Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2017-03-22 15:33, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:51:49PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> a3deae8cb post_setup_zz_backports: improve systemd/udev handling for >> jessie-backports > > nope, all failed too, see attached log… oh, we are doing jessie2bpo instead of

Bug#856845: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-22 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:51:49PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > a3deae8cb post_setup_zz_backports: improve systemd/udev handling for > jessie-backports nope, all failed too, see attached log… btw, something else is wrong, 7 out of 8 slaves are getting nothing to do atm, only one is testing

Bug#856845: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-22 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:51:49PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > a3deae8cb post_setup_zz_backports: improve systemd/udev handling for > jessie-backports picked, deployed and those src:systemd logs recycled. Thanks! -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2017-03-21 19:06, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Maybe it's best to use "jessie + udev/backports + systemd/backports" as the > reference chroot instead of jessie directly. Let's try that: a3deae8cb post_setup_zz_backports: improve systemd/udev handling for jessie-backports Andreas

Bug#856845: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2017-03-21 18:43, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:32:25PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> They are not missing. When I was talking about dependencies I meant the >> Breaks/Replaces. > > but those are not "depends" and I do believe they have different effects than > "depends"…

Bug#856845: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:32:25PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > They are not missing. When I was talking about dependencies I meant the > Breaks/Replaces. but those are not "depends" and I do believe they have different effects than "depends"… > Yeah, as I wrote earlier > "Forcing the upgrade

Bug#856845: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.03.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Holger Levsen: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:05:59PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> What should be wrong about the dependencies? > > they are missing? They are not missing. When I was talking about dependencies I meant the Breaks/Replaces. >> Note that you ask

Bug#856845: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:05:59PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > What should be wrong about the dependencies? they are missing? > Note that you ask apt explicitly to break stuff (in the logs I see " > --force-yes" which is documented as potentially breaking systems; I > hope users don't use

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:05:42PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep: > >> Forcing the upgrade of only one of the two will fail. > > if this is the case, then I think the

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep: >> >> a/ udev has Breaks/Replaces systemd (<< 224-2) >> b/ systemd has a

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 16:45 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep: > > > > a/ udev has Breaks/Replaces systemd (<< 224-2) > > b/ systemd has a Breaks/Replaces udev (<< 228-5) > > > >

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.03.2017 um 17:45 schrieb Holger Levsen: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep: >> >> a/ udev has Breaks/Replaces systemd (<< 224-2) >> b/ systemd has a Breaks/Replaces udev (<< 228-5) >> >>

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Michael, On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep: > > a/ udev has Breaks/Replaces systemd (<< 224-2) > b/ systemd has a Breaks/Replaces udev (<< 228-5) > > Forcing the upgrade of only one of the two will fail. if

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-19 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Holger Am 19.03.2017 um 12:56 schrieb Holger Levsen: > As I see it this is because we only tell apt-get to install udev from > backports but dont tell it to also upgrade systemd to that version, so this > is probably rather a bug in apt (or maybe piuparts) but not in src:systemd. > > Do you

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Dear systemd maintainers, On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > Package: piuparts.debian.org > > the subject says it: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing > status, which is far too many for the stable release. We should track down the > cause for

Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-05 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: piuparts.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, the subject says it: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status, which is far too many for the stable release. We should track down the cause for this and fix it. see https://piuparts.debian.org/jessie2bpo/ -- cheers,