Bug#316297: marked as done (Installation of qmail removes mailx)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:47:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#316297: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.18-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 22:14:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 29 15:14:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from haz2.siri.org [199.233.112.71] (qmailr) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dnkop-0007gk-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:14:07 -0700 Received: (qmail 700 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Jun 2005 18:14:04 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Woodard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dependency on mailx causes removal of mysql-server when MTA is changed X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:14:04 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mysql-server Version: 4.0.24-10 Severity: normal Because the mysql-server package depends on mailx, whenever I try to change from exim4 to qmail, mailx is removed, and mysql-server is also removed, crashing web services. While having a mail program is useful, it is hard to see why it should be essential for a database. Surely it is more robust simply to log errors or problems in a log file rather than to try to email them? My suggestion would be to allow mysql-server to be or remain installed without mailx so that the MTA could be changed without removing mysql-server. It is an excellent package otherwise. Thanks, Dan Woodard -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mysql-server depends on: ii adduser 3.63Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbi-perl 1.46-6 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libmysqlclient12 4.0.24-10 mysql database client library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent ii mysql-client 4.0.24-10 mysql database client binaries ii mysql-common 4.0.24-10 mysql database common files (e.g. ii passwd 1:4.0.3-31sarge1change and administer password and ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii psmisc 21.5-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: mysql-server/nis_warning: mysql-server/really_downgrade_from_41: false mysql-server/mysql_update_hints1: * mysql-server/start_on_boot: true mysql-server/postrm_remove_databases: false * mysql-server/mysql_install_db_notes: --- Received: (at 316297-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 07:50:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 23:50:33 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0DSr-8V-1Z; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:47:13 -0800 From: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#316297: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.18-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:47:13 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Bug#348854: marked as done (/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15: no version information available)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:47:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348854: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.18-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2006 12:36:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 04:36:21 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from nowwhat.lateralis.org ([81.56.190.81]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EzZ1X-00039c-Cp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:36:21 -0800 Received: from laurent by nowwhat.lateralis.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EzZ1L-0002Rx-75; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:36:07 +0100 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:36:06 +0100 From: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15: no version information available Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 Organization: Cabal Factory, a division of Lateralis Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: exim4 Version: 4.60-3 Severity: normal Hello, I get the message in $SUBJECT everytime I run sendmail or mailq, since last upgrade. Regards, Laurent. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4-bli Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages exim4 depends on: ii exim4-base4.60-3 support files for all exim MTA (v4 ii exim4-daemon-heavy4.60-3 exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended exim4 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 348854-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 07:50:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 23:50:32 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0DSr-8X-2N; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:47:13 -0800 From: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#348854: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.18-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:47:13 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: mysql-dfsg-5.0 Source-Version: 5.0.18-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mysql-dfsg-5.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmysqlclient15-dev_5.0.18-7_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/libmysqlclient15-dev_5.0.18-7_i386.deb libmysqlclient15_5.0.18-7_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/libmysqlclient15_5.0.18-7_i386.deb mysql-client-5.0_5.0.18-7_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-client-5.0_5.0.18-7_i386.deb mysql-client_5.0.18-7_all.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-client_5.0.18-7_all.deb mysql-common_5.0.18-7_all.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-common_5.0.18-7_all.deb mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.18-7.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.18-7.diff.gz mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.18-7.dsc to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.18-7.dsc mysql-server-5.0_5.0.18-7_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-server-5.0_5.0.18-7_i386.deb mysql-server_5.0.18-7_all.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-server_5.0.18-7_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mysql-dfsg-5.0 package) (This message was generated
Bug#349101: marked as done (exim4-daemon-heavy: Does not start: libmysqlclient.so.15: no version information available)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:47:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348854: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.18-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 23:36:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 15:36:38 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 220-253-60-240.vic.netspace.net.au ([220.253.60.240] helo=frontalis.tucuxi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F05o5-0002O1-J4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:36:38 -0800 Received: from neuralabyss by frontalis.tucuxi.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1F05o2-0007OW-9P; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:36:34 +1100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ben Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: exim4-daemon-heavy: Does not start: libmysqlclient.so.15: no version information available Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:36:34 +1100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: exim4-daemon-heavy Version: 4.60-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When attempting to start the daemon, or execute /usr/sbin/exim4, the following error message is received. # /etc/init.d/exim4 start Starting MTA: /usr/sbin/exim4: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15: no version information available (required by /usr/sbin/exim4) /usr/sbin/exim4: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15: no version information available (required by /usr/sbin/exim4) /usr/sbin/exim4: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15: no version information available (required by /usr/sbin/exim4) exim4. The package cannot be started manually, and an ldconfig did nothing to resolve this issue. Any suggestions would be greatly welcomed. -- Package-specific info: Exim version 4.60 #1 built 15-Jan-2006 00:29:52 Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2005 Berkeley DB: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.2.52: (December 3, 2003) Support for: crypteq iconv() IPv6 PAM Perl GnuTLS move_frozen_messages Content_Scanning Old_Demime Lookups: lsearch wildlsearch nwildlsearch iplsearch cdb dbm dbmnz dnsdb dsearch ldap ldapdn ldapm mysql nis nis0 passwd pgsql Authenticators: cram_md5 cyrus_sasl plaintext spa Routers: accept dnslookup ipliteral iplookup manualroute queryprogram redirect Transports: appendfile/maildir/mailstore/mbx autoreply lmtp pipe smtp Fixed never_users: 0 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages exim4-daemon-heavy depends on: ii exim4-base4.60-3 support files for all exim MTA (v4 ii libc6 2.3.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-23 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libgnutls12 1.2.9-2the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libldap2 2.1.30-12 OpenLDAP libraries ii libmysqlclient15 5.0.18-6 mysql database client library ii libpam0g 0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpcre3 6.4-1.1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libperl5.85.8.7-10 Shared Perl library ii libpq48.1.2-1PostgreSQL C client library ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.8 Authentication abstraction library exim4-daemon-heavy recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 348854-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 07:50:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 23:50:32 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0DSr-8X-2N; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:47:13 -0800 From: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#348854: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.18-7
Bug#343047: marked as done (madwifi-source: Please include a README.Debian to outline build process)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:11:21 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Isn't a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 04:23:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 20:23:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.networksplus.net ([63.245.131.182] helo=networksplus.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ElfDZ-0008DT-Na for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:23:17 -0800 Received: from rambler [12.158.148.131] by networksplus.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.20) id AB320A1C; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:23:14 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: madwifi-source: Please include a README.Debian to outline build process Reply-To: Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:22:39 -0600 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: madwifi-source Version: 0.svn20051110-1 Severity: wishlist I decided to try the madwifi-source this evening and am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. I followed the instructions I've used in the past at http://www.marlow.dk/site.php/tech/madwifi and performed the following: copied /boot/config-2.6.14-2-686 to /usr/src/linux/.config make-kpkg --append-to-version -2-686 --revision 2.6.14-4 --config oldconfig configure make-kpkg --append-to-version -2-686 --revision 2.6.14-4 --added-modules madwifi modules_image to build against the installed Debian linux-kernel package. After some output, the build process fails with the following error: # Build modules /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/modules/madwifi \ CC=gcc LD=ld TOOLPREFIX= \ KERNELPATH=/usr/src/linux KERNELRELEASE=2.6.14-2-686 TARGET=i386-elf ATH_RATE=ath_rate/sample make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi' Checking if all requirements are met... ok. mkdir -p ./symbols for i in ./ath_hal ./net80211 ath_rate/sample ./ath; do \ /usr/bin/make -C $i || exit 1; \ done make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi/ath_hal' cp ./../hal/linux/ah_osdep.c ah_osdep.c uudecode ./../hal/public/i386-elf.hal.o.uu cp ./../hal/public/i386-elf.opt_ah.h opt_ah.h /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/madwifi/ath_hal MODVERDIR=/usr/src/modules/madwifi/ath_hal/../symbols modules make[5]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.14' WARNING: Symbol version dump /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.14/Module.symvers is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions. CC [M] /usr/src/modules/madwifi/ath_hal/ah_osdep.o /bin/sh: scripts/genksyms/genksyms: No such file or directory make[6]: *** [/usr/src/modules/madwifi/ath_hal/ah_osdep.o] Error 1 make[5]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/madwifi/ath_hal] Error 2 make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.14' make[4]: *** [all] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi/ath_hal' make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi' make[2]: *** [binary-modules] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi' make[1]: *** [kdist_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi' Module /usr/src/modules/madwifi failed. Hit return to Continue The genksyms file seems is not yet built and I suspect that it won't be built until the kernel is built. Is this necessary? For the packages obtained from marlow.dk building the kernel was not necessary. It would be nice if the source package could provide some guidance about building the Madwifi modules using kernel-package. - Nate -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages madwifi-source depends on: ii build-essential 11.1 informational list of build-essent ii bzip2 1.0.2-11
Bug#314104: marked as done (gb: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:03:17 +1100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing bug for removed package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 21:33:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 14 14:33:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp08.web.de [217.72.192.226] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DiJ2P-0006kC-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:33:37 -0700 Received: from [84.180.153.47] (helo=pluto.sol) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.105 #291) id 1DiJ1t-70-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:33:06 +0200 Received: from jens by pluto.sol with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DiIxD-0006cT-0q; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:28:15 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:28:15 +0200 From: Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gb: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: gb Version: 0.0.20-6 Severity: minor Tags: patch l10n Hi, attached you will find an update of the German PO file de.po. Note that this is a semi automatic created mail which contains all issues I found during checking most of Debians German PO files. This includes also encoding but mostly typo fixes. Please contact upstream for non-native Debian packages to incorporate the changes (even if Debians version is old) since I noticed that the same errors are made again and again over all packages. Jens --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=de.po.diff Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- de.po.gz.orig/gb_0.0.20-6_de.po 2005-06-11 16:42:49.0 +0200 +++ de.po.gz/gb_0.0.20-6_de.po 2005-06-14 18:12:19.0 +0200 @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ #: gbrun/gbrun-array.c:61 #, c-format msgid Out of bounds array index %d != %d != %d -msgstr Ausserhalb der Begrenzung Feldindex %d != %d!= %d +msgstr Außerhalb der Begrenzung Feldindex %d != %d!= %d #: gbrun/gbrun-array.c:84 msgid Wierd, nowhere to assign @@ -92,11 +92,11 @@ #: gbrun/gbrun-array.c:477 gbrun/gbrun-array.c:494 #, c-format msgid dimension %d out of range -msgstr Dimension %d ausserhalb des Bereichs +msgstr Dimension %d außerhalb des Bereichs #: gbrun/gbrun-file.c:60 msgid File number out of range -msgstr Dateinummer ausserhalb des Bereichs +msgstr Dateinummer außerhalb des Bereichs #: gbrun/gbrun-file.c:65 #, c-format @@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ #: gbrun/gbrun-file.c:295 msgid File number already in use ! -msgstr Dateinummer wird bereits verwendet ! +msgstr Dateinummer wird bereits verwendet! #: gbrun/gbrun-file.c:355 msgid Open failed -msgstr Öffnen fehlgeschagen +msgstr Öffnen fehlgeschlagen #: gbrun/gbrun-file.c:478 gbrun/gbrun-file.c:538 msgid Need an object ref @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ #: gbrun/gbrun-type.c:125 #, c-format msgid element %s is not a method -msgstr Element %s is keine Methode +msgstr Element %s ist keine Methode #: gbrun/gbrun-value.c:104 #, c-format --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- --- Received: (at 314104-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 08:11:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 00:11:26 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au ([203.10.1.132]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0DqI-0006YO-Gh for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:11:26 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F9611B8D1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:10:55 +0800 (WST) Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vscan02.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24227-13 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:10:55
Bug#327972: marked as done (klog: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327972: fixed in klog 0.3.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy28-0003SS-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:20 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1b-0002SS-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:47 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: klog: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:47 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: klog Version: 0.3.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327972-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 08:40:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 00:40:29 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0EAI-0007ai-OQ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:32:06 -0800 From: Jaime Robles [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#327972: fixed in klog 0.3.3-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:32:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: klog Source-Version: 0.3.3-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of klog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: klog_0.3.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/klog/klog_0.3.3-1.diff.gz klog_0.3.3-1.dsc to pool/main/k/klog/klog_0.3.3-1.dsc klog_0.3.3-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/klog/klog_0.3.3-1_powerpc.deb klog_0.3.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/klog/klog_0.3.3.orig.tar.gz A summary
Bug#290288: marked as done (mozilla-firefox: View Page Source show the previous page)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:27:39 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#290288: mozilla-firefox: View Page Source show the
previous page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2005 11:58:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 13 03:58:33 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from host76-240.pool82105.interbusiness.it (ns2.rhx.it)
[82.105.240.76]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cp3cX-0005f0-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 03:58:33 -0800
Received: from epia.casa.lan (epia.casa.lan [192.168.1.14])
by ns2.rhx.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A65E17BB5;
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:57:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by epia.casa.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C095D15F54; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:57:58 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alessandro De Zorzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mozilla-firefox: View Page Source show the previous page
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:57:58 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: normal
When I press submit on a PHP dynamic form, and the form is incomplete
my code reload the same page, firefox show me the previous Souce Page
if I choose View - Page Source
this is the sample PHP code:
if ($someError)
{
include ('the_same_form.php');
}
else
{
include ('next_form.php');
}
Alessandro
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on:
ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii fontconfig 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library
ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library
ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.8-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.14-2The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libidl0 0.8.3-1 library for parsing CORBA IDL file
ii libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libpango1.0-01.6.0-3 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System printing extension
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii psmisc 21.5-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 290288-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 09:27:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 01:27:53 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from orfeo.duckcorp.org
([195.5.254.194] helo=mx.duckcorp.org ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0F2H-00021X-Fj
for [EMAIL
Bug#349138: marked as done (localechooser: Uses non existing fi_FI.UTF-8 locale for Finnish)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:12:45 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349138: localechooser: Uses non existing fi_FI.UTF-8 locale for Finnish has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 08:58:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 00:58:35 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from perrier.eu.org ([81.56.227.253] helo=kheops.perrier.eu.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0EZv-00015f-3g for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:58:35 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kheops.perrier.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286684F979; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:58:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from kheops.perrier.eu.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18892-08; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:58:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3]) by kheops.perrier.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FAE4F975; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:58:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4917B40A0AB; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:58:03 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: localechooser: Uses non existing fi_FI.UTF-8 locale for Finnish Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:58:03 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: localechooser Severity: normal It seems that neither locales nor belocs-locales-data have any fi_FI.UTF-8 locale. So, enforcing it in localechooser is actually a bad idea. Crap, I really never would have imagined this...I'll have to revert to the old non UTF-8 locale until fi_FI.UTF-8 is added to locales. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 349138-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 09:20:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 01:20:28 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from perrier.eu.org ([81.56.227.253] helo=kheops.perrier.eu.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Eo9-f2-Ox for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:13:18 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kheops.perrier.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CA74F979 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:12:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from kheops.perrier.eu.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27331-10 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:12:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3]) by kheops.perrier.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE0D4F975 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:12:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C7C8840A0AB; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:12:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:12:45 +0100 From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#349138: localechooser: Uses non existing fi_FI.UTF-8 locale for Finnish Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#302693: marked as done (sig2dot must not include external signatures if using a subset of your keyring)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:32:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302693: fixed in sig2dot 0.36 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 11:42:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 03:42:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from meitner.df7cb.de [217.160.132.97] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHh0x-0003QX-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 03:42:07 -0800 Received: from planck.df7cb.de (dsl-084-058-107-021.arcor-ip.net [84.58.107.21]) by meitner.df7cb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D51D204BA0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:42:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by planck.df7cb.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6A395427FB; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:35:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:35:35 +0200 From: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bugs Submit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian sig2dot package - improvements Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED], Debian Bugs Submit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn Content-Disposition: inline X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX Content-Disposition: inline --+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: sig2dot Severity: wishlist Christoph --=20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ --+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Original-To: cb Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: by planck.df7cb.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AFE87436E3; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:27:07 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl (octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl [150.254.204.7]) by meitner.df7cb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B35B20C02C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:03:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=amavis) by octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8bYT-0001qr-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:03:09 +0100 Received: from octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by amavis (octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06832-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:03:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [150.254.204.56] (helo=debian.kti.ae.poznan.pl) by octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8bYR-0001qi-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:03:07 +0100 Received: from thuriaux by debian.kti.ae.poznan.pl with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D8bYa-0004iI-IR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:03:16 +0100 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:03:16 +0100 From: Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian sig2dot package - improvements Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ieNMXl1Fr3cevapt Content-Disposition: inline Organization: KTI - Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kti.ae.poznan.pl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on meitner.df7cb.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Label: cb X-UID: 13608 X-Keywords: --ieNMXl1Fr3cevapt Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=CblX+4bnyfN0pR09 Content-Disposition: inline --CblX+4bnyfN0pR09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I sent a patch for sig2dot to Kevin
Bug#348783: marked as done (sig2dot: does not recognize trust signatures with a level =10)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:32:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348783: fixed in sig2dot 0.36
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2006 23:34:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 18 15:34:56 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp-4.hut.fi ([130.233.228.94])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EzMpL-0004Fn-UF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:34:56 -0800
Received: from localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115])
by smtp-4.hut.fi (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0INYOPp004704
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:34:24 +0200
Received: from smtp-4.hut.fi ([130.233.228.94])
by localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 02916-32-2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:34:23 +0200 (EET)
Received: from ip6-localhost (vipunen.hut.fi [130.233.228.9])
by smtp-4.hut.fi (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0INJ7pb002458
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:19:07 +0200
From: Eero =?utf-8?q?H=C3=A4kkinen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sig2dot: does not recognize trust signatures with a level =10
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:18:54 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed;
boundary=Boundary-00=_jzszDek/77+heLw
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-TKK-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.1.2-hutcc at katosiko.hut.fi
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--Boundary-00=_jzszDek/77+heLw
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: sig2dot
Version: 0.34-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
sig2dot does recognize a line
=C2=A0 sig 3 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A04 ABCDABCD 2006-01-18 =C2=A0Stub CA
but not a line
=C2=A0 sig 3 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0T DCBADCBA 2006-01-18 =C2=A0Root CA
That is to say, GnuPG reports trust signature level 10 and above using=20
a letter T but sig2dot does not know that.
=2D- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-powerpc
Locale: LANG=3Dfi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dfi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
Versions of packages sig2dot depends on:
ii perl 5.8.4-8sarge3 Larry Wall's Practical
Extraction
=2D- no debconf information
--Boundary-00=_jzszDek/77+heLw
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
charset=utf-8;
name=sig2dot-0.35.patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=sig2dot-0.35.patch
diff -ru sig2dot-0.35.orig/sig2dot sig2dot-0.35/sig2dot
--- sig2dot-0.35.orig/sig2dot 2006-01-19 00:31:12.68600 +0200
+++ sig2dot-0.35/sig2dot2006-01-19 00:31:43.94100 +0200
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
#sig 39456ADE2 2004-02-07 Michael Schiansky michael#schiansky.de
# type id date name
- if ($line =~ m#([\w]+)[ !\?][ \dLNPRX]{0,8} +([^ ]+) +([^ ]+)(?:
+?([^]*))?#)
+ if ($line =~ m#([\w]+)[ !\?][ \dLNPRTX]{0,8} +([^ ]+) +([^ ]+)(?:
+?([^]*))?#)
# differences:
# - [ !\?] (to use 'gpg --check-sigs|sig2dot.mio|springgraph|display')
# [ \d] - [ \dLRXP] (signature attributes)
--Boundary-00=_jzszDek/77+heLw--
---
Received: (at 348783-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 09:40:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 01:40:37 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0F6Z-0002yc-Ps; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:32:19 -0800
From: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#348783: fixed in sig2dot 0.36
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:32:19 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: sig2dot
Source-Version: 0.36
We believe
Bug#297302: marked as done (kbiff freezes very often)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:47:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297302: fixed in kbiff 3.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2005 13:56:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 28 05:56:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from furon.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.2.202] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D5lNo-0003vp-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:56:24 -0800 Received: from tibre1.ujf-grenoble.fr (tana2.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.24.22]) by furon.ujf-grenoble.fr (Switch-3.1.3/Switch-3.1.0/Configured by JE 9 8 2004) with ESMTP id j1SDtpvr014309 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:55:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from ifapp1.ujf-grenoble.fr (mozart.ujf-grenoble.fr [193.54.241.5]) by tibre1.ujf-grenoble.fr (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1SDtxCf060283 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:55:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from portable.maison ([:::193.48.255.242]) by fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr with esmtp; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:55:51 +0100 id 298C.422322E7.10B3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: San Vu-Ngoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kbiff freezes very often X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:55:44 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kbiff Version: 3.7.1-3.1 Severity: important I know this may be difficult to reproduce due to various network configurations. But I run kbiff to check an IMAP mailbox and a POP mailbox through a ssh tunnel. Usually it works very well but sometimes (2 ou 3 times a day !) it freezes: the icon is the KDE taskbar disappear and do no respond (to a click or a right-click). I have to kill it and re-run it. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kbiff depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-1 KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-6 client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.2-3 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 297302-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 09:50:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 01:50:59 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312381: marked as done (kbiff: imap4s support is buggy and leaky)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:47:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312381: fixed in kbiff 3.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 20:01:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 13:01:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfkGJ-0005Fu-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:01:23 -0700 Received: (qmail 21291 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2005 20:01:23 - Received: from dsl254-022-219.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO sirius.bignachos.com) ([216.254.22.219]) (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 7 Jun 2005 20:01:23 - Received: from rubeus (unknown [192.168.1.20]) by sirius.bignachos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EE452E6D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rubeus (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DD0F7344E9; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:01:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kbiff: imap4s support is buggy and leaky X-URL: http://bignachos.com Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:01:22 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kbiff Version: 3.7.1-3.1 Severity: important Using imap4s mailboxes with kbiff leaks gobs of memory (hundreds of megs after a few hours), whereas regular imap4 works fine. Here are some of my relevant settings: [Inbox] Docked=true DontCheck=false Mailboxes=imap4s://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:993/INBOX?keepalive=yesasync=notimeout=10,[...] Notify=false Poll=15 RunCommand=false ... And here's a snippet of some valgrind --error-limit=no --num-callers=50 --leak-check=yes output: ==30501== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==30501==at 0x1B9566B5: KBiffSocket::setSSL(bool) (in /usr/lib/kbiff.so) ==30501==by 0x1B9525D5: KBiffMonitor::setMailbox(KBiffURL) (in /usr/lib/kbi ff.so) ==30501==by 0x1B94B511: KBiff::setMailboxList(QPtrListKBiffMailbox const, unsigned) (in /usr/lib/kbiff.so) ==30501==by 0x1B94B1AD: KBiff::processSetup(KBiffSetup const*, bool) (in /us r/lib/kbiff.so) ==30501==by 0x1B94F210: main (in /usr/lib/kbiff.so) kdecore (KLibLoader): WARNING: KLibrary: /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4: undefined sym bol: PKCS7_content_free kdecore (KLibLoader): WARNING: KLibrary: /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4: undefined sym bol: OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms kdecore (KLibLoader): WARNING: KLibrary: /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4: undefined sym bol: OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms_conf kdecore (KLibLoader): WARNING: KLibrary: /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4: undefined sym bol: OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms_noconf ==30501== ==30501== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==30501==at 0x1DB31923: RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_type_2 (in /usr/lib/libcrypto. so.0.9.7) ==30501== ==30501== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==30501==at 0x1DB1D9D6: BN_ucmp (in /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7) ==30501== ==30501== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==30501==at 0x1DB2E4C0: (within /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7) ==30501== ==30501== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==30501==at 0x1DB1D9D6: BN_ucmp (in /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7) ==30501==by 0x1F: ??? ==30501== ==30501== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==30501==at 0x1DB1DC95: bn_cmp_words (in /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7) ==30501== ==30501== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==30501==at 0x1DB1E292: bn_mul_recursive (in /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7) ==30501== ==30501== Use of uninitialised value of size 4 ==30501==at 0x1DB1E29A: bn_mul_recursive (in /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7) ==30501== ==30501== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==30501==at 0x1DB249DE: bn_sub_words (in /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7) [... ad nauseam ...]
