Bug#1066260: mrtdreader: FTBFS: mrtdreader.c:95:41: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isprint’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-04-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: mrtdreader Followup-For: Bug #1066260 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Add #include of

Bug#1066285: nvi: FTBFS: ../dist/../common/options_f.c:324:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'conv_enc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-04-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: nvi Followup-For: Bug #1066285 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: *

Bug#1068789: nsis: build fails if version number has buildX or ubuntuX suffix

2024-04-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: nsis Version: build fails if version number has buildX or ubuntuX suffix Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu we don't do binNMUs, we build sourceful

Bug#1068782: libesmtp: fixes for t64 and new glibc

2024-04-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: libesmtp Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, Apologies for submitting this as only one report. libesmtp was failing on Ubuntu on armhf only because although

Bug#1066505: epic5: FTBFS: functions.c:7547:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strptime’; did you mean ‘strftime’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-04-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: epic5 Followup-For: Bug #1066505 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: *

Bug#1067654: tpm2-abrmd: Tests fail on 32-bit t64 arches

2024-03-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: tpm2-abrmd Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached

Bug#1067474: gxr-openvr: package Build-Depends on libgxr-0.15-0 whic is no longer built

2024-03-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: gxr-openvr Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached

Bug#1067473: gambas3: ftbfs on time64 arches

2024-03-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: gambas3 Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached

Bug#1066292: createrepo-c: FTBFS: xml_file.c:338:36: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rasprintf’; did you mean ‘g_sprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: createrepo-c Followup-For: Bug #1066292 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Fix printing

Bug#1067403: perdition: definition of strcasestr clashes with that of glibc

2024-03-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: perdition Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * d/patches/remove-strcasestr.patch:

Bug#1067076: x11vnc: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: uinput.c:723:25: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’

2024-03-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: x11vnc Followup-For: Bug #1067076 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: *

Bug#1067401: trantor: libtrantor1 has spurious depends on libssl3

2024-03-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: trantor Severity: important Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Drop spurious Depends on libssl3 as

Bug#1067391: bitlbee-facebook: redundant dependency on libglib2.0-0

2024-03-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: bitlbee-facebook Severity: important Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Remove explicit depedency on

Bug#1066794:

2024-03-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
It's hard to see from the log but the failures that are causing issues are the "path_info" gitweb tests such as expecting success of 9500.70 'path_info: project': gitweb_run "" "/.git" not ok 70 - path_info: project # gitweb_run "" "/.git" It's *impossible* to see from the log afaict but the

Bug#1064772: pymupdf: FTBFS: fitz.i.c:3343:5: error: conflicting types for ‘fz_pixmap_size’; have ‘int(fz_context *, fz_pixmap *)’

2024-03-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
/fz_pixmap_size2024-03-20 14:23:27.0 +1300 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +Description: Remove incorrect prototype for function now declared in mupdf's headers. +Author: Michael Hudson-Doyle +Origin: vendor +Forwarded: no +Last-Update: 2024-03-20 +--- +This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps

Bug#1065792: libspf2: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: spf_utils.c:207:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘memset’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: libspf2 Followup-For: Bug #1065792 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, I just uploaded the following rather than try to be in any way clever: *

Bug#1067204: libspf2-dev depends on both libspf2-2t64 and libspf2-2

2024-03-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: libspf2 Version: 1.2.10-8.1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, This prevents installation on a system that has been affected by the t64 transition. In

Bug#1067203: user-session-migration: fix ftbfs on architectures affected by t64 transition

2024-03-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: user-session-migration Severity: serious Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Do not use "%ld"

Bug#1065951: vde: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /tmp/ccwOo5J4.s:341: Error: symbol `open64' is already defined

2024-03-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
to + interpose both open and open64 +Author: Michael Hudson-Doyle +Forwarded: no +Last-Update: 2024-03-20 +--- +This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ +--- a/src/vdetaplib/libvdetap.c b/src/vdetaplib/libvdetap.c +@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ + /* Copyright 2004 Renzo Davoli

