On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:38:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Don't blame gcc 4.3. It built that code fine last week. Blame dpkg (see
my other mail)
If gcc fails to allocate registers, it is a bug in gcc. Report it to
them.
Diego
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: mplayer
Version: 1.0~rc2-10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is now
the default on most architectures (even if it's not the case on i386
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: mplayer
Version: 1.0~rc2-10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
hi
Read from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=402950#44
on.
As you see, that piece of code worked in the past, if enough
optimization was allowed. The fact that it does not work anymore is
quite surprising and I would consider this a regression in gcc 4.3
anyhow I will do some
On 14/04/08 at 13:55 +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: mplayer
Version: 1.0~rc2-10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild
On 14/04/08 at 11:58 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
now
the
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:30:24PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 14/04/08 at 11:58 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done
On 14/04/08 at 15:06 +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:30:24PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 14/04/08 at 11:58 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:06:50PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
This might be caused by the default value of CFLAGS now set by
dpkg-buildpackage.
No, certainly not.
well, looking at the original bug report, it really says cc -g -O2
more details are in
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:38:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Don't blame gcc 4.3. It built that code fine last week. Blame dpkg (see
my other mail)
actually, I am happy to know that. Having one gcc bug that stops
mplayer from transitioning from sid to lenny was already one gcc bug
too many.
11 matches
Mail list logo
