Re: Linux 6.1.27, cgroup: Instruction fault 4 with systemd

2023-06-19 Thread Frank Scheiner
). Running an SP kernel does not trigger that problem. I posted a diff between the -alpha-generic and -alpha-smp kernel configurations on [1]. [1]: https://pastebin.com/AwZQjHD9 On 22.05.23 11:37, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hello Frank! On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 11:34 +0200, Frank Scheiner wrote

Re: [PATCH] module: fix module load for ia64

2023-06-03 Thread Frank Scheiner
e module_layout with module_memory") Reported-by: Frank Scheiner Closes: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2023/05/msg00010.html Closes: https://marc.info/?l=linux-ia64=168509859125505 Cc: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Song Liu --- kernel/module/main.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insert

Re: systemd 252.6-1 produces an Instruction fault, sysvinit works

2023-05-22 Thread Frank Scheiner
Dear Michael, On 21.05.23 02:11, Michael Cree wrote: On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:01:25PM +0200, Frank Scheiner wrote: Welcome to Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)! [ 11.958978] CPU 1 [ 11.958978] systemd(1): Instruction fault 4 [ 12.032220] pc = [] ra = [] ps = Not tainted

Linux 6.1.27, cgroup: Instruction fault 4 with systemd

2023-05-22 Thread Frank Scheiner
Dear all, as already outlined on the debian-alpha mailing list ([1]), I get an instruction fault 4 with Linux 6.1.27 (6.1.0-9 on Debian actually) and systemd on my DS25: ``` aboot: Linux/Alpha SRM bootloader version 1.0_pre20040408 aboot: switching to OSF/1 PALcode version 1.92 aboot: loading

systemd 252.6-1 produces an Instruction fault, sysvinit works

2023-05-18 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi all, subject says it all: I yesterday upgraded my root FS(es) on my DS25 and noticed the following issue with the systemd version right where the login prompt should appear (I seem to remember that I recognized something similar already late last year with a self-compiled kernel but

Re: Bug#1036158: gcc-13: Please raise baseline for alpha to EV56

2023-05-17 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi all, On 17.05.23 11:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi Michael! On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 20:25 +1200, Michael Cree wrote: On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:38:56AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: After a long discussion on IRC and the mailing list, we have agreed to raise the baseline

Re: Unversioned symbols when building kernel package

2023-01-04 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Adrian, On 04.01.23 22:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hello! I just tried to build the Debian kernel package for alpha which fails with: debian/bin/buildcheck.py debian/build/build_alpha_none_alpha-generic alpha none alpha-generic ABI is not completely versioned!  Refusing to

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-15 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Adrian, On 15.12.22 11:06, Frank Scheiner wrote: Hi, On 15.12.22 11:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi! On 12/15/22 10:49, Frank Scheiner wrote: Maybe adding [1] might help, but the patch actually removes it. It's missing this hunk: diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-15 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi, On 15.12.22 11:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi! On 12/15/22 10:49, Frank Scheiner wrote: Maybe adding [1] might help, but the patch actually removes it. It's missing this hunk: diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf-sigstksz.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysconf-sigstksz.h

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-15 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi, On 15.12.22 09:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi! On 12/14/22 21:44, Frank Scheiner wrote: I'm attaching the second diff as a patch. I think there's some whitespace difference. I manually applied the rejected stuff, made a `git diff` and comparing that to your attached patch gives

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-14 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 14.12.22 21:32, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi! On 12/14/22 21:16, Frank Scheiner wrote: I'll do that tomorrow. The thing is that this diff doesn't apply cleanly: Which version of the workaround diff did you use? There are two. There is one that applies cleanly on top

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-14 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Adrian, On 14.12.22 20:51, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] Can we be sure that this reproducer identifies the same problem than the build failures from the original post ([1])? [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2022/11/msg3.html Well, this is how I identified that

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-14 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 14.12.22 20:55, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] Unfortunately it also doesn't work here when optimized for EV67. OK, this just confirms what my cross-compile tests with "-mcpu=ev67 -mtune=ev67" where the segfault wasn't fixed either by raising the baseline. If you have a user