Bug#1067125: RM: consolekit2/experimental -- ROM; t64 transition not needed

2024-03-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com A month or so ago I NMUed consolekit2 1.2.6-3.1~exp1 to experimental, which ftbfs and turned out to be unnecessary. The package can be removed. Cheers, mwh

Bug#1061493: consolekit: install PAM module and udev files into /usr

2024-03-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 08:51, Mark Hindley wrote: > Control: notfound -1 1.2.6-3 > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:40:40PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Followup-For: Bug #1061493 > > Control: found -1 1.2.6-3.1~exp1 > > Control: severity -1 serious > > Control: tag -1 ftbfs > > > > This

Bug#1065454: libcanberra: Correct dpkg-dev build dependency

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
@@ +libcanberra (0.30-12.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry). + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:55:23 +1300 + libcanberra (0.30-12.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload.

Bug#1065453: orc: Correct dpkg-dev build dependency

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
+ + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry). + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:54:56 +1300 + orc (1:0.4.34-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru orc-0.4.34/debian/control orc-0.4.34/debia

Bug#1065451: glibmm2.4: Correct dpkg-dev build dependency

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
(2.66.6-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry). + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:51:53 +1300 + glibmm2.4 (2.66.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru glibmm2

Bug#1065452: gtkmm3.0: Correct dpkg-dev build dependency

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
(3.24.8-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry). + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:53:03 +1300 + gtkmm3.0 (3.24.8-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru gtkmm3

Bug#1065450: glibmm2.68: Correct dpkg-dev build dependency

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
@@ +glibmm2.68 (2.78.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry). + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024 10:49:44 +1300 + glibmm2.68 (2.78.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru g

Bug#1065444: gegl: Correct dpkg-dev build dependency

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
-maintainer upload. + * Fix build depedency on dpkg-dev to use >= not >> (sorry). + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Tue, 05 Mar 2024 09:37:53 +1300 + gegl (1:0.4.48-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru gegl-0.4.48/debian/control gegl-0.4.48/debian/control

Bug#1065284: lucene++: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
++-3.0.9/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:42:22.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +lucene++ (3.0.9-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065284) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 04

Bug#1065279: libcanberra: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
+++ libcanberra-0.30/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:41:54.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libcanberra (0.30-12.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065279) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon,

Bug#1065278: gtkmm3.0: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
+++ gtkmm3.0-3.24.8/debian/changelog2024-03-04 23:41:24.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gtkmm3.0 (3.24.8-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065278) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 04

Bug#1065265: glade: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
-3.40.0/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:38:30.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +glade (3.40.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065265) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 04 Mar 2024

Bug#1065277: gtkmm2.4: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
+++ gtkmm2.4-2.24.5/debian/changelog2024-03-04 23:40:46.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gtkmm2.4 (1:2.24.5-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065277) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon,

Bug#1065272: orc: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
/changelog 2024-03-04 23:40:36.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +orc (1:0.4.34-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065272) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 04 Mar 2024 23:40:36 +1300 + orc

Bug#1065271: gsound: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
-1.0.3/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:40:14.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gsound (1.0.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065271) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 04 Mar 2024

Bug#1065252: glibmm2.68: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
+++ glibmm2.68-2.78.1/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:35:03.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +glibmm2.68 (2.78.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065252) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle

Bug#1065269: glibmm2.4: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
+++ glibmm2.4-2.66.6/debian/changelog 2024-03-04 23:39:52.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +glibmm2.4 (2.66.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065269) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon,

Bug#1065260: gegl: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t transition

2024-03-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
/debian/changelog2024-03-04 23:38:29.0 +1300 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gegl (1:0.4.48-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add build depedency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) for time_t transition. +(Closes: #1065260) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 04 Mar 2024 23

Bug#1062364:

2024-02-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Thanks for being so accommodating! A lot of disruption to go around...

