Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-13 Thread Gerrit Renker
Burak I have tried to replay your results but can not find anything wrong with the current test kernel. Please have a look at the results below, I repeated the same experiment on two different testbeds. Incidentally, these results agree with the values you observed for TCP Reno. It seems that

Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-13 Thread Burak Gorkemli
Gerrit, I am cloning your tree with the following command: git-clone git://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk/dccp_exp my_dccp But I did not check out the DCCP sub-branch, by: git-checkout --track -b dccp origin/dccp However, as I type this command above, git complains saying: git

Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-13 Thread Gerrit Renker
| git-clone git://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk/dccp_exp my_dccp | | | But I did not check out the DCCP sub-branch, by: | | git-checkout --track -b dccp origin/dccp | | | However, as I type this command above, git complains saying: | | git checkout: branch dccp already exists | | |

Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-12 Thread Burak Gorkemli
Here is my list of points, hoping that the others will add theirs, too: * would be good to have a standardised set of scripts, for comparison/benchmarking * the built-in VoIP module only works for UDP -- is it possible to port this to DCCP? * as per previous email, more

Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-12 Thread Burak Gorkemli
| The scenario that I mostly use is limiting the bandwidth with a middlebox running TBF. However, all of the recent trees | except 2.6.20final_dccp (2.6.20 patched with Ian's modifications) that I have tested fail to achieve acceptable transfer rates. Thank you for the report, but

Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-12 Thread Alessio Botta
Gerrit Renker ha scritto: | I am new of this mailing list and I am really interested in the | measurements you are performing with DCCP. This was more of a regression test, as there had been recent changes in the test tree, to see that the kernel (not userspace) still performs in a predictable

Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-12 Thread Alessio Botta
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo ha scritto: Em Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:21:28PM +, Gerrit Renker escreveu: | I am new of this mailing list and I am really interested in the | measurements you are performing with DCCP. This was more of a regression test, as there had been recent changes in the

Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-11 Thread Gerrit Renker
| I am new of this mailing list and I am really interested in the | measurements you are performing with DCCP. This was more of a regression test, as there had been recent changes in the test tree, to see that the kernel (not userspace) still performs in a predictable way. | Which tool are you

Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-11 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:21:28PM +, Gerrit Renker escreveu: | I am new of this mailing list and I am really interested in the | measurements you are performing with DCCP. This was more of a regression test, as there had been recent changes in the test tree, to see that the kernel (not

[Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set

2007-12-10 Thread Gerrit Renker
As promised, here are some test results using the latest (2.6.25-backported) version of the test tree. These are sanity checks and by no means statistically significant. For that it would necessary to run more tests, take averages and calculate standard deviation / error bars. Longer test runs (