How about http://www.perl.com/download.csp
rachakonda muralikrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/30/04
12:45AM
Hi all,
I would like to know where I can get the perl version 5.004 for AIX.
I haven't found that on any of the prel sites.
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Murali
Dear Mr Bunce,
We are using perl 5.005 and mysql 3.23 on a Linux Redhat 7.2 system.
We are trying to implement a better timeout for the DBI connections, as
the one incorporated in the DBI module only has a granularity of seconds.
We don't use persistent connections or mod-perl, so connection
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:19:15PM +0200, Dave Mullen - Marikina CGI wrote:
Dear Mr Bunce,
We are using perl 5.005 and mysql 3.23 on a Linux Redhat 7.2 system.
We are trying to implement a better timeout for the DBI connections, as
the one incorporated in the DBI module only has a
Hello,
from main perl
connect,
forking n kids and waiting for them to end with their prepare/execute sth
back to parent
and disconnect
gives
DBD::Oracle::db disconnect failed: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
(DBD ERROR: OCISessionEnd)
even if I reconnect inside kids,
do
n is finite and limited by the Oracle installation, not perl. You (plus all other
connections) may be reaching this limit.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fork and keeping
Mr Bunce,
Not all of the rest of the world is using persistent database connections.
There is a good reason not to use persistent database connections, it is database
licensing.
Licensing may not be an issue with mysql but it is an issue with commercial databases.
I use Informix with
That's not true. You can have one persistant connection and reuse that for all
requests, it'll just take away from having to connect/disconnect all the time. No one
said you have to open 40 different connections and pay for 40 concurrent licenses.
-Original Message-
From: Terry
Yes, it is true. The licensing agreement clearly states that connection pooling like
you describe is not allowed under the concurrent licensing structure.
Terry Maragakis
Database Administrator
The Inteq Group Inc.
5445 La Sierra Dr. Suite 400
Dallas, TX 75231
214-739-9494
214-739-7979 Fax
What connection pooling? You have one open database connection and the rest of the
scripts wait for it? There is no concurrent access happening. The only thing that
might matter is if you're using threads and/or processes. Each db vendor has
different concurrent license schemes, I always
I agree with you, that there has been a lot of confusion in the past and that the
sales people are generally uninformed about the licensing of their products, and
different vendors may license products differently. I believe that Oracle does not
license their product on the concurent user model
The child has to make and break the connection. You can't pass it from parent to
child. What I do is not have the parent connect at all, just leave it to the kids
ltg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 9:11 AM
To:
Licensing may not be an issue with mysql but it is an issue with commercial databases.
I use Informix with hundreds of users accessing the database for extremely short queries from a GUI. I cannot afford to have them connected constantly, I would have to spent $100,000 per server in licensing.
Commercial databases have commercial support behind them, that's what is driving it.
Most non-IT companies, do not want to invest in internal departments that are
responsible for supporting an open source software product. Until a giant like IBM,
HP, or similar puts their support behind an
Sterin, Ilya (I.) wrote:
Commercial databases have commercial support behind them, that's what is driving it.
Most non-IT companies, do not want to invest in internal departments that are
responsible for supporting an open source software product. Until a giant like IBM,
HP, or similar puts
I know Tim will kill me for this OT stuff:-)
I feel the likely hood of the economy changing and causing
major issues
for big companies is way more likely than the open source
community to
stop supporting and developing.
It's not that the open source community doesn't support, it's
Sterin, Ilya (I.) wrote:
I know Tim will kill me for this OT stuff:-)
Tim's a pretty cool guy it seems, but maybe we should let the horse die :)
I feel the likely hood of the economy changing and causing
major issues
for big companies is way more likely than the open source
community to
for one child, you can pass it
once you've done dbh-{InactiveDestroy}=1; inside the parent
and when it ends, the same connexion can be used from the parent.
But for many children, I tried to disconnect inside the parent,
and connect/disconnect inside kids,
and back to parent when kids end,
17 matches
Mail list logo
