Santiago Vila writes:
> Of course. The fact that it's in git means that the change has been
> approved by the policy group, that's the idea, and that's enough.
Thanks!
> I've already made the upload, but I still have a minor comment:
> We have symlinks like GPL -> GPL-3 for
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:19:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Maybe you can interpret that as a commit to the Policy repository that
> will be included in the next release, as opposed to an actual Policy
> release?
Of course. The fact that it's in git means that the change has been
approved by
Santiago Vila writes:
> Sorry, I believed we were out of time for that, but maybe I was wrong.
> Do you think this is ok for stretch?
> If yes, I can include the mpl licenses real soon now (I'd like to fix
> the bug about motd which was reported just a few days ago).
I think
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 08:47:31PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Santiago Vila writes:
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in
> >> common-licenses. Could you include those
Santiago Vila writes:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0 in
>> common-licenses. Could you include those two files in common-licenses
>> in base-files?
> Ok, will be done in the
Santiago Vila writes:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0
>> in common-licenses. This change was made and uploaded to the archive
>> in debian-policy release 3.9.7.0.
As noted
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:21:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 9.7
> Severity: normal
>
> Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0
> in common-licenses. This change was made and uploaded to the archive
> in debian-policy release
Package: base-files
Version: 9.7
Severity: normal
Debian Policy decided, in Bug#768292, to include MPL-1.1 and MPL-2.0
in common-licenses. This change was made and uploaded to the archive
in debian-policy release 3.9.7.0.
Could you include those two files in common-licenses in base-files?
You
8 matches
Mail list logo