Bug#1061961:

2024-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 2/28/24 8:33 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > Hi, thanks for taking the NMU. Unfortunately it looks like you uploaded > > just slightly too early and the package was built with 32 bit time_t on > ARM > >

Bug#1062545:

2024-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
on dpkg-dev to guard against accidental backports +with wrong ABI. (Closes: #1062545) + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:16:34 +1300 + falcosecurity-libs (0.14.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition (Closes: #1062545) diff -Nru falcosecurity

Bug#1061916: cups: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
(the first patch had the same number as the package I uploaded to experimental and so got rejected. oops!) On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:21, wrote: > Dear maintainer, > > Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t > transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable. > >

Bug#1061961:

2024-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, thanks for taking the NMU. Unfortunately it looks like you uploaded just slightly too early and the package was built with 32 bit time_t on ARM :(

Bug#1053111: Fwd:

2024-02-27 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
@@ +e2fsprogs (1.47.0-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + [ Helmut Grohne ] + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS when systemd.pc changes systemdsystemunitdir. (Closes: #-1) + + [ Michael Hudson-Doyle ] + * Account for changes in udevudevdir as well. + + -- Helmut Grohne Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:57:57

Bug#1062065:

2024-02-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Here is a patch with the sections that get confused by in-tree symlinks hacked out. I assume the package still ftbfs though. nmu_ceph.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1062246:

2024-02-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Here's an updated diff that strips the abi tag rather than appending to it. nmu_libcdk5.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1061863:

2024-02-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Additional testing showed that the previous patch was incomplete, here is an updated one. nmu_ace.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1063267:

2024-02-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The previous patch missed a required change to debian/rules, new version attached. nmu_vtk9.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1064806:

2024-02-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
And that patch had a lot of cruft in it. On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 09:27, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > Apologies, I missed some things in the first version of this patch. Here's > an update. > nmu_python3.11.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1064796:

2024-02-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Note that this diff includes the changes attached to bug 1053111.

Bug#1060000:

2024-02-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
+ + [ Helmut Grohne ] + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS when systemd.pc changes systemdsystemunitdir. (Closes: #-1) + + [ Michael Hudson-Doyle ] + * Account for changes in udevudevdir as well. + + -- Helmut Grohne Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:57:57 +0200 + e2fsprogs (1.47.0-2) unstable; urgency

Bug#1062770:

2024-02-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
> I published an updated consolidated report this morning. As you can see, > there is an ABI change due to LFS in raft/uv.h > > https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-22T10%3A55%3A00/compat_reports/libraft-dev/base_to_lfs/compat_report.html > > It is possible some API is not supposed to

Bug#1062928:

2024-02-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
FWIW adding a quirk to the analysis confirms that this package is unaffected by both the lfs and time_t transitions.

Bug#1062744:

2024-02-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Sigh, attached to *this* mail nmu_libzypp.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1062744:

2024-02-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I've just reuploaded the package to experimental, new debdiff attached.

Bug#1062744:

2024-02-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
> There are no mentions of 'time_t' in the public headers of this > library. Uh, this is not the case? zypp-core/Date.h contains a class with public time_t members. Were you grepping the wrong library or something? The library is also affected by the off_t transition. > The logs shows that it's

Bug#1062671:

2024-02-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I have taken the patch from this bug, applied it to 1.3.5012+dfsg-2.1 from unstable and uploaded it to experimental. Feel free to ignore this / overwrite it if it interferes with other plans but we want to make sure it passes binary NEW before we start uploading things to unstable.

