Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:13:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No longer applies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2005 15:11:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 21 07:11:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from guest2.not.iac.es ([161.72.16.112] helo=guest8.not.iac.es)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ep5be-0002GZ-Lr
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:10:18 -0800
Received: by guest8.not.iac.es (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7D3D015851E; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:10:23 +0000 (WET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: misleading README.Debian
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:10:22 +0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: auctex
Version: 11.55-3
Severity: minor
On your README.Debian you state that:
Users will need to put "(require 'tex-site)" in their "~/.emacs" to load
AUCTeX, unless the local system administrator chose to start it by
default.
That's right, but if your debconf level is too high, you're not going to
see the conf. question, and anyway the default value is "Yes, install AUCTeX
support site-wide". So maybe you should change this text for the more
accurate:
Users will need to put "(require 'tex-site)" in their "~/.emacs" to load
AUCTeX, if the local system administrator chose not to start it by
default.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=spanish, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to es_ES)
Versions of packages auctex depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.15.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii emacs21 21.4a-3 The GNU Emacs editor
ii make 3.80+3.81.b3-1 The GNU version of the "make" util
Versions of packages auctex recommends:
ii tetex-base 2.0.2c-6 Basic library files of teTeX
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 344285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 14:13:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 06:13:37 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay-pt4.poste.it ([62.241.4.118])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0JUn-0003yk-BJ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:13:37 -0800
Received: from rino.dft.invalid (82.50.169.129) by relay-pt4.poste.it (7.2.063)
(authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 43380EC3002BC6F4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:13:36
+0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No longer applies
From: "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Face: &6g,d%3hP0[qul^Z;FuwvIxNxPy2:}9K`7D?&[EMAIL PROTECTED])J$yL:J>70*[c!k*
[qo4Zx')Q_zPtl]25VG[X#6xMVp_1K<AZXl%;"!in}0WijT}4bY0mGV[HGY[-beJX),8B#tfEk%E;h
f~gm03;w^G&m5Zc:z5sUq+eL2ZSj}s@)0L`FG34HLFs"*pmg,OEPk~V\L90ivCN=S}%*cUMw+E>!t-
U{izN"hVM!$1`P\v~sRS:)^t_{py+"YcZ|2^z=AUz4"ZJNrtP@;'8dyarKA7)OPjihAGsMb
Organization: Quis ut Deus?
X-PGP-Fingerprint: D3B2 A3F5 E9EB BDE6 A245 AA4A 212B 306C 9396 865D
X-PGP-Affinity: Will accept encrypted messages for GNU Privacy Guard
X-Attribution: DGMS
X-Accept-Language: en, it, de, es
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEUfEQS3dFTavaX//+j5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Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:13:35 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 5
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Packaging for auctex has changed: this bug no longer applies. Thanks to
Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina for reporting, anyway.
--
Ciao, Davide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