Processed: Closing bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 327958 Bug#327958: komba2: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] Removed pending tag. close 313982 Bug#313982: komba2: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Removed pending tag. close 327957 Bug#327957: karamba: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314015: marked as done (kbiff: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:47:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#314015: fixed in kbiff 3.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 21:32:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 14 14:32:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp08.web.de [217.72.192.226] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DiJ1i-0006Ax-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:32:54 -0700 Received: from [84.180.153.47] (helo=pluto.sol) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.105 #291) id 1DiJ1D-eG-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:32:24 +0200 Received: from jens by pluto.sol with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DiIxl-0007Pq-3D; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:28:49 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:28:49 +0200 From: Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kbiff: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: kbiff Version: 3.7.1-3.1 Severity: minor Tags: patch l10n Hi, attached you will find an update of the German PO file de.po. Note that this is a semi automatic created mail which contains all issues I found during checking most of Debians German PO files. This includes also encoding but mostly typo fixes. Please contact upstream for non-native Debian packages to incorporate the changes (even if Debians version is old) since I noticed that the same errors are made again and again over all packages. Jens --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=de.po.diff --- de.po.gz.orig/kbiff_3.7.1-3.1_de.po 2005-06-11 16:42:50.0 +0200 +++ de.po.gz/kbiff_3.7.1-3.1_de.po 2005-06-14 15:03:42.0 +0200 @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ #: setupdlg.cpp:421 #, c-format, ycp-format msgid Rename Profile: %1 -msgstr Profil umbennen: %1 +msgstr Profil umbenennen: %1 #: setupdlg.cpp:461 #, c-format, ycp-format --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO-- --- Received: (at 314015-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 09:50:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 01:50:59 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0FKu-0007yp-2A; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:47:08 -0800 From: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#314015: fixed in kbiff 3.8-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:47:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: kbiff Source-Version: 3.8-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kbiff, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kbiff_3.8-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kbiff/kbiff_3.8-1.diff.gz kbiff_3.8-1.dsc to pool/main/k/kbiff/kbiff_3.8-1.dsc kbiff_3.8-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kbiff/kbiff_3.8-1_i386.deb kbiff_3.8.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kbiff/kbiff_3.8.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated kbiff package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP
Bug#343187: marked as done (new upstream version; please update your package)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:47:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343187: fixed in kbiff 3.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 14:45:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 06:45:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from p85.212.192.12.tisdip.tiscali.de ([85.212.192.12] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmBPf-0002hK-7q for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:45:55 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jonas Genannt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new upstream version; please update your package Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:45:22 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kbiff Severity: wishlist New Kbiff version (3.8) is out. Please update your package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 343187-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 09:50:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 01:50:58 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0FKu-0007yr-2u; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:47:08 -0800 From: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343187: fixed in kbiff 3.8-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:47:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kbiff Source-Version: 3.8-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kbiff, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kbiff_3.8-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kbiff/kbiff_3.8-1.diff.gz kbiff_3.8-1.dsc to pool/main/k/kbiff/kbiff_3.8-1.dsc kbiff_3.8-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kbiff/kbiff_3.8-1_i386.deb kbiff_3.8.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kbiff/kbiff_3.8.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated kbiff package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:30:17 +0100 Source: kbiff Binary: kbiff Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: kbiff - KDE mail notification utility Closes: 297302 312381 314015 343187 Changes: kbiff (3.8-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. (closes: #343187, #297302, #312381). * Update the German PO file. (closes: #314015) Files: 37ce3d1d2fa2f71cf4deb4780a4cb4c9 623 mail optional kbiff_3.8-1.dsc 20923b30a67c0ec9a7f4ca6b1d81e3e5 1104508 mail optional kbiff_3.8.orig.tar.gz f0ce25b98752633642175f1d462eba12 31884 mail optional kbiff_3.8-1.diff.gz 9bbfd8e986f47812c3cc5406d3c8c1b2 280670 mail optional kbiff_3.8-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD0gDAZA5kLi8vDN4RAjVeAJ4osulKLecuo+ABUlWPY/YqtaBMEACeOoqp p8ujafP7kvKhp46hoNsMKj8= =xP7N -END PGP SIGNATURE- --
Processed: Re: Bug#301558 acknowledged by developer ()
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 301558 Bug#301558: warnings compiling expect 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295633: marked as done (expect_5.42.1-1.2(i386/unstable): FTBFS: really build-depends autoconf2.13)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295633: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2005 03:51:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 19:51:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D1chH-0005Mu-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:51:24 -0800 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E1F16EED; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:51:23 -0700 (MST) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CCDA68F2E2; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:51:23 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:51:23 -0700 From: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: expect_5.42.1-1.2(i386/unstable): FTBFS: really build-depends autoconf2.13 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: expect Version: 5.42.1-1.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch 1) On a machine with autoconf installed, the package fails to build - it really build-depends on autoconf2.13, not autoconf. A patch to fix this is available from http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/expect.autoconf.diff 2) config.guess and config.sub are out-of-date. Please see the autotools-dev README file for some options on making them current. thanks, lamont --- Received: (at 295633-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 10:20:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 02:20:30 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Fny-0005Wt-47; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 From: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#295633: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: expect Source-Version: 5.42.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of expect, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: expect-dev_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expect-dev_5.42.1-4_i386.deb expect_5.42.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4.diff.gz expect_5.42.1-4.dsc to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4.dsc expect_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4_i386.deb expectk_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expectk_5.42.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated expect package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:13:52 -0800 Source: expect Binary: expect expectk expect-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 5.42.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: expect - A program that talks to other programs expect-dev - Development files for the expect package expectk- A Tk/X11 version of the expect program Closes: 156815 197640 294092 295633 301556 314224 Changes: expect (5.42.1-4) unstable; urgency=high . * Depending on autoconf2.13 not necessary
Bug#301556: marked as done (tcl8.4 based expect doesn't deliver reliable test results on hppa)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301556: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 19:33:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 11:33:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFH2P-00020L-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:33:37 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA09365 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:33:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE03F217 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:33:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 00485-28 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:33:34 +0100 (MET) 13883 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:33:34 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j2QJXYuU008549; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:33:34 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:33:34 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tcl8.4 based expect doesn't deliver reliable test results on hppa X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) Common Lisp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: expect Severity: important Please see for a rationale http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2005-March/026165.html I'm willing to maintain these packages as long as they are needed, you can find them at http://people.debian.org/~doko/expect/ --- Received: (at 301556-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 10:20:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 02:20:25 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Fny-0005Wv-4q; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 From: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#301556: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: expect Source-Version: 5.42.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of expect, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: expect-dev_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expect-dev_5.42.1-4_i386.deb expect_5.42.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4.diff.gz expect_5.42.1-4.dsc to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4.dsc expect_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4_i386.deb expectk_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expectk_5.42.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated expect package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7
Bug#197640: marked as done (expect: autoexpect doesn't accept options)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#197640: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 15:17:20 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 10:17:18 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from gw.lsli.com [66.47.58.90]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19RvjS-0008Vk-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:17:18 -0500
Received: by gw.lsli.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 67B8B40F8; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:17:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by gw via smwrap Version 5.1.0devel
id smwrapP1hFyg; Mon Jun 16 10:16:52 2003
From: Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: expect: autoexpect doesn't accept options
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:16:31 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: expect
Version: 5.32.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch, woody
The autoexpect script is documented as taking several options, but none
of them work, because 'expect' tries to process them, failing miserably.
The problem is the line in autoexpect that restarts it under expect:
exec expect $0 ${1+$@}
This needs to be
exec expect -- $0 ${1+$@}
so that expect doesn't try to process the options.
Alternatively, and perhaps better, since we know where 'expect' lives,
is simply to start autoexpect directly under expect rather than /bin/sh:
#!/usr/bin/expect -f
and get rid of the exec altogether.
Yes, I realize that autoexpect is just an example, but it's well known
and widely used 'example'. It probably ought to be installed into the
normal heirarchy on Debian.
Hmmm, odly enough, I can't reproduce this problem in sid, despite no
change to the autoexpect script -- perhaps expect itself is smarter
about option parsing? I've added a woody tag; perhaps you'll leave
this open so that others can see the problem and solution until sarge is
released? Your call, of course.
Thanks,
Steve
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux annie 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages expect depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii tcl8.38.3.3-7The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8
---
Received: (at 197640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 10:20:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 02:20:28 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0Fny-0005Wp-2a; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800
From: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#197640: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: expect
Source-Version: 5.42.1-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
expect, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
expect-dev_5.42.1-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/expect/expect-dev_5.42.1-4_i386.deb
expect_5.42.1-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4.diff.gz
expect_5.42.1-4.dsc
to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4.dsc
expect_5.42.1-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4_i386.deb
expectk_5.42.1-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/expect/expectk_5.42.1-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated expect package)
(This message was
Bug#314224: marked as done (expect: Tcl8.4 link problem)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#314224: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 09:22:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 02:22:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from eczema.ecze.com (teo.ecze.com) [217.145.35.90] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DiU6E-0003lg-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:22:18 -0700 Received: from teo.ecze.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by teo.ecze.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id j5F9jXC7016086 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:45:33 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by teo.ecze.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id j5F9jW38016084; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:45:32 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Authentication-Warning: teo.ecze.com: eczema set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alain Degreffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: expect: Tcl8.4 link problem X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:45:32 +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.84/940/Wed Jun 15 08:58:59 2005 on teo.ecze.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: expect Version: 5.42.1-1.2 Severity: important Hi, I'm the author of ciscocmd, a short and simple expect script for CISCO, hosted on COSI Website and I can't release my script because I use the fork command and expect is broken under Sarge. Under Woody, I was able to run my scripts with forking mechanism. After dist-upgrade, the spawn command in forked process doesn't work anymore. This problem is well known and depends from the compilation option of tcl. The linked tcl version is compiled with enable-threads. This is incompatible with expect forking mechanism. Debian maintainer of tcl has been contacted but he says that a version without thread is provided for this : tcl 8.3. To test it, I have modified the debian rules file to use tcl 8.3 instead 8.4 and all is working now. Could you provide a version of expect that use tcl 8.3 ? Thanks in advance, Alain Degreffe -- Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages expect depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii tcl8.4 8.4.9-1 Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 314224-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 10:20:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 02:20:31 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Fny-0005Wx-5a; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 From: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#314224: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: expect Source-Version: 5.42.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of expect, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: expect-dev_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expect-dev_5.42.1-4_i386.deb expect_5.42.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4.diff.gz expect_5.42.1-4.dsc to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4.dsc expect_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.42.1-4_i386.deb expectk_5.42.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/expect/expectk_5.42.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#156815: marked as done (expect make check fails)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#156815: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2002 17:50:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 15 12:50:38 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (bromo.msbb.uc.edu) [129.137.3.146]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17fOlV-0008Ov-00; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:50:33 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bromo.msbb.uc.edu (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA05647
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:49:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:49:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jack Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: expect make check fails
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: expect
Version: 5.37-3
On debian ppc sid, if I build the current expect source package
and then try to do a make check in the build dir I get...
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/howarth/debian-expect/expect-5.37/testsuite'
cc-c -o exp_test.o exp_test.c
cc exp_test.o -o exp_test
Rebuilding configure...
if [ x. = x. ] ; then \
srcdir=. ; export srcdir ; \
else true ; fi ; \
(cd ${srcdir}; autoconf --localdir=${srcdir}/..)
Rebuilding config.status...
/bin/sh ./config.status --recheck
running /bin/sh ./configure --prefix=/usr --includedir=/usr/include/tcl8.3
--mandir=/usr/share/man --enable-shared --with-tcl=/usr/lib/tcl8.3
--with-tk=/usr/lib/tk8.3 --with-tclinclude=/usr/include/tcl8.3/tcl-private
--with-tkinclude=/usr/include/tcl8.3/
loading cache .././config.cache
checking for Tcl configuration... (cached) found /usr/lib/tcl8.3/tclConfig.sh
checking Tcl build library... -L/usr/lib -ltcl8.3 -ldl -lieee -lm
checking for Tcl_CreateCommand... (cached) yes
checking if Tcl library build specification is valid... yes
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking whether the compiler (gcc) actually works... yes
checking how to run the C preprocessor... (cached) cc -E
checking if running LynxOS... (cached) no
checking for Tcl private headers... (cached) found in
/usr/include/tcl8.3/tcl-private/generic
creating ./config.status
Making a new config file...
rootme=`cd .. pwd`; export rootme; \
EXPECT=`if [ -f ${rootme}/expect ] ; then echo ${rootme}/expect ; else echo
expect; fi`; export EXPECT; \
if [ -f ../expect ] ; then \
TCL_LIBRARY=`echo /usr/include/tcl8.3/tcl-private/generic | sed -e 's/-I//'
-e 's/generic//'`/library ; \
export TCL_LIBRARY ; \
else true ; fi ; \
runtest --tool expect EXPECT=$EXPECT --srcdir .
WARNING: Couldn't find tool init file
Test Run By root on Thu Aug 15 13:48:45 2002
Native configuration is NONE
=== expect tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using ./config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running ./expect.tests/expect-tests.exp ...
WARNING: Timed out: Never got started, all
=== expect Summary ===
/home/howarth/debian-expect/expect-5.37/expect version is 5.37.2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/howarth/debian-expect/expect-5.37/testsuite'
---
Received: (at 156815-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 10:20:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 02:20:29 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0Fny-0005Wn-1r; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800
From: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#156815: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: expect
Source-Version: 5.42.1-4
Bug#294092: marked as done (Eternal output bug in expect)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:17:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#294092: fixed in expect 5.42.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 20:33:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 12:33:19 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from tkrat.math.chalmers.se (tkrat.org) [129.16.168.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyFZO-0003Wk-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:33:18 -0800
Received: from kilauea.firedoor.se (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by tkrat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 88F642F2A; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:30:57 +0100 (MET)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary0329411247==
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Forssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Eternal output bug in expect
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:33:15 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===0329411247==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: expect
Version: 5.42.1-1.2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I have also sent this to Don Libes. I consider the bug important since it
makes the interact command very dangerous, I often lock up my console by
cat-ing to big files:-(
I have found a bug in expect 5.42 which causes it to write an infinite
number of bytes to the terminal window. To see the bug open a new
terminal window (you will have to kill this later) and start
expect. Give the following commands (any shell works):
spawn tcsh
interact
You should now have a shell prompt. In that do a 'cat expect.c'.
You may have to cat it multiple times but eventually you should come
to a state where the output never stops, it just keeps printing the
same lines.
What happens is that tcl calls ExpOutputProc to write 4096 bytes. But
the write only accepts 4095 bytes (we are in nonblocking mode). The
loop the causes another call to write to flush the last remaining
byte. But this fails with EAGAIN. This causes ExpOutputProc to return
-1 and tcl thinks that no bytes at all were written even though 4095
were accepted. So tcl tries to write the same 4096 bytes again, with
the same result... repeat ad infinitum.
The problem is that ExpOutputProc will only return the status of
the last write in the loop. So the return value will always be bad if
the loop is executed more than once. The simplest solution is to
remove the loop since tcl has code for handling the case that the
write did not write all the data. I have attached a patch which does
this.
/MaF
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages expect depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii tcl8.4 8.4.9-1 Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8
-- no debconf information
--===0329411247==
Content-Type: text/x-c; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=writeloop.patch
--- exp_chan.c.old 2004-07-06 23:24:53.0 +0200
+++ exp_chan.c 2005-02-07 18:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -249,22 +249,18 @@
if (toWrite 0) Tcl_Panic(ExpOutputProc: called with negative char
count);
-while (toWrite 0) {
- written = write(esPtr-fdout, buf, (size_t) toWrite);
- if (written == 0) {
- /* This shouldn't happen but I'm told that it does
-* nonetheless (at least on SunOS 4.1.3). Since this is
-* not a documented return value, the most reasonable
-* thing is to complain here and retry in the hopes that
-* it is some transient condition. */
- sleep(1);
- expDiagLogU(write() failed to write anything - will sleep(1) and
retry...\n);
- } else if (written 0) {
- *errorCodePtr = errno;
- return
Processed: Re: Bug#277350 acknowledged by developer ()
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 277350 Bug#277350: expect: Needs more recent config.guess and config.sub for k*BSD 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335745: marked as done (sextractor: New upstream release)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335745: fixed in sextractor 2.4.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2005 18:10:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 25 11:10:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUTFp-0006tH-00; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:10:33 -0700 Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66]) by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9PIAUDK025052 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:10:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EUTFl-0001LV-VF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:10:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:10:29 -0400 To: Debian BTS Submission [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sextractor: New upstream release Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sextractor Version: 2.4.3-1 Severity: wishlist New upstream release 2.4.4 is available from: http://terapix.iap.fr/rubrique.php?id_rubrique=91/ Unfortunately it doesn't implement my mingw32 patch yet :/ --- Received: (at 335745-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 11:50:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 03:50:32 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0HD0-00014h-5A; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800 From: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#335745: fixed in sextractor 2.4.4-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: sextractor Source-Version: 2.4.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sextractor, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sextractor_2.4.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1.diff.gz sextractor_2.4.4-1.dsc to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1.dsc sextractor_2.4.4-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1_i386.deb sextractor_2.4.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated sextractor package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:37:51 -0500 Source: sextractor Binary: sextractor Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.4.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: sextractor - source extractor for astronomical images Closes: 335745 337281 Changes: sextractor (2.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release; closes: 335745. - 'fixes a few triggering issues with WIN parameters' - ./debian/copyright: update URL * Indent homepage pseudo field as per DevRef best-practice. * Clarify public-domain license in ./debian/copyright and ./debian/rules. * Update TODO with stuff from BTS that isn't
Bug#337281: marked as done (sextractor: Provide: sextractor-doc)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337281: fixed in sextractor 2.4.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 16:48:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 08:48:51 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.58]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXiGh-00060H-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:48:51 -0800
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66])
by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
jA3GmmV2019208
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:48:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EXiGd-0006qr-OS
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 11:48:47 -0500
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:48:47 -0500
To: Debian BTS Submission [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sextractor: Provide: sextractor-doc
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: sextractor
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: confirmed, patch
This is a reminder for myself to edit debian/control for the next
upload. I intend to Provide: sextractor-doc such that users of
previous sextractor packages (by me, with -doc package split by
Florian) will have that package removed (it is obsoleted by this
package). A separate -doc package is still a consideration, though.
Florian, can you confirm that Provide will do what I want? I know
Replaces+Provides+Conflicts is a thing specially interpretted by dpkg.
But I don't need the Conflict or Replaces (though I could use them
anyway, if necessary to have the effect). It seems that Provide:
sextractor-doc will do the right thing, since ${Source-Version} will
be greater than the previous version, and will cause an upgrade.
Right?