Bug#1064337: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1064337:

2024-02-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 21:49, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 21.02.2024 11:26, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > I have prepared another patch on top of what is in experimental now > (attached as nmu_samba.debdiff), does it look better? > > > > I have also prepared a patch on

Bug#1064337:

2024-02-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I have prepared another patch on top of what is in experimental now (attached as nmu_samba.debdiff), does it look better? I have also prepared a patch on top of what is currently in unstable, attached as nmu_samba_unstable.debdiff. I think the ideal way forward would be to upload to experimental

Bug#1064298:

2024-02-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, thanks so much for this. I've updated the diff in bug 1064090 to include your changes (and uploaded the new package to experimental as ~exp2).

Bug#1062022: dcmtk: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 22:03, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 1:09 AM wrote: > > If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. > Although > > this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be > a > > Are you going to nuke my

Bug#1064378: libevolution: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-02-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: libevolution Version: 3.50.3-1 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainers, Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies libevolution as an affected package, on the basis that the headers could not be compiled and

Bug#1064377: tcl-expect: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-02-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: tcl-expect Version: 5.45.4-2build1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainers, Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies tcl-expect as an affected package, on the basis that the headers could not be compiled and

Bug#1064285: dante: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
11:17:28.0 + +++ dante-1.4.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2024-02-05 02:19:17.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +dante (1.4.2+dfsg-7.1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 05 Feb

Bug#1061063:

2024-02-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
userland / arm64 +kernels without COMPAT_ALIGNMENT_FIXUPS as found in Ubuntu. + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:26:59 +1300 + h5py (3.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff -Nru h5py-3.10.0/debian/patches/fix-unaligned-access.patch h5py-3.10.0/debian/patches/fix

Bug#1061992:

2024-01-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
In addition to uploading a reversed debdiff, I didn't actually upload it to experimental, I'm attaching the debdiff that I just uploaded (which I realized I forgot to add the ~exp suffix to, apologies). The upload to experimental was based on the contents of unstable, which is newer that what was

Bug#1061992:

2024-01-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
> I believe these are the two cases: > > - The public 'struct curl_fileinfo' contains a time_t struct member, used for > FTP wildcard callbacks. > > - The public API curl_getdate() takes a time_t pointer in its second argument. > > If 'time_t' changes size, those two will not be ABI compatible.

Bug#1061901:

2024-01-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Apologies, previous version of patch was incorrect. nmu_compiz.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1061882:

2024-01-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Apologies, the initial message had an incorrect debdiff attached. Here's a better one (that has been uploaded to experimental). nmu_combblas.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1053470: ld.so: ignore tunables in secure mode

2023-10-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I think that is the sort of conclusion upstream is coming to in https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20231003201151.1406279-1-siddh...@sourceware.org/T/#e9123bc53d892ab6552e05109ce939d531d741092 too. In any case, the upstream bug tracker / mailing list is probably the place to start with this.

Bug#984205:

2022-08-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This is because upstream builds with -Werror -Wall by default, and that's usually a bad idea for distro packages. I fixed this like this: .PHONY: override_dh_auto_build override_dh_auto_build: $(MAINT_SCRIPTS) -dh_auto_build +dh_auto_build -- WERROR= Not really sure if this is

Bug#1014729: glibc 2.34 breaks wcc autopkgtest on amd64: open: Invalid argument

2022-07-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 04:30, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2022-07-11 10:06, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > It looks like a no-change rebuild fixed this in Ubuntu fwiw. > > Thanks, I confirm that in Debian too. Do you have an idea why? It could > be a missing or too loose depend

Bug#1014729: glibc 2.34 breaks wcc autopkgtest on amd64: open: Invalid argument

2022-07-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
It looks like a no-change rebuild fixed this in Ubuntu fwiw. On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 09:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Source: glibc, wcc > Control: found -1 glibc/2.34-0experimental4 > Control: found -1 wcc/0.0.2+dfsg-4.1 > Severity: important > Tags: experimental > > Dear maintainers, > > The

Bug#1013102: cmd/link: check CGO_CFLAGS for non -g/-I/-O options before,+ internal linking

2022-06-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 14:59, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:42:51AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > Ah yes but that patch doesn't actually work in practice. I've been slack > on > > this :( > > > > IIRC the problem with https://go-review.