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-14 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 14.12.22 18:21, Frank Scheiner wrote: [...] Regardless, I can confirm this on my DS15: ``` root@ds15:/srv/storage/build# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD/glibc-at-36231bee7ab36d59dd121ea85b91411ae86945f3 /bin/bash root@ds15:/srv/storage/build# echo $? 0 root@ds15:/srv/storage/build# exit exit root@ds15

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-14 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Adrian, On 13.12.22 17:21, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi! On 12/13/22 10:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: You could cross-compile glibc. That's most likely what I am going to do. For the record, here's how I am doing it. [...] Thanks for that, this is quite useful. 4. Enter

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-13 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi, On 13.12.22 10:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] During this compilation I got 4 segfaults from the compiler (gcc-12) and a "gcc: internal compiler error: Aborted signal terminated program cc1". If you are interested in the details, I have all the error messages available. Is

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-13 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi again, just wanted to clarify something I saw in the build logs from the buildds - imago to be specific. On 13.12.22 10:33, Frank Scheiner wrote: [...] Summarizing it, I'd be grateful if someone could do the bisecting on one of the buildds or developer machines. According to the logs

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-13 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi guys, On 13.12.22 06:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] I am still interested in fixing the glibc bug and will work on bisecting it. I yestderday did give that a try on a DS15, but it took already hours to get glibc 2.33 compiled. During this compilation I got 4 segfaults from

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-12 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 12.12.22 09:17, Michael Cree wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 08:56:40AM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote: Dear Michael, On 12.12.22 08:27, Michael Cree wrote: With the usrmerge uploads now depending on a recent libc version Alpha is now dead in the water. Nothing can be built. Thus we have

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-12-12 Thread Frank Scheiner
Dear Michael, On 12.12.22 08:27, Michael Cree wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 01:47:59PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote: On 20.11.22 10:03, Michael Cree wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 12:45:17AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I just noticed that there is a regression in glibc on alpha

Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+

2022-11-20 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 20.11.22 10:03, Michael Cree wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 12:45:17AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I just noticed that there is a regression in glibc on alpha with version 2.34 or later. Looking at the build logs for Debian's 2.34-8 [1], 2.35-4 [2] and 2.36-4 [3], it's obvious

Re: Linux 6.0.7 MP kernel works on DS25

2022-11-12 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Adrian, On 12.11.22 11:17, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Don't know what to make out of this. Is this a problem in the kernel sources or a problem for the Debian kernel team? [2]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=linux=alpha No idea, really. We need to ask someone from the

Linux 6.0.7 MP kernel works on DS25

2022-11-11 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi all, just a short update for all that might haven't noticed yet: It looks like MP operation is working **again** on Alpha with recent kernels - which is just a pleasure to see! I'm unsure what was fixed in the kernel to make it work again, quickly scanning through the changes I didn't find

Re: Alpha has gone to its reward

2022-07-02 Thread Frank Scheiner
Dear Bob, On 02.07.22 04:43, Bob Tracy wrote: We had a horrific electrical storm on the 28th, and a lightning strike took out my home air-conditioning units, my cable modem, my Wifi router, a 16-port switch, my Ooma Telo, my main computer, my printer, and... my PWS-433au :-(. My condolences,

Re: MP kernels broken with version 5.4.0-1

2022-02-20 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 20.02.22 19:34, Michael Cree wrote: On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 01:39:44PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote: I'm unsure if someone already noticed, but it looks like the MP kernels for the alpha arch are broken since at least 5.4.0-1 ([1]), tested on: * quad processor ES45 (with 5.4.0-1, 5.7.0-1

MP kernels broken with version 5.4.0-1

2022-02-20 Thread Frank Scheiner
Dear all, I'm unsure if someone already noticed, but it looks like the MP kernels for the alpha arch are broken since at least 5.4.0-1 ([1]), tested on: * quad processor ES45 (with 5.4.0-1, 5.7.0-1) * single processor AS 800 (with 5.7.0-1) * dual processor DS25 (with 5.4.0-1 and 5.15.0-1) [1]:

Re: systemd woes continue

2019-07-17 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 7/17/19 15:50, Frank Scheiner wrote: On 7/17/19 15:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 7/17/19 3:16 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote: To sum things up: what Adrian intends to do for Alpha - pre-include the firmware on the installer discs - seems to be the only way to get this problem fixed w/o