---
Received: (at 337281-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 11:50:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 03:50:28 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0HD0-00014j-5w; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800
From: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#337281: fixed in sextractor 2.4.4-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: sextractor
Source-Version: 2.4.4-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sextractor, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
sextractor_2.4.4-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1.diff.gz
sextractor_2.4.4-1.dsc
to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1.dsc
sextractor_2.4.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1_i386.deb
sextractor_2.4.4.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated sextractor package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:37:51 -0500
Source: sextractor
Binary: sextractor
Architecture:
Bug#347997: marked as done (cairo-ocaml - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/cairo/dllmlcairo.so': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:02:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347997: fixed in cairo-ocaml 20060107-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2006 22:38:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 13 14:38:16 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org ([82.139.201.22]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ExXYm-0005Uf-Bj for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:38:16 -0800 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 038E5187B1; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:38:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:38:30 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cairo-ocaml - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/cairo/dllmlcairo.so': No such file or directory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cairo-ocaml Version: 20051120-1+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of cairo-ocaml_20051120-1+b1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp --list-missing cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/cairo/dllmlcairo.so': No such file or directory dh_install: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060111-0751 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] --- Received: (at 347997-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 12:11:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 04:11:53 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0HRW-00030o-FP; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:02:06 -0800 From: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347997: fixed in cairo-ocaml 20060107-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:02:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cairo-ocaml Source-Version: 20060107-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cairo-ocaml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cairo-ocaml_20060107-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cairo-ocaml/cairo-ocaml_20060107-1.diff.gz cairo-ocaml_20060107-1.dsc to pool/main/c/cairo-ocaml/cairo-ocaml_20060107-1.dsc cairo-ocaml_20060107.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cairo-ocaml/cairo-ocaml_20060107.orig.tar.gz libcairo-ocaml-dev_20060107-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cairo-ocaml/libcairo-ocaml-dev_20060107-1_i386.deb libcairo-ocaml_20060107-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cairo-ocaml/libcairo-ocaml_20060107-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cairo-ocaml package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:45:24 +0100 Source: cairo-ocaml Binary: libcairo-ocaml-dev libcairo-ocaml Architecture: source i386 Version: 20060107-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libcairo-ocaml - OCaml bindings for Cairo libcairo-ocaml-dev - OCaml bindings for Cairo
Bug#279220: marked as done (sound is pure static)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:28:46 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#279220: sound is pure static has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2004 14:44:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 01 06:44:30 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1COdQ6-00077f-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 06:44:30 -0800 Received: from c-65-34-186-143.se.client2.attbi.com ([65.34.186.143]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id 20041101144359011002vm3me; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:43:59 + Subject: sound is pure static From: Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:34:43 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Subject: sound is pure static Package: tuxpaint Version: 1:0.9.13-2 Severity: normal This is with a system that has: 1. big-endian byte order 2. char being unsigned by default 3. USB audio -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages tuxpaint depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpng12-0 1.2.7-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsdl-image1.2 1.2.3-1 image loading library for Simple D ii libsdl-mixer1.2 1.2.5-2 mixer library for Simple DirectMed ii libsdl-ttf2.0-0 2.0.6-2 ttf library for Simple DirectMedia ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.7-10 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libvorbis0a 1.0.1-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisfile3 1.0.1-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii netpbm 2:9.20-10Graphics conversion tools. ii tuxpaint-data 1:0.9.13-2 Data files for Tux Paint, a paint --- Received: (at 279220-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 12:29:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 04:29:21 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca ([24.222.0.30]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Hrr-gP-PB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:29:21 -0800 Received: from ip04.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.20]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:29:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-206-6.eastlink.ca (HELO fountain.edennet) ([24.224.206.6]) by ip04.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:28:48 -0400 Received: by fountain.edennet (Postfix, from userid 100)id 869D04EB54; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:29:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from sanctuary.edennet (sanctuary.edennet [192.168.1.3]) by fountain.edennet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7024EA75 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:29:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by sanctuary.edennet (Postfix) with ESMTP id C074AB88031 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:28:46 -0400 (AST) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:28:46 -0400 From: Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#279220: sound is pure static In-reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AQAAA+k= X-Spam: NO X-Spam-Rating: 45 X-QSF-Info: WARNING: Using deprecated obtree backend! X-QSF-Info: WARNING: Dump, delete, and restore your X-QSF-Info: WARNING: databases to upgrade them to the X-QSF-Info: WARNING: new format and stop this warning. References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#348005: marked as done (tuxpaint (--sound) refuses to quit when /dev/sequencer cannot be found)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:20:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348005: tuxpaint (--sound) refuses to quit when /dev/sequencer cannot be found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 00:48:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 13 16:48:01 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ExZaL-0006f5-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:48:01 -0800 Received: from retiarius.localdomain (adsl-static-1-12.uklinux.net [62.245.36.12]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AF840A03E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:47:56 + (UTC) Received: from jeroen by retiarius.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1ExZZD-0002CM-Vr; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:46:51 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeroen Nijhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tuxpaint (--sound) refuses to quit when /dev/sequencer cannot be found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:46:44 + Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tuxpaint Version: 1:0.9.14-2 Severity: normal Starting tuxpaint on my newly installed, but not 100% setup box works -- but it refuses to quit! When I start tuxpaint (without any arguments) from a terminal, it responds with 'open /dev/sequencer: No such file or directory'. It does start, however, and drawing works. but Quit doesn't -- and neither does pressing control-C or control-backslash in the controlling terminal. Only kill -9 does... Jeroen Nijhof -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages tuxpaint depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libsdl-image1.2 1.2.4-1image loading library for Simple D ii libsdl-mixer1.2 1.2.6-1.1 mixer library for Simple DirectMed ii libsdl-ttf2.0-0 2.0.7-1ttf library for Simple DirectMedia ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.9-0.0 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libvorbis0a 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisfile31.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii netpbm2:10.0-10 Graphics conversion tools ii tuxpaint-data 1:0.9.14-2 Data files for Tux Paint, a paint Versions of packages tuxpaint recommends: ii tuxpaint-config 0.0.5-1Configuration tool for Tux Paint -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 348005-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 12:20:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 04:20:52 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca ([24.222.0.30]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Hjg-CJ-QX for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:20:52 -0800 Received: from ip03.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.15]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:20:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-206-6.eastlink.ca (HELO fountain.edennet) ([24.224.206.6]) by ip03.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:20:20 -0400 Received: by fountain.edennet (Postfix, from userid 100)id 5468D4EB54; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:20:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from sanctuary.edennet (sanctuary.edennet [192.168.1.3]) by fountain.edennet (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49A04EA75; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:20:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by sanctuary.edennet (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E35B88031; Sat, 21 Jan
Bug#339472: marked as done (sextractor: New upstream release)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335745: fixed in sextractor 2.4.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 15:18:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 07:18:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.56]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcP3N-0007K5-IB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:18:29 -0800 Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66]) by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAGFIPDK005312 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:18:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EcP3J-0004Xc-OD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:18:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:18:25 -0500 To: Debian BTS Submission [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sextractor: New upstream release Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sextractor Severity: wishlist Version 2.4.4 is available: http://terapix.iap.fr/rubrique.php?id_rubrique=91/ Additional TODO items: - Provide the ability to generate kernel filters of arbitrary size, like the ones in /u/s/sextractor/ - Remove mention of copyright in ./debian/rules and ./debian/copyright, since copyright and public domain aren't consistent. --- Received: (at 335745-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 11:50:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 03:50:32 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0HD0-00014h-5A; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800 From: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#335745: fixed in sextractor 2.4.4-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:47:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: sextractor Source-Version: 2.4.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sextractor, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sextractor_2.4.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1.diff.gz sextractor_2.4.4-1.dsc to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1.dsc sextractor_2.4.4-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4-1_i386.deb sextractor_2.4.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/sextractor/sextractor_2.4.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated sextractor package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:37:51 -0500 Source: sextractor Binary: sextractor Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.4.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: sextractor - source extractor for astronomical images Closes: 335745 337281 Changes: sextractor (2.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release; closes: 335745. - 'fixes a few triggering issues with WIN parameters' - ./debian/copyright: update URL
Bug#349160: marked as done (libogg-dev: ${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when libogg is needed)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:04:22 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libogg-dev:${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when
libogg is needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 12:19:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 04:19:32 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp13.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.54])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0HiO-5M-7p
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:19:32 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1306.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 03C8278E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:19:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette
(ADijon-256-1-86-184.w86-204.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.204.5.184])
by mwinf1306.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C04C378D;
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:19:00 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1F0Hhp-0003sI-Up; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:18:58 +0100
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (tangerine.coulon.evette [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port
10024)
with ESMTP id 02273-02; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:18:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from jean-luc by tangerine.coulon.evette with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1F0Hho-0003sA-J5; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:18:56 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libogg-dev: ${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when libogg is
needed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:18:56 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at coulon.evette
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libogg-dev
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: important
Hi,
With version 1.1.3-1 of libogg0 / libogg-dev, I cannot build a package which
depends on it.
${shlibs:Depends} doesnt expands correctly and I build time, I get:
dh_builddeb
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/kino/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
`kino':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code 512
If I've a look in debian/kino.substvars, I've:
Package: kino
Version: 1:0.8.1+cvs20060116-1
Section: graphics
Priority: extra
Architecture: amd64
Depends: (= 1.1.2), libasound2 ( 1.0.10), libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0),
libavc1394-
The package name is missing and I get only the version.
I've this error with other package which requires libogg also.
I've reverted from 1.1.3 to 1.1.2 and the package compiles fine.
Regards
Jean-Luc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-k8-3
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages libogg-dev depends on:
ii libc6-dev 2.3.5-12 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libogg0 1.1.2-1Ogg Bitstream Library
libogg-dev recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 349160-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 13:09:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 05:09:55 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp13.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.54])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0IV9-0002LX-Cd
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:09:55 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1307.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 68534796
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:09:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette
(ADijon-256-1-86-184.w86-204.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.204.5.184])
by mwinf1307.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id
Bug#97442: marked as done (eterm: vim (X11 enabled) does not respond to mouse clicks when TERM=Eterm)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:33:07 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#97442: eterm: vim (X11 enabled) does not respond to mouse clicks when TERM=Eterm has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2001 11:29:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 14 06:29:51 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.43] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14zGXv-0007uT-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 06:29:51 -0500 Received: from squat.wasters ([62.255.154.40]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 May 2001 12:29:51 +0100 Received: from piped.wasters ([192.168.0.8]) by squat.wasters with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14zGXs-0002OK-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 12:29:48 +0100 Received: from alisdair by piped.wasters with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14zGXs-FS-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 12:29:48 +0100 From: Alisdair McDiarmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: eterm: vim (X11 enabled) does not respond to mouse clicks when TERM=Eterm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 12:29:48 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: eterm Version: 0.9.1-0pre2001051101 Severity: normal [Sorry if this is a vim bug; I assume it's a problem with terminfo. Please reassign to vim-gtk or vim if it's a vim problem.] When using vim in an Eterm, the editor moves the cursor on mouse clicks only if TERM=xterm. When TERM=Eterm, vim still updates the terminal title bar, and responds to resize events, but the mouse doesn't do anything. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux piped 2.4.4-ac8 #1 Sun May 13 00:54:04 BST 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages eterm depends on: ii libast10.2-0.20010509 the Library of Assorted Spiffy Things ii libc6 2.2.3-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libimlib2 1.0.3-2Powerful image loading and rendering library ii libttf21.4pre.2001032 FreeType 1, The FREE TrueType Font Engine, s ii xlibs 4.0.3-3X Window System client libraries ii vim-gtk5.7.028-1 Vi IMproved - GTK version --- Received: (at 97442-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 13:32:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 05:32:57 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.35]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0IrR-0005xY-1f for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:32:57 -0800 Received: from hermes.madism.org (olympe.madism.org [82.225.205.10]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A9C1764C; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:32:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from hermes.madism.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.madism.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A414BC7A5; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:32:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from hades.madism.org (hades.madism.org [192.168.0.10]) by hermes.madism.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5A5BC79A; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:32:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by hades.madism.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7511A6211B; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:33:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:33:07 +0100 From: Pierre HABOUZIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alisdair McDiarmid [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Laurence J. Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#97442: eterm: vim (X11 enabled) does not respond to mouse clicks when TERM=Eterm Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV (using ClamSMTP) at hermes.madism.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Processed: Let's give proper version information
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 349160
Bug#349160: libogg-dev: ${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when libogg is
needed
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
notfound 349160 1.1.2-1
Bug#349160: libogg-dev: ${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when libogg is
needed
Bug marked as not found in version 1.1.2-1.
found 349160 1.1.3-1
Bug#349160: libogg-dev: ${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when libogg is
needed
Bug marked as found in version 1.1.3-1.
close 349160 1.1.3-2
Bug#349160: libogg-dev: ${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when libogg is
needed
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.1.3-2, send any further explanations to
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304144: marked as done (kvim: removing diversion fails)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:36:47 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304144: Problems while removing kvim has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 08:24:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 01:24:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail2.bluewin.ch [195.186.4.73] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DKuDx-0002sA-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:24:50 -0700 Received: from localhost (62.203.66.39) by mail2.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.0.043) id 423AEC4700261BD5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:24:17 + Received: from tpo by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DKuDQ-00035a-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:24:16 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tomas Pospisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kvim: removing diversion fails X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:24:16 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Tomas Pospisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: vim Version: 1:6.3-067+2 Severity: normal When upgrading vim and as a consequence removing kvim I get: (Reading database ... 208794 files and directories currently installed.) Removing kvim ... dpkg-divert: mismatch on divert-to when removing `diversion of /usr/bin/vim to /usr/bin/vim.org by kvim' found `diversion of /usr/bin/vim to /usr/bin/vim.old by kvim' dpkg: error processing kvim (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: kvim I think think this bug should be RC, but kvim available wasn't in woody and I'm not really sure about the why's of the above diversion. *t -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.22 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages vim depends on: ii dpkg1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgpmg11.19.6-19General Purpose Mouse - shared lib ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii vim-common 1:6.3-067+2 Vi IMproved - Common files -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 304144-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 13:36:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 05:36:37 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.30]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Iuy-00069i-TB; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:36:37 -0800 Received: from hermes.madism.org (olympe.madism.org [82.225.205.10]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3244EC36; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:36:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from hermes.madism.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.madism.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BC7BC7A5; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:36:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from hades.madism.org (hades.madism.org [192.168.0.10]) by hermes.madism.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E679DBC79A; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:36:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by hades.madism.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCB216211B; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:36:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:36:47 +0100 From: Pierre HABOUZIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#304144: Problems while removing kvim Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV (using ClamSMTP) at hermes.madism.org
Bug#349183: marked as done (diff for 3.1-6.1 NMU)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:48:39 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line diff for 3.1-6.1 NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 13:17:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 05:17:46 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19] ident=Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Ick-0004HR-GY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:17:46 -0800 Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:dc03:20e:cff:fe36:a766] helo=trofast.sesse.net) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Ici-00010v-UC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:17:45 +0100 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1F0Icp-0008TZ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:17:51 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:17:51 +0100 From: Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: diff for 3.1-6.1 NMU Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.14.3 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Package: xslideshow Version: 3.1-6 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my xslideshow 3.1-6.1 NMU. -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=xslideshow-3.1-6.1-nmu.diff diff -u xslideshow-3.1/debian/control xslideshow-3.1/debian/control --- xslideshow-3.1/debian/control +++ xslideshow-3.1/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: non-free/x11 Priority: optional Maintainer: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), xlibs-dev, xutils +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libx11-dev, libxaw8-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev, xutils Standards-Version: 3.0.1 Package: xslideshow diff -u xslideshow-3.1/debian/changelog xslideshow-3.1/debian/changelog --- xslideshow-3.1/debian/changelog +++ xslideshow-3.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +xslideshow (3.1-6.1) frozen unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Replace build-dependency on xlibs-dev with an explicit build-dependency +on each required package. (Closes: #347047) + + -- Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:16:32 +0100 + xslideshow (3.1-6) frozen unstable; urgency=medium * Fix build dependency error (Closes: Bug#134053). --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- --- Received: (at 349183-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 13:48:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 05:48:35 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19] ident=Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0J6Y-0006YD-PD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:48:34 -0800 Received: from trofast.sesse.net ([129.241.93.32]) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0J6X-0001If-9F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:48:33 +0100 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1F0J6d-0004rX-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:48:39 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:48:39 +0100 From: Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: diff for 3.1-6.1 NMU Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.14.3 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No,
Bug#144846: marked as done (auctex: Please support XEmacs21 )
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:12:54 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line preview-latex merged with auctex
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2002 11:26:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 28 06:26:34 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ling.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.245.14]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 171mp7-0005Es-00; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 06:26:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (dhcp020.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.245.147])
by Ling.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp (8.11.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id g3SBQVe06966
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:26:31 +0900
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:25:59 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: auctex: Please support XEmacs21
Organization: LILO-POPPY
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.4.6 (Common Lisp)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: auctex
Version: 11.06-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
I'm a maintainer of preview-latex, which renders LaTeX
equations and figures etc. in an Emacs buffer.
Its latest version supports XEmacs21 and requires AUC TeX 11.0
and later. I know that XEmacs21 has his own AUC TeX, so your
package doesn't support XEmacs21. But his AUC TeX is based on
version 10.0g. Thus my preview-latex package doesn't work fine
with XEmacs21 in Debian. So, please support XEmacs21.
I've already checked that AUC-TeX 11.06 with XEmacs21 works
fine.
See also
http://preview-latex.sourceforge.net/manual/AUC-TeX-prior-to-11.0.html
This is a part of preview-latex manual.
Thanks.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux pengyu 2.4.19-pre7
Versions of the packages auctex depends on:
ii debconf1.0.32 Debian configuration management system
ii debianutils1.16 Miscellaneous utilities specific to Debian.
ii emacs2121.2-1 The GNU Emacs editor.
ii emacs20-dl 20.7-14.3 The GNU Emacs editor. (Dynamic Loading suppo
^^^ (Provides virtual package emacs20)
OHURA Makoto
[EMAIL PROTECTED](private)
[EMAIL PROTECTED](LILO/Netfort)
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Kyoto Univ.)
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~ohura/
---
Received: (at 144846-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 14:12:57 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 06:12:57 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from relay-pt3.poste.it ([62.241.4.129])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0JU9-0003xh-31
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:12:57 -0800
Received: from rino.dft.invalid (82.50.169.129) by relay-pt3.poste.it (7.2.063)
(authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 433CF3D800293031 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:12:55
+0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: preview-latex merged with auctex
From: Davide G. M. Salvetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Face: 6g,d%3hP0[qul^Z;FuwvIxNxPy2:}9K`7D?[EMAIL PROTECTED])J$yL:J70*[c!k*
[qo4Zx')Q_zPtl]25VG[X#6xMVp_1KAZXl%;!in}0WijT}4bY0mGV[HGY[-beJX),8B#tfEk%E;h
f~gm03;w^Gm5Zc:z5sUq+eL2ZSj}s@)0L`FG34HLFs*pmg,OEPk~V\L90ivCN=S}%*cUMw+E!t-
U{izNhVM!$1`P\v~sRS:)^t_{py+YcZ|2^z=AUz4ZJNrtP@;'8dyarKA7)OPjihAGsMb
Organization: Quis ut Deus?
X-PGP-Fingerprint: D3B2 A3F5 E9EB BDE6 A245 AA4A 212B 306C 9396 865D
X-PGP-Affinity: Will accept encrypted messages for GNU Privacy Guard
X-Attribution: DGMS
X-Accept-Language: en, it, de, es
Face: iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwBAMAAAClLOS0GFBMVEUfEQS3dFTavaX//+j5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#344285: marked as done (misleading README.Debian)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:13:35 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line No longer applies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2005 15:11:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 21 07:11:53 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from guest2.not.iac.es ([161.72.16.112] helo=guest8.not.iac.es)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ep5be-0002GZ-Lr
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:10:18 -0800
Received: by guest8.not.iac.es (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7D3D015851E; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:10:23 + (WET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: misleading README.Debian
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:10:22 +
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: auctex
Version: 11.55-3
Severity: minor
On your README.Debian you state that:
Users will need to put (require 'tex-site) in their ~/.emacs to load
AUCTeX, unless the local system administrator chose to start it by
default.
That's right, but if your debconf level is too high, you're not going to
see the conf. question, and anyway the default value is Yes, install AUCTeX
support site-wide. So maybe you should change this text for the more
accurate:
Users will need to put (require 'tex-site) in their ~/.emacs to load
AUCTeX, if the local system administrator chose not to start it by
default.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=spanish, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to es_ES)
Versions of packages auctex depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.15.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii emacs21 21.4a-3The GNU Emacs editor
ii make 3.80+3.81.b3-1 The GNU version of the make util
Versions of packages auctex recommends:
ii tetex-base2.0.2c-6 Basic library files of teTeX
-- debconf information excluded
---
Received: (at 344285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 14:13:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 06:13:37 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from relay-pt4.poste.it ([62.241.4.118])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0JUn-0003yk-BJ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:13:37 -0800
Received: from rino.dft.invalid (82.50.169.129) by relay-pt4.poste.it (7.2.063)
(authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 43380EC3002BC6F4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:13:36
+0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No longer applies
From: Davide G. M. Salvetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Face: 6g,d%3hP0[qul^Z;FuwvIxNxPy2:}9K`7D?[EMAIL PROTECTED])J$yL:J70*[c!k*
[qo4Zx')Q_zPtl]25VG[X#6xMVp_1KAZXl%;!in}0WijT}4bY0mGV[HGY[-beJX),8B#tfEk%E;h
f~gm03;w^Gm5Zc:z5sUq+eL2ZSj}s@)0L`FG34HLFs*pmg,OEPk~V\L90ivCN=S}%*cUMw+E!t-
U{izNhVM!$1`P\v~sRS:)^t_{py+YcZ|2^z=AUz4ZJNrtP@;'8dyarKA7)OPjihAGsMb
Organization: Quis ut Deus?
X-PGP-Fingerprint: D3B2 A3F5 E9EB BDE6 A245 AA4A 212B 306C 9396 865D
X-PGP-Affinity: Will accept encrypted messages for GNU Privacy Guard
X-Attribution: DGMS
X-Accept-Language: en, it, de, es
Face: iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwBAMAAAClLOS0GFBMVEUfEQS3dFTavaX//+j5
9+KBXUFOLBLMkXMHbE5HAAACX0lEQVR4nF2TvY8bIRDFaUzazCmY2mgd98lKqc8mchtOGtxyxU5q
Vvbx7+cN2LlLtvCy/Pzm4w2Y749nPvXX6f5p3kE4zcfpGOLpP3AM2D20NcR/wBxDwHZbD1M4fQQx
HNZGzMlDotEe4HhwzJxlYb9O0zuYdyxSjLEiwusHxTHrdn/scpniX7AXeewXmwLyD/CtC+wgZtGS
zUMAAJXFq8hlnQYYGezCqECM2ETrqYNd7v9PCY2AWeYBZicWhS5ElYi4YPnUwVkzyAJAvpLLWA+F
1mo5ETVqrZEzkjqYs2hc8k1dbM0VszxF05uAImF/APpl5DIp0BQbwiRCuwM7QIECAAPppG4fQKzc
FeEARNsywA81cONbdezboTJvi+ngpxoEoM/aKnE25qJVfbUFBfa0AGhla8yiijf1+xVJJVFDpORg
Bug#329061: marked as done (emacs21: Package update fails)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:13:04 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line No longer applies. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 07:55:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 00:55:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sacramento.ovitas.no [217.8.135.172] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHGUV-0003yF-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:55:07 -0700 Received: from empolis.no (chris.ovitas.no [192.168.3.140]) by sacramento.ovitas.no (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with SMTP id j8J7t1dN019692; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:55:01 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 23721 invoked by uid 523); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:55:24 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Searle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: emacs21: Package update fails X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:55:24 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: emacs21 Version: 21.4a-2 Severity: normal aptitude upgrade gives the following error: Setting up emacs21 (21.4a-2) ... emacs-install emacs21 install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21... emacs-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-install line 28, TSORT line 5. dpkg: error processing emacs21 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: emacs21 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-evms Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages emacs21 depends on: ii emacs21-bin-common21.4a-2The GNU Emacs editor's shared, arc ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management ii libtiff4 3.7.3-1Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii libungif4g4.1.3-3shared library for GIF images (run ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxpm4 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X pixmap library ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xaw3dg1.5+E-8Xaw3d widget set ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime emacs21 recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed --- Received: (at 329061-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 14:13:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 06:13:05 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay-pt3.poste.it ([62.241.4.129]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0JUH-0003xh-FJ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:13:05 -0800 Received: from rino.dft.invalid (82.50.169.129) by relay-pt3.poste.it (7.2.063) (authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 433CF3D800293034 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:13:05 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No longer applies. From: Davide G. M. Salvetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Face: 6g,d%3hP0[qul^Z;FuwvIxNxPy2:}9K`7D?[EMAIL PROTECTED])J$yL:J70*[c!k* [qo4Zx')Q_zPtl]25VG[X#6xMVp_1KAZXl%;!in}0WijT}4bY0mGV[HGY[-beJX),8B#tfEk%E;h f~gm03;w^Gm5Zc:z5sUq+eL2ZSj}s@)0L`FG34HLFs*pmg,OEPk~V\L90ivCN=S}%*cUMw+E!t-
Bug#341213: marked as done (auctex: Problem while parsing maths)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:13:27 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Submitter states this is no longer a bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 09:40:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 29 01:40:52 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from imag.imag.fr ([129.88.30.1])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eh1yl-0002bx-Mk
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:40:52 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (pc-capp4.imag.fr [147.171.130.89])
by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAT9ejxV009870
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:40:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pcountch by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1Eh1yc-0002g2-9L; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:40:42 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Prakash Countcham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: auctex: Problem while parsing maths
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:40:42 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6
(imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:40:47 +0100 (CET)
X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: auctex
Version: 11.55-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
There is a problem in the auctex parser. Here is an exemple :
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
%\(
try to type $
\end{document}
Even if the syntax highlighting is correct, I can't type $ to enter math
mode. AucTeX says:
TeX-insert-dollar: Math mode because of `\('. Use `C-q $' to force a
dollar
This problem is reproducible with the CVS version of AucTeX.