Bug#1013102: cmd/link: check CGO_CFLAGS for non -g/-I/-O options before,+ internal linking

2022-06-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Ah yes but that patch doesn't actually work in practice. I've been slack on this :( IIRC the problem with https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/339370 is that lto causes some of the references in the linked executable to disappear, meaning cgo can't do the analysis it needs to do. It's a

Bug#1006579:

2022-03-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
FWIW upstream just made a release that claims to fix this bug.

Bug#1006857: python-websockets: source package no longer contains tests

2022-03-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: python-websockets Version: 9.1-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I don't know when this started, but this package is based on the sdists from pypi which currently do not contain the tests. So the tests aren't run during build, and we don't find out that e.g. the legacy submodule is

Bug#1006627: ntpsec package depends on libssl1.1 even if built against openssl3

2022-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: ntpsec Version: 1.2.1+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The ntpsec binary package on Ubuntu still depends on libssl1.1 despite being built against openssl3. The reason for this turns out to be very mundane: mwhudson@anduril:~/src/pkg/ntpsec-1.2.1+dfsg1$ grep ssl1.1 --before 1

Bug#997877:

2021-11-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I think an update to 3.3.5 will fix this. I have no idea how hard mailman3 upstream updates are :)

Bug#994055: cunit NMU

2021-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 10:49, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 16:16:53 +1300 Michael Hudson-Doyle > wrote: > > Hi, thanks for this fix. I think it meets the threshold for NMU (and also > > the maintainer seems to have been awol sinc

Bug#994055:

2021-11-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, thanks for this fix. I think it meets the threshold for NMU (and also the maintainer seems to have been awol since 2015) so I'm uploading it to DELAYED/10.

Bug#962510: postgresql-filedump: autopkgtest fails on big endian

2021-10-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Yes indeed, we dropped the Ubuntu delta at some point without me noticing and the autopkgtests have been passing fine on s390x. On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 01:14, Christoph Berg wrote: > Version: 13.1-1 > > Re: Michael Hudson-Doyle > > I don't think Debian currently runs autopkgt

Bug#993821: After upgrading libc, some services are unable to restart (including systemd-resolved)

2021-09-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 07:04, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Aurelien > > Am 07.09.21 um 12:41 schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > > Hi, > > > > On 2021-09-07 10:39, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > >> What's happening is that systemd is running with the old glibc

Bug#993821: After upgrading libc, some services are unable to restart (including systemd-resolved)

2021-09-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 17:49, Michael Biebl wrote: > Control: reassign -1 libc6 > Control: found -1 2.32-1 > Control: severity -1 serious > Control: affects -1 + systemd > > Hi Michael > > Am 07.09.21 um 00:39 schrieb Michael Hudson-Doyle: > > On Tue, 7 Sep

Bug#993821: After upgrading libc, some services are unable to restart (including systemd-resolved)

2021-09-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 10:21, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 06.09.21 um 23:45 schrieb Vincent Bernat: > > Package: systemd > > Version: 247.9-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hey! > > > > After upgrading to libc6 2.32-1, some services are unable to restart. > > In my case, systemd-resolved,

Bug#993767: radicale: autopkgtests fail with proxy set

2021-09-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
@@ +radicale (3.0.6-4ubuntu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * d/tests/control: Unset http_proxy when running tests. + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Mon, 06 Sep 2021 21:36:54 +1200 + radicale (3.0.6-4) unstable; urgency=medium * set LogsDirectory in systemd unit; diff -Nru radicale-3.0.6/debian

Bug#993730: snapd: - Mount snap "core" (11606) (snap is unusable due to missing files; contact developer)

2021-09-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This is already fixed in testing I think. On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 03:45, matteo wrote: > Package: snapd > Version: 2.49-1+b5 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: eng.matteo.nunzi...@gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > >* What led up to the situation? > tring to install any package with the

Bug#992223: autopkgtests test packages from boost1.71

2021-08-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: boost1.74 Version: 1.74.0-9 X-Debbugs-CC: mwhud...@debian.org Hi, the tests for the boost1.74 source package binaries from the boost1.71 source package: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/boost/-/blob/master/debian/tests/control That can't be intended :) Cheers, mwh

Bug#988905:

2021-07-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I see there is a fix in the git repo now. Are you planning an upload any time soon, or only after the buster release?

