On 2016-12-20 8:29 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:
Here's a question: what is the GitHub repo? I see 0 repos under
https://github.com/duncand (which I assume is you)
I didn't mention it before because I didn't want to appear too spammy.
To answer your question, I created a GitHub "organization"
On 10/12/2016 9:08 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:
As a followup to this thread, I have now committed and updated on GitHub a
rename of my API spec(s) as follows:
Muldis::DBP - Formal spec of an abstract database protocol for Perl 6
The "DBP" was also one of Brock Wilcox' working name suggestions
As a followup to this thread, I have now committed and updated on GitHub a
rename of my API spec(s) as follows:
Muldis::DBP - Formal spec of an abstract database protocol for Perl 6
The "DBP" was also one of Brock Wilcox' working name suggestions so I also
"acknowledge" this in the spec.
On 2016-12-09 7:41 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
Thanks for starting this thread.
Muldis::DBI::Duck_Coupling
If anyone wants to propose a better working title for the spec
That's pretty wordy, and other than "DBI" doesn't tell us what it is.
How about DBAPI? Or something short and sweet.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Thanks for starting this thread.
> Muldis::DBI::Duck_Coupling
>
> If anyone wants to propose a better working title for the spec
That's pretty wordy, and other than "DBI" doesn't tell us what it is.
How about DBAPI? Or something short and
Tim, thank you for your response.
I had posted my RFC more than 2 weeks ago and was starting to be concerned that
no one had yet made the slightest comment on it.
Your response of today has addressed my primary questions and concerns, for
which I greatly appreciate that, and it will help me
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:06:39PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
> This message is an RFC regarding Perl 6 and my proposed official successor
> there for the current Perl 5 "DBI" module, and in particular for usage of
> the "DBI" namespace.
> I believe that now is the time for a serious look at
This message is an RFC regarding Perl 6 and my proposed official successor there
for the current Perl 5 "DBI" module, and in particular for usage of the "DBI"
namespace.
For context, Perl 6 only now is starting to be treated by the community as an
actual usable-in-production language similar