Cheers,
Prakash
-- Package-specific info:
Content of '/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/'
0082727dd40a88b4ecc36cdf41433e55 /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/bib-cite.el
26515c3cecc5559dde0d60826a70e9cb /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/configure
b37ad50b8f5a153d619aae795d4e6bbc /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/context.el
bbad1ce7c33b02ed5fa29e761e3296ff
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/context-en.el
3a32e69b661cffb7267c505d4cf634fb
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/context-nl.el
2b11f4f8c3a4189bf7cc8fec5a51e8c0
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/doc/Makefile.in
2b2062a08e2e23595260ac33e2fa1258
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/font-latex.el
5afe8eb5573965dfb58378e4e46f3813 /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/install-sh
3194b56acdc63aae19d3fa1dc473bca2 /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/latex.el
25d64a18b64be706f81293350e320b06 /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/lpath.el
3387fc6389d25d4465d26c762ee2ff5d /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/Makefile.in
b22c7055d6b545e803983c449dede344
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/multi-prompt.el
682140df8cd4c08010dfc8dbdc42f302
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/alltt.el
f0467495e39ee7f7f6f4f0f5b1acceb8
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/alphanum.el
9dff3fab37d9e3e5b043b2ca20b0124a
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/amsart.el
ea1ec83e220eea7256ddaea6a5c4daf0
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/amsbook.el
b3fc45d19033d968f882bb5da3f4
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/amsbsy.el
9070b14e6ae4de68226fa34b27a2
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/amsmath.el
35ffcdb404f5c4baf2669e5626f7cec6
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/amsopn.el
aae81cf3039ff5033b50e91457b202d4
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/amstex.el
c9f33ad585db4b09bce457f2a25bb107
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/amstext.el
45902eea8706cf2364ab9e9b02d7e561
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/amsthm.el
aa31c5c7528d8c78f661519ce1a34068
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/article.el
b9e5c5dcb62e222e97ace1fbfbf415f2
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/style/beamer.el
Bug#347070: marked as done (vstream: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347070: fixed in vstream 0.4.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:42 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlze-tU-6n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:43 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1EvlzF-0006xb-DL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:17 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: vstream: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:17 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: vstream Version: 0.4.5-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 347070-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 14:11:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 06:11:33 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0JJl-0007mp-Ve; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:02:13 -0800 From: LENART Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347070: fixed in vstream 0.4.5-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:02:13 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: vstream Source-Version: 0.4.5-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vstream, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vstream_0.4.5-4.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vstream/vstream_0.4.5-4.diff.gz vstream_0.4.5-4.dsc to pool/main/v/vstream/vstream_0.4.5-4.dsc vstream_0.4.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vstream/vstream_0.4.5-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.
Processed: Re: /usr/share/vim/vim61/doc directory changes when :help syntax is invoked
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 295186 6.2 Bug#295186: /usr/share/vim/vim61/doc directory changes when :help syntax is invoked 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 6.2, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#190511: marked as done (randtype: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:47:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#190511: fixed in randtype 1.13-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2003 08:31:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 24 03:31:22 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 198c8X-0008Qw-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 03:31:21 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 198c8X-00062U-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:31:21 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 198c8W-0004JQ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 01:31:20 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: randtype: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 24 Apr 2003 01:31:20 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 41 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: randtype Version: 1.13-2 Severity: normal From my build log: ... debian/rules build test -f randtype.c -a -f debian/rules /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/randtype-1.13' gcc -Wall -ansi -pedantic -O2 -g -DDEF_MS=18 -DDEF_MULT=2 -DHAVE_RANDOM -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_ZLIB -c randtype.c -o randtype.o randtype.c:28:18: zlib.h: No such file or directory randtype.c: In function `splitter': randtype.c:334: `gzFile' undeclared (first use in this function) randtype.c:334: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once randtype.c:334: for each function it appears in.) randtype.c:334: `fp' undeclared (first use in this function) randtype.c:338: warning: ISO C89 forbids mixed declarations and code randtype.c:353: warning: implicit declaration of function `gzdopen' randtype.c:363: warning: implicit declaration of function `gzopen' randtype.c:373: warning: implicit declaration of function `gzgets' randtype.c:373: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast randtype.c:448: warning: implicit declaration of function `gzclose' make[1]: *** [randtype.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/randtype-1.13' make: *** [build] Error 2 The source package needs at least zlib1g-dev in its Build-Depends. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 190511-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 14:52:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 06:52:30 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0K1P-0006os-IQ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:47:19 -0800 From: LENART Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#190511: fixed in randtype 1.13-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:47:19 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: randtype Source-Version: 1.13-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of randtype, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: randtype_1.13-3.diff.gz to pool/main/r/randtype/randtype_1.13-3.diff.gz randtype_1.13-3.dsc to pool/main/r/randtype/randtype_1.13-3.dsc randtype_1.13-3_i386.deb to pool/main/r/randtype/randtype_1.13-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to
Bug#347099: marked as done (wmgtemp: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:32:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347099: fixed in wmgtemp 0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzv-vm-6q for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:59 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1EvlzP-0006ys-Nx for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:27 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wmgtemp: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:27 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wmgtemp Version: 0.6-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 347099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 14:33:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 06:33:52 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Jml-0004mr-Sf; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:32:11 -0800 From: LENART Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347099: fixed in wmgtemp 0.6-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:32:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: wmgtemp Source-Version: 0.6-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wmgtemp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wmgtemp_0.6-4.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmgtemp/wmgtemp_0.6-4.diff.gz wmgtemp_0.6-4.dsc to pool/main/w/wmgtemp/wmgtemp_0.6-4.dsc wmgtemp_0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wmgtemp/wmgtemp_0.6-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#300933: marked as done (preview-latex: clean target does not really clean)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:18:25 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closed by 11.81-1 (released version 11.81-2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 18:46:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 10:46:54 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (idmailgate2.unizh.ch) [130.60.68.106]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDoOz-0005zO-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:46:53 -0800
Received: from alhambra.kuesterei.ch ([130.60.169.112])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-2) with ESMTP id
j2MIkVTB030997
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:46:31 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.kuesterei.ch)
by alhambra.kuesterei.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDoOc-0004on-CK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:46:30 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: preview-latex: clean target does not really clean
X-Debbugs-CC: Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?=)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:46:28 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: preview-latex
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: minor
The clean target does not really clean the source to the state before,
and on my system it is impossible to build the package twice.
apt-get source preview-latex
cd preview-latex-0.9
dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -rfakeroot
[ this already calls texhash which is at most useless, if not annoying
or harmful]
fakeroot debian/rules clean
[ this calls autoconf, which is probably the culprit ]
dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -rfakeroot
gives:
[...]
# Add here commands to configure the package.
./configure --prefix=3D/usr \
--with-emacs=3D/usr/bin/emacs21 \
--with-lispdir=3D\${prefix}/share/emacs/site-lisp/preview-latex \
--with-packagelispdir=3D\${prefix}/share/emacs/site-lisp/preview-latex
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
./configure: line 1386: EMACS_PROG_EMACS: command not found
./configure: line 1390: syntax error near unexpected token `21,4'
./configure: line 1390: ` EMACS_CHECK_VERSION(21,4)'
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 2
It seems you either need a tighter dependency on a particular
autoconf/automake version, or just don't invoke it. There was a thread
about this on -devel recently (I think just before the Vancouver
mega-thread started), but I didn't follow it.
Regards, Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages preview-latex depends on:
ii auctex11.55-1An integrated environment for =
writ
ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration managemen=
t sy
ii emacs21 21.3+1-9 The GNU Emacs editor
ii gs8.01-5 Transitional package
ii gs-afpl [gs-aladdin] 8.14-3 The AFPL Ghostscript PostScrip=
t in
ii gs-aladdin8.14-3 Transitional package
ii gs-esp [gs] 7.07.1-9 The Ghostscript PostScript int=
erpr
ii gs-gpl [gs] 8.01-5 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript=
int
ii preview-latex-style 0.9-1 LaTeX style files for editor e=
mbed
ii tetex-bin 3.0-2 The teTeX binary files
-- debconf information:
* preview-latex/default: true
preview-latex/auctex:
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
---
Received: (at 300933-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 15:18:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 07:18:28 2006
Return-path:
Bug#318114: marked as done (preview-latex-style: Wrong equation numbers with option auctex)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:18:25 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closed by 11.81-1 (released version 11.81-2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 14:56:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 07:56:25 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from hexagon.math-inst.hu (renyi.hu) [193.224.79.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dsiev-0003NM-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:56:25 -0700
Received: from gold.math-inst.hu (gold.math-inst.hu [193.224.79.6])
by renyi.hu (8.8.8/8.8.8/3s) with ESMTP id QAA12374
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:56:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Braun Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: preview-latex-style: Wrong equation numbers with option auctex
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:56:20 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: preview-latex-style
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The problem:
When I open the file below in Emacs and generate previews by
pressing 'C-c C-p C-d' then the equation environment disappears and
I see
(0.1)A=B
instead. However, I would expect to see '(1.1)' instead of '(0.1)'
since that is what I see when I run latex on the file and view the
result. Passing also the option 'sections' to preview.sty the
equation number is displayed correctly as '(1.1)'.
The sample file:
\documentclass{amsart}
\usepackage[displaymath,textmath]{preview}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\begin{document}
\section[$\pi$ stuff]{A section about $\pi$ stuff}
\label{sec:section}
Some stuff.
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:1}
A = B
\end{equation}
\end{document}
I have reported this bug to preview-latex-style instead of
preview-latex because I think the bug is in the prauctex.cfg file
of the former package.
Patch:
--- /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/preview/prauctex.cfg 2005-04-03
15:28:16.0 +0200
+++ prauctex.cfg 2005-07-13 16:35:25.784731144 +0200
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
\PreviewMacro*\thanks
\PreviewMacro*[][#1{}]\caption
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@startsection}{%
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\PreviewMacro*\index
\endinput
%%
The changed line caused (in the original) all sectioning commands to
be dropped (whithout the 'sections' option) and its arguments (the
title and the short version of the title) to be typesetted.
In this way, the sectioning commands don't increase the appropriate
counter.
The modification puts '{}' after the sectioning commands instead of
dropping them: i.e. they produce an empty heading. The original
arguments (the title and its short version) are typeset as in the
previous case, so we have previews in titles.
(To be more precise: the sectioning commands expand to a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] macro and in fact the behaviour of this macro is
changed.)
Whith the option 'sections', the changed line is always ignored, so
our modification has no effect.
Best wishes,
Gabor Braun
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9.20041228
Locale: LANG=hu_HU.iso88592, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU.iso88592 (charmap=ISO-8859-2)
(ignored: LC_ALL set to hu_HU.iso88592)
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 318114-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 15:18:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 07:18:28 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from relay-pt3.poste.it ([62.241.4.129])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0KVY-00089d-81; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:18:28 -0800
Received: from rino.dft.invalid (82.54.235.181) by relay-pt3.poste.it (7.2.063)
(authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 433CF3D8002931F6; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:18:27 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed by 11.81-1 (released version
Bug#277885: marked as done (preview-latex: Customise screens incorrectly parented)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:18:25 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closed by 11.81-1 (released version 11.81-2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2004 05:33:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 22 22:33:32 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CLEWy-0004jO-00; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:33:32 -0700
Received: from [192.168.2.20] (ppp152-7.lns1.mel2.internode.on.net
[150.101.152.7])
by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
i9N5XTOU005668;
Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:03:29 +0930 (CST)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Lincoln Burrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: preview-latex: Customise screens incorrectly parented
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.6
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:33:28 +1000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: preview-latex
Version: 0.8.1+0-3
Severity: normal
The customization group 'Preview' shows the parent group to be 'Auc Tex'
when no such customize group exists. It should be 'AUCTeX' in order that
the 'Preview' customization group be browseable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages preview-latex depends on:
ii auctex11.53-1An integrated environment for writ
ii debconf 1.4.39 Debian configuration management sy
ii emacs21 21.3+1-8 The GNU Emacs editor
ii gs8.01-5 Transitional package
ii gs-esp [gs] 7.07.1-9 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr
ii gs-gpl [gs] 8.01-5 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int
ii preview-latex-style 0.8.1+0-3 LaTeX style files for editor embed
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-22 The teTeX binary files
-- debconf information:
* preview-latex/default: true
* preview-latex/auctex:
---
Received: (at 277885-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 15:18:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 07:18:28 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from relay-pt3.poste.it ([62.241.4.129])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0KVY-00089d-81; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:18:28 -0800
Received: from rino.dft.invalid (82.54.235.181) by relay-pt3.poste.it (7.2.063)
(authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 433CF3D8002931F6; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:18:27 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed by 11.81-1 (released version 11.81-2)
From: Davide G. M. Salvetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Face: 6g,d%3hP0[qul^Z;FuwvIxNxPy2:}9K`7D?[EMAIL PROTECTED])J$yL:J70*[c!k*
[qo4Zx')Q_zPtl]25VG[X#6xMVp_1KAZXl%;!in}0WijT}4bY0mGV[HGY[-beJX),8B#tfEk%E;h
f~gm03;w^Gm5Zc:z5sUq+eL2ZSj}s@)0L`FG34HLFs*pmg,OEPk~V\L90ivCN=S}%*cUMw+E!t-
U{izNhVM!$1`P\v~sRS:)^t_{py+YcZ|2^z=AUz4ZJNrtP@;'8dyarKA7)OPjihAGsMb
Organization: Quis ut Deus?
X-PGP-Fingerprint: D3B2 A3F5 E9EB BDE6 A245 AA4A 212B 306C 9396 865D
X-PGP-Affinity: Will accept encrypted messages for GNU Privacy Guard
X-Attribution: DGMS
X-Accept-Language: en, it, de, es
Face: iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwBAMAAAClLOS0GFBMVEUfEQS3dFTavaX//+j5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#347472: marked as done (auctex: update-auctex-elisp calls rm with a too long list of files)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:02:04 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347472: fixed in auctex 11.81-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 23:33:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 15:33:40 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.175.20]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EwSzk-0004hI-4v for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:33:40 -0800 Received: from host18-222.pool8175.interbusiness.it ([81.75.222.18] helo=gandalf ident=Debian-exim) by alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1EwSzh-0004EW-00; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:33:37 +0100 Received: from norbert by gandalf with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EwSzd-0001F1-Mj; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:33:33 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:33:33 +0100 From: Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: preview-latex: update-auctex-elisp calls rm with a too long list of files Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: preview-latex Version: 0.9.1-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi! At the end of the update-auctex-elisp scripts there is a call: rm -f $(find /var/lib/auctex/ -type f -name \*.el) which can lead to too long argument list. Please use find /var/lib/auctex/ -type f -name \*.el -print0 | xargs -o /bin/rm -f Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc5-mm2 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages preview-latex depends on: ii auctex 11.55-3 An integrated environment for writ ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.67 Debian configuration management sy ii emacs-snapshot-gtk [emac 1:20060103-1The GNU Emacs editor (with GTK+ 2. ii emacs21 21.4a-3 The GNU Emacs editor ii gs-afpl [gs-aladdin] 8.14-3 The AFPL Ghostscript PostScript in ii gs-esp [gs] 8.15.1.dfsg.1-1 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii gs-gpl [gs] 8.15-4.1The GPL Ghostscript PostScript int ii preview-latex-style 0.9.1-4 LaTeX style files for editor embed ii texlive-latex-recommende 2005-1 TeX Live: LaTeX recommended packag preview-latex recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * preview-latex/default: true preview-latex/auctex: --- Received: (at 347472-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 15:12:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 07:12:48 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0KFg-00033r-Or; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:02:04 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Davide G. M. Salvetti) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347472: fixed in auctex 11.81-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:02:04 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: auctex Source-Version: 11.81-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of auctex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: auctex_11.81-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/auctex/auctex_11.81-2.diff.gz auctex_11.81-2.dsc to pool/main/a/auctex/auctex_11.81-2.dsc auctex_11.81-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/auctex/auctex_11.81-2_all.deb auctex_11.81.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/auctex/auctex_11.81.orig.tar.gz preview-latex-style_11.81-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/auctex/preview-latex-style_11.81-2_all.deb A summary of the changes
Bug#331751: marked as done (auctex depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:18:25 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closed by 11.81-1 (released version 11.81-2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:40:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 16:40:25 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMwOX-0004Ll-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:40:25 -0700
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 12CC217F72; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:40:25 + (GMT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: auctex depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks
cdebconf transition
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:40:25 + (GMT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: auctex
This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency
to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its
dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0
Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf,
and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all.
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been
provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began
automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it
generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current
version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and
review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is
modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it.
This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to
the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced
mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and
it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign
this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature
your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf.
---
Received: (at 331751-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 15:18:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 07:18:28 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from relay-pt3.poste.it ([62.241.4.129])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0KVY-00089d-81; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:18:28 -0800
Received: from rino.dft.invalid (82.54.235.181) by relay-pt3.poste.it (7.2.063)
(authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 433CF3D8002931F6; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:18:27 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed by 11.81-1 (released version 11.81-2)
From: Davide G. M. Salvetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Face: 6g,d%3hP0[qul^Z;FuwvIxNxPy2:}9K`7D?[EMAIL PROTECTED])J$yL:J70*[c!k*
[qo4Zx')Q_zPtl]25VG[X#6xMVp_1KAZXl%;!in}0WijT}4bY0mGV[HGY[-beJX),8B#tfEk%E;h
f~gm03;w^Gm5Zc:z5sUq+eL2ZSj}s@)0L`FG34HLFs*pmg,OEPk~V\L90ivCN=S}%*cUMw+E!t-
U{izNhVM!$1`P\v~sRS:)^t_{py+YcZ|2^z=AUz4ZJNrtP@;'8dyarKA7)OPjihAGsMb
Organization: Quis ut Deus?
