Hi Christian,
hmm I think in this case I prefer a consistent order - that way, the
configurations are grouped by platform, which especially useful when
you want to differentiate spoc, posc, opsc from spoc, posc, ospc :)
As you wish, was just an idea :)
Take care,
Fred
Hi Masahide,
If one ask me why? I would answer that it is become many of the
wikipedia categories are classes and in such a case why not defining
them as a Class, and not a category (that could be considered a class
for some sense of that class)?
Wikipedia category is a
Hi Richard,
No. The Wikipedia category system is simply not appropriate as a class
hierarchy. That's not a bug; it serves its purpose well, and the
Wikipedia community likes it that way. It is essentially a tagging
system, where tags themselves can be tagged. See [1] for an in-depth
Hi Richard,
In fact, Wikipedia categories can be many things: named entities,
concepts, relations, (something else?)
They certainly all are skos:Concepts. SKOS was created for the purpose
of representing exactly that sort of things -- thesauri, taxonomies,
and tagging schemes -- in RDF.
Hi Davide
I'm playing with the dbpedia sparql endpoint in order to extract the
new dbpedia-owl:properties
Nonetheless, it works fine with some resources but it doesn't work
with others.
So for example
Hi Bob,
Not sure about the namespace for dbpedia2, but try to change the filters
for:
?artistName bif:contains Miles.
?album bif:contains Blue.
Good luck,
Fred
Sometimes the following query works, and sometimes it times out. Can
anyone give me any suggestions about ways to
Hi all,
I think you are not querying the Virtuoso endpoint. Are you accessing
this URI: http://dbpedia.org/sparql/, or another place? This could be
the issue ;)
No bif:contains doesn't have any prefix and is a built-in function of
the datastore.
Take care,
Fred
Hi Richard
I'm looking at:
http://www.umbel.org/documentation.html
I can't find umbel_class_hierarchy_v071.n3 there, and I also don't
know if umbel_dbpedia_types_v071.nt is the same as the
umbel_dbpedia_types.n3 available for download there (note the
different formats).
I think that
Hi Ross!
Exactly. It is a good example of the usage of umbel:linksEntity. so, it
links a concept to a related (in terms of aboutness) individual.
So, with these two properties, we have the usecases for: Concept -
Individual and Individual - Concept
Additionally, you have other properties that
