Hi Rémi,
On May 18, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:56:52 +0100, Colin Perkins c...@csperkins.org
wrote:
What's the concern here? Use the IANA registered port, unless specified
otherwise by the application. Any UDP tunnelling solutions must specify
a
UDP
On 19 May 2011, at 12:54, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 07:24:19 +0100, Colin Perkins c...@csperkins.org wrote:
It might be that the API makes the problem go away, but that seems like a
risky bet in the absence of any sketch of an API (it would not need to be
normative).
On Wed, 18 May 2011 07:24:19 +0100, Colin Perkins c...@csperkins.org
wrote:
It might be that the API makes the problem go away, but that seems like
a risky bet in the absence of any sketch of an API (it would not need
to
be normative).
Do you want to propose an API?
I have no _sane_ ideas
Rémi,
On 18 May 2011, at 06:22, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:56:52 +0100, Colin Perkins c...@csperkins.org
wrote:
What's the concern here? Use the IANA registered port, unless specified
otherwise by the application. Any UDP tunnelling solutions must specify a
UDP port.
On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:56:52 +0100, Colin Perkins c...@csperkins.org
wrote:
What's the concern here? Use the IANA registered port, unless specified
otherwise by the application. Any UDP tunnelling solutions must specify
a
UDP port.
The concern is that we have two (pairs of) ports. This does