X-PGP-Fingerprint: D3B2 A3F5 E9EB BDE6 A245 AA4A 212B 306C 9396 865D
X-PGP-Affinity: Will accept encrypted messages for GNU Privacy Guard
X-Attribution: DGMS
X-Accept-Language: en, it, de, es
Face: iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwBAMAAAClLOS0GFBMVEUfEQS3dFTavaX//+j5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#349169: marked as done (diff for 8.14-3.1 NMU)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:09:50 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line diff for 8.14-3.1 NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 12:46:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 04:46:59 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19] ident=Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0I8x-0003yD-DF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:46:59 -0800 Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:dc03:20e:cff:fe36:a766] helo=trofast.sesse.net) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0I8v-hi-Nn for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:46:58 +0100 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1F0I91-0006hL-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:47:03 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:47:03 +0100 From: Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: diff for 8.14-3.1 NMU Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.14.3 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Package: gs-afpl Version: 8.14-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my gs-afpl 8.14-3.1 NMU. -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=gs-afpl-8.14-3.1-nmu.diff diff -u gs-afpl-8.14/debian/control gs-afpl-8.14/debian/control --- gs-afpl-8.14/debian/control +++ gs-afpl-8.14/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: non-free/text Priority: optional Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: autoconf, automaken, debhelper (= 4.0.0), dpatch, libjpeg-dev, libpaper-dev, libpng-dev, libz-dev, xlibs-dev +Build-Depends: autoconf, automaken, debhelper (= 4.0.0), dpatch, libjpeg-dev, libpaper-dev, libpng-dev, libz-dev, libxt-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Uploaders: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -u gs-afpl-8.14/debian/changelog gs-afpl-8.14/debian/changelog --- gs-afpl-8.14/debian/changelog +++ gs-afpl-8.14/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gs-afpl (8.14-3.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Replace build-dependency on xlibs-dev with an explicit build-dependency +on each required package. (Closes: #346993) + + -- Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:41:41 +0100 + gs-afpl (8.14-3) unstable; urgency=low * Added lj3100sw driver. --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo-- --- Received: (at 349169-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 15:09:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 07:09:46 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19] ident=Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0KN8-0007cv-CB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:09:46 -0800 Received: from trofast.sesse.net ([129.241.93.32]) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0KN5-0001q7-QC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:09:44 +0100 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1F0KNC-6u-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:09:50 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:09:50 +0100 From: Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: diff for 8.14-3.1 NMU Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.14.3 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#348792: marked as done (libgcj6: string-to-double conversion can throw NullPointerException)
-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gcj-4.0- The GNU compiler for Java(TM) gcj-4.0-base - The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj base package) gij-4.0- The GNU Java bytecode interpreter libgcj-common - Java runtime library (common files) libgcj6- Java runtime library for use with gcj libgcj6-awt - AWT peer runtime libraries for use with gcj libgcj6-dbg - Debugging symbols for libraries provided in libgcj6-dev libgcj6-dev - Java development headers and static library for use with gcj libgcj6-jar - Java runtime library for use with gcj (jar files) libgcj6-src - libgcj java sources for use in eclipse Closes: 348792 Changes: gcj-4.0 (4.0.2-7j1) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to SVN 20060121, taken from the gcc-4_0-branch. - Fix PR classpath/23863, string-to-double conversion can throw NullPointerException. Closes: #348792. Files: 524d1fe58f0a238ec1b438e02bce1cfa 2765 devel standard gcj-4.0_4.0.2-7j1.dsc 7f7fd51c2b6a4888d2f0298e3db2c50b 969939 devel standard gcj-4.0_4.0.2-7j1.diff.gz a8a0869575294a78dd92dcdd82905612 3104300 libs optional libgcj6-jar_4.0.2-7j1_all.deb 0019f8e8f537ab54e600dc2d69edc71b 1172 libs optional libgcj-common_4.0.2-7j1_all.deb 699018c3eb5e9ecc32ec9b72a1f6a72e 6436214 libdevel optional libgcj6-src_4.0.2-7j1_all.deb 3b5d7e1103fcc17e8f02b2ea18790d24 77516 libs optional gcj-4.0-base_4.0.2-7j1_powerpc.deb eb54db739685f3742e2b2e40816f3e2c 2932840 devel optional gcj-4.0_4.0.2-7j1_powerpc.deb 9ef8c5818c1fe12380eeb09346e21301 33110 devel optional gij-4.0_4.0.2-7j1_powerpc.deb 5044936c8681f6c88fd582e8e2c8193d 5305684 libs optional libgcj6_4.0.2-7j1_powerpc.deb d1fe88442061c680da0979bbaede8d02 254068 libs optional libgcj6-awt_4.0.2-7j1_powerpc.deb 00cb2019fd801ef28836b9acc693d037 8373468 libdevel optional libgcj6-dev_4.0.2-7j1_powerpc.deb 0233b22021531cc2f0db20a9fa90b819 8643836 libdevel extra libgcj6-dbg_4.0.2-7j1_powerpc.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD0klNStlRaw+TLJwRAklWAJ9ft1l2RnOGLEuEsdzb+l13Zs5qAACglg9Z qE9+edcWWQdmmM87CpS94ZQ= =473D -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346687: marked as done (baken: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:17:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346687: fixed in baken 0.5.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:37 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzX-lc-Oo for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:37 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlyz-0006j7-2J for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: baken: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: baken Version: 0.5.3-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346687-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 16:20:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 08:20:34 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0LQJ-0001pR-IS; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:17:07 -0800 From: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346687: fixed in baken 0.5.3-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:17:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: baken Source-Version: 0.5.3-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of baken, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: baken_0.5.3-4.diff.gz to pool/main/b/baken/baken_0.5.3-4.diff.gz baken_0.5.3-4.dsc to pool/main/b/baken/baken_0.5.3-4.dsc baken_0.5.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/b/baken/baken_0.5.3-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#347679: marked as done (emacs-dl-wnn: Depends on libwnn6, which is uninstallable)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:12:07 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 00:45:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 16:45:17 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jem01.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.224.23]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ewqab-0005Gh-16 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:45:17 -0800 Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.jem01.its.hawaii.edu by jem01.its.hawaii.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.01 (built Nov 22 2005)) id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:44:42 -1000 (HST) Received: from localhost (amakihi.soest.hawaii.edu [128.171.156.62]) by jem01.its.hawaii.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.01 (built Nov 22 2005)) with ESMTPS id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:44:29 -1000 (HST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:44:28 -1000 (HST) From: Ryo Furue [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: emacs-dl-wnn: Depends on libwnn6, which is uninstallable To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Content-type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.1.1.222179, Antispam-Engine: 2.2.0.0, Antispam-Data: 2006.01.11.161103 X-Debbugs-CC: Ryo Furue [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: emacs-dl-wnn Version: 0.4.2-5.1 Severity: serious Hello, emacs-dl-wnn depends on libwnn6, which conflicts with libwnn6-1. On the other hand, kinput2-canna-wnn depends on libwnn6-1 . This results in a dependecy error on a system with both emacs-dl-wnn and kinput2-canna-wnn installed. Ryo -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages emacs-dl-wnn depends on: ii emacs20-dl20.7-14.3 The GNU Emacs editor. (Dynamic Loa ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libwnn6 1.0.0-12 Wnn6 client library emacs-dl-wnn recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 347679-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 16:20:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 08:20:43 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0LLk-Rs-NM for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:12:25 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LGBtxo007543 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:11:55 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LGC7Q3028193 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:12:07 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LGC7UU028191; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:12:07 +0100 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:12:07 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 emacs-dl-wnn was removed from Debian in April 2003 because no one was interested in maintaining it. See http://bugs.debian.org/190836 for details. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320216: marked as done (logwatch: pb with compressed samba logfiles)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:19:08 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2005 17:02:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 27 10:02:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DxpIk-0001GJ-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:02:39 -0700 Received: from (srv-dmz.33sdis.fr) [81.255.162.101] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dxlgf-0003Bf-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:11:06 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by srv-dmz.33sdis.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF3629EB81 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:10:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from srv-dmz.33sdis.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv-dmz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06887-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.33sdis.fr (unknown [10.1.1.211]) by srv-dmz.33sdis.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E232A29EB7B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.33sdis.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66E92C6C5A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.33sdis.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv-mail.33sdis.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03817-04-3; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from srv-dams.33sdis.fr (srv-dams.33sdis.fr [10.1.1.2]) by mail.33sdis.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5082C6C58; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Debian User [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: logwatch: pb with compressed samba logfiles X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:09:59 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at sdis33.fr X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at sdis33.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: logwatch Version: sarge Severity: minor /etc/logwatch/conf/logfiles/samba is configured like that: LogFile = samba/* thus permitting inclusion of gzipped files in the mail that appear as binary data! The files log.winbind, log.smbd and log.nmbd are rotated and compressed by default. Solution: LogFile = samba/*[^.gz] and use an Archive line if needed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR) --- Received: (at 320216-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 16:18:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 08:18:52 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smartmx-06.inode.at ([213.229.60.38]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0LRz-00025h-RK for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:18:52 -0800 Received: from [85.124.105.25] (port=56974 helo=[85.124.105.25]) by smartmx-06.inode.at with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1F0LRy-0008C1-FU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:18:50 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:19:08 +0100 From: Willi Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in unstable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: logwatch Source-Version:
Bug#338006: marked as done (libssl0.9.8: bad record mac because of wrong SSL_OP_TLS_BLOCK_PADDING_BUG handling)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:32:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338006: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 19:24:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 11:24:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-217-29-140.tn.glocalnet.net (mulder.hem.za.org) [84.217.29.140] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZCb5-0003hb-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:24:04 -0800 Received: from skinner.hem.za.org ([fec0::202:44ff:fe1d:d021]) by mulder.hem.za.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EZCb1-000340-NY; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:23:59 +0100 Received: from mikael by skinner.hem.za.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EZCax-0007tO-CT; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:23:55 +0100 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:23:55 +0100 From: Mikael Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libssl0.9.8: bad record mac because of wrong SSL_OP_TLS_BLOCK_PADDING_BUG handling Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: Mikael Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libssl0.9.8 Version: 0.9.8a-3 Severity: important Use of SSL_OP_TLS_BLOCK_PADDING_BUG, which is included in SSL_OP_ALL, triggers a bug in OpenSSL if both the client and server is using version 0.9.8. Upstream bug report: http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1204 The bug can be demonstrated with the following execution of s_server and s_client. Server: # openssl s_server -accept 5061 -cert /etc/apache/ssl.crt/snakeoil-dsa.crt -key /etc/apache/ssl.key/snakeoil-dsa.key -CAfile /etc/apache/ssl.crt/snakeoil-ca-dsa.crt -no_ssl2 Client: $ openssl s_client -connect skinner:5061 -no_ssl2 -bugs CONNECTED(0003) depth=1 /C=XY/ST=Snake Desert/L=Snake Town/O=Snake Oil, Ltd/OU=Certificate Authority (DSA)/CN=Snake Oil CA/[EMAIL PROTECTED] verify error:num=19:self signed certificate in certificate chain verify return:0 29985:error:1408F455:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed or bad record mac:s3_pkt.c:426: Sometimes the connection succeeds, but it fails most of the times. Regards, Mikael -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (871, 'stable'), (50, 'testing'), (30, 'unstable'), (10, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-vserver-k7 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libssl0.9.8 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.57 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime libssl0.9.8 recommends no packages. -- debconf information: libssl0.9.8/restart-services: --- Received: (at 338006-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 16:41:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 08:41:04 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Lev-0003kJ-6K; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:32:13 -0800 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#338006: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:32:13 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: openssl Source-Version: 0.9.8a-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8a-6_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/openssl/libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8a-6_i386.udeb
Bug#349044: marked as done (Please default the encrypt passwords settings in default smb.conf)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:09:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Suggestion about adding encrypted passwords to smb.conf has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2004 15:54:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 23 08:54:36 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from trogdor.progsoc.uts.edu.au [138.25.6.3] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BzH9Y-000239-00; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:54:36 -0700 Received: from wildfire by trogdor.progsoc.uts.edu.au with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BzH9W-Kb-A1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:54:34 +1000 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:54:34 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: corrections / clarifications to smb.conf Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on trogdor.progsoc.uts.edu.au); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: samba-common Version: 3.0.5-1 Seveirty: important Hi, Attached is a patch to the default smb.conf which contains a number of corrections (encrypted passwords, invalid users, etc.) and a few other sections (Domains) and some suggested shares (for roaming profiles). I believe this patch would be beneficial for Samba and as it is only a change in an example file I believe an update prior to Debian 3.1 is released is warranted. Thus the 'importance' of this bug. Thanks, Anand -- `` All actions take place in time by the interweaving of the forces of Nature; but the man lost in selfish delusion thinks that he himself is the actor.'' Lord Krishna to Arjuna in _The Bhagavad Gita_ --lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smb.conf.diff --- /usr/share/samba/smb.conf 2004-07-22 22:28:55.0 +1000 +++ /tmp/smb.conf 2004-08-24 01:49:11.0 +1000 @@ -44,6 +44,14 @@ # to IP addresses ; name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast +# Only bind to the named interfaces and/or networks. It is recommended that +# you enable this feature if your Samba machine is not protected by a +# firewall or is a firewall itself +; bind interfaces only = true + +# The specific set of interfaces / networks to bind to +# This can be either the interface name or an IP address/netmask +; interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8 eth0 Debugging/Accounting @@ -77,7 +85,11 @@ # You may wish to use password encryption. See the section on # 'encrypt passwords' in the smb.conf(5) manpage before enabling. - encrypt passwords = no +# As per the Samba-HOWTO Collection +# http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/passdb.html +# Section 'Important Notes About Security' +# Use of encrypted passwords is strong advised + encrypt passwords = true # If you are using encrypted passwords, Samba will need to know what # password database type you are using. @@ -85,8 +97,13 @@ obey pam restrictions = yes +# As per the Samba-HOWTO Collection +# http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html +# Section 'Important Administrative Information' +# It is important for correct functioning that the following are left +# commented out. Uncomment only if you are sure you know what you are doing! ; guest account = nobody - invalid users = root +; invalid users = root # This boolean parameter controls whether Samba attempts to sync the Unix # password with the SMB password when the encrypted SMB password in the @@ -126,13 +143,68 @@ # properties ; printer admin = @ntadmin +# addprinter command +# Samba maintainer put something useful here +# deleteprinter command +# Samba maintainer put something useful here + File sharing # Name mangling options -; preserve case = yes -; short preserve case = yes +
Bug#343260: marked as done (Grub: After installing linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 grub had wrong entries)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:03:53 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 00:01:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 16:01:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from viefep16-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.17]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmJvc-0001QI-6o for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:51:28 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([213.47.207.78]) by viefep16-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:50:56 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Hirschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Grub: After installing linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 grub had wrong entries Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:50:57 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 Version: 2.6.14-5 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After installing linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 grub had only wrong entries. For example Instead of hda(0,8) hda(0,7) was in the grub config file. And also: Instead: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-2-k7 root=/dev/hda9 ro there was: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-2-k7 root=/dev/hda8 ro This was for all 3 kernels I have ever installed including this. Only the winxp entry at the end of the menu.lst (the name of my grub conffile) was not affected. Until I corrected this, the system was not bootable so I think that severity: critical, breaks the whole system is the right one, cause until I corrected it, no kernel version was able to boot. The output of my partition table is: Disk /dev/hda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 4 765 6120765b W95 FAT32 /dev/hda2 766 19457 150143490f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda5 766522735840983+ b W95 FAT32 /dev/hda65228 1471176180198+ b W95 FAT32 /dev/hda7 14712 1748422274091b W95 FAT32 /dev/hda8 17485 18358 7020373+ 83 Linux /dev/hda9 18359 19209 6835626 83 Linux /dev/hda10 19210 19457 1992028+ 82 Linux swap / You should know, that linux (including the kernel) is installed on hda9, but a few important directorys are chanced with symlinks to hda8 (e.g. home). The kernel itself is on hda9. Another strang bug, is that if winxp is the first entry in grub, than it will removed after an aptitude install linux Cheers, Stefan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-4 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.11-12 Yet Another mkInitRD Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 recommends: ii libc6-i6862.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.14-2-k7: false linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.14-2-k7: true
Bug#345516: marked as done (needs to support an environment file in cluster conf dir)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#345516: fixed in postgresql-common 40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2005 13:40:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 21 05:40:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from serval.logix-tt.com ([213.239.221.42] helo=mail.logix-tt.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EeBu7-00042z-FD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:40:19 -0800 Received: from kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Kb0b4.k.pppool.de [85.75.176.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D635224409A; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:46:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D658B74A3F; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:40:12 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Markus Schaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Crossgrade from postgresql 7.4 to postgresql-7.4 broke DATADIR environment variables X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:40:11 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: postgresql-7.4 Version: 1:7.4.8-17 Severity: normal Hi, Some time ago, I crossgraded the Postgresql 7.4 installation to the new postgresql-common and postgresql-7.4 packaging. In the earlier postgresql instalations, one could define environment variables in postgresql.env or postmaster.conf which then were exported to the postmaster, and we could use it as LOCATION when creating new databases in other locations. I happen to have such legacy databases, and recently wanted to drop one of them, and got the following error message: dropdb: database removal failed: ERROR: postmaster environment variable PGDATAEXTERN not found Not only that the environment variable setting was not migrated, I also did not find the right place to reinstantiate this setting. All the init scripts seem to be generic for the different postgresql versions, and the postmaster itsself is a binary... So I'm stuck with either dropping the whole cluster (and thus having to migrate about 50 gig into a new cluster without stopping production environment), or having an empty zombie-database lingering around which confuses users. Thanks, Markus -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.1 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages postgresql-7.4 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr21.38-2 common error description library ii libkrb53 1.3.6-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpam0g 0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpq31:7.4.8-17 PostgreSQL C client library ii libreadline5 5.0-11 GNU readline and history libraries ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-5 SSL shared libraries ii postgresql-client-7.4 1:7.4.8-17 front-end programs for PostgreSQL ii postgresql-common 32 manager for PostgreSQL database cl ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime postgresql-7.4 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 345516-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 17:02:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 09:02:41 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0M7t-rA-M2; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#345516: fixed in postgresql-common 40 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive
Bug#346442: marked as done (Typo in /usr/share/doc/postgresql-common/README.Debian.gz: detailled)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346442: fixed in postgresql-common 40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 00:44:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 07 16:44:22 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com ([195.54.107.70]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvOfV-sk-Sv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:44:22 -0800 Received: from alderaan.a8n.se ([85.224.152.221] [85.224.152.221]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:43:48 +0100 Received: from ehn by alderaan.a8n.se with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EvOew-00027k-00; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:43:46 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andreas Ehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Typo in /usr/share/doc/postgresql-common/README.Debian.gz: detailled Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:43:45 +0100 Sender: Andreas Ehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: postgresql-common Version: 39 Severity: minor In /usr/share/doc/postgresql-common/README.Debian.gz on lines 18 and 124 there is a minor type: detailed is spelled detailled. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages postgresql-common depends on: ii adduser 3.80 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.67 Debian configuration management sy ii lsb-base 3.0-13 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip Versions of packages postgresql-common recommends: ii openssl 0.9.8a-5 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 346442-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 17:02:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 09:02:41 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0M7t-rC-Mq; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346442: fixed in postgresql-common 40 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: postgresql-common Source-Version: 40 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of postgresql-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: postgresql-common_40.dsc to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40.dsc postgresql-common_40.tar.gz to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40.tar.gz postgresql-common_40_all.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated postgresql-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:16:32 +0100 Source: postgresql-common
Bug#348447: marked as done (/etc/postgresql-common/user_clusters not available)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348447: fixed in postgresql-common 40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 01:29:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 17:29:09 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pomo.hostsharing.net ([212.42.230.39]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eyfen-0004nf-0b for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:29:09 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (p54831DD3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.131.29.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pomo.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CAC5002427 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 02:29:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 02:28:17 +0100 From: Peter Niederlag [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: /etc/postgresql-common/user_clusters not available X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: postgresql-common Version: 39 Severity: important after purging and reinstalling postgresql-common the user_clusters file has been missing. Due to missing file all wrapper-scripts are failing with: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ psql Warning: could not open /etc/postgresql-common/user_clusters, connecting to default port Error: You must install at least one postgresql-client-version package. Problem was fixed here by manually extracing the map file from .deb and placing it in /etc/postgresql-common. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (1200, 'testing'), (40, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages postgresql-common depends on: ii adduser 3.80 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.67 Debian configuration management sy ii lsb-base 3.0-13 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip Versions of packages postgresql-common recommends: ii openssl 0.9.8a-5 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a -- debconf information: * postgresql-common/obsolete-major: --- Received: (at 348447-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 17:02:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 09:02:40 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0M7t-rE-Ni; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#348447: fixed in postgresql-common 40 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: postgresql-common Source-Version: 40 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of postgresql-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: postgresql-common_40.dsc to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40.dsc postgresql-common_40.tar.gz to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40.tar.gz postgresql-common_40_all.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of
Bug#348875: marked as done (postgresql-common: possible port conflict with pgpool)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348875: fixed in postgresql-common 40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2006 14:41:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 06:41:25 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from p508962aa.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.137.98.170] helo=bell.credativ.de) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ezaya-0005bX-BA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:41:25 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: postgresql-common: possible port conflict with pgpool Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:41:34 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: postgresql-common Version: 39 Severity: normal pgpool uses port 5433. postgresql-common will also give out this port to the second cluster it creates, leading to trouble. Perhaps postgresql-common could check whether the port is in use before assigning it (difficult?) or we should work out some other agreement. --- Received: (at 348875-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 17:02:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 09:02:44 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0M7t-rG-OX; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#348875: fixed in postgresql-common 40 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:02:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: postgresql-common Source-Version: 40 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of postgresql-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: postgresql-common_40.dsc to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40.dsc postgresql-common_40.tar.gz to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40.tar.gz postgresql-common_40_all.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql-common/postgresql-common_40_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated postgresql-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:16:32 +0100 Source: postgresql-common Binary: postgresql-common Architecture: source all Version: 40 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: postgresql-common - manager for PostgreSQL database clusters Closes: 345516 346442 348447 348875 Changes: postgresql-common (40) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/supported-versions: Add 8.1 to Ubuntu 5.10 to properly support backport. * PgCommon.pm: If /etc/postgresql-common/user_clusters does not exist, use the default cluster instead of returning an invalid value. Also, do not complain if the file does not exist (which is legitime). Closes: #348447 * debian/README.Debian: Fix 'detailled' typo. Closes: #346442 * Replace most calls to get_conf_value() with the much more efficient new function read_cluster_conf_file(). * pg_upgradecluster: Factorized and cleaned up parameter
Bug#343021: marked as done (Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:17:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343021: fixed in socketapi 1.7.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:55:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:55:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Elb2N-Rp-Nj for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:55:28 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19990 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:55:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCC3F2C5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:55:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 24498-35 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:55:25 +0100 (MET) 14197 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:55:25 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBBNtPCx023254 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:55:25 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:55:25 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: socketapi Usertag: g++-3.4 This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.4 (most likely, because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although currently not a hard release goal. Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the build dependency on g++-3.4. Collect further information in this bug report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version). (Side note: PR c++/21123 is now fixed in g++-4.0, allowing many KDE related packages to build on arm/hppa/m68k with the default g++ A build-dependency on g++ (= 4:4.0.2-2) is currently needed until all the buildds use this version. --- Received: (at 343021-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 17:21:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 09:21:49 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0MMR-0005x4-5I; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:17:11 -0800 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343021: fixed in socketapi 1.7.0-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:17:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: socketapi Source-Version: 1.7.0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of socketapi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: socketapi-dev_1.7.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi-dev_1.7.0-4_i386.deb socketapi1_1.7.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi1_1.7.0-4_i386.deb socketapi_1.7.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi_1.7.0-4.diff.gz socketapi_1.7.0-4.dsc to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi_1.7.0-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer
Bug#337846: marked as done (Should -DRUNTIME_CPUDETECT to enable runtime CPU detection)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:47:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337846: fixed in ffmpeg 0.cvs20050918-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2005 21:20:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 06 13:20:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYrwX-0001Ni-00; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:20:49 -0800 Received: from bee.dooz.org (levallois.dooz.org [81.57.180.178]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CE2371CF; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:20:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 172724F058C; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:20:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:20:46 +0100 From: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Should -DRUNTIME_CPUDETECT to enable runtime CPU detection Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ffmpeg Severity: important Hi, ffmpeg should be built with -DRUNTIME_CPUDETECT to postpone the choice of optimized functions at run time, especially to enable G3 machines to run the packages built on Altivec capable machines in Debian. This shouldn't be used on m68k, where it causes an ICE (porters were informed). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) --=20 Lo=EFc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do we want? BRAINS!When do we want it? BRAINS! --- Received: (at 337846-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 17:50:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 09:50:59 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0MpS-00086d-4y; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:47:10 -0800 From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#337846: fixed in ffmpeg 0.cvs20050918-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:47:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: ffmpeg Source-Version: 0.cvs20050918-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ffmpeg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-6.diff.gz to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-6.diff.gz ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-6.dsc to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-6.dsc ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-6_i386.deb to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-6_i386.deb libavcodec-dev_0.cvs20050918-6_i386.deb to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/libavcodec-dev_0.cvs20050918-6_i386.deb libavformat-dev_0.cvs20050918-6_i386.deb to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/libavformat-dev_0.cvs20050918-6_i386.deb libpostproc-dev_0.cvs20050918-6_i386.deb to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/libpostproc-dev_0.cvs20050918-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ffmpeg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Bug#338895: marked as done (ffmpeg: debian/rules does not respect DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip noopt debug)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:47:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338895: fixed in ffmpeg 0.cvs20050918-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 16:10:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 08:10:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.netsonic.fi ([194.29.192.26]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EbKRA-00019J-BO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:36 -0800 Received: from sauna (kulho150.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.193.150]) by smtp.netsonic.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5A51F8067; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:10:34 +0200 (EET) Received: from sauna.l.org ([192.168.0.99] helo=[192.168.1.32]) by sauna with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EbKR8-Df-00; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:10:34 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timo Lindfors [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ffmpeg: debian/rules does not respect DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip noopt debug X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:10:33 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ffmpeg Version: 0.cvs20050918-4 Severity: normal In order to debug a bug I tried to build the package with debugging symbols using DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip noopt debug dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot and was surprised to see gcc called with -O3 and without -g. I tried to fix this with --- ffmpeg2/ffmpeg-0.cvs20050918/debian/rules Sun Nov 13 16:58:13 2005 +++ ffmpeg/ffmpeg-0.cvs20050918/debian/rulesSun Nov 13 16:49:31 2005 @@ -13,7 +13,14 @@ confflags += --enable-gpl --enable-pp confflags += --enable-zlib --enable-vorbis --enable-libogg --enable-theora --enable-a52 --enable-dts --enable-dc1394 --enable-libgsm +ifneq (,$(findstring debug,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) +confflags += --enable-debug +else confflags += --disable-debug +endif +ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) +confflags += --disable-opts +endif ifneq (,$(findstring risky,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) weak-build-deps += liblame-dev but then the build failed with libpostproc/postprocess_template.c: In function 'postProcess_MMX': libpostproc/postprocess_template.c:3551: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'blockCopy_MMX' differ in signedness libpostproc/postprocess_template.c:3697: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'blockCopy_MMX' differ in signedness libpostproc/postprocess_template.c:3798: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'tempNoiseReducer_MMX' differ in signedness libpostproc/postprocess_template.c:3822: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'tempNoiseReducer_MMX' differ in signedness gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -Wall -Wno-switch -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H -I.. -I'/home/lindi/local/ffmpeg/ffmpeg-0.cvs20050918'/libavutil -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE-c -o oggvorbis.o oggvorbis.c oggvorbis.c: In function 'oggvorbis_decode_frame': oggvorbis.c:297: warning: unused variable 'i' gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -Wall -Wno-switch -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H -I.. -I'/home/lindi/local/ffmpeg/ffmpeg-0.cvs20050918'/libavutil -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE-c -o oggtheora.o oggtheora.c gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -Wall -Wno-switch -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H -I.. -I'/home/lindi/local/ffmpeg/ffmpeg-0.cvs20050918'/libavutil -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE-c -o libgsm.o libgsm.c gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -Wall -Wno-switch -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H -I.. -I'/home/lindi/local/ffmpeg/ffmpeg-0.cvs20050918'/libavutil -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE-c -o i386/fdct_mmx.o i386/fdct_mmx.c /tmp/ccLUv78B.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccLUv78B.s:2004: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pshufw' make[1]: *** [i386/fdct_mmx.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/lindi/local/ffmpeg/ffmpeg-0.cvs20050918/libavcodec' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 The problematic file builds with -O3 -O2 -O1 and even -O1 -g but not with -O0. Is this a GCC bug? How about using the following fix as a compromise? ---
Bug#342207: marked as done (ffmpeg: Exploitable heap overflow in libavcodec's image handling)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:47:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342207: fixed in ffmpeg 0.cvs20050918-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2005 09:41:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 06 01:41:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from inutil.org ([193.22.164.111] helo=vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EjZKN-0004xs-Dy for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 01:41:39 -0800 Received: from wlan-client-022.informatik.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.116.23] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EjZKK-0001Ju-8L for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:41:36 +0100 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EjZJt-0001VY-SM; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:41:09 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ffmpeg: Exploitable heap overflow in libavcodec's image handling Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:41:08 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 134.102.116.23 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ffmpeg Version: 0.cvs20050918-5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole An exploitable heap overflow has been found in libavcodec's handling of images with PIX_FMT_PAL8 pixel formats. Please see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/26558 for more information and a demo image. Upstream's fix can be found at http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/2005-December/000979.html Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages ffmpeg depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdc1394-131.1.0-2 high level programming interface f ii libfreetype62.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgsm1 1.0.10-13Shared libraries for GSM speech co ii libimlib2 1.2.1-2 powerful image loading and renderi ii libogg0 1.1.2-1 Ogg Bitstream Library ii libraw1394-50.10.1-1.1 library for direct access to IEEE ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.9-0.0Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libtheora0 0.0.0.alpha4-1.1 The Theora Video Compression Codec ii libvorbis0a 1.1.0-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisenc2 1.1.0-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libx11-66.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8compression library - runtime ffmpeg recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 342207-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 17:50:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 09:50:57 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0MpS-00086h-6Z; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:47:10 -0800 From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#342207: fixed in ffmpeg 0.cvs20050918-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:47:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#349217: marked as done (libgtk2-gladexml-perl missing method signal_connect_after)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:53:47 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349217: libgtk2-gladexml-perl missing method signal_connect_after has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 16:15:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 08:15:05 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.193]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0LBC-0005Kb-8O for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:01:30 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so654934nzf for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:01:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hbiK7ijzVYL/FB4YRPlnnhLqwKMT43FlqqiAOYSysnpTxJAiJLd7rAFW3FZWXRIFFgy79bfH5iRKfoAOcA0uRTMntuNWEAh2Go0QXY/2UhQ2e37jN+tIsUrHLlsUBOhaS68PFaXFsb7jVN7EeI/Po9aWIQubWTAxIa1Ine4pVo4= Received: by 10.36.56.18 with SMTP id e18mr2286033nza; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:01:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.14.66 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:01:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:01:29 +0100 From: Fabio Marzocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgtk2-gladexml-perl missing method signal_connect_after MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libgtk2-gladexml-perl Version: 1.005-1 Severity: Major libgtk2-gladexml-perl v.1.005-1 is missing the method: signal_connect_after= . All perl programs using that method, report: Can't locate object method signal_connect_after via package Gtk2::CheckButton at /usr/lib/perl5/Gtk2/GladeXML.pm line 40. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers dapper-updates APT policy: (500, 'dapper-updates'), (500, 'dapper-security'), (500, 'dap= per') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-13-386 Locale: LANG=3Dit_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dit_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages libgtk2-gladexml-perl depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.11.2-0ubuntu1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.6-0ubuntu4 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an ii libcairo2 1.0.2-3ubuntu1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics l= ibra ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1.1ubuntu3 generic font configuration lib= rary ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2ubuntu1 library to load .glade files a= t ru ii libglib-perl 1:1.102-1 Perl interface to the GLib and= GOb ii libglib2.0-0 2.9.4-0ubuntu1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2-perl 1:1.101-1 Perl interface to the 2.x seri= es o ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.10-1ubuntu1The GTK+ graphical user interf= ace ii libpango1.0-0 1.11.2-0ubuntu1Layout and rendering of intern= atio ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-0ubuntu3 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor1 1.1.5.2-0ubuntu2 X cursor management library ii libxext6 2:1.0.0-0ubuntu2 X11 miscellaneous extension li= brar ii libxfixes31:3.0.1.2-0ubuntu2 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' exte= nsio ii libxi62:1.0.0-0ubuntu2 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 2:1.0.1-0ubuntu2 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.6.23-1ubuntu2GNOME XML library ii libxrandr21:1.1.0.2-0ubuntu2 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0.2-0ubuntu2 X Rendering Extension client l= ibra ii perl 5.8.7-10ubuntu1Larry Wall's Practical Extract= ion ii perl-base [perlapi-5. 5.8.7-10ubuntu1The Pathologically Eclectic Ru= bbis ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-6ubuntu4 compression library - runtime libgtk2-gladexml-perl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 349217-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 17:53:56 + From [EMAIL
Bug#255376: marked as done (amavisd-new reload kills daemon)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:02:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#255376: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2004 14:10:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 20 07:10:05 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.110] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bc31J-0006cS-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:10:05 -0700 Received: by av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id D18A637E89; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06D37E44 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from balrog (h173n2fls33o284.telia.com [213.64.142.173]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791A337E45 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amavis by balrog with scanned-ok (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bc30l-0001Y6-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 Received: from balrog ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balrog [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15801-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thomas by balrog with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bc30V-0007Fx-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:15 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:15 +0200 From: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Logrotate 'reload' doesnt properly restart amavisd-new Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Request: http://www.northernsecurity.net/contact/114aa85c.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3367 0D84 444B D5B6 980E 7D5D 1209 639D 114A A85C User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p9-1 Amavis doesnt continue working after logratate has been called, so it seems it doesnt handle 'reload' very well. Replacing 'reload' with 'restart' may not be a beutiful fix, but it works. Patch for /etc/logrotate.d/amavis: --- amavis.old Sun Jun 20 15:32:20 2004 +++ amavis Sun Jun 20 15:29:17 2004 @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ delaycompress create 640 root root postrotate - /etc/init.d/amavis reload /dev/null + /etc/init.d/amavis restart /dev/null endscript } # dpkg -l |egrep 'amavisd*|clamav*' ii amavis-stats 0.1.13-rc1 generate rrd statistics from amavis* log ii amavisd-new20030616p9-1 Interface between MTA and virus scanner/c= ont ii clamav 0.72-1 Antivirus scanner for Unix ii clamav-base0.72-1 Base package for clamav, an anti-virus ut= ili ii clamav-daemon 0.72-1 Powerful Antivirus scanner daemon ii clamav-freshcl 0.72-1 Downloads clamav virus databases from the= In ii libclamav1 0.72-1 Virus scanner library /Thomas --=20 =3D=3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D=3D Encrypted e-mails preferred | GPG KeyID: 114AA85C -- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQNWai9XAsD67qPj1AQJDVwgAtg6wqaVw+C0C+eXssSkxDknXIdWqTOW8 +CaqeVxu2gHbiUNbvEXub+P3WVwGcqL0JACZLQ/+ex6CSnyqRqQ9dz5hvzEnkd7r LBvKEyQre+bA2V4QJLA49fTdfYCB+BepqfFB2kCTqwbfMTpKpXPK7hQR33xv/83t 3JgyjaAQZz99nxUlEtXYnqjkvgTn6qVw2Lqw2hOOaly0AcSLbcjqqPuFRAgkCm50 xO1cwphoV8xZ/Sj/+LhceWLQQbT6VBq1GWDX16xl5W0KeDq6Uw8liAaXPCTviHGe 28bO4CmHRO3OaIM/OM8UlL9GmwFyhXHOOp+1xB4cqZDEK7gOYqaeUg== =FCyd -END PGP
Bug#348439: marked as done (amavisd-new: wrong libcompress-zlib-perl dependency version)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:02:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348439: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2006 23:47:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 15:47:57 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.tokkee.org ([212.114.247.92] helo=albany.tokkee.org ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eye4r-0006in-IX for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:47:57 -0800 Received: by albany.tokkee.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B037A4CBBD; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:47:55 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sebastian Harl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: wrong libcompress-zlib-perl dependency version X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:47:23 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: amavisd-new Version: 1:2.3.3-2bpo1 Severity: minor The libcompress-zlib-perl dependency version should be changed to 1.35 as the Amavis::Unpackers package depends on a version greater or equal to that. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.12-1Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl1.23-1Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl1.14-1Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libberkeleydb-perl 0.26-3use Berkeley DB 4 databases from P ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.34-1Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.5.1-1 Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libio-stringy-perl 2.110-1 Perl5 modules for IO from scalars ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.417-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl 0.87-3An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl0.100-4 Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-8sarge3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl] 5.8.4-8sarge3 Core Perl modules -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 348439-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 18:12:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 10:12:00 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0N3w-0001sj-Qs; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:02:08 -0800 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#348439: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:02:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: amavisd-new Source-Version: 1:2.3.3-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amavisd-new, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amavisd-new-milter_2.3.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amavisd-new/amavisd-new-milter_2.3.3-4_i386.deb amavisd-new_2.3.3-4.diff.gz to pool/main/a/amavisd-new/amavisd-new_2.3.3-4.diff.gz amavisd-new_2.3.3-4.dsc to pool/main/a/amavisd-new/amavisd-new_2.3.3-4.dsc amavisd-new_2.3.3-4_all.deb to
Bug#348990: marked as done ([config] missing defaults for local_domain_maps disable functionality)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:02:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348990: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 09:44:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 01:44:15 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from o9.88.net ([217.155.165.26]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EzsoY-0002Di-Dd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:44:15 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by o9.88.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB832430008; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:42 + (GMT) Received: from o9.88.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (o9.88.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16554-01; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:34 + (GMT) Received: by o9.88.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AA189430007; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:34 + (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas Lakofski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new not tagging messages as SPAM except when quarantining messages Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:34 + X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 88.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: amavisd-new Version: 1:2.3.3-3 Severity: normal Per subject, amavis is not tagging unless the mail is put in the spam quarantine (score exceeds sa_tag2_levl_deflt). Here is the relevant configuration, a log entry and sample headers of a mail which amavis considered spam, but didn't tag: (from 20-debian_defaults) use strict; # COMMONLY ADJUSTED SETTINGS: $QUARANTINEDIR = $MYHOME/quarantine/; $log_recip_templ = undef;# disable by-recipient level-0 log entries $DO_SYSLOG = 1; # log via syslogd (preferred) $SYSLOG_LEVEL = 'mail.debug'; # switch to mail.info to drop debug output, etc $enable_db = 1; # enable use of BerkeleyDB/libdb (SNMP and nanny) $enable_global_cache = 1;# enable use of libdb-based cache if $enable_db=1 $inet_socket_port = 10024; # default listenting socket $sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** '; $sa_tag_level_deflt = -10; # add spam info headers if at, or above that level $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level $sa_kill_level_deflt = 15; # triggers spam evasive actions $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 0; # spam level beyond which a DSN is not sent $sa_mail_body_size_limit = 500*1024; # don't waste time on SA if mail is larger $sa_local_tests_only = 0;# only tests which do not require internet access? # Quota limits to avoid bombs (like 42.zip) $MAXLEVELS = 14; $MAXFILES = 1500; $MIN_EXPANSION_QUOTA = 100*1024; # bytes $MAX_EXPANSION_QUOTA = 300*1024*1024; # bytes # OTHER MORE COMMON SETTINGS (defaults may suffice): # You should: # Use D_DISCARD to discard data (viruses) # Use D_BOUNCE to generate local bounces by amavisd-new # Use D_REJECT to generate local or remote bounces by the calling MTA # Use D_PASS to deliver the message # # Whatever you do, *NEVER* use D_REJECT if you have other MTAs *forwarding* # mail to your account. Use D_BOUNCE instead, otherwise you are delegating # the bounce work to your friendly forwarders, which might not like it at all. # # On dual-MTA setups, one can often D_REJECT, as this just makes your own # MTA generate the bounce message. Test it first. # # Bouncing viruses is stupid, always discard them after you are sure the AV # is working correctly. Bouncing real SPAM is also useless, if you cannot # D_REJECT it (and don't D_REJECT mail coming from your forwarders!). $final_virus_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (data not lost, see virus quarantine) $final_banned_destiny = D_DISCARD; # D_REJECT when front-end MTA $final_spam_destiny = D_DISCARD; $final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS; # False-positive prone (for spam) $virus_admin = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; # due to D_DISCARD default # Leave empty (undef) to add no header $X_HEADER_LINE = Debian $myproduct_name at $mydomain; [rest of 20-debian_defaults unchanged
Bug#303131: marked as done (1.29 contains officially required boilerplates)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:33:39 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303131: 1.29 contains officially required boilerplates has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 23:04:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 04 16:04:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIac7-0004nB-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:04:11 -0700 Received: from deneb.enyo.de ([212.9.189.171]) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtp id 1DIac5-0007oO-0Q for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:04:09 +0200 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DIac2-0004tJ-R4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:04:06 +0200 From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 1.29 contains officially required boilerplates Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:04:06 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xml2rfc Severity: important Tags: upstream The IETF Secretariat recently announced that they require different boilerplates in I-D submissions: However, as of 17:00 ET on Friday May 6, 2005, the Secretariat will accept *only* those Internet-Drafts that comply with the requirements of RFC 3978, and with the most recent version of the Guidelines document. Unfortunately, xml2rfc 1.29 (which will contain the necessary changes) has not yet been released. --- Received: (at 303131-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 18:33:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 10:33:43 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0NYV-0001Gj-9a for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:33:43 -0800 Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp id 1F0NYT-0002Pb-Bv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:33:41 +0100 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1F0NYS-00016L-2Q for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:33:40 +0100 From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#303131: 1.29 contains officially required boilerplates References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:33:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Florian Weimer's message of Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:04:06 +0200) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 xml2rfc 1.30 contains the correct boilerplates, which are expected to be fairly stable. This means that xml2rfc is finally in a releasable state. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346650: marked as done (baycomepp: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:47:05 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346650: fixed in baycomepp 0.10-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:34 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzV-ld-H1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:34 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlyz-0006jA-4a for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: baycomepp: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: baycomepp Version: 0.10-8 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346650-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 18:50:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 10:50:41 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0NlR-0002GI-T7; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:47:05 -0800 From: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346650: fixed in baycomepp 0.10-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:47:05 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: baycomepp Source-Version: 0.10-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of baycomepp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: baycomepp_0.10-9.diff.gz to pool/main/b/baycomepp/baycomepp_0.10-9.diff.gz baycomepp_0.10-9.dsc to pool/main/b/baycomepp/baycomepp_0.10-9.dsc baycomepp_0.10-9_i386.deb to pool/main/b/baycomepp/baycomepp_0.10-9_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug,
Bug#255376: marked as done (amavisd-new reload kills daemon)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:08:47 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-3bpo1 (source all i386) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2004 14:10:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 20 07:10:05 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.110] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bc31J-0006cS-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:10:05 -0700 Received: by av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id D18A637E89; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06D37E44 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from balrog (h173n2fls33o284.telia.com [213.64.142.173]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791A337E45 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amavis by balrog with scanned-ok (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bc30l-0001Y6-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 Received: from balrog ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balrog [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15801-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thomas by balrog with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bc30V-0007Fx-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:15 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:15 +0200 From: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Logrotate 'reload' doesnt properly restart amavisd-new Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Request: http://www.northernsecurity.net/contact/114aa85c.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3367 0D84 444B D5B6 980E 7D5D 1209 639D 114A A85C User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p9-1 Amavis doesnt continue working after logratate has been called, so it seems it doesnt handle 'reload' very well. Replacing 'reload' with 'restart' may not be a beutiful fix, but it works. Patch for /etc/logrotate.d/amavis: --- amavis.old Sun Jun 20 15:32:20 2004 +++ amavis Sun Jun 20 15:29:17 2004 @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ delaycompress create 640 root root postrotate - /etc/init.d/amavis reload /dev/null + /etc/init.d/amavis restart /dev/null endscript } # dpkg -l |egrep 'amavisd*|clamav*' ii amavis-stats 0.1.13-rc1 generate rrd statistics from amavis* log ii amavisd-new20030616p9-1 Interface between MTA and virus scanner/c= ont ii clamav 0.72-1 Antivirus scanner for Unix ii clamav-base0.72-1 Base package for clamav, an anti-virus ut= ili ii clamav-daemon 0.72-1 Powerful Antivirus scanner daemon ii clamav-freshcl 0.72-1 Downloads clamav virus databases from the= In ii libclamav1 0.72-1 Virus scanner library /Thomas --=20 =3D=3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D=3D Encrypted e-mails preferred | GPG KeyID: 114AA85C -- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQNWai9XAsD67qPj1AQJDVwgAtg6wqaVw+C0C+eXssSkxDknXIdWqTOW8 +CaqeVxu2gHbiUNbvEXub+P3WVwGcqL0JACZLQ/+ex6CSnyqRqQ9dz5hvzEnkd7r LBvKEyQre+bA2V4QJLA49fTdfYCB+BepqfFB2kCTqwbfMTpKpXPK7hQR33xv/83t 3JgyjaAQZz99nxUlEtXYnqjkvgTn6qVw2Lqw2hOOaly0AcSLbcjqqPuFRAgkCm50 xO1cwphoV8xZ/Sj/+LhceWLQQbT6VBq1GWDX16xl5W0KeDq6Uw8liAaXPCTviHGe 28bO4CmHRO3OaIM/OM8UlL9GmwFyhXHOOp+1xB4cqZDEK7gOYqaeUg== =FCyd
Bug#348439: marked as done (amavisd-new: wrong libcompress-zlib-perl dependency version)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:08:47 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-3bpo1 (source all i386) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2006 23:47:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 15:47:57 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.tokkee.org ([212.114.247.92] helo=albany.tokkee.org ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eye4r-0006in-IX for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:47:57 -0800 Received: by albany.tokkee.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B037A4CBBD; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:47:55 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sebastian Harl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: wrong libcompress-zlib-perl dependency version X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:47:23 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: amavisd-new Version: 1:2.3.3-2bpo1 Severity: minor The libcompress-zlib-perl dependency version should be changed to 1.35 as the Amavis::Unpackers package depends on a version greater or equal to that. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.12-1Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl1.23-1Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl1.14-1Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libberkeleydb-perl 0.26-3use Berkeley DB 4 databases from P ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.34-1Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.5.1-1 Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libio-stringy-perl 2.110-1 Perl5 modules for IO from scalars ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.417-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl 0.87-3An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl0.100-4 Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-8sarge3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl] 5.8.4-8sarge3 Core Perl modules -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 348439-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:08:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:08:51 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0O6V-0007RN-HK; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:08:51 -0800 Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF94FD2FE57; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:08:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:08:49 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 1T4XhjR7Upt3WEYMiIwFIwuUrFlUfIeCRECr3BgzaIrP 1137870529 Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net (c91fc544.cps.virtua.com.br [201.31.197.68]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207D357146D; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:08:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0804F20A960; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:08:48 -0200 (BRST) Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (khazad-dum.debian.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26672-03; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:08:47 -0200 (BRST)
Bug#348990: marked as done ([config] missing defaults for local_domain_maps disable functionality)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:08:47 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-3bpo1 (source all i386) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 09:44:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 01:44:15 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from o9.88.net ([217.155.165.26]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EzsoY-0002Di-Dd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:44:15 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by o9.88.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB832430008; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:42 + (GMT) Received: from o9.88.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (o9.88.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16554-01; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:34 + (GMT) Received: by o9.88.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AA189430007; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:34 + (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas Lakofski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new not tagging messages as SPAM except when quarantining messages Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:34 + X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 88.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: amavisd-new Version: 1:2.3.3-3 Severity: normal Per subject, amavis is not tagging unless the mail is put in the spam quarantine (score exceeds sa_tag2_levl_deflt). Here is the relevant configuration, a log entry and sample headers of a mail which amavis considered spam, but didn't tag: (from 20-debian_defaults) use strict; # COMMONLY ADJUSTED SETTINGS: $QUARANTINEDIR = $MYHOME/quarantine/; $log_recip_templ = undef;# disable by-recipient level-0 log entries $DO_SYSLOG = 1; # log via syslogd (preferred) $SYSLOG_LEVEL = 'mail.debug'; # switch to mail.info to drop debug output, etc $enable_db = 1; # enable use of BerkeleyDB/libdb (SNMP and nanny) $enable_global_cache = 1;# enable use of libdb-based cache if $enable_db=1 $inet_socket_port = 10024; # default listenting socket $sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** '; $sa_tag_level_deflt = -10; # add spam info headers if at, or above that level $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level $sa_kill_level_deflt = 15; # triggers spam evasive actions $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 0; # spam level beyond which a DSN is not sent $sa_mail_body_size_limit = 500*1024; # don't waste time on SA if mail is larger $sa_local_tests_only = 0;# only tests which do not require internet access? # Quota limits to avoid bombs (like 42.zip) $MAXLEVELS = 14; $MAXFILES = 1500; $MIN_EXPANSION_QUOTA = 100*1024; # bytes $MAX_EXPANSION_QUOTA = 300*1024*1024; # bytes # OTHER MORE COMMON SETTINGS (defaults may suffice): # You should: # Use D_DISCARD to discard data (viruses) # Use D_BOUNCE to generate local bounces by amavisd-new # Use D_REJECT to generate local or remote bounces by the calling MTA # Use D_PASS to deliver the message # # Whatever you do, *NEVER* use D_REJECT if you have other MTAs *forwarding* # mail to your account. Use D_BOUNCE instead, otherwise you are delegating # the bounce work to your friendly forwarders, which might not like it at all. # # On dual-MTA setups, one can often D_REJECT, as this just makes your own # MTA generate the bounce message. Test it first. # # Bouncing viruses is stupid, always discard them after you are sure the AV # is working correctly. Bouncing real SPAM is also useless, if you cannot # D_REJECT it (and don't D_REJECT mail coming from your forwarders!). $final_virus_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (data not lost, see virus quarantine) $final_banned_destiny = D_DISCARD; # D_REJECT when front-end MTA $final_spam_destiny = D_DISCARD; $final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS; # False-positive prone (for spam) $virus_admin = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; # due to D_DISCARD default # Leave empty (undef) to add no header $X_HEADER_LINE = Debian $myproduct_name at $mydomain; [rest of 20-debian_defaults
