04:07:09PM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
I was tempted to leave The cool thing is but opted to drop it as it
doesn't match the tone of the rest of the docs - although they are
rather dry :)
Pity. Thought I was
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:58:52PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
I am exploring a few different options for adding authentication
support to Gofer::Transport::http and I would appreciate any
feedback.
The most straightforward option is to add several attributes
(netloc, realm, http_user,
On Mar 7, 2010, at 5:43 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Looks good, thanks. Pity you removed the `$dbh-{private_myapp_sql_mode}`
bit, though, as that's required when using Cconnect_cached(), which
you almost certainly are doing if you need this hack.
Are you sure it's required when using connected()?
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:58:52PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
I am exploring a few different options for adding authentication
support to Gofer::Transport::http and I would appreciate any
feedback.
The most straightforward option is to add several attributes
(netloc, realm,
Henri Asseily wrote:
On 3/7/2010 3:50 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:58:52PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
I am exploring a few different options for adding authentication
support to Gofer::Transport::http and I would appreciate any
feedback.
The most straightforward option
Stuart Johnston wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:58:52PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
I am exploring a few different options for adding authentication
support to Gofer::Transport::http and I would appreciate any
feedback.
The most straightforward option is to add several
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:29:29AM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 7, 2010, at 5:43 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Looks good, thanks. Pity you removed the `$dbh-{private_myapp_sql_mode}`
bit, though, as that's required when using Cconnect_cached(), which
you almost certainly are doing if you
On Mar 7, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Uh, yeah, I just looked at the code. Sometimes I confuse myself.
I think that's a bug. I always intended connected() to be used as an
on-new-physical-connection-established hook.
Any objections to making it so?
Not from me, but you might get
On 3/7/2010 11:11 PM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
Pass userid and a hash of userid and password.
The server uses the password to hash userid and password and tests for
equality.
That's something similar to what Amazon and others do.
The idea here is to add support for Basic HTTP Authentication,
