Am Friday, den 20.06.2014, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Agustin Martin:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:09:38PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 18:13 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
2014-05-19 22:00 GMT+02:00 Tobias Frost t...@coldtobi.de:
I reuploaded the current state to mentors;
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:09:38PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 18:13 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
2014-05-19 22:00 GMT+02:00 Tobias Frost t...@coldtobi.de:
I reuploaded the current state to mentors; It should be here:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 18:13 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
2014-05-19 22:00 GMT+02:00 Tobias Frost t...@coldtobi.de:
I reuploaded the current state to mentors; It should be here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-it/aspell-it_2.4-20070901-0-2.1.dsc
(Of course the binary
2014-05-19 22:00 GMT+02:00 Tobias Frost t...@coldtobi.de:
I reuploaded the current state to mentors; It should be here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-it/aspell-it_2.4-20070901-0-2.1.dsc
(Of course the binary on mentors is currently built against
dictionaries-common-dev
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 09:54:15PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 11:21 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:20:38PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hallo Agustin,
Just an idea: Maybe a sample package would be helpful as a reference? (I
can prepare
On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 23:01 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-05-16 21:54, Tobias Frost wrote:
+ * Example-package to demonstrate dh_aspell-simple available
+dictionaries-common-dev =1.23.3. See bug #737515 for details.
+Build-Depends-Indep: aspell (= 0.60.3-3),
+
On 2014-05-16 21:54, Tobias Frost wrote:
+ * Example-package to demonstrate dh_aspell-simple available
+dictionaries-common-dev =1.23.3. See bug #737515 for details.
+Build-Depends-Indep: aspell (= 0.60.3-3),
+ dictionaries-common-dev (= 1.23.2)
* inconsistent version numbers
On 16. Mai 2014 21:54:15 MESZ, Tobias Frost t...@coldtobi.de wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 11:21 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:20:38PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hallo Agustin,
Just an idea: Maybe a sample package would be helpful as a
reference? (I
can prepare
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 11:21 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:20:38PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hallo Agustin,
Just an idea: Maybe a sample package would be helpful as a reference? (I
can prepare one after my vacation)
Better if we have one, thanks. Please make
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:50:15PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-04-10 17:40, Agustin Martin wrote:
However, postrm cannot rely on anything in dependencies, there is no
warranty on removal ordering. So, script is not
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:50:15PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-04-10 17:40, Agustin Martin wrote:
However, postrm cannot rely on anything in dependencies, there is no
warranty on removal ordering. So, script is not available and not run if
dictionaries-common is removed first
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:20:38PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hallo Agustin,
Hi, Tobias,
Sounds very very good :)
I have done the real uploads to sid, both the new dict-common and some of
my dicts built using new stuff.
Just noticed piuparts unistallation errors in dictionaries with the
Thanks a lot for getting this into production!
On 2014-04-10 16:34, Agustin Martin wrote:
Just noticed piuparts unistallation errors in dictionaries with the new
stuff, /var/lib/{aspell,ispell} was left behind in piuparts run.
This happens because piuparts removes dictionaries-common before
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:47:36PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Thanks a lot for getting this into production!
On 2014-04-10 16:34, Agustin Martin wrote:
Just noticed piuparts unistallation errors in dictionaries with the new
stuff, /var/lib/{aspell,ispell} was left behind in piuparts
On 2014-04-10 17:40, Agustin Martin wrote:
However, postrm cannot rely on anything in dependencies, there is no
warranty on removal ordering. So, script is not available and not run if
dictionaries-common is removed first (which can happen) and those dirs are
left behind. This is something I
2014-03-07 12:35 GMT+01:00 Agustin Martin agmar...@debian.org:
I have been working on these new uploads during this week and now would like
to have spare time for other things. Will try to find time to start
ellaborating on those points.
Hi,
Had little time last weeks, so I only wrote a
Hallo Agustin,
Sounds very very good :)
Just an idea: Maybe a sample package would be helpful as a reference? (I can
prepare one after my vacation)
Tobias
(Btw, Should the snippet read --with aspell-simple?)
On 27. März 2014 15:13:21 MEZ, Agustin Martin agmar...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 12:33:56AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
Am Freitag, den 21.02.2014, 18:16 +0100 schrieb Agustin Martin:
My roadmap about this is something like:
a) On Sunday 1.22.0 reaches testing (#737515).
b) Somewhere next week I plan to upload something to fix [#625278:
Am Freitag, den 21.02.2014, 18:16 +0100 schrieb Agustin Martin:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:17:29PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
Just one question: disabling auto-compat does not have any effect
anymore? (I think thats good, just want to ensure that this was
intended)
If it is not in info
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:17:29PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hallo Agustin,
Just tested the exp2... Looks good from here!
I do not expect to have time during this weekend to follow this, so I have
uploaded 1.22.0 to delayed so it reaches sid on Sunday and I can monitor
better its first days.
Hallo Agustin,
Just tested the exp2... Looks good from here!
Just one question: disabling auto-compat does not have any effect
anymore? (I think thats good, just want to ensure that this was
intended)
When I'm back from my business trip, I will then proceed to start the
discussion for the
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:09:22PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
2014-02-08 11:19 GMT+01:00 Tobias Frost t...@frost.de:
Hallo Augustin,
thanks for the patch, look and feel of it is very good.
I also tried it on the modified aspell-it (just randomly picked pet
package to test
Hallo Augustin,
thanks for the patch, look and feel of it is very good.
I also tried it on the modified aspell-it (just randomly picked pet
package to test piuparts-happy-dictionaries packaging) and the result
was as expected.
However, when I disabled auto-compat by removing the line in
On 2014-02-08 11:19, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hallo Augustin,
thanks for the patch, look and feel of it is very good.
I also tried it on the modified aspell-it (just randomly picked pet
Thanks for testing Agustin#s patch.
I just have an additional suggestion, however this is just something
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: agmar...@debian.org
Hi Andreas,
well, there's defintly a point in your argument and it would be also
fine to fix that by adding ignore logix to lintian.
Lets also ask the lintian people about their opinion and ask
2014-02-08 11:19 GMT+01:00 Tobias Frost t...@frost.de:
Hallo Augustin,
thanks for the patch, look and feel of it is very good.
I also tried it on the modified aspell-it (just randomly picked pet
package to test piuparts-happy-dictionaries packaging) and the result
was as expected.
However,
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:15:31PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:58:24PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
and it also adds a debhelper sequence, so you can have this rules file:
= 8 =
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@ --with aspell
# this is
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:58:24PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Tags: patch
attached is my first attempt to turn installdeb-aspell into dh_aspell.
I'm not sure if the changes are sufficient for all aspell-xx packages,
this will require further evaluation.
Also I'm not sure how this can
Package: dictionaries-common-dev
Version: 1.20.5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
attached is my first attempt to turn installdeb-aspell into dh_aspell.
I'm not sure if the changes are sufficient for all aspell-xx packages,
this will require further evaluation. Also I'm not sure how this can be
29 matches
Mail list logo