Bug#346624: marked as done (grig: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:02:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346624: fixed in grig 0.4.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:26 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzO-om-IV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:26 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz2-0006nH-GZ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:04 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grig: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:04 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: grig Version: 0.4.2-4 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346624-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:10:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:10:43 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Nzz-0003U5-VY; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:02:07 -0800 From: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346624: fixed in grig 0.4.3-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:02:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: grig Source-Version: 0.4.3-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of grig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: grig_0.4.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/grig/grig_0.4.3-1.diff.gz grig_0.4.3-1.dsc to pool/main/g/grig/grig_0.4.3-1.dsc grig_0.4.3-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/grig/grig_0.4.3-1_i386.deb grig_0.4.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grig/grig_0.4.3.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug,
Bug#336907: marked as done (openssl: sha512 regresstion test failed on hppa.)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:48 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line openssl: sha512 regresstion test failed on hppa. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 19:30:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 11:29:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.74] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EX1pX-00056u-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:29:59 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C0E03817A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:29:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667903800F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:29:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id EE03026136; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:29:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:29:57 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openssl: sha512 regresstion test failed on hppa. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8a-1 Severity: important Hi, It seems that the regression test for sha512 is failing on hppa, all other regression tests pass. Kurt --- Received: (at 336907-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:32:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:32:50 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.73]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OTi-o3-9S for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:32:50 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A44038363 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3538A382B1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id B9F0F26136; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:48 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: openssl: sha512 regresstion test failed on hppa. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS, RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 I can't reproduce this bug anymore. The buildd log 0.9.8a-5 for hppa build with gcc-4.0 4.0.2-5 still shows the failure, trying 0.9.8a-5 now on paer with gcc-4.0 4.0.2-6 doesn't show the failure anymore. I assume this is a bug that's been solved in gcc-4.0. So, I'm going to close this bug. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334803: marked as done (login: suspend command from su shell doesn't work again)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:25:31 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334803: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#334803: login: suspend command from su shell doesn't work again has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 23:05:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 16:05:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail3.uklinux.net [80.84.72.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ESMzZ-00045K-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:05:06 -0700 Received: from ip6-localhost (213-228-241-230.dsl.prodigynet.co.uk [213.228.241.230]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AFB409FBC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:05:04 + (UTC) Received: from jdg by ip6-localhost with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ESMzX-0004Yi-Ba for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:05:03 +0100 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:05:03 +0100 From: Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian bug reports [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: login: suspend command from su shell doesn't work again Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: login Version: 1:4.0.12-6 The issue described in #314727 appears to have reappeared in this version of the package (currently in testing): suspending a process in an su shell hangs the shell. Julian --- Received: (at 334803-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:25:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:25:33 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OMf-UQ-FY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:25:33 -0800 Received: from ip6-localhost (213-228-241-230.dsl.prodigynet.co.uk [213.228.241.230]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2AC409FC1; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:25:31 + (UTC) Received: from jdg by ip6-localhost with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1F0OMd-0002Zf-CW; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:25:31 + Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:25:31 + From: Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alexander Gattin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#334803: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#334803: login: suspend command from su shell doesn't work again Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 4.0.13-7 Yes, it appears to work again (I'm using bash 3.1-1, login 4.0.13-7, libpam0g version 0.79-3). Closing this report. Julian On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:18:08AM +0200, Alexander Gattin wrote: tags 334803 unreproducible thanks Hi! On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:19:18AM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: First `sudo su - newuser` in new xterm/shell is unsuccessful, I send SIGCONT to su process, exit from awaken shell and then next `sudo su - newuser` is OK WRT `suspend -f`... I can get this behaviour no more with current shadow, bash and pam. Hence I'm forced to say that the bug is unreproducible anymore, although I don't know which update exactly did fixed the problem. Julian, do you still have the problem or can provide us any clue about it? -- WBR, xrgtn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348114: marked as done (happydigger: [INTL:sv] Swedish PO translation)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:32:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348114: fixed in happydigger 2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 23:39:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 15:39:34 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [213.132.115.138] (helo=mail.lidkoping.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Exuze-Ra-Al for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:39:34 -0800 Received: (qmail 30944 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Jan 2006 00:39:00 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary0727534102== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: happydigger: [INTL:sv] Swedish PO translation Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:39:00 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0727534102== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: happydigger Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Here is the swedish translation of happydigger. Regards, Daniel -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --===0727534102== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=happydigger_2.0_happydigger.sv.po # Swedish translation of happydigger. # Copyright (C) 2006 Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This file is distributed under the same license as the happydigger package. # Daniel Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2006. # msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: happydigger 2.0\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n POT-Creation-Date: 2005-08-21 21:42+0200\n PO-Revision-Date: 2006-01-15 00:36+0100\n Last-Translator: Daniel Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n Language-Team: Swedish [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n #: src/callbacks_startupwindow.c:104 #: src/main.c:135 #, c-format msgid Error creating table %s: %s msgstr Fel vid skapandet av tabell %s: %s #: src/callbacks_startupwindow.c:105 #: src/main.c:136 msgid happydigger - error msgstr happydigger - fel #: src/callbacks_startupwindow.c:127 #: src/main.c:177 #, c-format msgid happydigger - table %s msgstr happydigger - tabell %s #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:277 msgid Id msgstr Id #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:282 #: src/interface.c:369 #: src/interface.c:1015 msgid Number msgstr Nummer #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:288 #: src/interface.c:386 #: src/interface.c:1019 msgid Description msgstr Beskrivning #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:294 #: src/interface.c:403 #: src/interface.c:1023 msgid Type msgstr Typ #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:300 #: src/interface.c:418 #: src/interface.c:1027 msgid Material msgstr Material #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:306 #: src/interface.c:433 #: src/interface.c:1031 msgid Period msgstr Period #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:312 #: src/interface.c:448 #: src/interface.c:1035 msgid Findnotes msgstr Anteckningar för upptäckt #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:318 #: src/interface.c:470 #: src/interface.c:1039 msgid Date msgstr Datum #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:324 #: src/interface.c:487 #: src/interface.c:1043 msgid Value msgstr Värde #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:330 #: src/interface.c:504 #: src/interface.c:1047 msgid Reference msgstr Referens #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:336 #: src/interface.c:538 #: src/interface.c:1067 msgid Find date msgstr Datum för upptäckt #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:342 #: src/interface.c:555 #: src/interface.c:1071 msgid Location msgstr Plats #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:348 #: src/interface.c:572 #: src/interface.c:1075 msgid Coordinates msgstr Koordinater #: src/callbacks_toolbar.c:354 #: src/interface.c:589 #:
Bug#342072: marked as done (happydigger: [INTL:tl] Tagalog program translation file)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:32:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342072: fixed in happydigger 2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2005 05:16:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 04 21:16:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [203.167.88.25] (helo=maganda.upm.edu.ph) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ej8hl-0006oX-Ag for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:16:03 -0800 Received: by maganda.upm.edu.ph (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D77E6A4028; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:15:56 +0800 (PHT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1123265807== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: eric pareja [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: happydigger: [INTL:tl] Tagalog program translation file X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:15:56 +0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1123265807== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: happydigger Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please find attached the Tagalog program translation file for happydigger from Roel Cantada. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.0 Locale: LANG=tl_PH, LC_CTYPE=tl_PH (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to tl_PH) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDk80LqYbDibguQtkRAjPsAKCZcHiVLJAgu3whV8ENEQ4GSLkfsACfSF96 5hfUrgNtZoB1Ol3hARLZNAI= =9m0z -END PGP SIGNATURE- --===1123265807== Content-Type: application/octet-stream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=happydigger_1.2_happydigger.po.gz H4sICCHEk0MCA2hhcHB5ZGlnZ2VyXzEuMl9oYXBweWRpZ2dlci5wbwCdWd2O27oRvt+nIDYI0jaW YsmW/5oeZNfrJD71bgyvc64OUNASV+YRJQoktY570Xc5lwWKXhXIffbFOpRt/axoe3GARSxRM/MN h98Mh8wrtMQhZjxESuBEMqwoTxB/QGucptuAhiER9sUrNObpVtBwrdCfxn9GbrvtoZ85T9G9whFJ VlyE6H0adukHHEusbHj/CbSWayrRA2UEwW9ApRJ0lSkSoCwJiEBqTZDEMUGM+iSRBGGZj1WwUYr9 CIdE+7DghKG5jcY4UTjA6L2AgQ9q57+9kT+1cse0qP6LZUgDdHmpHwBZP13OBf+N+MqaBtYvREiY 66iG5tjurwnILUjKhbJutQnrOgulteSjszPOVedfltZYkDyQ1g1WZJR7ZbU7ljNArjNyem/bTru9 F7YW5JHK57I9qz1EznDkDd62B3vZGZbKWu5XiYvR+Xjs1ZIwgwhaS4LjUbHc7wOyojixFPuwwskG 21ka2yTI7HS907ud3k7KIDn2zokxTxRJwI9tCs4q8k29SxmmyV+Rv8ZCEvW3r8uP1qAuq31+IMKa JD4PaBKO0GBF1eXFxasRksJ/52PGVrDO8h+Kc3gStj9ye93DCk6Dcg3182m1Qf6NArR4wD6BsU7H a4w57U7nYP8ui1dElBjXlEHMzuD03SaO55pw+gecGyJ9QVNNjBIMBiMYlHSrR09D9pqQvaEBsusc IPUylVhfxdN/z2AM2k2MoSl8Xe+AcQu8FRSzEicf2eqR01jdht2u65iwhgesOSDxCh3mOMHrs4Eb NDnR7fYNQF7BiY80CRKuiCyxlhjyLovY0+/yDN6wyYOucaG8khsQssq0iJL4HEiTDd1BzwDSK9jw C2ZZBeUzTCg8A9NpNwnhtTsmmIIQCwLJThK/AnUPCRVmCRScc3BNTngd01INvOpSoaAZP5SEaI7D 6GWL1mk3SeJ5XRNywcYZ93E9m2c8wvJsJnecJkG8von5w4KQY84F1E5co+RtiFH54RxokxyeITMA tGDlfcqVIQtSzqMzYG6TNo7jFLOZxrAjOZW4YYE3OHHOWe2arPZrVt2GVVdbtdFycXV3P7taflnc j/T7X9ANRzC7ovMhaDG5urmdQHfCiJRoyzOUCv5IA+hMEGzpAbQqNNHjArH9ttramSJ2aOe9S5Ap f10IS6TnAQ3PbDK5v53+DL2JfWqGXbcI0c6XcjKH94N6sAL5Xv/iVQv51gMXMVYH1YkQXCDo48ag tJyM0Gv5a4Wk+ecf3yFD5lefZtO/f74a/fi+E6kbH1ZTTOocwysMbZrMfJ/Ih4yxLfJ1q0OCqn0o /zjM4hRvUQJZiBmN1hhBvEoL8LzPygbqsHtySpJg4a+hiUAx/nZ8ZikO17A3pGgvaJyg4/RejkWD M2hVPBA2Irrd07O7mcwmZxbs+uviyHp1HOek8end/WSxPGn8fnr3abo8Yn44PGn+6/zmGNnQ3vWr 66tPXxrWa+ncdQ+GK315aa42aDTQ65WsFVJVup8EH1HpFyqWV8rrZ6P4sOhM5wKad55VyuMdzo7B uGWhuoO+ubI5ZjJLeHBEyy203lace3vEOU2ww+6Eq7O/yRg/ouINDipXaapTGpgcVmv+FEOPv80z GJi+ghQOj9nqDcouIOaPBCqhD/tTdf+ATgBKQpKbEyTKvxpt9QdlvDYNQ9fgxDkLhkbMcdyic5jB iRQ9UrKpuYc3umwx+KZT2my503YrHNi3O9WNGUuLrmh4RNsptD8TllbQYZGSI0qeY2zuhvU26NwR o1J5zTC9tgHGaTu1rQDaAoBSmDJZhVGYbfPaPocGIYfB8lgEe26zq+uVBxfbtkvL+YvRSM/UZrhO rSF41i/tmwKzwYHbNZQfZMFWwIivgLOIapvGggRiaRZT9vQfHQO2w/nx/QhSv21GYk1S1gVUTtHT
Bug#346976: marked as done (vkeybd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:32:17 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346976: fixed in vkeybd 1:0.1.17-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:36 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzI-tO-Hg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:20 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1EvlzB-0006xQ-Ra for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:14 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: vkeybd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:13 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: vkeybd Version: 1:0.1.17-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346976-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:41:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:41:25 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OTB-ms-9U; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:32:17 -0800 From: Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346976: fixed in vkeybd 1:0.1.17-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:32:17 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=4.0 tests=ADDR_FREE,BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: vkeybd Source-Version: 1:0.1.17-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vkeybd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vkeybd_0.1.17-3.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vkeybd/vkeybd_0.1.17-3.diff.gz vkeybd_0.1.17-3.dsc to pool/main/v/vkeybd/vkeybd_0.1.17-3.dsc vkeybd_0.1.17-3_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vkeybd/vkeybd_0.1.17-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will
Bug#221270: marked as done (oneko: Segfault on excessive command line argument.)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:30 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in oneko 1.2.sakura.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2003 15:25:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 17 09:25:57 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from springfield.intasys.com (steve.edi.intasys.com) [194.217.254.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALlGG-0002gT-00; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:25:56 -0600
Received: from steve by steve.edi.intasys.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1ALlCp-0004ND-00; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:22:23 +
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: oneko: Segfault on excessive command line argument.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:22:23 +
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: oneko
Version: 1.2.sakura.6-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
oneko segfaults when given an excessively large argument to the
'-display' option.
Were this game setgid/setuid it would be exploitable, but thankfully
it is not.
The following session demonstrates the problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ oneko -display `perl -e 'print Xx'`
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The diff below fixes the issue.
Steve
--
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux steve 2.4.19-686 #1 Mon Nov 18 23:59:03 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages oneko depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii xlibs 4.2.1-13 X Window System client libraries
-- debconf information excluded
--- oneko.c-orig2003-11-17 15:15:55.0 +
+++ oneko.c 2003-11-17 15:16:08.0 +
@@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@
if (strcmp(argv[ArgCounter], -display) == 0) {
ArgCounter++;
if (ArgCounter argc) {
- strcpy(theDisplayName, argv[ArgCounter]);
+ strncpy(theDisplayName, argv[ArgCounter], sizeof(theDisplayName)-1);
} else {
fprintf(stderr, %s: -display option error.\n, ProgramName);
exit(1);
---
Received: (at 221270-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 20:07:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 12:07:26 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0P1C-0003K1-DH; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:07:26 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK7IkF029487;
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:19 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK7Uap019666;
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:30 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LK7Uuv019664;
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:30 +0100
From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in oneko 1.2.sakura.6-2
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:30 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: oneko
Source-Version: 1.2.sakura.6-2
Now that oneko is orphaned, NMU-fixed bugs can be closed.
The original .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:49:27 +0100
Source: oneko
Binary: oneko
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.2.sakura.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Bug#286533: marked as done (kplot: FTBFS: not using -fPIC to make shared lib.)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in kmatplot 0.4-7.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2004 18:28:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 20 10:28:08 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CgSGN-00059E-00; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:28:08 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 63E543BC2A5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:28:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5775FD9.kabel.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFCE3BC244 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:28:06 +0100 (MET) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id A833626136; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:28:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:28:05 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kplot: FTBFS: not using -fPIC to make shared lib. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kmatplot Version: 0.4-7 Severity: serious Your package is currently failing to build on amd64. Here is an extract from the log: make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kmatplot-0.4/kmatplot/interface' cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SU PPORT -pthread -O0 -g -Wall -O2 -c common.c common.c: In function `_run_new_server': common.c:71: warning: unused variable `null_fd' common.c: In function `_get_reply_code': common.c:214: warning: implicit declaration of function `_read_data' rm -f libkmatplot_interface.a ar cru libkmatplot_interface.a common.o ranlib libkmatplot_interface.a make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kmatplot-0.4/kmatplot/interface' Making all in octave make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kmatplot/kmatplot-0.4/kmatplot/octave' /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v --output kplot.oct -L../interface -lkmatplot_interface kplot.cpp /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.64 -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.64/octave -O2 kplot.cpp -o kplot.o In file included from /usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/iostream.h:31, from kplot.cpp:19: /usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the X header for the X.h header for C++ includes, or sstream instead of the deprecated header strstream.h. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated. /usr/bin/g++ -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o kplot.oct kplot.o -L../interface -lkmatplot_interface -L/usr/lib/octave-2.1.64 -loctinterp -loctave -lcruft -s -llapack-3 -lblas-3 -lfftw3 -lreadline -lncurses -ldl -lhdf5 -lz -lm -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-linux/3.3.5 -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-linux/3.3.5/../../../../lib64 -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-linux/3.3.5/../../.. -L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/../lib64 -lhdf5 -lz -lfrtbegin -lg2c -lm -lgcc_s /usr/bin/ld: ../interface/libkmatplot_interface.a(common.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC ../interface/libkmatplot_interface.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [kplot.oct] Error 1 To make a shared library you must use the -fPIC option. See policy section 10.2. It properly used it for kplot.cpp but it didn't for common.c in libkmatplot_interface.a. Kurt --- Received: (at 286533-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:58:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:58:28 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OsV-0002nQ-Hw; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:58:28 -0800 Received: from
Bug#300867: marked as done (kmatplot: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid cast from type 'double' to type 'QSGFill::Style')
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in kmatplot 0.4-7.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 11:55:20 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 03:55:20 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDhyh-0007ql-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:55:19 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDhyg-0006NG-4N; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:55:18 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kmatplot: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid cast from type 'double' to
type 'QSGFill::Style'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:55:18 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kmatplot
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'kmatplot' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I.
-DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -pthread -O0 -g -Wall -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new
-c qsruler.cpp
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I.
-DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -pthread -O0 -g -Wall -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new
-c qsgraphicaldata.cpp
qsgraphicaldata.cpp: In static member function 'static QSGFill
QSGraphicalData::fillFromData(QSMatrix*, int, int, const QSGFill)':
qsgraphicaldata.cpp:227: error: invalid cast from type 'double' to type
'QSGFill::Style'
qsgraphicaldata.cpp: In static member function 'static QSGLine
QSGraphicalData::lineFromData(QSMatrix*, int, int, const QSGLine)':
qsgraphicaldata.cpp:240: error: invalid cast from type 'double' to type
'QSGLine::Style'
qsgraphicaldata.cpp: In static member function 'static QSGPoint
QSGraphicalData::pointFromData(QSMatrix*, int, int, const QSGPoint)':
qsgraphicaldata.cpp:254: error: invalid cast from type 'double' to type
'QSGPoint::Style'
qsgraphicaldata.cpp:255: error: invalid cast from type 'double' to type
'QSGPoint::Fill'
qsgraphicaldata.cpp: In static member function 'static QSGArrow
QSGraphicalData::arrowFromData(QSMatrix*, int, int, const QSGArrow)':
qsgraphicaldata.cpp:269: error: invalid cast from type 'double' to type
'QSGArrow::Style'
make[4]: *** [qsgraphicaldata.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/kmatplot-0.4/kmatplot/widgets'
With the attached patch 'kmatplot' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kmatplot-0.4/kmatplot/widgets/qsgraphicaldata.cpp
./kmatplot/widgets/qsgraphicaldata.cpp
--- ../tmp-orig/kmatplot-0.4/kmatplot/widgets/qsgraphicaldata.cpp
2002-01-24 17:48:51.0 +0100
+++ ./kmatplot/widgets/qsgraphicaldata.cpp 2005-03-22 12:16:33.0
+0100
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@
QSGFill result = default_value;
if ( source source-rows() row ) {
int cols = source-cols() - start_col;
- if ( cols0 !source-string(row,start_col+0).isEmpty() )
result.style = (QSGFill::Style )source-value(row,start_col+0);
+ if ( cols0 !source-string(row,start_col+0).isEmpty() )
result.style = (QSGFill::Style )(long)source-value(row,start_col+0);
result.color = colorFromData( source, row, start_col+1, result.color );
}
return result;
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
QSGLine result = default_value;
if ( source source-rows() row ) {
int cols = source-cols() - start_col;
- if ( cols0 !source-string(row,start_col+0).isEmpty() )
result.style = (QSGLine::Style )source-value(row,start_col+0);
+ if ( cols0 !source-string(row,start_col+0).isEmpty() )
result.style = (QSGLine::Style )(long)source-value(row,start_col+0);
if ( cols1 !source-string(row,start_col+1).isEmpty() )
result.width = (int )source-value(row,start_col+1);
result.color = colorFromData( source, row, start_col+2, result.color );
}
@@ -251,8 +251,8 @@
QSGPoint result = default_value;
if ( source source-rows() row ) {
int cols = source-cols() - start_col;
- if ( cols0
Bug#236804: marked as done (wmitime needs rebuild for prelinking)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:05:06 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in wmitime 0.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2004 13:11:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 08 05:11:53 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B0KXx-0006WS-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:11:53 -0800 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.235]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28DBoSe013438 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:11:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA3874994 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:11:49 +0100 Received: (qmail 27229 invoked by uid 0); 8 Mar 2004 13:11:48 - Received: from ?80.137.13.42? (HELO live) (80.137.13.42) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 13:11:48 - Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B0KXr-0007k5-2B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 14:11:47 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:11:46 +0100 From: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wmitime needs rebuild for prelinking Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48 X-GPG-Key: http://ernst.uni-hd.de/pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: 34F8 7997 8BC1 03F0 9C43 F3D7 B375 3E4D 514B 3E7C User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 X-Spam-Level: --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: wmitime Version: 0.3-5 Severity: wishlist On Debian i386 Sid, the current wmitime package contains binaries which fail to prelink due to being built with a very old version of binutils. A simple rebuild with the current binutils in Sid will solve this and eliminate the current error... Prelinking /usr/bin/wmitime /usr/sbin/prelink: /usr/bin/wmitime: Not enough room to add .dynamic entry ...one gets when trying to prelink that file. This error is indicative of the binary not having the necessary fields for the prelinking information to be stored in. Cheers, Flo -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-ll Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages wmitime depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFATHESs3U+TVFLPnwRAqGhAJ9JBpFpCMupKNDOY9Mu3QmVFcgTeQCeLWKm W46PaIiZ1TgmyrGe5SP8Ah8= =mYJv -END PGP SIGNATURE- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP-- --- Received: (at 236804-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 20:05:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 12:05:26 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OzG-0003C5-Av; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:05:26 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK4tV4029309; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:04:55 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK56bD019658; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:05:06 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id
Bug#326338: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in kmatplot 0.4-7.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 20:40:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 13:40:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBIL0-0006bf-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:40:38 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA10184 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:36 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362E4FD4A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:36 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 20825-19 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:36 +0200 (MEST) 13916 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:36 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j82KeaR9003750 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:36 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:36 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kmatplot The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version will be removed from the archive in the near future. Please change your build dependencies to libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev Please raise the severity of this bug report to serious, if the package cannot be built with libreadline5-dev. --- Received: (at 326338-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:58:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:58:28 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OsV-0002nQ-Hw; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:58:28 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LJwA1s028068; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:10 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LJwLRH019593; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LJwLq8019591; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in kmatplot 0.4-7.1 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: kmatplot Source-Version: 0.4-7.1 Now that kmatplot is orphaned, NMU-fixed bugs can be closed. The original .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:43:54 +0100 Source: kmatplot Binary: kmatplot Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.4-7.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Hugo van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: kmatplot - A Gnuplot-like tool for plotting data sets in 2D or 3D Closes: 286533 300867 326338 327980 Changes: kmatplot
Bug#327980: marked as done (kmatplot: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in kmatplot 0.4-7.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy28-0003Sa-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:20 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1a-0002SW-Et for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:48 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kmatplot: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kmatplot Version: 0.4-7 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327980-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:58:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:58:28 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OsV-0002nQ-Hw; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:58:28 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LJwA1s028068; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:10 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LJwLRH019593; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LJwLq8019591; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in kmatplot 0.4-7.1 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:21 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version:
Bug#343669: marked as done (tlf: several valgrind hits at startup (may result in crash))
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#343669: fixed in tlf 0.9.27-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 01:25:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 16 17:25:03 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19] ident=Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnQop-0004PQ-8X
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:25:03 -0800
Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:dc03:20e:cff:fe36:a766]
helo=trofast.sesse.net)
by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnQon-0004hG-IX; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:25:01 +0100
Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EnQon-0002EQ-00; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:25:01 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary3631741400121579979==
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tlf: several valgrind hits at startup (may result in crash)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:25:01 +0100
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===3631741400121579979==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: tlf
Version: 0.9.25-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
tlf has several valgrind hits, mostly going outside its buffers or
reading uninitialized data. This seems to make it crash in some
situations and on some machines. The included patch should fix at least
the ones during startup.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages tlf depends on:
ii hamlib3 1.2.4-3Run-time library to control radio
ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
Versions of packages tlf recommends:
ii cwdaemon 0.9.2 morse daemon for the parallel or s
-- debconf-show failed
--===3631741400121579979==
Content-Type: text/x-c; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=tlf-fix-valgrind-hits.diff
diff -ur tlf-0.9.25/src/parse_logcfg.c tlf-0.9.25.patched/src/parse_logcfg.c
--- tlf-0.9.25/src/parse_logcfg.c 2005-11-15 14:43:03.0 +0100
+++ tlf-0.9.25.patched/src/parse_logcfg.c 2005-12-17 02:21:33.0
+0100
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@
char *tk_ptr;
- for (ii = 0; ii = MAX_COMMANDS; ii++) {
+ for (ii = 0; ii MAX_COMMANDS; ii++) {
teststring[0] = '\0';
strncat(teststring, commands[ii], 79);
diff -ur tlf-0.9.25/src/readctydata.c tlf-0.9.25.patched/src/readctydata.c
--- tlf-0.9.25/src/readctydata.c2005-11-15 14:43:03.0 +0100
+++ tlf-0.9.25.patched/src/readctydata.c2005-12-17 02:19:29.0
+0100
@@ -77,7 +77,9 @@
while ( !feof(fp_db))
{
// fgets (buf, 180, fp_db); ### bug fix
- fgets (buf, sizeof(buf), fp_db);
+ if (fgets (buf, sizeof(buf), fp_db) == NULL) {
+ break;
+ }
if (buf[0] == '\n') continue;
@@ -88,6 +90,7 @@
else// prefix line
{
strncpy(buffer, buf, 79);
+ buffer[79] = 0;
char *loc = NULL;
//PG4I, 26Jul2005
if ((loc = strchr(buffer, '\r')))
@@ -104,6 +107,9 @@
buffer[i] = '\0';
}
+ if (j 4)
+
Bug#346822: marked as done (xmailbox: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:00:51 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in xmailbox 2.5-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:33 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evm0S-0001P0-M2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:33 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlzw-00074J-BD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:00 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmailbox: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:00 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xmailbox Version: 2.5-9 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346822-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 20:00:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 12:00:57 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Ouu-0002u8-9y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:00:57 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK0dVA028295 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:00:39 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK0pLn019643 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:00:51 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LK0pco019641; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:00:51 +0100 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in xmailbox 2.5-10 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:00:51 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
