Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:21:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 2.1.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2004 21:42:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 12 14:42:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-68-73-58-91.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net (shuttle)
[68.73.58.91]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BvNL1-0007uQ-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:42:19 -0700
Received: by shuttle (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8FCE31AD53; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:42:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Josh Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: postfix: double depends on debconf
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:42:05 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: postfix
Version: 2.1.4-4
Severity: minor
Postfix depends on debconf twice - once is versioned with debconf >= 0.5 |
debconf-2.0, and the other is a straight debconf. This effectively rules
out debconf-2.0.
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libdb4.2, libgdbm3, debconf (>= 0.5) |
debconf-2.0, netbase, adduser (>= 3.48), dpkg (>= 1.8.3), debconf
Josh
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 284003-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 03:21:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 19:21:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3n5u-0005J7-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:21:46 -0800
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E6216DE1;
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:21:45 -0700 (MST)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 319D88F2EC; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:21:45 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:21:45 -0700
From: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 2.1.5-2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5
These were all fixed in 2.1.5-2, but not closed with the upload.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