Re: systemd woes continue

2019-07-17 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 7/17/19 15:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 7/17/19 3:16 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote: debian-installer doesn't use fdisk (anymore), it uses partman. Did you try any of the recent installation images, see [1]. Please note these images are currently shipped without proprietary firmware

Re: systemd woes continue

2019-07-17 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 7/17/19 11:54, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 7/17/19 11:00 AM, Michael Cree wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 04:11:44PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I assume you are talking about the non-functionality of a separate /usr partition, but this is something that isn't guaranteed

Re: Updated installation images 2019-01-20

2019-05-13 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 5/10/19 23:03, Michael Cree wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 09:31:02PM +0200, Frank Scheiner wrote: On 5/10/19 21:11, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On May 10, 2019, at 9:07 PM, Skye wrote: I was able to boot from CDROM and the loading ran fine until it got to the hardware discovery

Re: Updated installation images 2019-01-20

2019-05-10 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 5/10/19 21:11, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On May 10, 2019, at 9:07 PM, Skye wrote: I was able to boot from CDROM and the loading ran fine until it got to the hardware discovery phase. It was unable to find the CD-ROM hardware. My AlphaStations all have the Toshiba SCSI CD-ROM player.

Re: pata drivers in the alpha installer

2019-05-08 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi again, On 5/8/19 23:16, Frank Scheiner wrote: Hi all, On 5/8/19 22:24, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hello  JH Chatenet! On 5/8/19 10:19 PM, jhcha54...@free.fr wrote: I wonder if the line in the patch of bug #920353 [1] : pata-modules-${kernel:Version} would still be helpful. (I

Re: pata drivers in the alpha installer

2019-05-08 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi all, On 5/8/19 22:24, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hello JH Chatenet! On 5/8/19 10:19 PM, jhcha54...@free.fr wrote: I wonder if the line in the patch of bug #920353 [1] : pata-modules-${kernel:Version} would still be helpful. (I haven't tested since I submitted the bug report) I

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-04-20

2019-05-08 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 5/6/19 23:37, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On May 6, 2019, at 11:17 PM, Frank Scheiner mailto:frank.schei...@web.de>> wrote: I just tried the 2019-04-20 ISO on my DS25. Unfortunately the disc drive cannot be detected by the installer so I'm stuck at this point. As far as I know,

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-04-20

2019-05-06 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 4/20/19 10:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hello! I just uploaded updated installation images 2019-04-20 for the following Debian Ports architectures: * alpha [...] I uploaded both CD images [1] as well as netboot images [2]. Please test those images and report back over the

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-04-09

2019-04-17 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 4/16/19 14:55, Darren Goossens wrote: > Hi, and thanks for the inte3resting discussion. > > Yes, the QLOGIC chip seems to be the issue. The Debian 5 installer > works flawlessly. I used full disk not netinstall for that. I believe at that time the Linux kernel (tree) still included a lot of

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-04-09

2019-04-15 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 4/15/19 03:53, Darren Goossens wrote: Hi Sorry If I am replying in the wrong way, I tried to understand how these lists work but I always seem to get it wrong. I have tried to use the Alpha netboot image. It booted very nicely, but then I got the message that I needed to load some firmware

Re: is there a working UP generic 4.X kernel available?

2019-03-07 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Bob, On 3/7/19 09:59, Bob Tracy wrote: I'm finally starting to get a bit of traction on Debian bug #919825, but Michael Biebl would really like to see me testing with a Debian-provided kernel instead of my hand-built kernel.org versions (now running 5.0.0). I saw where Ben Hutchings grabbed

Re: PWS 433au (Miata) recovery update

2019-01-27 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 1/27/19 22:53, Alex Winbow wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, Michael Cree wrote: samba build-depends on ceph [1] but ceph hasn't built on Alpha for some time [2].  Looks like dtp-relative relocation errors during linking in the build of ceph [3] is the reason.  I have a theory that gcc is not