Bug#988905: src:request-tracker5: ftbfs due to changes in gpg error messages

2021-05-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: src:request-tracker5 Version: 5.0.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, As can be seen at https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/request-tracker5.html or

Bug#973623:

2020-11-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I concocted a test case that was independent from ghc, confirmed it still reproduced with current binutils git and filed an upstream bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26902. I even made a little patch that fixes the problem but I don't know if it's in any way correct.

Bug#973072:

2020-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
it's easy to fix the base64 related failures (patch attached) but then the build hangs for me. --- a/kubernetes/config/kube_config.py +++ b/kubernetes/config/kube_config.py @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ if use_data_if_no_file: if self._base64_file_content: self._file =

Bug#973061:

2020-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This trivial fix seems to fix the problem: diff -Nru nototools-0.2.13/debian/rules nototools-0.2.13/debian/rules --- nototools-0.2.13/debian/rules 2020-09-29 11:11:13.0 +1300 +++ nototools-0.2.13/debian/rules 2020-11-11 14:13:22.0 +1300 @@ -22,3 +22,4 @@ override_dh_auto_clean:

Bug#973623: stack overflows with ghc on ppc64el

2020-11-03 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
In that case, someone should upload something like this: (master *)mwhudson@anduril:~/src/pkg/DHG_packages/p/ghc$ git diff diff --git a/p/ghc/debian/rules b/p/ghc/debian/rules index a5fd42860b..af3f8851d3 100755 --- a/p/ghc/debian/rules +++ b/p/ghc/debian/rules @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ endif # once

Bug#973623:

2020-11-02 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I think this is a gold bug, and even better I think it is a gold bug that was fixed already, in this commit from a few weeks back: commit fa40fbe484954c560ab1c0ff4bc1b2eeb1511344 Author: Alan Modra Date: Fri Oct 9 16:56:33 2020 +1030 [GOLD] Power10 segv due to wild r2 Calling

Bug#972733: python-bitstring: ftbfs now that Python 3.9 is a supported version

2020-10-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: python-bitstring Version: 3.1.5-2 Severity: normal Tags: upstream User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.9 Dear Maintainer, I think an upstream update will fix this. Cheers, mwh -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers focal-updates APT

Bug#972730: python-mpd: merge changes from accidental NMU

2020-10-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Ah luckily my upload got rejected thanks to an orig mismatch. In which case please consider this bug report as a request to merge the linked branch! On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 15:33, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Source: python-mpd > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > Hi,

Bug#972730: python-mpd: merge changes from accidental NMU

2020-10-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: python-mpd Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Hi, I got confused and thought this package was maintained by the Python team and uploaded an autopkgtest fix. Sorry! At least the change is hopefully non-controversial. I've made a merge request on salsa:

Bug#972728: python-latexcodec: ftbfs with python 3.9 as supported version

2020-10-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: python-latexcodec Version: 1.0.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.9 Dear Maintainer, I think an upstream update will fix this. Cheers, mwh -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#972723: python-asttokens: fails to build from source with Python 3.9 as a supported version

2020-10-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: python-asttokens Version: 2.0.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.9 Dear Maintainer, Like so: = test session starts == platform

Bug#972722: pyvows: ftbfs with python 3.9

2020-10-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: pyvows Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.9 Dear Maintainer, Now that python 3.9 is a supported version in unstable the build fails in the following slightly alarming

  1   2   3   4   >