David, thanks for your quick response.
David E. Wheeler wrote:
You *really* need to get Matt to signoff on this, IMHO.
I have tried emailing Matt several times without response already. Should I try
telephoning him next? For all it looks like, Matt has abandoned the module. If
someone
In data 27 marzo 2009 alle ore 03:30:10, Darren Duncan
dar...@darrenduncan.net ha scritto:
So, out of my un-paid projects, my promise to take over release
management of DBD::SQLite (from the still incommunicado previous owner)
has now come to the front of my queue (now that Set::Relation
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:30:10 -0700, Darren Duncan
dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
1. I have no problem with unbundling, but how big a deal is it to keep
a pretty recent version bundled for systems that do /not/ have the
library installed? In my mixed environment, neither HP-UX nor AIX
Cosimo Streppone wrote:
In data 27 marzo 2009 alle ore 03:30:10, Darren Duncan
dar...@darrenduncan.net ha scritto:
So, out of my un-paid projects, my promise to take over release
management of DBD::SQLite (from the still incommunicado previous
owner) has now come to the front of my queue (now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I have tried emailing Matt several times without response already.
Did you cc modu...@perl.org? What did they say? They've been helpful
with me in the past in tracking module owners down.
In particular, I will continue to bundle the SQLite
Amalgamation what the SQLite maintainers recommend, and it's the
most portable, etc. So this is the right choice.
Also, given the way SQLite is maintained (backward compatibility is fairly
strict, they jump through hoops in their API to make it so), bundling
is fine, and is intended by the
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
I have tried emailing Matt several times without response already.
Did you cc modu...@perl.org? What did they say? They've been helpful
with me in the past in tracking module owners down.
I very rarely read mailing list mail these days - my
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 27, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
I have tried emailing Matt several times without response already.
Should I try telephoning him next? For all it looks like, Matt has
abandoned the module. If someone knows better, or has been in contact
recently,
On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:40 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
I'm not a pushover. It's more that I wasn't strongly opinionated on
the matter in the first place and I was fishing; your response led
to me realizing that a simpler plan of action was better (and less
work for both me and others).
Hello,
So, out of my un-paid projects, my promise to take over release management of
DBD::SQLite (from the still incommunicado previous owner) has now come to the
front of my queue (now that Set::Relation 0.9.0 is out), so I'm now starting to
think about it in detail and get to work over the
On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:
Hello,
So, out of my un-paid projects, my promise to take over release
management of DBD::SQLite (from the still incommunicado previous
owner) has now come to the front of my queue (now that Set::Relation
0.9.0 is out), so I'm now
11 matches
Mail list logo
