Bug#849835: Include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses

2017-04-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Santiago Vila writes: > Of course. The fact that it's in git means that the change has been > approved by the policy group, that's the idea, and that's enough. Thanks! > I've already made the upload, but I still have a minor comment: > We have symlinks like GPL -> GPL-3 for

Bug#849835: Include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses

2017-04-04 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:19:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Maybe you can interpret that as a commit to the Policy repository that > will be included in the next release, as opposed to an actual Policy > release? Of course. The fact that it's in git means that the change has been approved by

Bug#849835: Include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses

2017-04-03 Thread Russ Allbery
Santiago Vila writes: > Sorry, I believed we were out of time for that, but maybe I was wrong. > Do you think this is ok for stretch? > If yes, I can include the mpl licenses real soon now (I'd like to fix > the bug about motd which was reported just a few days ago). I think

Bug#849835: Include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses

2017-04-03 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 08:47:31PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Santiago Vila writes: > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in > >> common-licenses. Could you include those

Bug#849835: Include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses

2017-04-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Santiago Vila writes: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in >> common-licenses. Could you include those two files in common-licenses >> in base-files? > Ok, will be done in the

Bug#849835: Include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses

2016-12-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Santiago Vila writes: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 >> in common-licenses. This change was made and uploaded to the archive >> in debian-policy release 3.9.7.0. As noted

Bug#849835: Include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses

2016-12-31 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Package: base-files > Version: 9.7 > Severity: normal > > Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 > in common-licenses. This change was made and uploaded to the archive > in debian-policy release

Bug#849835: Include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses

2016-12-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: base-files Version: 9.7 Severity: normal Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in common-licenses. This change was made and uploaded to the archive in debian-policy release 3.9.7.0. Could you include those two files in common-licenses in base-files? You