Re: Updated installation images 2019-01-20

2019-01-21 Thread Frank Scheiner
Dear Adrian, On 1/21/19 00:42, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi! On 1/20/19 9:40 PM, Bob Tracy wrote: Thank you! I'll give the Alpha version a try in the next few days. Waiting on a 4.18 kernel build: should be done in the next 24 hours or so. The klibc package included in the current

Re: Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-14 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 12/13/18 09:08, Michael Cree wrote: On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 08:21:11AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 07:54:52AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 12:01:23PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:39:58PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote

Re: Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-10 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Bob, Michael, On 12/8/18 21:03, Bob Tracy wrote: On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 07:41:15PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote: On 12/8/18 15:05, Bob Tracy wrote: So can we assume `CONFIG_ALPHA_GENERIC=y` also activates `CONFIG_ALPHA_LEGACY_START_ADDRESS`? I wouldn't assume so, particularly

Re: Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-10 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Philippe, On 12/9/18 19:12, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: FYI I've added few tests to QEMU to avoid regressions, one is booting the DP264 machine (not yet merged, the specific test is here:) Wow, didn't knew Alpha emulation is already that good with QEMU!

Re: Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-08 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 12/8/18 15:05, Bob Tracy wrote: On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:15:21AM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote: Is this Gentoo generic installer kernel SMP capable? I believe these Gentoo kernels have the config included in the kernel image, so available as `/proc/config.gz` during runtime, I think. From

Re: Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-08 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 12/8/18 06:58, Bob Tracy wrote: On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 10:06:25AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote: As per [1] and our recent discussions the generic 4.x kernels seem to no longer work on Alpha machines which also renders any

Re: Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-07 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 12/7/18 22:06, Michael Cree wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote: As per [1] and our recent discussions the generic 4.x kernels seem to no longer work on Alpha machines which also renders any installer images using the generic 4.x kernels non-working. Yes

Re: Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-06 Thread Frank Scheiner
On 12/5/18 07:33, Bob Tracy wrote: Can you open PRs so that these changes can get merged? I will then build new images. Sure, created them now: * First part: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/merge_requests/79 * Second part:

Re: Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-04 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Adrian, On 12/4/18 17:45, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: ## Patches ## 1. https://salsa.debian.org/frank-scheiner-guest/linux/commit/865cacfd7722b346629082ab3094b6ad93964095 2. https://salsa.debian.org/frank-scheiner-guest/debian-installer/commit

Use SMP kernel for Alpha (udeb) builds

2018-12-04 Thread Frank Scheiner
. With working installer images more people could get involved and maybe sometime in the future someone has enough time and effort to invest in fixing the actual problem. ## Patches ## 1. https://salsa.debian.org/frank-scheiner-guest/linux/commit/865cacfd7722b346629082ab3094b6ad93964095 2

Re: [alpha] Debian 9.0 NETINST fails

2018-11-06 Thread Frank Scheiner
Dear Bob, sorry, looks like I missed your mails to the debian-alpha list until now. On 11/2/18 19:56, Bob Tracy wrote: Additional info... Frank Scheiner reported similar badness on his PWS back in March of 2017. See the "debian-alpha" archive link: https://lists.debian.org/debian-

Re: Latest install images

2017-09-11 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi, On 09/11/2017 09:06 AM, Gyenes Istvan wrote: Hello, I have tried out the latest images but it fails to boot both on AS800 and Miata. The same things happen on DS10 As per [1] and [2] I was partly successful in netbooting my Alpha machines (which include a PWS 500au and a DS20E (similar

Re: Debian kernel boot failure on Alpha [was Re: systemd FTBFS]

2017-04-26 Thread Frank Scheiner
Hi Michael, ooops, looks like I have to correct myself. :-( The Debian v4.8 and v4.9 (up to 4.9.18) SMP kernels do not successfully boot on my AlphaStations 200 and 255 - at least not fully, they do start though. I didn't test the `agp=off` kernel command line option on the AlphaStations

Re: Debian kernel boot failure on Alpha [was Re: systemd FTBFS]

2017-03-29 Thread Frank Scheiner
Dear Michael, just a quick note because it might be related or at least helpful: I have had a similar problem than you, i.e. no generic Linux kernel v4.x from Debian runs or ran on my Alpha gear (the newest one is a PWS 500au with EV56). E.g. this is the output of a tried boot with a generic