On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:40 +0200, Jens Rehsack
rehs...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, I understood your desire - but your patch doesn't catch all the backward
compatibility you typically want - see (and apply)
0001-add-test-case-for-rt61168.patch
first.
As we have no reason this time to run
2010/9/16 H.Merijn Brand h.m.br...@xs4all.nl:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:40 +0200, Jens Rehsack
rehs...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, I understood your desire - but your patch doesn't catch all the backward
compatibility you typically want - see (and apply)
0001-add-test-case-for-rt61168.patch
No tests?
Tim.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:48:36PM -0700, rehs...@cvs.perl.org wrote:
Author: REHSACK
Date: Wed Sep 15 22:48:35 2010
New Revision: 14407
Modified:
dbi/trunk/Changes
dbi/trunk/lib/DBD/DBM.pm
dbi/trunk/lib/DBD/File.pm
dbi/trunk/lib/DBD/File/Developers.pod
2010/9/16 Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com:
No tests?
The tests are already in there - t/5?dbm* test for these features, especially
t/52dbm_complex.t. This is more a refactoring to allow better implementation
in DBD::CSV - which has a separate test for it's special case.
Tim.
/Jens
On Wed, Sep
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:43:05 +0200, Jens Rehsack
rehs...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/9/16 H.Merijn Brand h.m.br...@xs4all.nl:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:51:40 +0200, Jens Rehsack
rehs...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, I understood your desire - but your patch doesn't catch all the
backward