Bug#346825: marked as done (xmem: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:02:40 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in xmem 1.20-21 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:33 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evm0S-0001P2-MF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:33 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlzw-00074S-ES for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:00 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmem: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:00 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xmem Version: 1.20-19 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346825-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 20:02:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 12:02:56 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Owq-0002yg-AS for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:02:56 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK2TK1029137 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:02:29 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK2eRV019650 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:02:40 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LK2eRg019648; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:02:40 +0100 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in xmem 1.20-21 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:02:40 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level:
Bug#347120: marked as done (wmitime: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:05:06 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in wmitime 0.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:42:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:42:09 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzw-vs-7r for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:00 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1EvlzQ-0006z3-Gy for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:28 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wmitime: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:28 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wmitime Version: 0.3-5 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 347120-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 20:05:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 12:05:26 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OzG-0003C5-Av; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:05:26 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK4tV4029309; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:04:55 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK56bD019658; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:05:06 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LK56hl019656; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:05:06 +0100 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in wmitime 0.3-6 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:05:06 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
Bug#347132: marked as done (oneko: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:30 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in oneko 1.2.sakura.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:42:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:42:10 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzb-qu-Fz for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:40 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz5-0006sL-Qc for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:07 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: oneko: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:07 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: oneko Version: 1.2.sakura.6-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 347132-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 20:07:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 12:07:26 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0P1C-0003K1-DH; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:07:26 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK7IkF029487; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:19 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LK7Uap019666; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:30 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LK7Uuv019664; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:30 +0100 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in oneko 1.2.sakura.6-2 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:07:30 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0
Processed: closing 348979
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 close 348979 1.4.1-1 Bug#348979: pgadmin3: Please package newer version 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.4.1-1, send any further explanations to Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#281853: marked as done (pgadmin3: support local connection?)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:10:28 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#281853 pgadmin3: support local connection? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2004 07:21:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 17 23:21:56 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from disorder.primate.net [198.144.194.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CUgc8-0002h6-00; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:21:56 -0800 Received: from disorder.primate.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disorder.primate.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-17) with ESMTP id iAI7LrsJ001741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:21:54 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by disorder.primate.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAI7LrRB001739; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:21:53 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: disorder.primate.net: itz set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Received: from itz by unicorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUgc5-00050i-00; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:21:53 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ian Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pgadmin3: support local connection? X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:21:53 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Ian Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (disorder.primate.net [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:21:54 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: pgadmin3 Version: 1.0.2-7 Severity: wishlist It was hard to believe, but it seems pgadmin3 cannot connect to a postgres daemon which only listens on the local (a.k.a. Unix) socket. Could this be added please? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-8custom1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages pgadmin3 depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.6.1-5The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.2-2 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.7-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-0 1.4.1-4Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.7-1PNG library - runtime ii libpq37.4.6-2Shared library libpq.so.3 for Post ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-5 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++51:3.3.4-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff4 3.6.1-3Tag Image File Format library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii pgadmin3-data 1.0.2-7Graphical administration tool for ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 281853-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 22:11:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 14:11:01 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.21] helo=mail.gmx.net) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0Qwm-0005ig-QG for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:11:00 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2006 22:10:29 - Received: from dslb-084-063-040-048.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) [84.63.40.48] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 21 Jan 2006 23:10:29 +0100 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut
Bug#340063: marked as done (nullmailer: ipv6 support not enabled)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:20 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340063: fixed in nullmailer 1:1.02-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 17:45:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 09:45:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk ([213.162.97.75]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdtFq-0003j2-VN for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:45:31 -0800 Received: from guacamole (guacamole.digriz.org.uk [84.51.134.14]) by smtp.metronet.co.uk (MetroNet Mail) with ESMTP id A5FE94169EF; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:45:16 + (GMT) Received: from inskipp.digriz.org.uk (inskipp.wifi.digriz.wormnet [IPv6:2001:4bd0:2028:11:205:4eff:fe40:18c2]) by guacamole (Postfix) with SMTP id C23ED17A90; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:38:45 + (GMT) Received: (nullmailer pid 12065 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:34:57 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alexander Clouter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nullmailer: ipv6 support not enabled X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:34:57 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: nullmailer Version: 1:1.00-3 Severity: important Hi, Thanks for including my IPv6 patch...the only problem is that for some reason I do not think it was enabled in the binary (i386) release :( Using 1.00-3 from unstable in /var/log/mail.log I get (my mailserver is 'smtp'): --- Nov 20 17:21:59 localhost nullmailer[9886]: smtp: Failed: Connect failed Nov 20 17:21:59 localhost nullmailer[1827]: Sending failed: Host or network unreachable --- If I 'apt-get source nullmailer' and compile I get: --- Nov 20 17:23:57 localhost nullmailer[1827]: Starting delivery: protocol:smtp host: smtp file: 1132407134.3602 Nov 20 17:23:59 localhost nullmailer[10058]: smtp: Failed: 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access denied Nov 20 17:23:59 localhost nullmailer[1827]: Sending failed: Permanent error in sending the message --- Obviously now a completely different error message, but now the fault lies with me and a misconfigured mailserver :) I'm on a 100% IPv6 network and so I'm guessing that the binary release is making an IPv4 only connection and thats why it is sulking. As /usr/lib/nullmailer/smtp is rather quick, I cannot attach an 'strace' to the process to put proof to this but I think the recompile from source shows that somethings afoot. When you compile the package, does './configure' come back with: [snipped] checking whether named pipes are buggy... no checking for setenv... yes checking for srandom... yes checking for getaddrinfo... yes important line configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile [snipped] Thats the line which 'enables' IPv6 connectivity. Cheers Alex -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-ck5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages nullmailer depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.59 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-4 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.0.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii lsb-base 3.0-11 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip ii ucf 2.003 Update Configuration File: preserv Versions of packages nullmailer recommends: ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon] 1.4.1-17 System Logging Daemon -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 340063-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 22:11:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 14:11:39 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0QpM-0004N7-9q; Sat,
Bug#345140: marked as done ([l10n] Czech translation for kernel-patch-grsecurity2)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#345140: fixed in kernel-patch-grsecurity2 2.1.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2005 09:49:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 29 01:49:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cl-lnx-sprinc-srch.blue4.cz ([212.158.157.91]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EruPt-0007bM-Ob for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:49:50 -0800 Received: from [192.168.3.215] (unknown [192.168.3.215]) by cl-lnx-sprinc-srch.blue4.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B3C1AF34A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:48:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: [l10n] Czech translation for kernel-patch-grsecurity2 From: Martin =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9=EDn?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bugs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-83WQ8ewx3fe+3/LTKjjk Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:44:07 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --=-83WQ8ewx3fe+3/LTKjjk Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch In attachement there is Czech translation (cs.po) for kernel-patch-grsecurity2 package, please include it. Regards Martin Sin --=-83WQ8ewx3fe+3/LTKjjk Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.7-1_cs.po Content-Type: text/x-gettext-translation; name=kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.7-1_cs.po; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to #this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # #Some information specific to po-debconf are available at #/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # #Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 2.1.5.1-1\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n POT-Creation-Date: 2005-06-21 00:54+0200\n PO-Revision-Date: 2005-12-29 10:03+0100\n Last-Translator: Martin Sin [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n Language-Team: Czech [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n #. Type: text #. Description #: ../kernel-patch-grsecurity2.templates:3 msgid Incompatibility with Debian kernels 2.4.20 and upwards msgstr Nekompatibilita s debian=C3=ADmi j=C3=A1dry 2.4.20 a vy=C5=A1=C5=A1= =C3=ADmi #. Type: text #. Description #: ../kernel-patch-grsecurity2.templates:3 msgid Due to backports and other packaging decisions by the kernel maintainer = with respect to the kernel-source packages for kernels 2.4.20 and upwards, th= e grsecurity patch will *not* apply to the Debian kernels anymore. You may= read more about this in /usr/share/doc/kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity/ README.2.4.2x. If you want to apply this patch, please use a vanilla ker= nel source tree, or please use the modified version for 2.4.27 and hopefully= upwards by the kernel-patch-grsecurity2 maintainer (but bugs found only = in the latter should not be sent to upstream, but to the Debian BTS). msgstr Vzhledem k backport=C5=AFm a dal=C5=A1=C3=ADm rozhodnut=C3=ADm spr=C3=A1= vce bal=C3=AD=C4=8Dku j=C3=A1dra ohledn=C4=9B bal=C3=AD=C4=8Dk=C5=AF kernel-source verze 2.4.20 a vy=C5=A1=C5=A1=C3=AD= ch, se ji=C5=BE z=C3=A1plata grsecurity *ned=C3=A1* pou=C5=BE=C3=ADt na j=C3=A1drech Debianu. V=C3=ADce si m=C5=AF= =C5=BEete p=C5=99e=C4=8D=C3=ADst v /usr/share/doc/ kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity/README.2.4.2x. Pokud si p=C5=99ejete pou=C5=BE= =C3=ADt tuto z=C3=A1platu, pou=C5=BEijte pros=C3=ADm j=C3=A1dro p=C5=99=C3=ADmo z ker= nel.org, nebo pou=C5=BEijte upravenou verzi grsecurity pro j=C3=A1dra 2.4.27 a (doufejme) vy=C5=A1=C5=A1=C3=AD= od spr=C3=A1vce bal=C3=AD=C4=8Dku kernel-patch-grsecurity2 (ov=C5=A1em chyby nalezen=C3=A9 v t=C3=A9to ver= zi, byste nem=C4=9Bli
Bug#348798: marked as done (nullmailer: New upstream release)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:20 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348798: fixed in nullmailer 1:1.02-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2006 00:24:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 18 16:24:19 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gpl.gnu-rox.org ([213.41.184.169] helo=smtp.gnu-rox.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EzNb8-00055p-PJ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:24:19 -0800 Received: from totoz-linux.gnu-rox.org (unknown [10.0.0.6]) by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A11E38BBF6; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:28:40 +0100 (CET) Received: (nullmailer pid 7341 invoked by uid 0); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:23:32 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Xavier Maillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nullmailer: New upstream release Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:23:32 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: nullmailer Version: 1:1.00-3 Severity: normal Hi, It seems there is a new release available on the upstream author's site. Would you mind packaging it since it adds SMTP AUTH support ? Thank you -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages nullmailer depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.67 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-7 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.0.2-7The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii lsb-base 3.0-14 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip ii ucf 2.004 Update Configuration File: preserv Versions of packages nullmailer recommends: ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon] 1.4.1-17.1 System Logging Daemon -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 348798-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 22:11:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 14:11:35 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0QpM-0004N9-Ag; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:20 -0800 From: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#348798: fixed in nullmailer 1:1.02-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:20 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: nullmailer Source-Version: 1:1.02-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nullmailer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nullmailer_1.02-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nullmailer/nullmailer_1.02-1.diff.gz nullmailer_1.02-1.dsc to pool/main/n/nullmailer/nullmailer_1.02-1.dsc nullmailer_1.02-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nullmailer/nullmailer_1.02-1_i386.deb nullmailer_1.02.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nullmailer/nullmailer_1.02.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated nullmailer package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#348983: marked as done (New version 0.9.12 available)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:28 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348983: fixed in re2c 0.9.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 08:42:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 00:42:44 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ns.aerolife.net ([217.11.52.134] helo=mail.aerolife.net ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ezrr2-0004k0-1U for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:42:44 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aerolife.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76117380026C6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:42:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.aerolife.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (viruswall.aerolife.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07851-21-3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:42:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.62.26] (p50831692.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.22.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.aerolife.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9827C380026B7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:42:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disposition-Notification-To: Simon Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:42:38 +0100 From: Simon Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New version 0.9.12 available X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at viruswall.aerolife.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: re2c Version: 0.9.10 Severity: minor There is a new version 0.9.12 available since 2005-12-28. E.g. building PDO_MYSQL needs it. Simon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFD0KJ+pviYlW58Ck8RAjXDAKDGaRdIPKftHph2NuficT7zQd9pOACgmGv4 9cFzLclf3WgJz7z2kTpd/Os= =vhGY -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 348983-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 22:11:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 14:11:58 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0QpU-0004PK-D0; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:28 -0800 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#348983: fixed in re2c 0.9.12-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:28 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: re2c Source-Version: 0.9.12-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of re2c, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: re2c_0.9.12-1.diff.gz to pool/main/r/re2c/re2c_0.9.12-1.diff.gz re2c_0.9.12-1.dsc to pool/main/r/re2c/re2c_0.9.12-1.dsc re2c_0.9.12-1_i386.deb to pool/main/r/re2c/re2c_0.9.12-1_i386.deb re2c_0.9.12.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/r/re2c/re2c_0.9.12.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated re2c package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:22:46 +0100 Source: re2c Binary: re2c Architecture: source i386
Bug#348989: marked as done (pybliographer: New upstream version 1.2.7)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348989: fixed in pybliographer 1.2.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 09:41:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 01:41:35 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ezslz-00023l-Ft for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:41:35 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2006 09:41:04 - Received: from p54819F6C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO ursus.igf.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE) [84.129.159.108] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 20 Jan 2006 10:41:04 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1941950 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pybliographer: New upstream version 1.2.7 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:43:41 +0100 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pybliographer Version: 1.2.6.2-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, a new upstream version 1.2.7 is out which quite an amount of fixes which might fix some of the debian reported bugs. Thanks, Wolfgang -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages pybliographer depends on: ii python2.3.5-5An interactive high-level object-o ii python-bibtex 1.2.1-1Python interfaces to BibTeX and th ii python-glade2 2.8.2-3GTK+ bindings: Glade support ii python-gnome2 2.12.3-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python2.3-glade2 2.8.2-3GTK+ bindings: Glade support ii python2.3-gnome2 2.12.3-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desk Versions of packages pybliographer recommends: ii yelp 2.12.2-2 Help browser for GNOME 2 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 348989-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 22:11:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 14:11:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0QpS-0004Ot-JX; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:26 -0800 From: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#348989: fixed in pybliographer 1.2.7-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:26 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: pybliographer Source-Version: 1.2.7-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pybliographer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pybliographer_1.2.7-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pybliographer/pybliographer_1.2.7-1.diff.gz pybliographer_1.2.7-1.dsc to pool/main/p/pybliographer/pybliographer_1.2.7-1.dsc pybliographer_1.2.7-1_all.deb to pool/main/p/pybliographer/pybliographer_1.2.7-1_all.deb pybliographer_1.2.7.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/pybliographer/pybliographer_1.2.7.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pybliographer package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
Bug#349246: marked as done (GRSecurity Elevated Service Privileges Weakness)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349246: fixed in kernel-patch-grsecurity2 2.1.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:54:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 11:54:13 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net ([64.62.161.42] ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0OoP-0002P5-9W for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:54:13 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (99-063-dial.xtn.net [66.118.99.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2D918126 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:54:11 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74756BEE29; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:54:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:54:03 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GRSecurity Elevated Service Privileges Weakness Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 Severity: important Tags: security Version: 2.1.7-1 Verison 2.1.8 of grsecurity fixes a security issue that is described as follows: Fixed a serious RBAC bug reported by Julien Tinnes where starting services from an admin role, then exiting the shell without unauthenticating from the admin role with gradm -u, would result in the admin role still existing on the restarted service. This is CVE-2006-0228. --=20 see shy jo --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD0pFbd8HHehbQuO8RAmpnAKCxysDuF4shl86/Z4w7PvH5VsRNqwCgl8y1 ygzuqUKfV7zbX1/LLmq6MsM= =eHK1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm-- --- Received: (at 349246-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 22:12:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 14:12:25 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F0QpE-0004L9-LS; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:12 -0800 From: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#349246: fixed in kernel-patch-grsecurity2 2.1.8-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:03:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 Source-Version: 2.1.8-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-patch-grsecurity2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.8-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-grsecurity2/kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.8-1.diff.gz kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.8-1.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-grsecurity2/kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.8-1.dsc kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.8-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-grsecurity2/kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.8-1_all.deb kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.8.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-grsecurity2/kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.8.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer
Bug#275247: marked as done (phpsysinfo: add info for hddtemp)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:39:04 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line phpsysinfo: add info for hddtemp has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2004 21:57:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 06 14:57:19 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from port-212-202-174-55.dynamic.qsc.de (server.home) [212.202.174.55] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CFJmh-K5-00; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:57:19 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id D164360B0270; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:56:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.home ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.home [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 23999-03; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:56:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by server.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C532060B026E; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:56:49 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Martin Lohmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: phpsysinfo: add info for hddtemp X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:56:49 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferris.dyndns.info Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: phpsysinfo Version: 2.2-7 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, can you probably add information on hddtemp. An entry in the config file to disable this feature would be useful. The patch can be found at [1], the idea is from [2]. by, Martin [1] http://kingd0m.homepage.t-online.de/hddtemp.diff [2] https://www.debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32825 - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-rc3 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages phpsysinfo depends on: ii apache [httpd]1.3.31-6 Versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii debconf 1.4.30.5 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii php4 [phpapi-20020918]4:4.3.4-4 A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip ii php4-cgi [phpapi-20020918]4:4.3.4-4 A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip ii ucf 1.09 Update Configuration File: preserv - -- debconf information: * phpsysinfo/template: aq * phpsysinfo/lmsensors: false * phpsysinfo/language: en * phpsysinfo/mountpoints: true -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBZGohGxxhbGlQyAkRApBEAJ0cR7xiNNa7wJbEWg/mrpW4UiZGtwCfRy+i FUmBnrP6BbJd/4Eo+E47vzg= =O1Qg -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 275247-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 22:39:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 14:39:13 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de ([213.178.77.226] helo=mail.lowpingbastards.de ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0RO5-0007Y7-2Y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:39:13 -0800 Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LMd4nP028274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:39:05 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0LMd4lg028273; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:39:04 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:39:04 +0100 From: Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: phpsysinfo: add info for hddtemp Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#349059: marked as done (egroupware postgresql backend not working properly)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:27:56 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349059: egroupware postgresql backend not working properly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 19:10:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 11:10:31 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from iluvatar.caltech.edu ([131.215.35.27]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F01eZ-0007kU-N8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:10:31 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Johannes Graumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: egroupware postgresql backend not working properly Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:10:07 -0800 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: egroupware Version: 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to use egroupware with the postgres beckend (as described in /usr/share/doc/egroupware-core/README.Debian.gz), egroupware does not recognize the created data base and produces this blurb: Your Database is not working! Make sure that your database is created and the account permissions are set. Instructions for creating the database in PostgreSQL: Start the postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] user]# postmaster -i -D /home/[username]/[dataDir] Create the empty database - [EMAIL PROTECTED] user]# createdb egroupware Trying to have egroupware create the database fails miserably and upon login as user postgres both user and database with name egroupware are reported existing. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (550, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages egroupware depends on: ii egroupware-addressboo 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare addressbook management ii egroupware-bookmarks 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare bookmark management app ii egroupware-calendar 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare calendar management app ii egroupware-comic 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare comic strip application ii egroupware-core 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare core modules ii egroupware-developer- 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare developer tools ii egroupware-email 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare E-mail client applicati ii egroupware-emailadmin 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare E-mail user administrat ii egroupware-etemplate 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 widget-based template system for e ii egroupware-felamimail 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare FeLaMiMail application ii egroupware-filemanage 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare file manager applicatio ii egroupware-forum 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare forum application ii egroupware-ftp1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare FTP application ii egroupware-fudforum 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare FUDforum application ii egroupware-headlines 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare headlines catcher appli ii egroupware-infolog1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare infolog application ii egroupware-jinn 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 content management system for eGro ii egroupware-manual 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare manual ii egroupware-messenger 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare messenger application ii egroupware-news-admin 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare news administration int ii egroupware-phpbrain 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare phpbrain application ii egroupware-phpldapadm 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare phpLDAPadmin applicatio ii egroupware-phpsysinfo 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare phpSysInfo application ii egroupware-polls 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare polling application ii egroupware-projects 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare projects management app ii egroupware-registrati 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare registration applicatio ii egroupware-sitemgr1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 eGroupWare site manager applicatio ii
Bug#85437: marked as done (kdoc: missing subroutine called)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:36:56 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#85437: fixed in current version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2001 22:39:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 09 16:39:53 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com) [:::192.6.9.33] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14RMCn-0006Yr-00; Fri, 09 Feb 2001 16:39:53 -0600 Received: from msgrel1.cos.agilent.com (msgrel1.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.77]) by msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136784CD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:39:48 -0700 (MST) Received: from toolie.cos.agilent.com (toolie.cos.agilent.com [130.29.67.166]) by msgrel1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC107EB; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:39:47 -0700 (MST) Received: from agilent.com (toolie.cos.agilent.com [130.29.67.166]) by toolie.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E58A39096; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:39:46 -0700 (MST) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 15:39:46 -0700 From: Stephen M Moraco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Agilent Technologies, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/712) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kdoc: missing subroutine called Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: kdoc Version: 2.0a46-1 Severity: important Made a directory containing to .h files decl.h and tweedle.h from kdoc tests I then made a subdirectory called ./html I invoked kdoc with: kdoc -p -f check -d ./html -u file:/home/stephen/test/kdoc-exam/html \ -n test decl.h tweedle.h kdoc: processing decl.h kdoc: processing tweedle.h warning: TWibble inherits unknown class 'normal' warning: TWibble inherits unknown class 'templated' warning: Dee inherits unknown class 'mapint, int *::iterator' Generating documentation in check format... Undocumented functions: Undefined subroutine kdocAstUtil::nodeSource called at /usr/share/kdoc/kdocDocHelper.pm line 67. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux smmihn03 2.2.15 #1 Thu Jun 1 10:47:16 EST 2000 i586 unknown Versions of the packages kdoc depends on: ii perl-5.6 5.6.0-6.2 Larry Wall's Practical Extracting and Report ^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5) --- Received: (at 85437-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 22:36:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 14:36:58 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0RLt-0007Ti-M9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:36:58 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LMaiOU007808 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:36:44 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0LMauwT027314 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:36:56 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0LMauOn027312; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:36:56 +0100 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#85437: fixed in current version Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:36:56 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kdoc Source-Version: 2.0a54-1 The current version of kdoc correctly handles `-f check': kdoc: processing decl.h kdoc: processing tweedle.h warning: TWibble inherits unknown class 'normal' warning: TWibble inherits unknown class 'templated' warning: Dee inherits unknown class 'mapint, int *::iterator' Generating documentation in check
